Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analyzing transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by concentration of frequency and time

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.07968 v2 pith:4R2UKON6 submitted 2017-12-19 eess.SP physics.data-anstat.AP

Analyzing transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by concentration of frequency and time

classification eess.SP physics.data-anstat.AP
keywords componentsfrequencyemissionslinearreflectionwhencoherentconceft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The linear part of transient evoked (TE) otoacoustic emission (OAE) is thought to be generated via coherent reflection near the characteristic place of constituent wave components. Because of the tonotopic organization of the cochlea, high frequency emissions return earlier than low frequencies; however, due to the random nature of coherent reflection, the instantaneous frequency (IF) and amplitude envelope of TEOAEs both fluctuate. Multiple reflection components and synchronized spontaneous emissions can further make it difficult to extract the IF by linear transforms. In this paper, we propose to model TEOAEs as a sum of {\em intrinsic mode-type functions} and analyze it by a {nonlinear-type time-frequency analysis} technique called concentration of frequency and time (ConceFT). When tested with synthetic OAE signals {with possibly multiple oscillatory components}, the present method is able to produce clearly visualized traces of individual components on the time-frequency plane. Further, when the signal is noisy, the proposed method is compared with existing linear and bilinear methods in its accuracy for estimating the fluctuating IF. Results suggest that ConceFT outperforms the best of these methods in terms of optimal transport distance, reducing the error by 10 to {21\%} when the signal to noise ratio is 10 dB or below.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.