Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.06712 v2 pith:4RJMAJXC submitted 2023-04-13 cs.CV

What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMs

classification cs.CV
keywords clipmodelstasksattentioncircleclassificationengineeringlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large-scale Vision-Language Models, such as CLIP, learn powerful image-text representations that have found numerous applications, from zero-shot classification to text-to-image generation. Despite that, their capabilities for solving novel discriminative tasks via prompting fall behind those of large language models, such as GPT-3. Here we explore the idea of visual prompt engineering for solving computer vision tasks beyond classification by editing in image space instead of text. In particular, we discover an emergent ability of CLIP, where, by simply drawing a red circle around an object, we can direct the model's attention to that region, while also maintaining global information. We show the power of this simple approach by achieving state-of-the-art in zero-shot referring expressions comprehension and strong performance in keypoint localization tasks. Finally, we draw attention to some potential ethical concerns of large language-vision models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive

    cs.CV 2024-04 accept novelty 6.0

    BLINK benchmark shows multimodal LLMs reach only 45-51 percent accuracy on core visual perception tasks where humans achieve 95 percent, indicating these abilities have not emerged.

  2. RAR: Retrieving And Ranking Augmented MLLMs for Visual Recognition

    cs.CV 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RAR combines CLIP retrieval with MLLM ranking to improve few-shot and zero-shot fine-grained visual recognition on 5 benchmarks, 11 few-shot datasets, and 2 detection tasks.

  3. The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)

    cs.CV 2023-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    GPT-4V processes interleaved image-text inputs generically and supports visual referring prompting for new human-AI interaction.