Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Black hole masses of tidal disruption event host galaxies II

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.04077 v2 pith:4KKG3S43 submitted 2019-02-11 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Black hole masses of tidal disruption event host galaxies II

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords opticalx-rayhostemissionfindgalaxiesblackconsistent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present new medium resolution, optical long-slit spectra of a sample of 6 UV/optical and 15 X-ray selected tidal disruption event candidate host galaxies. We measure emission line ratios from the optical spectra, finding that the large majority of hosts are quiescent galaxies, while those displaying emission lines are generally consistent with star-formation dominated environments; only 3 sources show clear evidence of nuclear activity. We measure bulge velocity dispersions using absorption lines and infer host black hole (BH) masses using the M-$\sigma$ relation. While the optical and X-ray host BH masses are statistically consistent with coming from the same parent distribution, the optical host distribution has a visible peak near $M_{\rm BH} \sim 10^6 M_\odot$, whereas the X-ray host distribution appears flat in $M_{\rm BH}$. We find a subset of X-ray selected candidates that are hosted in galaxies significantly less luminous (M$_{\rm g}$$\sim$-16) and less massive (stellar mass$\sim$10$^{8.5-9}$M$_{\odot}$) than those of optical events. Using statistical tests we find suggestive evidence that, in terms of black hole mass, stellar mass and absolute magnitude, the hard X-ray hosts differ from the UV/optical and soft X-ray samples. Similar to individual studies, we find that the emission region size for the X-ray sample is much smaller than the optical emission region, consistent with a compact accretion disk. We find a typical Eddington ratio of the X-ray emission is $\sim$0.01, as opposed to the optical events which have L$_{\rm BB}$$\sim$L$_{\rm Edd}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tidal Disruption Events with the SKA

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    With its projected sensitivity, low-frequency coverage, and VLBI, the SKA would shift tidal disruption event radio studies from a handful of events to hundreds, enabling population-level inference on jets, black-hole ...