REVIEW 1 cited by
Fast and Near-Optimal Diagonal Preconditioning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The convergence rates of iterative methods for solving a linear system $\mathbf{A} x = b$ typically depend on the condition number of the matrix $\mathbf{A}$. Preconditioning is a common way of speeding up these methods by reducing that condition number in a computationally inexpensive way. In this paper, we revisit the decades-old problem of how to best improve $\mathbf{A}$'s condition number by left or right diagonal rescaling. We make progress on this problem in several directions. First, we provide new bounds for the classic heuristic of scaling $\mathbf{A}$ by its diagonal values (a.k.a. Jacobi preconditioning). We prove that this approach reduces $\mathbf{A}$'s condition number to within a quadratic factor of the best possible scaling. Second, we give a solver for structured mixed packing and covering semidefinite programs (MPC SDPs) which computes a constant-factor optimal scaling for $\mathbf{A}$ in $\widetilde{O}(\text{nnz}(\mathbf{A}) \cdot \text{poly}(\kappa^\star))$ time; this matches the cost of solving the linear system after scaling up to a $\widetilde{O}(\text{poly}(\kappa^\star))$ factor. Third, we demonstrate that a sufficiently general width-independent MPC SDP solver would imply near-optimal runtimes for the scaling problems we consider, and natural variants concerned with measures of average conditioning. Finally, we highlight connections of our preconditioning techniques to semi-random noise models, as well as applications in reducing risk in several statistical regression models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Model Immunization from a Condition Number Perspective
A new regularizer increases the condition number of the linear-probing Hessian on harmful tasks, making gradient-descent fine-tuning slower, but the theoretical analysis contains a false claim.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.