REVIEW 2 cited by
secml-malware: Pentesting Windows Malware Classifiers with Adversarial EXEmples in Python
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
secml-malware: Pentesting Windows Malware Classifiers with Adversarial EXEmples in Python
read the original abstract
Machine learning has been increasingly used as a first line of defense for Windows malware detection. Recent work has however shown that learning-based malware detectors can be evaded by carefully-perturbed input malware samples, referred to as adversarial EXEmples, thus demanding for tools that can ease and automate the adversarial robustness evaluation of such detectors. To this end, we present secml-malware, the first Python library for computing adversarial attacks on Windows malware detectors. secml-malware implements state-of-the-art white-box and black-box attacks on Windows malware classifiers, by leveraging a set of feasible manipulations that can be applied to Windows programs while preserving their functionality. The library can be used to perform the penetration testing and assessment of the adversarial robustness of Windows malware detectors, and it can be easily extended to include novel attack strategies. Our library is available at https://github.com/pralab/secml_malware.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Latent Stability Analysis of Malware Representations Under Feature-Space Perturbations
Latent-stability metrics (LED and PINNFlow shifts) diagnose malware representation movement under feature-space probes, without beating full EMBER or PCA-64 on clean classification.
-
Building an Adversarial Malware Dataset by Family and Type: Generation, Evasion, and Poisoning Evaluation
The paper releases two adversarial malware datasets (44k family-labelled, 33k type-labelled) with high evasion rates and demonstrates that 0.5% poisoning injection raises evasion from 26.1% to 92.8%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.