Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Q2ATransformer: Improving Medical VQA via an Answer Querying Decoder

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01611 v2 pith:4KWEHCEU submitted 2023-04-04 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords medicalanswerapproachesclassificationopen-endquestionstransformeranswers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems play a supporting role to understand clinic-relevant information carried by medical images. The questions to a medical image include two categories: close-end (such as Yes/No question) and open-end. To obtain answers, the majority of the existing medical VQA methods relies on classification approaches, while a few works attempt to use generation approaches or a mixture of the two. The classification approaches are relatively simple but perform poorly on long open-end questions. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose a new Transformer based framework for medical VQA (named as Q2ATransformer), which integrates the advantages of both the classification and the generation approaches and provides a unified treatment for the close-end and open-end questions. Specifically, we introduce an additional Transformer decoder with a set of learnable candidate answer embeddings to query the existence of each answer class to a given image-question pair. Through the Transformer attention, the candidate answer embeddings interact with the fused features of the image-question pair to make the decision. In this way, despite being a classification-based approach, our method provides a mechanism to interact with the answer information for prediction like the generation-based approaches. On the other hand, by classification, we mitigate the task difficulty by reducing the search space of answers. Our method achieves new state-of-the-art performance on two medical VQA benchmarks. Especially, for the open-end questions, we achieve 79.19% on VQA-RAD and 54.85% on PathVQA, with 16.09% and 41.45% absolute improvements, respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HSCR: Hierarchical Self-Contrastive Rewarding for Aligning Medical Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HSCR uses visual token dropout and logit contrast to construct self-generated dispreferred answers, then trains a medical VLM with explicit and implicit preference losses, improving zero-shot Rad-VQA, SLAKE, and PathV...

  2. Knowing or Guessing? Robust Medical Visual Question Answering via Joint Consistency and Contrastive Learning

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RoMed and CCL: a 144k-question perturbation benchmark for medical VQA and a consistency-plus-contrastive training method that improves LLaVA-Med's accuracy and reduces answer variation.

  3. MIRA: A Novel Framework for Fusing Modalities in Medical RAG

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A medical multimodal RAG pipeline with rethink-and-rearrange and online search; the claimed SOTA is contradicted by the paper's own PMC-VQA numbers.

Pith tools