Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Intervening With Confidence: Conformal Prescriptive Monitoring of Business Processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.03710 v1 pith:4PP4WWKB submitted 2022-12-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords monitoringprescriptiveprocessinterventionmethodsconfidenceconformalinterventions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prescriptive process monitoring methods seek to improve the performance of a process by selectively triggering interventions at runtime (e.g., offering a discount to a customer) to increase the probability of a desired case outcome (e.g., a customer making a purchase). The backbone of a prescriptive process monitoring method is an intervention policy, which determines for which cases and when an intervention should be executed. Existing methods in this field rely on predictive models to define intervention policies; specifically, they consider policies that trigger an intervention when the estimated probability of a negative outcome exceeds a threshold. However, the probabilities computed by a predictive model may come with a high level of uncertainty (low confidence), leading to unnecessary interventions and, thus, wasted effort. This waste is particularly problematic when the resources available to execute interventions are limited. To tackle this shortcoming, this paper proposes an approach to extend existing prescriptive process monitoring methods with so-called conformal predictions, i.e., predictions with confidence guarantees. An empirical evaluation using real-life public datasets shows that conformal predictions enhance the net gain of prescriptive process monitoring methods under limited resources.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SCOPE plans sequential intervention decisions in business processes by estimating outcomes with causal models, and generally beats two baselines on two simulated datasets.

Pith tools