Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Brief reply to "Can gravity account for the emergence of classicality?"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1509.07767 v1 pith:4DPJMZ7X submitted 2015-09-24 gr-qc quant-ph

classification gr-qcquant-ph
keywords alreadybondernotereplyworkaccountallegedarxiv
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a series of comments, Bonder et al. criticized our work on decoherence due to time dilation [Nature Physics 11, 668-672 (2015)]. First the authors erroneously claimed that our results contradict the equivalence principle, only to "resolve" the alleged conflict in a second note. The resolution - relativity of simultaneity - was already explained in our reply [arXiv:1508.03296], which Bonder et al. now essentially reiterate. The newly raised points were also already extensively clarified in our note. The physical prediction of our work remains valid: systems with internal dynamics decohere if the superposed paths have different proper times.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools