Critical endpoint and universality class of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids in neutron stars

Muneto Nitta; Shigehiro Yasui; Takeshi Mizushima

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Critical endpoint and universality class of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids in neutron stars

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The critical endpoint of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluidity belongs to a new universality class, with $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta)\approx(0.68,0.41,0.57,2.3)$.

desk verdict The paper has a solid mean-field computation of effective critical exponents at the 3P2 CEP, but the 'new universality class' claim is not supported without a fluctuation analysis, which the authors themselves leave to future work. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07944 v2 pith:4P5FEF5J submitted 2019-08-21 nucl-th cond-mat.stat-mech

Takeshi Mizushima , Shigehiro Yasui , Muneto Nitta This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-thcond-mat.stat-mech

keywords neutron3P2superfluiditycriticalendpointuniversalityclassexponentsBogoliubov-deGennestheoryGinzburg-Landaustarcoolingmagnetar

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Inside neutron stars, neutrons can pair in the $^3P_2$ channel, forming a superfluid whose order parameter has several competing orientations. This paper studies how a strong magnetic field drives that superfluid between two biaxial nematic phases and shows that the line separating first-order and second-order transitions ends at a critical endpoint. Around that endpoint, the heat capacity, magnetization, and spin susceptibility scale with exponents $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta)\approx(0.68,0.41,0.57,2.3)$, which satisfy the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom scaling equalities. The authors argue that large $\alpha$ and $\gamma<1$ place this endpoint in a universality class not seen in ordinary systems, and they show the same exponents emerge from an eighth-order Ginzburg-Landau free energy. If correct, a neutron star crossing this point would carry a sharp thermal signature in its cooling history.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rank-2 tensor order parameter $A_{\mu i}$ of the $^3P_2$ superfluid, whose biaxiality parameter $r\in[-1,-1/2]$ distinguishes the D2-BN phase (intermediate $r$) from the D4-BN phase ($r=-1$). The machinery is the quasiclassical superfluid Fermi liquid theory: self-consistent Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations derived from a Luttinger--Ward thermodynamic functional, with the Fermi-liquid parameter $G^{(n)}_0$ renormalizing the Zeeman field through the effective field $B_{\rm eff}=\{1+G^{(n)}_0(1-M/M_N)\}B$. The thermodynamic potential yields the heat capacity $C_V$, magnetization $M$, and spin susceptibility $\chi$, whose scaling around the CEP fixes $\alpha$, $\beta$, $\gamma$, and $\delta$. A complementary Ginzburg-Landau free energy expanded to eighth order in the condensate and to fourth/second order in the magnetic field reproduces the BdG exponents, and the 8th-order term is the one that creates the CEP in the GL description. The Rushbrooke ($\alpha+2\beta+\gamma=2$), Griffiths ($\alpha+\beta(1+\delta)=2$), and Widom ($\delta-\gamma/\beta=1$) equalities are the consistency relations used to test whether the extracted exponents form a valid universality class.

What would settle it

Compute the same exponents with a beyond-mean-field method, such as a functional renormalization group applied to the eighth-order Ginzburg-Landau free energy: if $\gamma$ moves to $\geq1$ or $\alpha$ drops below roughly $0.5$, the proposed universality class is not what the physical superfluid realizes. A less direct check would be a neutron-star cooling curve that shows no critical heat-capacity enhancement where the CEP is predicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the critical endpoint (CEP) in the temperature--magnetic-field phase diagram of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids belongs to a new universality class. Solving the Bogoliubov--de Gennes equations as a superfluid Fermi liquid theory, with the spin-polarization feedback encoded through the Landau parameter $G^{(n)}_0$, the authors locate the CEP where the first-order transition between the D2-biaxial nematic and D4-biaxial nematic phases meets the second-order line. Reading the scaling of the superfluid contributions to the heat capacity $C_V$, magnetization $M$, and spin susceptibility $\chi$ around the CEP, they extract $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta)=(0.68,0.41,0.57,2.3)$ for $G^{(n)}_0=-0.7$ and $(0.60,0.45,0.59,2.3)$ for $G^{(n)}_0=-0.4$. These satisfy the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities within $5\%$--$10\%$, with large $\alpha$ and sub-unity $\gamma$ as the authors' evidence for a new universality class distinct from standard Ising-type or mean-field critical points. The same conclusion emerges from the eighth-order Ginzburg-Landau functional, which yields $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta)=(0.60,0.49,0.52,1.95)$ and provides a tractable low-energy description of the critical behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that omitting fluctuations of the superfluid order parameter does not change the critical exponents, and the authors themselves note that the effect of such fluctuations remains a future issue.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A neutron star whose core crosses the CEP would show a strong, non-mean-field anomaly in heat capacity, magnetization, and spin susceptibility, with the heat-capacity exponent $\alpha\approx0.6$ implying slow cooling.
The extracted exponents are insensitive to the Landau parameter within the numerical errors, so the proposed universality class is robust to the strength of the spin-polarization screening of the magnetic field.
The eighth-order Ginzburg-Landau free energy reproduces the BdG exponents even though the CEP location differs, making GL theory a valid low-energy tool for studying this critical behavior in dense neutron matter.
The new class is characterized by large $\alpha$ and $\gamma<1$, which sets it apart from ordinary liquid-gas or Ising-type critical endpoints and would be the main observable fingerprint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A beyond-mean-field calculation, such as a renormalization-group treatment of the same eighth-order GL functional, would decide whether the quoted exponents survive fluctuations; if they do not, the physical superfluid belongs to a different class.
The same order-parameter symmetry appears in other spin-triplet and spin-2 condensates, so a parallel analysis of helium-3 under a magnetic field or of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates could reveal whether this universality class is generic to multicomponent pairing.
Observationally, a survey of isolated magnetar cooling curves might reveal the predicted heat-capacity enhancement if the CEP lies in the relevant density and field range, providing an indirect constraint on the Fermi-liquid parameter $G^{(n)}_0$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read 1908.07944. What is actually new: the CEP was already in the authors' earlier BdG and GL papers; here they compute the four critical exponents around it and check the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities. That is a legitimate extension, and the technical work is solid: the quasiclassical BdG framework and the 8th-order GL free energy are written out explicitly, the phase diagrams are self-consistent, and the authors flag the open issues, including the uncertain Fermi-liquid parameter G0(n) and the neglect of fluctuations.

The main weakness is one the paper names itself. Section IV says order-parameter fluctuations are left for future work. Universality classes are fixed points of the renormalization group; a mean-field/quasiclassical calculation cannot establish a new universality class. The scaling equalities are consistency checks, not evidence for a new fixed point. Worse, the quoted exponents are not the classical mean-field values (α=0, β=1/2, γ=1, δ=3), which strongly suggests these are effective exponents over a finite numerical window rather than asymptotic critical exponents. Without error bars or a stated fitting range, and with BdG and GL differing by ~20% in β and δ, it is hard to tell whether there is one universal set at all.

The BdG-GL agreement is useful but not independent confirmation, because both are mean-field descriptions of the same physics. The self-citations are legitimate: the CEP position and the 8th-order Landau coefficients come from their earlier papers. I do not see a citation problem.

Who is this for? People working on neutron-star superfluidity, multicomponent Ginzburg-Landau theory, and possibly magnetar cooling. The paper is a concrete, reproducible contribution to a niche but real topic. The headline claim, however, should be downgraded to 'effective critical exponents consistent with a nontrivial critical endpoint' unless a fluctuation analysis or at least a proper error analysis is added. I would send it to a serious referee, expecting revision rather than acceptance as is.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the thermodynamics and critical behavior of neutron 3P2 superfluids in neutron stars, focusing on the critical endpoint (CEP) where the first-order and second-order transition lines between the D2-biaxial nematic and D4-biaxial nematic phases meet in the temperature–magnetic-field plane. Using the quasiclassical BdG (superfluid Fermi liquid) theory with spin-polarization feedback, the authors compute the specific heat, magnetization, and spin susceptibility near the CEP and extract critical exponents (α, β, γ, δ) ≈ (0.68, 0.41, 0.57, 2.3) for G0 = -0.7, with similar values for other Landau parameters. They also construct a Ginzburg-Landau free energy up to eighth order in the order parameter and obtain exponents (0.60, 0.49, 0.52, 1.95) at the GL CEP. The reported exponents approximately satisfy the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities, and the authors interpret this as evidence for a new universality class with large α and small γ.

Significance. If established, the claim of a new universality class at the CEP of neutron 3P2 superfluids would be significant not only for condensed-matter-like critical phenomena in neutron-star matter but also for astrophysical cooling models, since a strongly divergent specific heat could alter neutron-star thermal evolution. The paper provides a detailed derivation of the quasiclassical formalism and the eighth-order GL expansion, and the fact that two independent approximations yield non-classical exponents in rough mutual agreement is a nontrivial internal consistency check. The approximate satisfaction of the three scaling equalities is also a useful check of the numerical analysis. However, the calculation is mean-field in character—order-parameter fluctuations are not included—so the claimed universality class is not actually demonstrated; the significance of the paper therefore depends on a careful reframing of the claim and a quantitative assessment of the extracted exponents.

major comments (4)

[Section II E and Section IV] The central claim that the CEP belongs to a new universality class is not established by this calculation. Both the BdG/quasiclassical theory and the GL free energy are mean-field treatments: the order parameter is determined by self-consistent stationary-point equations, and order-parameter fluctuations are not included. Universality classes are defined by the long-wavelength fluctuation fixed points of the renormalization group, not by the saddle-point equations. The paper itself states in Section IV that the impact of order-parameter fluctuations on the critical exponents 'remains as a future issue.' The exponents reported here are effective exponents of a mean-field-like approximation; calling them a new universality class is an overreach. I recommend reframing the conclusion as effective exponents within the quasiclassical/GL approximation and discussing how fluctuations could alter them, or adding an RG/epsilon-expansion analysis to substantiate a true universality class.
[Section II E and Table I] The numerical extraction of the critical exponents lacks the detail needed to support the claimed 10% accuracy. The text says the exponents are 'read' from the log-log plots in Figs. 4 and 5 without specifying the fitting ranges, the fitted functional form (pure power law with or without corrections), or any statistical or systematic uncertainties. The spread between the BdG result for G0 = -0.7 and the GL result is sizable: β = 0.41 vs 0.49 (about 20% difference) and δ = 2.3 vs 1.95 (about 18% difference). With no quoted errors, the statement that the BdG and GL exponents are 'properly regarded to be the same' is not quantified, and the apparent non-universality of the extracted set is a concern for the claim that a single universal set has been found. Please provide the full fitting details and error estimates, and assess whether the two formalisms are actually consistent within uncertainties.
[Section III A and III B] The GL expansion is derived under the assumption |1 - T/Tc| ≪ 1, but the GL CEP is located at T/Tc = 0.7746, i.e., |1 - T/Tc| = 0.225, which is not small. The paper explicitly states the GL equation's applicable region is limited to |1 - T/Tc| ≪ 1 and then uses it to extract critical exponents at this CEP. The convergence of the eighth-order GL series at this temperature is not demonstrated, and the fact that the BdG CEP occurs at a much lower temperature (T/Tc ≈ 0.49 for G0 = -0.7) means the two calculations probe very different regimes. The claimed agreement between the BdG and GL exponents could therefore be coincidental. Please justify the use of the GL functional at this temperature (e.g., by examining the convergence of the series in the order-parameter expansion) or qualify the claim that the GL theory 'properly captures' the CEP physics.
[Abstract and Section II E] The Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities in Eqs. (1)–(3) are consistency conditions that hold for any scaling form, including analytic mean-field free energies; their approximate satisfaction is a necessary but not sufficient test for a new universality class. The abstract's phrase 'indicating a new universality class' is therefore not a direct consequence of the equalities. The inference rests entirely on the numerical values of the exponents, which are subject to the limitations in the two preceding comments. The abstract and conclusion should be revised to separate the internal-consistency check from the much stronger claim of a new universality class.

minor comments (6)

[Introduction] There is a typo: 'cerntainly' should be 'certainly' in the sentence 'The existence of the CEP is cerntainly important...'.
[Table I] The table lists critical exponents but gives no error bars, although the text states the exponents are determined 'within 10% numerical errors'. Please add error estimates to the table or specify the source and meaning of the 10% figure.
[Eqs. (57)–(60)] The definitions of the critical exponents assume extraction on the low-temperature/low-field side (T < Tcep, B < Bcep). Please state explicitly whether the exponents were also checked on the other side of the transition, and whether they are symmetric.
[Fig. 1 caption] The caption says the CEP is marked in (a, b) but the text discusses the CEP position in the GL theory for (c, d); the GL panels do not appear to show a CEP marker. Please indicate the CEP in the GL panels or adjust the caption for clarity.
[Section III B] The phrase 'as shown in Fig. 1(d)' referring to the different positions of the BdG and GL CEPs is confusing, because Fig. 1(d) appears to show only the GL phase diagram. Please clarify the comparison, e.g., by referring to both (a,b) and (c,d).
[Eq. (65)] The notation O(B^m A^n) with m+n ≥ 7 is unusual; please specify the ranges of m and n (e.g., m, n ≥ 0) and clarify which terms are omitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the critical exponents are computed from self-consistent BdG and GL free energies and checked against external scaling relations, not fitted or assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the CEP of neutron 3P2 superfluids has critical exponents satisfying the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities and belonging to a new universality class. The exponents are read from numerical scaling behavior of CV, M, and chi computed from self-consistent BdG/quasiclassical solutions (Eqs. (57)-(60) and Fig. 4) and from the GL free energy with coefficients written out in Eqs. (65)-(69). No exponent is used as an input or fitted to a target; the scaling equalities are external independent consistency conditions. The self-citations [62, 90, 92] provide the quasiclassical phase diagram and the GL expansion coefficients, but the current paper displays the equations and performs the CEP and exponent computation itself; these citations are inputs, not conclusions that are assumed to justify the universality-class claim. The BdG and GL calculations being both mean-field and sharing the quasiclassical approximation means their agreement is not fully independent confirmation, and the absence of order-parameter fluctuations is a validity limitation explicitly acknowledged in Section IV. These are correctness concerns, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new physical entities or fitted parameters beyond the critical exponents themselves. The main assumptions are the quasiclassical and mean-field approximations, the separable 3P2 interaction, the use of GL theory outside its nominal validity range, and the scaling hypothesis.

free parameters (1)

Critical exponents α, β, γ, δ = α=0.68, β=0.41, γ=0.57, δ=2.3 (BdG, G0=-0.7); α=0.60, β=0.45, γ=0.59, δ=2.3 (BdG, G0=-0.4); α=0.60, β=0.49, γ=0.52…
These values are read as slopes of log-log plots of numerical data near the CEP. The central claim of a new universality class rests directly on these numbers, yet no error bars or fitting procedure are provided.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The quasiclassical approximation is valid for neutron 3P2 superfluids in neutron star cores (T/TF and B/εF small).
Invoked in Section II B to derive the quasiclassical transport equation and the self-consistent gap equations.
domain assumption Mean-field (BdG and GL) theory captures the thermodynamics of the CEP, i.e., order-parameter fluctuations do not alter the critical exponents.
This underpins the entire analysis. The authors explicitly defer the treatment of fluctuations to future work in Section IV, yet the claim of a new universality class presumes fluctuations are irrelevant or at least do not change the exponents.
domain assumption The interaction in the 3P2 channel can be represented by the separable zero-range potential of Eq. (38), and J=0 and J=1 components are negligible.
Used to derive the gap equation and the GL free energy. This is a standard simplification but is not derived from microscopic nuclear forces.
ad hoc to paper The GL expansion up to 8th order in the order parameter is sufficient to describe the CEP even at T/Tc = 0.775, outside the stated validity |1-T/Tc|<<1.
In Section III A the authors state the GL theory is limited to temperatures near Tc, yet the GL CEP is computed at T/Tc=0.775. No justification is given for applying the truncated expansion in this regime.
standard math The scaling hypothesis holds, so the system near the CEP is characterized by critical exponents satisfying the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities.
This is a standard assumption in critical phenomena, used to interpret the numerical exponents in Section II E.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical endpoint and universality class of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids in neutron stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4P5FEF5J

@misc{pith2026190807944,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical endpoint and universality class of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids in neutron stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4P5FEF5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07944}
}

abstract

We study the thermodynamics and critical behavior of neutron $^3P_2$ superfluids in the inner cores of neutron stars. $^3P_2$ superfluids offer a rich phase diagram including uniaxial/biaxial nematic phases, the ferromagnetic phase, and the cyclic phase. Using the Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) equation as superfluid Fermi liquid theory, we show that a strong (weak) magnetic field drives the first (second) order transition from the dihedral-two biaxial nematic phase to dihedral-four biaxial nematic phase in low (high) temperatures, and their phase boundaries are divided by the critical endpoint (CEP). We demonstrate that the set of critical exponents at the CEP satisfies the Rushbrooke, Griffiths, and Widom equalities, indicating a new universality class. At the CEP, the $^3P_2$ superfluid exhibits critical behavior with nontrivial critical exponents, indicating a new universality class. Furthermore, we find that the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) equation up to the 8th-order expansion satisfies three equalities and properly captures the physics of the CEP. This implies that the GL theory can provide a tractable way for understanding critical phenomena which may be realized in the dense core of realistic magnetars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07944 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Leading order contributions to quasiclassical self- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a) Temperature dependence of the order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The scaling behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The scaling behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Microscopic description of axisymmetric vortices in $^{3}P_{2}$ superfluids
cond-mat.supr-con 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

Microscopic calculations show the o vortex is the most stable axisymmetric vortex in 3P2 superfluids under strong magnetic fields and hosts two zero-energy Majorana fermions in its core.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Graber, N

V . Graber, N. Andersson, and M. Hogg, Neutron Stars in the Laboratory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730015 (2017) , arXiv:1610.06882 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2017
[2]

( 47) we set Sp′{· · · } ≡ NFT ∑ n ⟨· · · ⟩

In Eq. ( 47) we set Sp′{· · · } ≡ NFT ∑ n ⟨· · · ⟩. (48) The quasiclassical auxiliary function gλ is given by replacing σMF →λσMF in Eq. ( 18). Here we determine the quasiclassi- cal Φ-functional so as to consistently generate the self-energy through the functional derivative, σMF = 2δ∆Φ[g]/δgT. It is found that the Φ-functional is constructed as ∆Φ[g] = ...
[3]

Demorest, T

P . Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts, and J. Hessels, Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star, Nature 467, 1081 (2010) , arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2010
[4]

Antoniadis, P

J. Antoniadis, P . C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tau- ris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V . S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J. W. T. Hessels, V . M. Kaspi, V . I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T. R. Marsh, M. A. McLaughlin, T. T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J. P . W. V erbiest, and D. G. Whe- lan, A Massive Pulsar in a Com...

doi:10.1126/science.1233232 2013
[5]

Abbott et al

B. Abbott et al. (Virgo, LIGO Scientiﬁc), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational W aves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017) , arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2017
[6]

Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017)

N. Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017)

2017
[7]

Haskell and A

B. Haskell and A. Sedrakian, Superﬂuid- ity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 457, 401 (2018) , arXiv:1709.10340 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2018
[8]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P . D. Powell, Y . Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neu- tron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902 (2018) , arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2018

Show all 117 references

[9]

G. Baym, C. Pethick, D. Pines, and M. Ruderman, Spin Up in Neutron Stars : The Future of the V ela Pulsar , Nature 224, 872 (1969)

1969
[10]

Pines, J

D. Pines, J. Shaham, and M. Ruderman, Corequakes and the V ela Pulsar,Nature Phys. Sci. 237, 83 (1972)

1972
[11]

Takatsuka and R

T. Takatsuka and R. Tamagaki, Corequake Model of Pul- sar Glitches for Neutron Stars With Pion Condensed Core, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79, 274 (1988)

1988
[12]

D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, O. Y . Gnedin, and P . Haensel, Neutrino emission from neutron stars, Phys. Rept. 354, 1 (2001) , arXiv:astro-ph/0012122 [astro-ph]

2001 arXiv
[13]

A. Y . Potekhin, J. A. Pons, and D. Page, Neutron stars - cooling and transport, Space Sci. Rev. 191, 239 (2015) , arXiv:1507.06186 [astro-ph.HE]

2015 arXiv
[14]

Sedrakian and J

A. Sedrakian and J. W. Clark, Superﬂuidity in nuclear systems and neutron stars, (2018), arXiv:1802.00017 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[15]

C. O. Heinke and W. C. G. Ho, Direct Ob- servation of the Cooling of the Cassiopeia A Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. 719, L167 (2010) , arXiv:1007.4719 [astro-ph.HE]

2010 arXiv
[16]

P . S. Shternin, D. G. Yakovlev, C. O. Heinke, W. C. G. Ho, and D. J. Patnaude, Cooling neutron star in the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant: evidence for superﬂuidity in the core, Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 412, L108 (2011)

2011
[17]

D. Page, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, and A. W. Steiner, Rapid Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cas- siopeia A Triggered by Neutron Superﬂuidity in Dense Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 081101 (2011) , arXiv:1011.6142 [astro-ph.HE]

2011 arXiv
[18]

P . E. Reichley and G. S. Downs, Second Decrease in the Pe- riod of the V ela Pulsar ,Nature Phys. Sci. 234, 48 (1971)

1971
[19]

P . W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restlessness as a hard superﬂuidity phenomenon, Nature 256, 25 (1975)

1975
[20]

D. G. Yakovlev, K. P . Levenﬁsh, and Y u. A. Shibanov, Cooling neutron stars and superﬂuid- ity in their interiors, Phys. Usp. 42, 737 (1999) , arXiv:astro-ph/9906456 [astro-ph]

1999 arXiv
[21]

R. A. Wolf, Some E ﬀects of the Strong Interac- tions on the Properties of Neutron-Star Matter , Astrophys. J. 145, 834 (1966)

1966
[22]

Tabakin,Single Separable Potential with Attraction and Re- pulsion, Phys

F. Tabakin,Single Separable Potential with Attraction and Re- pulsion, Phys. Rev. 174, 1208 (1968)

1968
[23]

Hoﬀberg, A

M. Hoﬀberg, A. E. Glassgold, R. W. Richardson, and M. Ru- derman, Anisotropic Superﬂuidity in Neutron Star Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 775 (1970)

1970
[24]

Tamagaki, Superﬂuid State in Neutron Star Matter

R. Tamagaki, Superﬂuid State in Neutron Star Matter . I: Generalized Bogoliubov Transforma- tion and Existence of 3P2 Gap at High Density*), Progress of Theoretical Physics 44, 905 (1970)

1970
[25]

Takatsuka and R

T. Takatsuka and R. Tamagaki, Superﬂuid State in Neutron 13 Star Matter . IIProperties of Anisotropic Energy Gap of 3P2 Pairing, Progress of Theoretical Physics 46, 114 (1971)

1971
[26]

A. B. Migdal, Superﬂuidity and the Moments of Inertia of Nuclei, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 37, 249 (1960), [Sov. Phys. JETP10,no.1,176(1960)]

1960
[27]

Fujita and T

T. Fujita and T. Tsuneto, The Ginzburg-Landau Equa- tion for 3P2 PairingSuperﬂuidity in Neutron Stars, Progress of Theoretical Physics 48, 766 (1972)

1972
[28]

R. W. Richardson, Ginzburg-landau theory of anisotropic su- perﬂuid neutron-star matter , Phys. Rev. D5, 1883 (1972)

1972
[29]

Topological Materials Science

may be negligible. This result stems from the short-range prope rty of the ρ-meson exchange interaction. It will be important to more carefully study the short-range behavior of the nucleo n- nucleon interaction, which will be attributed by the quark- exchange contributions at...
[30]

Takatsuka and R

T. Takatsuka and R. Tamagaki, Superﬂuidity in neu- tron star matter and symmetric nuclear matter , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 112, 27 (1993)

1993
[31]

J. A. Sauls, Superﬂuidity in the Interiors of Neutron Stars, in Timing Neutron Stars, edited by H. ¨Ogelman and E. P . J. van den Heuvel (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1989) pp. 457–490

1989
[32]

Takatsuka, Superﬂuid State in Neutron Star Mat- ter

T. Takatsuka, Superﬂuid State in Neutron Star Mat- ter . III: Tensor Coupling E ﬀect in 3P2 Energy Gap, Progress of Theoretical Physics 47, 1062 (1972)

1972
[33]

Elgaroy, L

O. Elgaroy, L. Engvik, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and E. Osnes, Triplet pairing of neutrons in beta sta- ble neutron star matter , Nucl. Phys. A607, 425 (1996) , arXiv:nucl-th/9604032 [nucl-th]

1996 arXiv
[34]

V . A. Khodel, V . V . Khodel, and J. W. Clark, Universalities of triplet pairing in neu- tron matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3828 (1998) , arXiv:nucl-th/9807034 [nucl-th]

1998 arXiv
[35]

Amundsen and E

L. Amundsen and E. Ostgaard, Superﬂuidity of neutron matter (II). triplet pairing, Nucl. Phys. A442, 163 (1985)

1985
[36]

V . V . Khodel, V . A. Khodel, and J. W. Clark, Triplet pairing in neutron matter , Nucl. Phys. A679, 827 (2001) , arXiv:nucl-th/0001006 [nucl-th]

2001 arXiv
[37]

M. V . Zverev, J. W. Clark, and V . A. Khodel, (3)p(2) - (3)F(2) pairing in dense neutron matter: The Spectrum of solutions, Nucl. Phys. A720, 20 (2003) , arXiv:nucl-th/0301028 [nucl-th]

2003 arXiv
[38]

is recast into V (o) ab;cd( pF, p′ F) = −v 3∑ µ,ν=1 Tµν,ab( pF)T ∗ µν,dc( p′ F), (39) with the traceless and symmetric tensor Tµν,ab( pF) = ( i ( 1 2 √ 2 ( σµ pF,ν +σν pF,µ ) − 1 3 √ 2 δµνσ· pF ) σy ) ab , (40) which obeys Tµν( pF) = Tνµ( pF) and tr( T ( pF)) ≡ ∑ µ Tµµ( pF) = ...
[39]

Baldo, J

M. Baldo, J. Cugnon, A. Lejeune, and U. Lombardo, Proton and neutron superﬂuidity in neutron star matter , Nucl. Phys. A536, 349 (1992)

1992
[40]

Srinivas and S

S. Srinivas and S. Ramanan, Triplet Pairing in pure neutron matter , Phys. Rev. C94, 064303 (2016) , arXiv:1606.09053 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[41]

Baldo, O

M. Baldo, O. Elgaroey, L. Engvik, M. Hjorth- Jensen, and H. J. Schulze, Triplet P-3(2) to F-3(2) pairing in neutron matter with modern nucleon- nucleon potentials, Phys. Rev. C58, 1921 (1998) , arXiv:nucl-th/9806097 [nucl-th]

1998 arXiv
[42]

D. H. Brownell and J. Callaway, Ferromagnetic transition in superdense matter and neutron stars, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1965-1970) 60, 169 (1969)

1969
[43]

Rice, The hard-sphere Fermi gas and ferromagnetism in neutron stars, Physics Letters A 29, 637 (1969)

M. Rice, The hard-sphere Fermi gas and ferromagnetism in neutron stars, Physics Letters A 29, 637 (1969)

1969
[44]

Maurizio, J

S. Maurizio, J. W. Holt, and P . Finelli, Nuclear pair- ing from microscopic forces: singlet channels and higher-partial waves, Phys. Rev. C90, 044003 (2014) , arXiv:1408.6281 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[45]

S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl, and A. Schwenk, From low-momentum interactions to nuclear structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 65, 94 (2010) , arXiv:0912.3688 [nucl-th]

2010 arXiv
[46]

M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, and T. Hatsuda, Ferromag- netic neutron stars: axial anomaly, dense neutron matter , and pionic wall, Phys. Rev. D88, 081701 (2013) , arXiv:1209.4814 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[47]

D. J. Dean and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Pairing in nuclear systems: From neutron stars to ﬁ- nite nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 607 (2003) , arXiv:nucl-th/0210033 [nucl-th]

2003 arXiv
[48]

Tatsumi, Ferromagnetism of quark liquid, Phys

T. Tatsumi, Ferromagnetism of quark liquid, Phys. Lett. B489, 280 (2000) , arXiv:hep-ph/9910470 [hep-ph]

2000 arXiv
[49]

Nakano, T

E. Nakano, T. Maruyama, and T. Tatsumi, Spin polarization and color superconductivity in quark matter , Phys. Rev. D68, 105001 (2003) , arXiv:hep-ph/0304223 [hep-ph]

2003 arXiv
[50]

S. D. Silverstein, Criteria for Ferromagnetism in Dense Neutron Fermi Liquids-Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 139 (1969)

1969
[51]

and ( 52), CN(T ) and MN(B), are negligible in the vicinity of the CEP , and the critical behaviors of the hea t capacity CV , the magnetization M, and the spin susceptibility (b) (d) 1 0 -1 -2 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -3 -5 -4 -3 -2 -2 -4 -1 -3 -2 -4 (a) 1 2 3 4 -5 -4 -3 -2 (c) -5 -4 -...
[52]

Haensel and S

P . Haensel and S. Bonazzola,Ferromagnetism of dense matter and magnetic properties of neutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 314, 1017 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9605149 [astro-ph]

1996 arXiv
[53]

Hashimoto, Possibility of ferromagnetic neutron matter , Phys

K. Hashimoto, Possibility of ferromagnetic neutron matter , Phys. Rev. D91, 085013 (2015) , arXiv:1412.6960 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[54]

Blaschke, H

D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, and D. N. V oskresensky, Nu- clear medium cooling scenario in the light of new Cas A cooling data and the 2M ⊙ pulsar mass measurements, Phys. Rev. C88, 065805 (2013) , arXiv:1308.4093 [nucl-th]

2013 arXiv
[55]

Grigorian, D

H. Grigorian, D. N. V oskresensky, and D. Blaschke, Inﬂuence of the sti ﬀness of the equation of state and in-medium e ﬀects on the cooling of compact stars, Pro- ceedings, Compact Stars in the QCD Phase Diagram IV (CSQCD IV): Prerow, Germany, September 26-30, 2014, (2016), 10...

2016 arXiv
[56]

Ohnishi, M

K. Ohnishi, M. Oka, and S. Yasui, Possible fer- romagnetism in the large N(c) and N(f) limit of quark matter , Phys. Rev. D76, 097501 (2007) , arXiv:hep-ph/0609060 [hep-ph]

2007 arXiv
[57]

G. H. Bordbar and M. Bigdeli, Spin polarized asym- metric nuclear matter and neutron star matter within the lowest order constrained variational method, Phys. Rev. C77, 015805 (2008) , arXiv:0809.3498 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[58]

C. O. Heinke and W. C. G. Ho, Direct Observa- tion of the Cooling of the Cassiopeia A Neutron Star , The Astrophysical Journal Letters 719, L167 (2010)

2010
[59]

Blaschke, H

D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, D. N. V oskresensky, and F. We- ber, On the Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A, Phys. Rev. C85, 022802 (2012) , arXiv:1108.4125 [nucl-th]

2012 arXiv
[60]

Masuda and M

K. Masuda and M. Nitta, Magnetic Properties of Quan- tized V ortices in Neutron 3P2 Superﬂuids in Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. C93, 035804 (2016) , arXiv:1512.01946 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[61]

First of all, one may notice the large value of α (α ∼ 0.6)

belongs to a new type of university class. First of all, one may notice the large value of α (α ∼ 0.6). It is known that the value of α is usually much smaller than one in the phase transitions accompanied with a continuous symme- try breaking at least in known models thus far...
[62]

J. A. Sauls and J. Serene, 3P2 pairing near the transition tem- perature in neutron-star matter ,Phys. Rev. D17, 1524 (1978)

1978
[63]

Muzikar, J

P . Muzikar, J. A. Sauls, and J. W. Serene, 3P2 pairing in neutron star matter: magnetic ﬁeld e ﬀects and vortices, Phys. Rev. D21, 1494 (1980)

1980
[64]

J. A. Sauls, D. L. Stein, and J. W. Serene, magnetic vortices in a rotating 3P2 neutron superﬂuid, Phys. Rev. D25, 967 (1982)

1982
[65]

is explained as follows. Ω(0) 8 [A] includes Aµi up to the 8th order with no mag- netic ﬁeld, Ω(≤4) 2 [A] includes Aµi up to the 2nd order with the magnetic ﬁeld up to |B|4, and Ω(≤2) 4 [A] includes Aµi up to the 4th order with the magnetic ﬁeld up to |B|2. Their explicit form...
[66]

V . Z. Vulovic and J. A. Sauls,inﬂuence of strong-coupling cor- rections on the equilibrium phase for 3P2 superﬂuid neutron star matter ,Phys. Rev. D29, 2705 (1984)

1984
[67]

Masuda and M

K. Masuda and M. Nitta, Half-quantized Non-Abelian V ortices in Neutron 3P2 Superﬂuids inside Magnetars, arXiv:1602.07050 [nucl-th]

arXiv
[68]

Mizushima, K

T. Mizushima, K. Masuda, and M. Nitta, 3P2 su- perﬂuids are topological, Phys. Rev. B95, 140503 (2017) , arXiv:1607.07266 [cond-mat.supr-con]

2017 arXiv
[69]

Mizushima and M

T. Mizushima and M. Nitta, Topology and sym- metry of surface Majorana arcs in cyclic su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B97, 024506 (2018) , 14 arXiv:1710.07403 [cond-mat.supr-con]

2018 arXiv
[70]

P . F. Bedaque, G. Rupak, and M. J. Savage, Gold- stone bosons in the 3P(Z) superﬂuid phase of neutron mat- ter and neutrino emission, Phys. Rev. C68, 065802 (2003) , arXiv:nucl-th/0305032 [nucl-th]

2003 arXiv
[71]

L. B. Leinson, New eigen-mode of spin oscillations in the triplet superﬂuid condensate in neutron stars, Phys. Lett. B702, 422 (2011) , arXiv:1107.4025 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[72]

L. B. Leinson, Collective modes of the order pa- rameter in a triplet superﬂuid neutron liquid, Phys. Rev. C85, 065502 (2012) , arXiv:1206.3648 [nucl-th]

2012 arXiv
[73]

L. B. Leinson, Neutrino emissivity of anisotropic neutron superﬂuids, Phys. Rev. C87, 025501 (2013) , arXiv:1301.5439 [nucl-th]

2013 arXiv
[74]

P . F. Bedaque and A. N. Nicholson, Low lying modes of triplet-condensed neutron matter and their e ﬀective theory, Phys. Rev. C87, 055807 (2013) , [Erratum: Phys. Rev.C89,no.2,029902(2014)], arXiv:1212.1122 [nucl-th]

2013 arXiv
[75]

Bedaque and S

P . Bedaque and S. Sen, Neutrino emissivity from Goldstone boson decay in magnetized neutron matter , Phys. Rev. C89, 035808 (2014) , arXiv:1312.6632 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[76]

P . F. Bedaque and S. Reddy, Goldstone modes in the neutron star core, Phys. Lett. B735, 340 (2014) , arXiv:1307.8183 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[77]

P . F. Bedaque, A. N. Nicholson, and S. Sen, Massive and massless modes of the triplet phase of neutron matter , Phys. Rev. C92, 035809 (2015) , arXiv:1408.5145 [nucl-th]

2015 arXiv
[78]

L. B. Leinson, Neutrino emission from triplet pairing of neutrons in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C81, 025501 (2010) , arXiv:0912.2164 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[79]

L. B. Leinson, Neutrino emission from spin waves in neutron spin-triplet superﬂuid, Phys. Lett. B689, 60 (2010) , arXiv:1001.2617 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[80]

L. B. Leinson, Superﬂuid phases of triplet pair- ing and neutrino emission from neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C82, 065503 (2010) , [Erratum: Phys. Rev.C84,049901(2011)], arXiv:1012.5387 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[81]

L. B. Leinson, Zero sound in triplet-correlated super- ﬂuid neutron matter , Phys. Rev. C83, 055803 (2011) , arXiv:1007.2803 [hep-ph]

2011 arXiv
[82]

L. B. Leinson, Neutrino emissivity of 3P2-3F2 super- ﬂuid cores in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C84, 045501 (2011) , arXiv:1110.2145 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[83]

K. M. Shahabasyan and M. K. Shahabasyan, V ortex struc- ture of neutron stars with triplet neutron superﬂuidity, Astrophysics 54, 429 (2011) , [Astroﬁz.54,483(2011)]

2011
[84]

Masaki, T

Y . Masaki, T. Mizushima, and M. Nitta, Microscopic description of axisymmetric vortices in 3P2 superﬂuids, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013193 (2020) , 1908.06215

2020 arXiv
[85]

Chatterjee, M

C. Chatterjee, M. Haberichter, and M. Nitta, Collective excita- tions of a quantized vortex in 3P2 superﬂuids in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C96, 055807 (2017) , arXiv:1612.05588 [nucl-th]

2017 arXiv
[86]

Yasui and M

S. Yasui and M. Nitta, Domain walls in neutron 3P2 superﬂu- ids in neutron stars, (2019), arXiv:1907.12843 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[87]

Yasui, C

S. Yasui, C. Chatterjee, and M. Nitta, Symmetry and topology of the boundary of neutron 3P2 superﬂuids in neutron stars: boojums as surface topological defects, (2019), phys. Rev. C (to be published), arXiv:1905.13666 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[88]

N. D. Mermin, d-wave pairing near the transition tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. A9, 868 (1974)

1974
[89]

V ollhardt and P

D. V ollhardt and P . W¨ olﬂe, The Superﬂuid Phases of Helium 3 , Dover Books on Physics Series (Dover Publications, New Y ork, 2013)

2013
[90]

G. E. V olovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Clarendon, Oxford, 2003)

2003
[91]

Mizushima, Y

T. Mizushima, Y . Tsutsumi, T. Kawakami, M. Sato, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida, Symmetry-Protected Topo- logical Superﬂuids and Superconductors —From the Basics to 3He—, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 85, 022001 (2016) , arXiv:1508.00787 [cond-mat.supr-con]

2016 arXiv
[92]

A. P . Mackenzie and Y . Maeno, The superconductiv- ity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657 (2003)

2003
[93]

Maeno, S

Y . Maeno, S. Kittaka, T. Nomura, S. Y onezawa, and K. Ishida, Evaluation of Spin-Triplet Superconductivity in Sr 2RuO4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 011009 (2012)

2012
[94]

D. Aoki, K. Ishida, and J. Flouquet, Review of U-based Ferromagnetic Superconductors: Comparison between UGe2, URhGe, and UCoGe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 022001 (2019)

2019
[95]

Kawaguchi and M

Y . Kawaguchi and M. Ueda, Spinor Bose- Einstein condensates, Phys. Rep. 520, 253 (2012) , arXiv:1001.2072 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

2012 arXiv
[96]

Yasui, C

S. Yasui, C. Chatterjee, and M. Nitta, Phase structure of neu- tron 3P2 superﬂuids in strong magnetic ﬁelds in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C99, 035213 (2019) , arXiv:1810.04901 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[97]

Yasui, C

S. Yasui, C. Chatterjee, and M. Nitta, Eﬀects of strong mag- netic ﬁelds on neutron 3P2 superﬂuidity in spin-orbit interac- tions, in 8th International Conference on Quarks and Nuclear Physics (QNP2018) Tsukuba, Japan, November 13-17, 2018 (2019) arXiv:1902.00674 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[98]

Yasui, C

S. Yasui, C. Chatterjee, M. Kobayashi, and M. Nitta, Revis- iting Ginzburg-Landau theory for neutron 3P2 superﬂuidity in neutron stars, (2019), arXiv:1904.11399 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[99]

Uchino, M

S. Uchino, M. Kobayashi, M. Nitta, and M. Ueda, Quasi-Nambu-Goldstone Modes in Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230406 (2010) , arXiv:1010.2864 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

2010 arXiv
[100]

Principles of Condensed Matter Physics

P . M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, “Principles of Condensed Matter Physics” (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995)

1995
[101]

Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, 2002)

J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , International series of monographs on physics (Clarendon Press, 2002)

2002
[102]

Guida and J

R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, 3D Ising model: the scaling equa- tion of state, Nuclear Physics B 489, 626 (1997)

1997
[103]

Yin, S.-K

S. Yin, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Chiral Tricritical Point: A New Universality Class in Dirac Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 215702 (2018)

2018
[104]

Serene and D

J. Serene and D. Rainer, The quasiclassical approach to su- perﬂuid 3He, Phys. Rep. 101, 221 (1983)

1983
[105]

J. A. Sauls, Fermi-Liquid Theory for Unconventional Super- conductors, in Strongly Correlated Electronic Materials - The Los Alamos Symposium 1993 , edited by K. Bedell, Z. Wang, D. Meltzer, A. Balatsky, and E. Abrahams (Addison-Wesley, New Y ork, 1994)

1993
[106]

R. W. Richardson, Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Anisotropic Superﬂuid Neutron-Star Matter , Phys. Rev. D 5, 1883 (1972)

1972
[107]

A. B. V orontsov and J. A. Sauls, Thermodynamic properties of thin ﬁlms of superﬂuid 3He − A, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064508 (2003)

2003
[108]

Mizushima, Superﬂuid 3He in a restricted geometry with a perpendicular magnetic ﬁeld, Phys

T. Mizushima, Superﬂuid 3He in a restricted geometry with a perpendicular magnetic ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. B 86, 094518 (2012)

2012
[109]

N. D. Mermin, d-wave pairing near the transition tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. A 9, 868 (1974)

1974
[110]

J. A. Sauls and J. W. Serene, 3P2 pairing near the transition temperature in neutron-star matter , Phys. Rev. D 17, 1524 (1978)

1978
[111]

D. G. Yakovlev, A. D. Kaminker, O. Y . Gnedin, and 15 P . Haensel, Neutrino emission from neutron stars, Phys. Rep. 354, 1 (2001)

2001
[112]

B¨ ackman, G

S.-O. B¨ ackman, G. E. Brown, and J. A. Niskanen, The nucleon-nucleon interaction and the nuclear many-body prob- lem, Phys. Rep. 124, 1 (1985)

1985
[113]

Ashida and K

M. Ashida and K. Nagai, A-B Transition of Super- ﬂuid 3He under Magnetic Field at Low Pressures, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 949 (1985)

1985
[114]

Machida, T

K. Machida, T. Mizushima, and M. Ichioka, Generic Phase Diagram of Fermion Superﬂuids with Population Imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120407 (2006)

2006
[115]

Mizushima, M

T. Mizushima, M. Takahashi, and K. Machida, Fulde- Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov States in Two-Band Superconduc- tors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 023703 (2014)

2014
[116]

Radzihovsky and D

L. Radzihovsky and D. E. Sheehy, Imbalanced Feshbach- resonant Fermi gases, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 076501 (2010)

2010
[117]

J. J. Kinnunen, J. E. Baarsma, J.-P . Martikainen, and P . T¨ orm¨ a,The Fulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov state for ul- tracold fermions in lattice and harmonic potentials: a revi ew, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 046401 (2018)

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Graber, N

V . Graber, N. Andersson, and M. Hogg, Neutron Stars in the Laboratory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730015 (2017) , arXiv:1610.06882 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2017

[2] [2]

( 47) we set Sp′{· · · } ≡ NFT ∑ n ⟨· · · ⟩

In Eq. ( 47) we set Sp′{· · · } ≡ NFT ∑ n ⟨· · · ⟩. (48) The quasiclassical auxiliary function gλ is given by replacing σMF →λσMF in Eq. ( 18). Here we determine the quasiclassi- cal Φ-functional so as to consistently generate the self-energy through the functional derivative, σMF = 2δ∆Φ[g]/δgT. It is found that the Φ-functional is constructed as ∆Φ[g] = ...

[3] [3]

Demorest, T

P . Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts, and J. Hessels, Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star, Nature 467, 1081 (2010) , arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2010

[4] [4]

Antoniadis, P

J. Antoniadis, P . C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tau- ris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V . S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J. W. T. Hessels, V . M. Kaspi, V . I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T. R. Marsh, M. A. McLaughlin, T. T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J. P . W. V erbiest, and D. G. Whe- lan, A Massive Pulsar in a Com...

doi:10.1126/science.1233232 2013

[5] [5]

Abbott et al

B. Abbott et al. (Virgo, LIGO Scientiﬁc), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational W aves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017) , arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2017

[6] [6]

Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017)

N. Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017)

2017

[7] [7]

Haskell and A

B. Haskell and A. Sedrakian, Superﬂuid- ity and Superconductivity in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. Space Sci. Libr. 457, 401 (2018) , arXiv:1709.10340 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2018

[8] [8]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P . D. Powell, Y . Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neu- tron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81, 056902 (2018) , arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2018