Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Streaming Erasure Codes over Multi-hop Relay Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05951 v1 pith:4IIYLSBG submitted 2020-06-10 cs.IT math.IT

Streaming Erasure Codes over Multi-hop Relay Network

classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords networksizeboundcaseerasureerasuresschemestreaming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper studies low-latency streaming codes for the multi-hop network. The source is transmitting a sequence of messages (streaming messages) to a destination through a chain of relays where each hop is subject to packet erasures. Every source message has to be recovered perfectly at the destination within a delay constraint of $T$ time slots. In any sliding window of $T+1$ time slots, we assume no more than $N_j$ erasures introduced by the $j$'th hop channel. The capacity in case of a single relay (a three-node network) was derived by Fong [1], et al. While the converse derived for the three-node case can be extended to any number of nodes using a similar technique (analyzing the case where erasures on other links are consecutive), we demonstrate next that the achievable scheme, which suggested a clever symbol-wise decode and forward strategy, can not be straightforwardly extended without a loss in performance. The coding scheme for the three-node network, which was shown to achieve the upper bound, was ``state-independent'' (i.e., it does not depend on specific erasure pattern). While this is a very desirable property, in this paper, we suggest a ``state-dependent'' (i.e., a scheme which depends on specific erasure pattern) and show that it achieves the upper bound up to the size of an additional header. Since, as we show, the size of the header does not depend on the field size, the gap between the achievable rate and the upper bound decreases as the field size increases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.