Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Duality between subgradient and conditional gradient methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1211.6302 v3 pith:4EH5W7C5 submitted 2012-11-27 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML
keywords algorithmsconditionaldualgradientmethodproblemsconvexdescent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a convex optimization problem and its dual, there are many possible first-order algorithms. In this paper, we show the equivalence between mirror descent algorithms and algorithms generalizing the conditional gradient method. This is done through convex duality, and implies notably that for certain problems, such as for supervised machine learning problems with non-smooth losses or problems regularized by non-smooth regularizers, the primal subgradient method and the dual conditional gradient method are formally equivalent. The dual interpretation leads to a form of line search for mirror descent, as well as guarantees of convergence for primal-dual certificates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Eliciting Language Model Behaviors with Investigator Agents

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Investigator models trained with an iterative Frank-Wolfe objective discover diverse, interpretable natural-language prompts that elicit targeted jailbreaks, hallucinations, and aberrant behaviors.

Pith tools