Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Action Quality Assessment using Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.12318 v1 pith:4OLJG75I submitted 2022-07-20 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords transformersactionarchitecturesassessmentcapturingconvolutional-baseddependencieseffectively
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Action quality assessment (AQA) is an active research problem in video-based applications that is a challenging task due to the score variance per frame. Existing methods address this problem via convolutional-based approaches but suffer from its limitation of effectively capturing long-range dependencies. With the recent advancements in Transformers, we show that they are a suitable alternative to the conventional convolutional-based architectures. Specifically, can transformer-based models solve the task of AQA by effectively capturing long-range dependencies, parallelizing computation, and providing a wider receptive field for diving videos? To demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed architectures, we conducted comprehensive experiments and achieved a competitive Spearman correlation score of 0.9317. Additionally, we explore the hyperparameters effect on the model's performance and pave a new path for exploiting Transformers in AQA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of Action Quality Assessment organizes the past decade of research into 7 trends, 9 dataset domains, and performance comparisons across 195 papers.

Pith tools