Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Unbalanced minibatch Optimal Transport; applications to Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.03606 v1 pith:4TJQB2AH submitted 2021-03-05 cs.LG math.STstat.MLstat.TH

classification cs.LGmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
keywords optimaltransportunbalancedadaptationapplicationsassociateddistancesdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optimal transport distances have found many applications in machine learning for their capacity to compare non-parametric probability distributions. Yet their algorithmic complexity generally prevents their direct use on large scale datasets. Among the possible strategies to alleviate this issue, practitioners can rely on computing estimates of these distances over subsets of data, {\em i.e.} minibatches. While computationally appealing, we highlight in this paper some limits of this strategy, arguing it can lead to undesirable smoothing effects. As an alternative, we suggest that the same minibatch strategy coupled with unbalanced optimal transport can yield more robust behavior. We discuss the associated theoretical properties, such as unbiased estimators, existence of gradients and concentration bounds. Our experimental study shows that in challenging problems associated to domain adaptation, the use of unbalanced optimal transport leads to significantly better results, competing with or surpassing recent baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optical Physics-Based Generative Models

    physics.optics 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Optical wave equations are claimed to work as generative models with big efficiency gains, but the derivations contain algebraic sign errors and the reported FID scores are mutually inconsistent.

Pith tools