Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Convolve and Conquer: Data Comparison with Wiener Filters

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.06558 v2 pith:4G5UDDX7 submitted 2023-11-11 cs.LG

Convolve and Conquer: Data Comparison with Wiener Filters

classification cs.LG
keywords datasamplescomparedistributionsfilterslearningoptimisationsimilarities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantitative evaluations of differences and/or similarities between data samples define and shape optimisation problems associated with learning data distributions. Current methods to compare data often suffer from limitations in capturing such distributions or lack desirable mathematical properties for optimisation (e.g. smoothness, differentiability, or convexity). In this paper, we introduce a new method to measure (dis)similarities between paired samples inspired by Wiener-filter theory. The convolutional nature of Wiener filters allows us to comprehensively compare data samples in a globally correlated way. We validate our approach in four machine learning applications: data compression, medical imaging imputation, translated classification, and non-parametric generative modelling. Our results demonstrate increased resolution in reconstructed images with better perceptual quality and higher data fidelity, as well as robustness against translations, compared to conventional mean-squared-error analogue implementations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.