pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22133 · v2 · pith:4LFMY7YZnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🧬 q-bio.BM · cs.AI

Atom-level Protein Representation Learning Improves Protein Structure Prediction

Taewon Kim , Hyosoon Jang , Hyunjin Seo , Seonghwan Seo , Hyeongwoo Kim , Wonho Zhung , Mingyeong Shin , Wooyoun Kim
show 1 more author
Sungsoo Ahn
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.BM cs.AI
keywords protein representation learningstructure predictionpretrainingmulti-viewVQ-VAEhomodimerinteraction predictionRepSP benchmark
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pretraining to recover tokens from corrupted amino-acid, backbone, and full-atom views produces representations that improve structure-prediction tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces TriProRep, which jointly encodes three aligned residue-level views of a protein—amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry—using VQ-VAE tokenizers. It pretrains the model to reconstruct the original tokens after generator-based corruption of these views, forcing it to learn distinctions between plausible but incorrect combinations. The authors create the RepSP benchmark to test how well such representations support structure-oriented uses: homodimer co-folding from separate chain representations, residue-level interaction property prediction, and representation-aligned monomer folding. Across these tasks TriProRep outperforms both sequence-only baselines and earlier structure-aware representation methods while remaining competitive on standard benchmarks.

Core claim

TriProRep jointly models three aligned residue-level views—amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry—discretely encoded via VQ-VAE tokenizers. By pretraining to recover original tokens from generator-corrupted views, it learns to distinguish plausible but incorrect cross-view augmentations from the original protein. When evaluated on RepSP, which includes homodimer co-folding from apo-chain representations, residue-level prediction of interaction properties, and representation-aligned monomer structure prediction, TriProRep improves over sequence-only and prior structure-aware models.

What carries the argument

Joint three-view token recovery pretraining on VQ-VAE-encoded amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry.

If this is right

  • Representations support direct homodimer co-folding from individual apo-chain inputs.
  • They improve residue-level prediction of homodimer interaction properties.
  • They enhance monomer structure prediction when the model is aligned to the learned representations.
  • Performance on conventional protein benchmarks remains competitive with prior methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cross-view corruption objective could be tested on other biomolecules that have both sequence and coordinate data.
  • RepSP-style benchmarks may expose limitations in existing representations when the downstream goal is interaction rather than single-chain folding.
  • If the three-view alignment proves robust, similar tokenization could reduce the need for task-specific fine-tuning in related prediction problems.

Load-bearing premise

Recovering original tokens from generator-corrupted cross-view augmentations produces representations that transfer to downstream structure-prediction tasks without additional fine-tuning or task-specific adaptation.

What would settle it

Apply the frozen TriProRep representations to the three RepSP tasks and measure whether co-folding accuracy, interaction prediction AUC, or monomer structure quality show no improvement over sequence-only baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22133 by Hyeongwoo Kim, Hyosoon Jang, Hyunjin Seo, Mingyeong Shin, Seonghwan Seo, Sungsoo Ahn, Taewon Kim, Wonho Zhung, Wooyoun Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TRIPROREP. (a) Three-view tokenization. A protein is independently tokenized into amino-acid, backbone, and full-atom token sequences at the residue level. (b) ELECTRA-style discriminative pretraining. A small generator corrupts each of the three sequences, and a large discriminator predicts the original token at every position. The richer space of cross-token corruptions provides a stronger training signa… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: REPSP. We define three structure-generative tasks that use protein representations as input: (task 1) homodimer structure prediction, (task 2) per-residue homodimer binding-property prediction via MLP probing, and (task 3) distillation into a monomer structure prediction model. identity. From the resulting cluster representatives, we select 400 validation and 1,000 test sequences, and use the remaining rep… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Scaling of flexible-docking. Predicted homodimer structures (chain A blue, chain B gold) overlaid on ground truth (gray) across encoder sizes (150M, 650M, 3B) for four test records. while the huge TRIPROREP model achieves the strongest performance on nearly all metrics, with ESM3 only marginally higher in LDDT. The gains are most pronounced on interface-level metrics, which depend not only on accurate mono… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Acceleration of monomer structure prediction via representation alignment on REPSP. We compare the no-REPA baseline against ESM2, SaProt, S-PLM, MIF-ST, and TRIPROREP as the alignment target. TRIPROREP provides strongest alignment target for structure prediction model. 5.2 Per-residue homodimer binding property prediction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Tokens vs. sidechain ro￾tamer. Density of codes in the χ1 simplex. (a) Backbone tokens. (b) Full-atom tokens. Hyperparameters. The tokenizer uses single width 256, pair width 128, and N = 6 Pairformer-style layers with 8 attention heads. The output embedding dimension is 256. The codebook contains V = 512 entries, uses EMA updates with decay 0.99, and uses entropy regularization with weight 0.1. Backbone a… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in generative modeling show that pretrained representations can improve generation as conditioning features or alignment targets. Motivated by this, we study protein representations for predicting structures beyond conventional function annotation. We propose TriProRep, a structure-aware pretraining method that jointly models three aligned residue-level views: amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry, discretely encoded via VQ-VAE tokenizers. By pretraining to recover original tokens from generator-corrupted views, TriProRep learns to distinguish plausible but incorrect cross-view augmentations from the original protein. We further introduce RepSP, a benchmark for evaluating protein representations in structure-predictive settings. RepSP tests three uses of representations: homodimer co-folding from apo-chain representations, residue-level prediction of homodimer-derived interaction properties, and representation-aligned monomer structure prediction. Across these tasks, TriProRep improves over sequence-only and prior structure-aware representation models, while maintaining competitive performance on conventional benchmarks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TriProRep, a structure-aware pretraining method that jointly models three aligned residue-level views (amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry) via VQ-VAE tokenizers. Pretraining recovers original tokens from generator-corrupted cross-view augmentations to learn distinctions between plausible but incorrect augmentations and the original protein. The authors introduce the RepSP benchmark, which evaluates representations on homodimer co-folding from apo-chain representations, residue-level prediction of homodimer-derived interaction properties, and representation-aligned monomer structure prediction. They claim TriProRep improves over sequence-only and prior structure-aware models on RepSP tasks while remaining competitive on conventional benchmarks.

Significance. If the claimed improvements hold under rigorous controls, the work would demonstrate that atom-level cross-view token recovery pretraining can yield transferable structure-aware representations without task-specific fine-tuning, advancing representation learning for proteins beyond sequence-only or coarse structure models. The RepSP benchmark itself would be a useful standardized testbed for structure-predictive uses of representations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of improvements across RepSP tasks is stated without any quantitative results, baselines, error bars, ablation studies, or statistical details, preventing assessment of whether the gains are load-bearing or attributable to the proposed pretraining rather than dataset effects.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (pretraining description): the token-recovery objective on generator-corrupted cross-view augmentations is presented as producing representations that improve homodimer co-folding, interaction prediction, and monomer folding without fine-tuning, yet the objective supplies only local cross-view consistency and no direct supervision on global fold geometry or interaction interfaces; this leaves open whether reported gains reflect learned structure awareness or artifacts such as tokenizer leakage or data overlap.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'RepSP' is introduced as a new benchmark without spelling out the acronym or providing even a high-level description of its three tasks beyond the listed uses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of improvements across RepSP tasks is stated without any quantitative results, baselines, error bars, ablation studies, or statistical details, preventing assessment of whether the gains are load-bearing or attributable to the proposed pretraining rather than dataset effects.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative support. In the revised manuscript, we will incorporate key performance metrics from the RepSP benchmark, including specific improvements over sequence-only and prior structure-aware baselines, along with error bars from repeated runs and any available statistical details. This will allow clearer evaluation of the gains. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (pretraining description): the token-recovery objective on generator-corrupted cross-view augmentations is presented as producing representations that improve homodimer co-folding, interaction prediction, and monomer folding without fine-tuning, yet the objective supplies only local cross-view consistency and no direct supervision on global fold geometry or interaction interfaces; this leaves open whether reported gains reflect learned structure awareness or artifacts such as tokenizer leakage or data overlap.

    Authors: While the objective operates at the local residue level, the joint three-view modeling is intended to capture structural distinctions that transfer to global tasks, as demonstrated by the RepSP results on co-folding and interaction properties. The full manuscript provides comparisons showing advantages over prior models. To address concerns about artifacts, we will expand the discussion section with additional analysis on data overlap and tokenizer behavior. We view the gains as reflecting the learned representations rather than artifacts. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: pretraining objective independent of downstream RepSP tasks

full rationale

The paper defines TriProRep via a VQ-VAE token-recovery objective on generator-corrupted cross-view augmentations (amino-acid, backbone, full-atom). This objective is stated independently of the RepSP benchmark tasks (homodimer co-folding, residue-level interaction prediction, representation-aligned monomer folding). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the claimed gains on RepSP to quantities fitted on the evaluation data or to self-referential definitions. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; limited visibility into exact hyperparameters or modeling choices.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption VQ-VAE tokenizers can faithfully discretize amino-acid identity, backbone geometry, and local full-atom geometry without significant information loss for downstream structure tasks.
    Central to the three-view tokenization step described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5727 in / 1211 out tokens · 19681 ms · 2026-05-25T02:52:00.960787+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Douglas Renfrew, Tomasz Kosciolek, Julia Koehler Leman, Daniel Berenberg, Tommi Vatanen, Chris Chandler, Bryn C

    Vladimir Gligorijevi´c, P. Douglas Renfrew, Tomasz Kosciolek, Julia Koehler Leman, Daniel Berenberg, Tommi Vatanen, Chris Chandler, Bryn C. Taylor, Ian M. Fisk, Hera Vlamakis, Ramnik J. Xavier, Rob Knight, Kyunghyun Cho, and Richard Bonneau. Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks.Nature Communications, 12(1):3168, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Saprot: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary

    Jin Su, Chenchen Han, Yuyang Zhou, Junjie Shan, Xibin Zhou, and Fajie Yuan. Saprot: Protein language modeling with structure-aware vocabulary. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure.NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, 6(4):lqae150, 12 2024

    Michael Heinzinger, Konstantin Weissenow, Joaquin Gomez Sanchez, Adrian Henkel, Milot Mirdita, Martin Steinegger, and Burkhard Rost. Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure.NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, 6(4):lqae150, 12 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Fast and accurate protein structure search with foldseek.Nature biotechnology, 42(2):243–246, 2024

    Michel Van Kempen, Stephanie S Kim, Charlotte Tumescheit, Milot Mirdita, Jeongjae Lee, Cameron LM Gilchrist, Johannes Söding, and Martin Steinegger. Fast and accurate protein structure search with foldseek.Nature biotechnology, 42(2):243–246, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model.Science, 387(6736):850–858, 2025

    Thomas Hayes, Roshan Rao, Halil Akin, Nicholas J Sofroniew, Deniz Oktay, Zeming Lin, Robert Verkuil, Vincent Q Tran, Jonathan Deaton, Marius Wiggert, et al. Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model.Science, 387(6736):850–858, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Masked inverse folding with sequence transfer for protein representation learning.Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 36:gzad015, 2023

    Kevin K Yang, Niccolò Zanichelli, and Hugh Yeh. Masked inverse folding with sequence transfer for protein representation learning.Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 36:gzad015, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    S-plm: structure-aware protein language model via contrastive learning between sequence and structure.Advanced Science, 12(5):2404212, 2025

    Duolin Wang, Mahdi Pourmirzaei, Usman L Abbas, Shuai Zeng, Negin Manshour, Farzaneh Esmaili, Biplab Poudel, Yuexu Jiang, Qing Shao, Jin Chen, et al. S-plm: structure-aware protein language model via contrastive learning between sequence and structure.Advanced Science, 12(5):2404212, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Return of unconditional generation: A self- supervised representation generation method.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:125441–125468, 2024

    Tianhong Li, Dina Katabi, and Kaiming He. Return of unconditional generation: A self- supervised representation generation method.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:125441–125468, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models. 2023

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Test-time conditioning with representation-aligned visual features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03753, 2026

    Nicolas Sereyjol-Garros, Ellington Kirby, Victor Letzelter, Victor Besnier, and Nermin Samet. Test-time conditioning with representation-aligned visual features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03753, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think

    Sihyun Yu, Sangkyung Kwak, Huiwon Jang, Jongheon Jeong, Jonathan Huang, Jinwoo Shin, and Saining Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think. InThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Repa-e: Unlocking vae for end-to-end tuning of latent diffusion transformers

    Xingjian Leng, Jaskirat Singh, Yunzhong Hou, Zhenchang Xing, Saining Xie, and Liang Zheng. Repa-e: Unlocking vae for end-to-end tuning of latent diffusion transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 18262–18272, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Aaron Van Den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Protein structure tok- enization: Benchmarking and new recipe

    Xinyu Yuan, Zichen Wang, Marcus D Collins, and Huzefa Rangwala. Protein structure tok- enization: Benchmarking and new recipe. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 73645–73670. PMLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Le, and Christopher D

    Kevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V . Le, and Christopher D. Manning. ELECTRA: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators. InICLR, 2020. 10

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Alphafold database expands to proteome-scale quaternary structures.bioRxiv, pages 2026–03, 2026

    Yewon Han, Maxim I Tsenkov, Niccolo AE Venanzi, Damian Bertoni, Sooyoung Cha, Alejandro Chacon, Nick Dietrich, Boris Fomitchev, Yonathan Goldtzvik, Darren Hsu, et al. Alphafold database expands to proteome-scale quaternary structures.bioRxiv, pages 2026–03, 2026

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Protein complex prediction with alphafold-multimer.biorxiv, pages 2021–10, 2021

    Richard Evans, Michael O’neill, Alexander Pritzel, Natasha Antropova, Andrew Senior, Tim Green, Augustin Žídek, Russ Bates, Sam Blackwell, Jason Yim, et al. Protein complex prediction with alphafold-multimer.biorxiv, pages 2021–10, 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3.Nature, 630(8016):493–500, 2024

    Josh Abramson, Jonas Adler, Jack Dunger, Richard Evans, Tim Green, Alexander Pritzel, Olaf Ronneberger, Lindsay Willmore, Andrew J Ballard, Joshua Bambrick, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3.Nature, 630(8016):493–500, 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Boltz-1 democratizing biomolecular interaction modeling.BioRxiv, pages 2024–11, 2025

    Jeremy Wohlwend, Gabriele Corso, Saro Passaro, Noah Getz, Mateo Reveiz, Ken Leidal, Wojtek Swiderski, Liam Atkinson, Tally Portnoi, Itamar Chinn, et al. Boltz-1 democratizing biomolecular interaction modeling.BioRxiv, pages 2024–11, 2025

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Boltz-2: Towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction.BioRxiv, 2025

    Saro Passaro, Gabriele Corso, Jeremy Wohlwend, Mateo Reveiz, Stephan Thaler, Vignesh Ram Somnath, Noah Getz, Tally Portnoi, Julien Roy, Hannes Stark, et al. Boltz-2: Towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction.BioRxiv, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Susskind, and Miguel Ángel Bautista

    Yuyang Wang, Jiarui Lu, Navdeep Jaitly, Joshua M. Susskind, and Miguel Ángel Bautista. Simplefold: Folding proteins is simpler than you think. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic- level protein structure with a language model.Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023

    Zeming Lin, Halil Akin, Roshan Rao, Brian Hie, Zhongkai Zhu, Wenting Lu, Nikita Smetanin, Robert Verkuil, Ori Kabeli, Yaniv Shmueli, Allan dos Santos Costa, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, Tom Sercu, Salvatore Candido, and Alexander Rives. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic- level protein structure with a language model.Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Mc-bert: Efficient language pre-training via a meta controller.arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05744, 2020

    Zhenhui Xu, Linyuan Gong, Guolin Ke, Di He, Shuxin Zheng, Liwei Wang, Jiang Bian, and Tie-Yan Liu. Mc-bert: Efficient language pre-training via a meta controller.arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05744, 2020

    work page arXiv 2006

  24. [24]

    Alphafold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models.Nucleic acids research, 50(D1):D439–D444, 2022

    Mihaly Varadi, Stephen Anyango, Mandar Deshpande, Sreenath Nair, Cindy Natassia, Galabina Yordanova, David Yuan, Oana Stroe, Gemma Wood, Agata Laydon, et al. Alphafold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models.Nucleic acids research, 50(D1):D439–D444, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023, 2023

    The UniProt Consortium. Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023, 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Mgnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020.Nucleic acids research, 48(D1):D570–D578, 2020

    Alex L Mitchell, Alexandre Almeida, Martin Beracochea, Miguel Boland, Josephine Burgin, Guy Cochrane, Michael R Crusoe, Varsha Kale, Simon C Potter, Lorna J Richardson, et al. Mgnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020.Nucleic acids research, 48(D1):D570–D578, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Alphafold protein structure database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences.Nucleic Acids Research, 52(D1):D368–D375, 01 2024

    Mihaly Varadi, Damian Bertoni, Paulyna Magana, Urmila Paramval, Ivanna Pidruchna, Malarvizhi Radhakrishnan, Maxim Tsenkov, Sreenath Nair, Milot Mirdita, Jingi Yeo, Oleg Kovalevskiy, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Agata Laydon, Augustin Žídek, Hamish Tomlin- son, Dhavanthi Hariharan, Josh Abrahamson, Tim Green, John Jumper, Ewan Birney, Martin Steinegger, Demis ...

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ron- neberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold.nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.Journal of molecular biology, 55(3):379–IN4, 1971

    Byungkook Lee and Frederic M Richards. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.Journal of molecular biology, 55(3):379–IN4, 1971

    work page 1971

  30. [30]

    Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms

    Andrew Shrake and John A Rupley. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. lysozyme and insulin.Journal of molecular biology, 79(2):351–371, 1973. 11

    work page 1973

  31. [31]

    Plip: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler.Nucleic acids research, 43(W1):W443–W447, 2015

    Sebastian Salentin, Sven Schreiber, V Joachim Haupt, Melissa F Adasme, and Michael Schroeder. Plip: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler.Nucleic acids research, 43(W1):W443–W447, 2015

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Arpeggio: a web server for calculating and visualising interatomic interactions in protein structures.Journal of molecular biology, 429(3):365–371, 2017

    Harry C Jubb, Alicia P Higueruelo, Bernardo Ochoa-Montaño, Will R Pitt, David B Ascher, and Tom L Blundell. Arpeggio: a web server for calculating and visualising interatomic interactions in protein structures.Journal of molecular biology, 429(3):365–371, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks.Nature communications, 12(1):3168, 2021

    Vladimir Gligorijevi´c, P Douglas Renfrew, Tomasz Kosciolek, Julia Koehler Leman, Daniel Berenberg, Tommi Vatanen, Chris Chandler, Bryn C Taylor, Ian M Fisk, Hera Vlamakis, et al. Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks.Nature communications, 12(1):3168, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Stephen K Burley, Charmi Bhikadiya, Chunxiao Bi, Sebastian Bittrich, Li Chen, Gregg V Crichlow, Cole H Christie, Kenneth Dalenberg, Luigi Di Costanzo, Jose M Duarte, et al. Rcsb protein data bank: powerful new tools for exploring 3d structures of biological macromolecules for basic and applied research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, bi...

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Mmseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets.Nature biotechnology, 35(11):1026–1028, 2017

    Martin Steinegger and Johannes Söding. Mmseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets.Nature biotechnology, 35(11):1026–1028, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Peter J. A. Cock, Tiago Antao, Jeffrey T. Chang, Brad A. Chapman, Cymon J. Cox, Andrew Dalke, Iddo Friedberg, Thomas Hamelryck, Frank Kauff, Bartek Wilczynski, and Michiel J. L. de Hoon. Biopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.Bioinformatics, 25(11):1422–1423, 2009

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution.Journal of molecular biology, 403(4):660–670, 2010

    Emmanuel D Levy. A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution.Journal of molecular biology, 403(4):660–670, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    Learning to design protein-protein interactions with enhanced generalization

    Anton Bushuiev, Roman Bushuiev, Petr Kouba, Anatolii Filkin, Marketa Gabrielova, Michal Gabriel, Jiri Sedlar, Tomas Pluskal, Jiri Damborsky, Stanislav Mazurenko, and Josef Sivic. Learning to design protein-protein interactions with enhanced generalization. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.Biopolymers, 22(12):2577–2637, 1983

    Wolfgang Kabsch and Christian Sander. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.Biopolymers, 22(12):2577–2637, 1983. 12 A Details in TRIPROREP A.1 Full-atom tokenization For each residue, the tokenizer computes heavy-atom geometry features from Atom37 coordinates. These features include (i) ...

    work page arXiv 1983