REVIEW 4 cited by
OmnixR: Evaluating Omni-modality Language Models on Reasoning across Modalities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce OmnixR, an evaluation suite designed to benchmark SoTA Omni-modality Language Models, such as GPT-4o and Gemini. Evaluating OLMs, which integrate multiple modalities such as text, vision, and audio, presents unique challenges. Particularly, the user message might often consist of multiple modalities, such that OLMs have to establish holistic understanding and reasoning across modalities to accomplish the task. Existing benchmarks are limited to single modality or dual-modality tasks, overlooking comprehensive multi-modal assessments of model reasoning. To address this, OmnixR offers two evaluation variants: (1)synthetic subset: a synthetic dataset generated automatically by translating text into multiple modalities--audio, images, video, and hybrids (Omnify). (2)realistic subset: a real-world dataset, manually curated and annotated by experts, for evaluating cross-modal reasoning in natural settings. OmnixR presents a unique evaluation towards assessing OLMs over a diverse mix of modalities, such as a question that involves video, audio, and text, providing a rigorous cross-modal reasoning testbed unlike any existing benchmarks. Our experiments find that all state-of-the-art OLMs struggle with OmnixR questions that require integrating information from multiple modalities to answer. Further analysis highlights differences in reasoning behavior, underscoring the challenges of omni-modal AI alignment.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
AVI-Bench: Toward Human-like Audio-Visual Intelligence of Omni-MLLMs
AVI-Bench is a cognitively inspired benchmark that evaluates Omni-MLLMs on joint audio-visual tasks and reveals substantial limitations in current models.
-
TokenSwap: Benchmarking and Reducing the Modality Gap in Multimodal LLMs
TokenSwap measures and mitigates the MLLM modality gap: swapping textual concepts for matched images lowers accuracy by 4-47% across 42 models, and training with such swaps reduces the gap.
-
Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs
State-of-the-art MLLMs show substantial inconsistency when reasoning over the same information presented in image, text, or mixed modalities, even after accounting for OCR errors, with inconsistency linked to visual f...
-
Towards Understanding Modality Interaction in Multimodal Language Models via Partial Information Decomposition
PID applied to MLLMs identifies task-specific modality interaction profiles that generalize across models, extend to tri-modal cases, and yield initial performance gains via reweighting.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.