Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Event2Mind: Commonsense Inference on Events, Intents, and Reactions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.06939 v2 pith:4TGGJ4KJ submitted 2018-05-17 cs.CL

Event2Mind: Commonsense Inference on Events, Intents, and Reactions

classification cs.CL
keywords eventintentsreactionscommonsenseeventsinferencelikelyparticipants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate a new commonsense inference task: given an event described in a short free-form text ("X drinks coffee in the morning"), a system reasons about the likely intents ("X wants to stay awake") and reactions ("X feels alert") of the event's participants. To support this study, we construct a new crowdsourced corpus of 25,000 event phrases covering a diverse range of everyday events and situations. We report baseline performance on this task, demonstrating that neural encoder-decoder models can successfully compose embedding representations of previously unseen events and reason about the likely intents and reactions of the event participants. In addition, we demonstrate how commonsense inference on people's intents and reactions can help unveil the implicit gender inequality prevalent in modern movie scripts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured Noise

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NoisyCausal benchmark tests LLMs on causal reasoning with structured noise, and a modular LLM-plus-causal-graph framework outperforms baselines while generalizing to Cladder.