Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Model Comparison and Calibration Assessment: User Guide for Consistent Scoring Functions in Machine Learning and Actuarial Practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.12780 v3 pith:4NKSP26S submitted 2022-02-25 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords handmodelmodelspracticescoringcalibrationcomparisondata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the main tasks of actuaries and data scientists is to build good predictive models for certain phenomena such as the claim size or the number of claims in insurance. These models ideally exploit given feature information to enhance the accuracy of prediction. This user guide revisits and clarifies statistical techniques to assess the calibration or adequacy of a model on the one hand, and to compare and rank different models on the other hand. In doing so, it emphasises the importance of specifying the prediction target functional at hand a priori (e.g. the mean or a quantile) and of choosing the scoring function in model comparison in line with this target functional. Guidance for the practical choice of the scoring function is provided. Striving to bridge the gap between science and daily practice in application, it focuses mainly on the pedagogical presentation of existing results and of best practice. The results are accompanied and illustrated by two real data case studies on workers' compensation and customer churn.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Point to probabilistic gradient boosting for claim frequency and severity prediction

    stat.ML 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark of ten gradient boosting algorithms on five insurance datasets shows probabilistic versions can improve fit without losing predictive accuracy, with LightGBM and XGBoostLSS fastest.

Pith tools