pith. sign in

arxiv: 2310.11469 · v1 · pith:4NUM5GERnew · submitted 2023-10-16 · ⚛️ physics.data-an · nucl-ex

Blinding for precision scattering experiments: The MUSE approach as a case study

classification ⚛️ physics.data-an nucl-ex
keywords analysisblindingexperimentexperimentsbiascommonquantitiesresults
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Human bias is capable of changing the analysis of measured data sufficiently to alter the results of an experiment. It is incumbent upon modern experiments, especially those investigating quantities considered contentious in the broader community, to blind their analysis in an effort to minimize bias. The choice of a blinding model is experiment specific, but should also aim to prevent accidental release of results before an analysis is finalized. In this paper, we discuss common threats to an unbiased analysis, as well as common quantities that can be blinded in different types of nuclear physics experiments. We use the Muon Scattering Experiment as an example, and detail the blinding scheme used therein.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The MUSE Target Chamber Post Veto

    physics.ins-det 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A custom veto detector was designed and installed in the MUSE target chamber to eliminate background events from beam tails striking support posts at the trigger level.