Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Self-Tracking Solutions for Asymptotic Scalar Fields

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A rolling scalar field can become its own radiation background.

desk verdict The self-tracker idea is real and worth engaging: a rolling scalar on an exponential potential can use its own subhorizon perturbations as the radiation fluid, though the numerical support is narrower than the claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.04161 v2 pith:4DRWBNAH submitted 2025-07-05 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qc

Martin Mosny , Joseph P. Conlon , Edmund J. Copeland This is my paper
classification hep-thastro-ph.COgr-qc MSC 83F0583E30 PACS 98.80.Cq
keywords scalarfieldperturbationsexponentialpotentialtrackersolutionkinationradiationdominationstringcosmologyovershootproblemearlyuniverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the self-perturbations of a scalar field rolling on an exponential potential can act as an effective radiation fluid, so a pure scalar field system with no separate background fluid approaches the radiation tracker fixed point $x^2 = 8/(3\lambda^2)$, $y^2 = 4/(3\lambda^2)$. This matters because the epoch between inflation and nucleosynthesis is observationally loose, and string cosmologies need a way to guide rolling moduli to their minima without overshooting. If the claim is right, the radiation needed for tracking does not have to be inserted by hand: field fluctuations themselves supply it, as long as they are small, sub-horizon, and the potential remains exponential. The paper supports the claim with an analytic derivation of the perturbation equation of state and with full nonlinear numerical simulations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decomposition $\phi(t,x) = \bar\phi(t) + \delta\phi(t,x)$ with the exponential potential expanded as $\bar V(1 - \lambda\delta\phi/M_P + \lambda^2\delta\phi^2/2M_P^2)$. The load-bearing mechanism is that for sub-horizon Fourier modes the gradient term $k^2/a^2$ dominates the effective mass $\bar m^2 = \lambda^2\bar V/M_P^2$ in the perturbation equation, making the fluctuations behave as a massless radiation fluid with equation of state $\delta P = \delta\rho/3$; the mass term is also suppressed in the energy density during perturbation domination. This turns the averaged autonomous system $x'(N)$, $y'(N)$ of a scalar plus radiation fluid into an accurate description of a single scalar field and its own perturbations, with fixed point $x^2 = 8/(3\lambda^2)$, $y^2 = 4/(3\lambda^2)$.

What would settle it

Run the same full-field simulation with initial perturbations placed well outside the sub-horizon regime, so $k/(aH)$ is small and $\bar m^2\,\delta\phi$ is not negligible; the measured perturbation equation of state should depart from $P = \rho/3$ and the energy fractions should fail to settle at $x^2 = 8/(3\lambda^2)$, $y^2 = 4/(3\lambda^2)$ within the same number of e-folds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the spatially averaged background $\bar\phi(t)$ and the inhomogeneous fluctuations $\delta\phi(t,x)$ of a single scalar field on an exponential potential $V = V_0 e^{-\lambda\phi/M_P}$ form a self-contained tracker system. For sub-horizon modes satisfying $k \gg aH$, the effective mass term $\bar m^2\,\delta\phi$ with $\bar m^2 = \lambda^2\bar V/M_P^2$ is negligible, the perturbations obey a massless wave equation, and their averaged density and pressure satisfy $\delta P = \delta\rho/3$, i.e. radiation. The background then evolves according to the standard autonomous tracker equations with an effective radiation component, converging to the fixed point $x^2 = 8/(3\lambda^2)$, $y^2 = 4/(3\lambda^2)$ for $\lambda > 2$. Numerical simulations of the full field, without splitting background and perturbations during evolution, reproduce this convergence and show the equation-of-state parameter settling at $c = 1/2$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the scalar-field perturbations stay small and sub-horizon ($k \gg aH$) throughout the relevant epoch, so the effective mass term in the perturbation equation is negligible and the fluctuations behave as radiation; if that term grows, the perturbations act like matter and the self-tracker is not radiation-like.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A pure scalar field on an exponential potential with $\lambda > 2$ can reach a radiation-dominated tracker without any separate radiation bath, so radiation-like behavior is not necessarily evidence for a distinct fluid.
  • During kination, the self-perturbations grow relative to the background kinetic energy and end kination roughly 11 e-folds after inflation if seeded by the standard inflationary spectrum.
  • The self-tracker can pull a rolling modulus to its minimum before the overshoot problem becomes fatal, provided the initial perturbation amplitude is enhanced beyond the slow-roll prediction, as in primordial-black-hole formation scenarios.
  • When the potential turns quadratic near the minimum, the perturbations stop behaving as radiation and instead dilute like matter, so their relative energy fraction is fixed once they become non-relativistic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the mechanism would be to extract the perturbation equation of state from the simulations as a function of $k/(aH)$; the radiation behavior should degrade continuously as modes leave the sub-horizon regime and the mass term becomes important.
  • The self-tracker implies that long kination eras are self-limiting even without particle production; this may sharpen gravitational-wave background forecasts, since the end of kination is set by the perturbation spectrum rather than by an assumed thermal bath.
  • In multifield string compactifications, the combined fluctuations of many rolling moduli could act as a collective radiation fluid, possibly making the self-tracker easier to reach than the single-field estimate suggests.
  • If the self-perturbations later convert to matter perturbations at the quadratic minimum, imprints of their spectrum could appear in the abundance and clustering of any structures that form during moduli domination.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the dynamics of a single canonical scalar field with an exponential potential in a flat FLRW universe, without any additional fluid. The field is split into a homogeneous background and perturbations; for subhorizon Fourier modes in a scale-factor background a(t) ∝ t^c with 1/3 < c < 1, the effective mass term is negligible and the mode function scales as a^{-1}, so the kinetic and gradient energies scale as a^{-4} and the equation of state approaches that of radiation. The authors then identify the perturbation energy density z^2 as a radiation component and invoke the standard radiation tracker fixed point x^2 = 8/(3λ^2), y^2 = 4/(3λ^2) of the Copeland-Liddle-Wands autonomous system. They support the analysis with two CosmoLattice simulations and discuss consequences for string-motivated moduli cosmology, including the duration of kination and the overshoot problem.

Significance. If correct, the result is significant: it shows that a pure scalar field on an exponential potential can self-generate the radiation-like component needed for tracker behavior, without introducing a separate fluid. This is a natural extension of the tracker literature and has concrete implications for pre-BBN moduli cosmology. The paper's strengths are its clean analytic treatment of the subhorizon mode equation, the use of the standard and well-tested autonomous-system fixed point, and reproducible numerical simulations with a publicly available code. The main caveat is that the identification of the perturbation spectrum with an exact radiation fluid is demonstrated rigorously only in the deep-subhorizon limit and for single-mode initial data; the paper itself flags the heuristic character of the perturbation-domination argument.

major comments (3)
  1. [2.1, Eqs. (2.15)-(2.19)] The derivation of the radiation equation of state is performed for modes satisfying the deep-subhorizon condition (2.15). The paper does not quantify the correction to Pδ = ρδ/3 from modes with k/(aH) ~ O(1), which are present in the initial conditions of both simulations (Table 1 lists (λ̃ r_H^{-1})_i = 1.4 and 0.17) and in any realistic spectrum. Since the autonomous system (2.22)-(2.24) and the fixed point (2.26) rely on the perturbations scaling exactly as radiation, Eq. (2.19) is not enough: one needs either a controlled estimate of the deviation of wδ from 1/3 as a function of k/(aH), or a demonstration that the tracker is reached with a broad initial spectrum. The asymptotic statement that modes eventually enter the subhorizon regime is necessary but not sufficient without a bound on the transient contribution to z^2.
  2. [2.3, Eqs. (2.29)-(2.33)] Eq. (2.29) is presented as a Cauchy-Schwarz bound, but as written it is not generally valid: for a sharply peaked spectrum one can have ∫d³k/(2π)³|δφ_k|² ≫ (∫d³k/(2π)³|δφ_k|)², so the inequality does not follow from Cauchy-Schwarz without additional assumptions on the spectral shape and normalization (e.g., finite box volume and mode counting). This matters because the conclusion that a perturbation-dominated era cannot be matter-like is load-bearing for the radiation-fluid identification. The subsequent estimates in Eqs. (2.31)-(2.33) are order-of-magnitude; I recommend replacing them with a controlled bound, for example an explicit expansion in (m̄ a/k) for the relevant modes.
  3. [3, Table 1 and Figs. 1-2] The numerical evidence consists of two simulations, each initialized with a single standing-wave mode. While the runs are informative and reproduce the expected tracker and oscillation frequency, they do not test the claim for generic initial perturbations, which would contain a distribution of modes spanning k/(aH) from O(1) to ≫1, including modes with differing phases and amplitudes. Because the paper's abstract and conclusion state the self-tracker as a general phenomenon, I ask for at least one multi-mode simulation, or an explicit argument that linear superposition of the single-mode results guarantees the same late-time fixed point; without this, the generality claim is not fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [2.3] There is a typo: 'rolling down it's potential' should be 'rolling down its potential'.
  2. [4.1] 'Large V olume Scenario' has a spurious space; also 'one popular examples' should be 'one popular example'.
  3. [4.1, Eq. (4.3)] The integration limits appear inconsistent with the text. During kination the comoving horizon grows, so a later time corresponds to a smaller k; the integral from kkin to k with k < kkin would be negative. The intended range should be stated explicitly (likely ∫_k^{kkin}).
  4. [2.2, footnote 2] The statement that the additional 2λV̄Φ term on the right-hand side of the scalar equation of motion scales as t^{-3} is not derived; a one-line derivation or a more precise reference would help the reader verify the claimed suppression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radiation equation of state for the perturbations is derived from the mode equation, and the tracker fixed point is taken from the external Copeland-Liddle-Wands result.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction. Section 2.1 starts from the full scalar equation of motion (2.1), splits phi = bar-phi + delta-phi, and linearizes the exponential potential to obtain the mode equation (2.14), delta-phiddot_k + 3H delta-phidot_k + (k^2/a^2 + H^2(6c-2)/c^2) delta-phi_k = 0. The mass term is dropped under the explicit subhorizon condition (2.15), k >> (aH) sqrt((6c-2)/c^2), and the asymptotic solution (2.18) gives delta-phi_k proportional to a^{-1}, with the kinetic and gradient energies scaling as a^{-4}; this is how delta-P = delta-rho/3 is obtained, not assumed. The tracker fixed point (2.26), x^2 = 8/(3 lambda^2), y^2 = 4/(3 lambda^2), is the standard radiation tracker of Copeland-Liddle-Wands [6], an external result whose inputs (exponential potential plus radiation fluid) are independently matched by the derived perturbation behaviour. The numerical section is a full-field CosmoLattice simulation with a post-hoc background/perturbation split (Eqs. 3.9-3.12); no parameter is fitted to force the claimed attractor. The self-citation [13] is used only for prior kination perturbation analysis and for the expected oscillation frequency (3.17) around the tracker; neither use is load-bearing for the existence or location of the self-tracker. The single-mode, subhorizon limitation noted for the numerics concerns physical robustness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard scalar field dynamics, the small-perturbation expansion of the exponential potential, the sub-horizon massless approximation, and the neglect of metric backreaction. No free parameters are fitted to data; λ and the initial conditions are illustrative choices. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • lambda (exponential potential exponent) = 3 (set by hand in simulations)
    Chosen for numerical demonstration; analytic results hold for any λ > 2. Not fitted to data.
  • initial energy fractions (x_i^2, y_i^2, z_i^2) = Sim1: 0.495, 0.498, 0.007; Sim2: 0.23, 0.16, 0.61
    Initial conditions in the simulations, chosen to test different starting points; not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The scalar field is minimally coupled and lives in a flat FLRW universe with no other energy component (in the self-tracker case).
    Standard for tracker cosmology; stated in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption The exponential potential can be expanded to quadratic order in the perturbations, requiring λδφ << M_P.
    Used in Eq. (2.4) and throughout Section 2; violations would bring non-linear terms.
  • domain assumption Perturbation modes considered are sub-horizon (k >> aH), so the effective mass term is negligible and the perturbations behave as a massless field.
    Required for Eq. (2.19) and the radiation equation of state; introduced after Eq. (2.15).
  • domain assumption Metric backreaction from scalar perturbations is negligible for adiabatic modes.
    Assumed in Section 2.2, justified by citation to [22]; the paper notes this may fail for large perturbations.
  • standard math Standard linear perturbation theory and WKB approximation apply when the equation of state changes slowly.
    Used in Sections 2.1-2.2 to solve the mode equation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-Tracking Solutions for Asymptotic Scalar Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4DRWBNAH

@misc{pith2026250704161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-Tracking Solutions for Asymptotic Scalar Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4DRWBNAH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.04161}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the dynamics of pure scalar fields rolling on an exponential potential in the absence of any additional background fluid and demonstrate the existence of self-tracking solutions in which the self-perturbations of the scalar field act as an effective radiation background. The validity of these solutions is demonstrated through both analytic techniques and numerical simulations using CosmoLattice. We discuss applications to string cosmologies with significant trans-Planckian field excursions between inflation and BBN, including the required initial level of scalar perturbations to avoid overshoot.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Waves from Multiple Cosmic Superstrings and the Overshoot Problem

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A string-theory model with three cosmic superstring species solves the modulus overshoot problem via gravitational-wave friction and predicts a high-frequency multi-peaked stochastic gravitational-wave spectrum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Allahverdi et al., The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe, Open J

    R. Allahverdi et al., The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe, Open J. Astrophys. 4 (2021) astro.2006.16182, [arXiv:2006.16182]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo, and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today, Phys. Rept. 1059 (2024) 1–155, [arXiv:2303.04819]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Superstring Cosmology -- A Complementary Review

    R. Brandenberger, Superstring cosmology — a complementary review, JCAP 11 (2023) 019, [arXiv:2306.12458]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Brustein and P

    R. Brustein and P. J. Steinhardt, Challenges for superstring cosmology, Phys. Lett. B 302 (1993) 196–201, [hep-th/9212049]

    arXiv 1993

  5. [5]

    P. G. Ferreira and M. Joyce, Cosmology with a primordial scaling field, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 023503, [astro-ph/9711102]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686–4690, [gr-qc/9711068]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y . Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures, arXiv:2111.01150

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello, Catch-me-if-you-can: the overshoot problem and the weak/inflation hierarchy, JHEP 11 (2022) 155, [arXiv:2207.00567]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Revello, Attractive (s)axions: cosmological trackers at the boundary of moduli space, JHEP 05 (2024) 037, [arXiv:2311.12429]

    F. Revello, Attractive (s)axions: cosmological trackers at the boundary of moduli space, JHEP 05 (2024) 037, [arXiv:2311.12429]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni, and H. V . Tran,Late-time attractors and cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 6 063528, [arXiv:2306.07327]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni, and H. V . Tran,Accelerating universe at the end of time, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 6 063527, [arXiv:2303.03418]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Seo, Asymptotic behavior of saxion-axion system in stringy quintessence model, arXiv:2403.07307

    M.-S. Seo, Asymptotic behavior of saxion-axion system in stringy quintessence model, arXiv:2403.07307

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Apers, J

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, M. Mosny, and F. Revello, String theory and the first half of the universe, JCAP 08 (2024) 018, [arXiv:2401.04064]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    G. Shiu, F. Tonioni, and H. V . Tran,Analytic bounds on late-time axion-scalar cosmologies, JHEP 09 (2024) 158, [arXiv:2406.17030]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Andriot, S

    D. Andriot, S. Parameswaran, D. Tsimpis, T. Wrase, and I. Zavala, Exponential quintessence: curved, steep and stringy?, JHEP 08 (2024) 117, [arXiv:2405.09323]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, E. Hardy, and N. S. González, Percolating cosmic string networks from kination, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024), no. 8 083537, [arXiv:2406.12637]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Revello and G

    F. Revello and G. Villa, Cosmic (super)strings with a time-varying tension, arXiv:2411.04186. – 18 –

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Cunillera, A. Padilla, and F. G. Pedro, From inflation to quintessence: a history of the universe in string theory, JHEP 10 (2024) 141, [arXiv:2407.03405]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. F. Casas and I. Ruiz, Cosmology of light towers and swampland constraints, JHEP 12 (2024) 193, [arXiv:2409.08317]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Apers, J

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, M. Mosny, and F. Revello, Kination, meet Kasner: on the asymptotic cosmology of string compactifications, JHEP 08 (2023) 156, [arXiv:2212.10293]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Apers, J

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, and M. Mosny, A note on 4d kination and higher-dimensional uplifts, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025), no. 3 337, [arXiv:2409.08049]

    2025

  14. [22]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y . Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,A universal bound on the duration of a kination era, arXiv:2501.17226

  15. [23]

    Brunelli, M

    L. Brunelli, M. Cicoli, and F. G. Pedro, Growth of Cosmic Strings beyond Kination, arXiv:2503.11293

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori, and T. Van Riet, Scale separation, rolling solutions and entropy bounds, arXiv:2504.08634

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bedroya, H

    A. Bedroya, H. Lee, and P. Steinhardt, A species scale-driven breakdown of effective field theory in time-dependent string backgrounds, arXiv:2504.13260

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Ghoshal, F

    A. Ghoshal, F. Revello, and G. Villa, Cosmic superstrings in large volume compactifications: PTAs, LISA and time-varying tension, arXiv:2504.20994

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Sánchez González, J

    N. Sánchez González, J. P. Conlon, E. J. Copeland, and E. Hardy, Dynamical Systems and Superstring Phases in the Early Universe, arXiv:2505.14187

  20. [28]

    Barreiro, B

    T. Barreiro, B. de Carlos, and E. J. Copeland, Stabilizing the dilaton in superstring cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 083513, [hep-th/9805005]

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    J. P. Conlon, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and F. Quevedo, Volume Modulus Inflation and the Gravitino Mass Problem, JCAP 09 (2008) 011, [arXiv:0806.0809]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cicoli, F

    M. Cicoli, F. Muia, and F. G. Pedro, Microscopic Origin of Volume Modulus Inflation, JCAP 12 (2015) 040, [arXiv:1509.07748]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3406

    1988

  24. [32]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753–1936, [hep-th/0603057]

    2006 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario, Phys

    B. Spokoiny, Deflationary universe scenario, Phys. Lett. B 315 (1993) 40–45, [gr-qc/9306008]

    1993 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Joyce, Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe, Phys

    M. Joyce, Electroweak Baryogenesis and the Expansion Rate of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1875–1878, [hep-ph/9606223]

    1997 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Eröncel, Y

    C. Eröncel, Y . Gouttenoire, R. Sato, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn,A New Source for (QCD) Axion Dark Matter Production: Curvature-Induced, arXiv:2503.04880

  28. [36]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, S. Krippendorf, F. Muia, S. Orani, and F. Quevedo, Oscillons from String Moduli, JHEP 01 (2018) 083, [arXiv:1708.08922]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Kasuya, M

    S. Kasuya, M. Kawasaki, F. Otani, and E. Sonomoto, Revisiting oscillon formation in the Kachru-Kallosh-Linde-Trivedi scenario, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 4 043016, [arXiv:2001.02582]. – 19 –

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cheng, P

    C. Cheng, P. Giannadakis, L. Heurtier, and E. A. Lim, Non-linear Dynamics and Primordial Black Hole Formation During Kination, arXiv:2507.19166

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and E. A. Lim, Cosmology using numerical relativity, arXiv:2409.01939

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Ikeda, and H. Okawa, Gravitational Collapse of a Massless Scalar Field in a Periodic Box, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 7 075004, [arXiv:1811.00762]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valkenburg, The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I, JCAP 04 (2021) 035, [arXiv:2006.15122]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valkenburg, CosmoLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge field dynamics in an expanding universe, Comput. Phys. Commun. 283 (2023) 108586, [arXiv:2102.01031]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V . Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo,Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications, JHEP 03 (2005) 007, [hep-th/0502058]

    2005 arXiv

  36. [44]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751

    1977

  37. [45]

    Parker, Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes

    L. Parker, Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. 1., Phys. Rev. 183 (1969) 1057–1068

    1969

  38. [46]

    Eggemeier, B

    B. Eggemeier, B. Schwabe, J. C. Niemeyer, and R. Easther, Gravitational collapse in the postinflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 2 023516, [arXiv:2110.15109]. – 20 –

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.