Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Deterministic cascade coarsening in a Bistable Gene Toggle model

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A chain of diffusively coupled bistable gene switches coarsens by discrete cascade collapse, not smooth front motion, with log-periodic oscillations and a slower-than-classical power-law exponent.

desk verdict The qualitative cascade picture is probably right, but the quantitative DSI claim is not yet supported: lambda_t is inferred from an unvalidated collapse law, not measured directly. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18891 v1 pith:4TTHK5C7 submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.PSphysics.bio-ph

Priyanka D. Bhoyar , Prashant M. Gade This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.PSphysics.bio-ph
keywords bistablegenetogglecoarseningdomainwallscascadedynamicslog-periodicoscillationsdiscretescaleinvariancefrontpinningreaction-diffusionlattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a one-dimensional lattice of diffusively coupled bistable gene switches coarsens through deterministic cascade events: domain walls stay pinned for long stretches, then whole domains vanish abruptly. It claims the domain-wall density decays as a power law, but with an exponent below the classical value of 1/2 for curvature-driven coarsening, and with log-periodic oscillations superimposed. The oscillations are controlled by the sizes of disappearing domains, which grow by roughly one lattice site per cascade, making successive cascade times geometrically spaced and pointing to temporal discrete scale invariance. If true, the result means coordinated, intermittent reorganization of gene-expression patterns can arise in a homogeneous system without quenched disorder or hierarchical spatial structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the exponential front-interaction law dL/dt = -v0 exp(-κL), obtained heuristically in the appendix by linearizing the reaction term around the low stable state and estimating the interaction of two fronts whose tails decay as exp(-κ|x|), with κ = sqrt(-f'(A_L)/D). This law converts integer-valued, roughly linearly growing disappearing-domain lengths into geometric cascade time ratios t_{i+1}/t_i ~ e^κ. The companion ingredient is the empirical observation that the average disappearing-domain length grows by about one lattice site per cascade, which together with the exponential law yields the constant spacing λ_t and the log-periodic oscillations.

What would settle it

Simulate isolated domains of fixed length L in the same bistable model and measure collapse time as a function of L; if t_c(L) is not exponential in L (or does not match e^{κL}/(κv0) with independently measured κ), the mechanism is wrong. Also test whether t_{i+1}/t_i remains constant over many more cascades than simulated; a visible drift in the ratio would mean the discrete scale invariance is only approximate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a deterministically evolving lattice of diffusively coupled bistable gene switches, tuned near a critical diffusion strength, coarsens through a cascade mechanism rather than by continuous curvature-driven interface motion. Domain walls remain pinned for long intervals, then entire domains collapse abruptly. The wall density decays as ρ(t) ~ t^{-δ} with δ systematically below 1/2 for all promoter strengths tested (δ ~ 0.28 for the weakest), and the decay is modulated by log-periodic oscillations. The paper identifies the population of disappearing domains—not the wall density—as the controlling variable: their mean size grows roughly linearly with cascade index, app

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that a domain's collapse time grows exponentially with its length (because front interactions decay exponentially) and that the typical disappearing domain grows by about one lattice site per cascade; if either fails outside the fitted regime, the geometric cascade spacing and discrete-scale-invariance picture collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, deterministic bistable systems can violate the standard 1/2 coarsening exponent even with no noise, no conserved order parameter, and no curvature-driven dynamics; slow cascade coarsening with δ ~ 0.28 is a candidate for a distinct universality class.
  • The measured near-constant product δω ~ 2 links the coarsening exponent to the log-periodic frequency, giving a quantitative relation that can be checked in other systems.
  • Because the mechanism only needs bistability, diffusive coupling, front pinning, and discrete domains, the paper predicts that similar cascade coarsening and temporal discrete scale invariance should appear in other reaction-diffusion and bistable lattice models.
  • The log-periodicity is tied to the disappearing-domain length spectrum, so observations should focus on collapse events themselves rather than only on interface counts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A sharper test would measure the front-localization parameter κ directly from static front profiles and compare it with the fitted λ_t; the paper's own appendix cautions that its κ estimate is only qualitative, so this is the natural next check.
  • If the one-site-per-cascade growth persists indefinitely, cascade coarsening maps to an iterated rule L → L+1 with geometric waiting times; that reduction could yield the full distribution of cascade intervals and possibly derive δ from κ and boundary conditions, which the paper leaves open.
  • The δω ~ 2 product hints at a scaling relation near the depinning threshold that may survive under unequal diffusivities or in higher dimensions; testing whether the cascade picture persists in two dimensions would delineate whether this is a one-dimensional lattice effect or a generic mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies deterministic coarsening in a one-dimensional lattice of diffusively coupled bistable gene-toggle switches. It reports that domain walls remain pinned for long intervals and then disappear through collective cascade events, that the domain-wall density decays as ρ(t)∼t^{-δ} with δ<0.5 for all promoter strengths α considered, and that the decay has superimposed log-periodic oscillations. The authors argue that these oscillations are controlled by the sizes of domains disappearing in each cascade: because collapse times grow exponentially with domain length (Eq. 7) and the average disappearing-domain length grows roughly linearly with cascade index, successive cascade times are geometrically spaced, giving λ_t≈3.476 for α=10, consistent with temporal discrete scale invariance (DSI).

Significance. If the quantitative claims are established, this would be an interesting and novel observation: temporal discrete scale invariance emerging in a homogeneous deterministic lattice model without quenched disorder or an imposed hierarchy, together with a coarsening exponent systematically below the Allen–Cahn value. The qualitative phenomenology — pinned interfaces, abrupt cascades, log-periodic density — is plausible and visually supported. The paper also benefits from large-scale simulations and careful tabulation of fit parameters. However, as argued below, the central DSI interpretation currently rests on an unvalidated exponential-collapse law and on fits whose uncertainties are not reported, so the quantitative conclusions are not yet load-bearing.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5, Eqs. (7)–(9), Appendix A] The exponential collapse law dL/dt = -v0 e^{-κL} is the load-bearing premise for the entire DSI interpretation, but the Appendix explicitly states that the linearization is 'only qualitative' and that κ 'does not provide a quantitative prediction of cascade times.' No direct measurement of dL/dt versus L, and no direct measurement of successive cascade times t_i, is reported. The quoted λ_t≈3.476 in Eq. (9) is therefore not an independently measured cascade-time ratio; it is inferred from the assumed exponential law combined with the observed L_i growth. To support DSI, the paper should (i) test Eq. (7) by direct measurement of collapsing domain lengths, and (ii) report the measured sequence of cascade times and their ratios, with uncertainties, and compare directly with λ=exp(2π/ω).
  2. [Table 1, §4] The central quantitative claim δ<0.5 rests on nonlinear least-squares fits in which δ and D_c are free parameters, yet the table gives uncertainties only for ω. No error bars are reported for δ, and no stability analysis is provided (e.g., variation of fit window or initial guesses). In addition, the D_c values are quoted to ten significant digits with no criterion describing how the critical coupling is determined; Section 7 defines D_c only qualitatively as separating pinned and mobile fronts. Without a protocol for D_c or error estimates for δ, the claim of a systematic deviation from δ=1/2 is not quantitatively supported.
  3. [§4, Table 1] The statement that 'the product δω is approximately 2 for all values of α studied' is not supported by the table. From the listed values, δω equals 1.97, 2.38, 2.38, and 1.70 for α=20, 10, 5, and 3 respectively — a spread of roughly 40%. Since δ has no reported uncertainty, this does not reliably suggest an inverse scaling δ∼1/ω. This is a secondary point, but it should be corrected or removed.
  4. [§2, Eqs. (3)–(4)] The simulation parameters are incompletely specified. The model contains γ and m, but the simulation section states only α, n=m=2, N=50000, Δt=0.01, t_max≈2.5×10^6, and the initial conditions; γ is never given. Unless γ=1 is intended and simply omitted, the simulations are not reproducible. The depinning example in §2.1 also uses D=0.091 without stating how this relates to the reported D_c values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 and §5] The claim that the slope is 'close to one lattice site per cascade' is not quantified. A linear fit with slope and uncertainty should be reported. Also, individual domain lengths are integers, but the mean length can change by less than one lattice site, so lattice discreteness does not by itself force Δ⟨L⟩=1.
  2. [Table 1] The table caption states that φ is fitted and has uncertainties, but φ is not shown in the table and no error bars are given for it. Please include φ (or state that it is omitted for space) and its uncertainty.
  3. [Fig. 4] For α=3, the amplitude ratio c1/c0 ≈ 0.05 is very small; the claim of 'clear' log-periodic oscillations would be stronger with residual plots or a comparison to a pure power-law model.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical issues (e.g., 'atleast' in §2, 'theoretical framework predicts that can explain' in §4). The manuscript would benefit from careful proofreading.
  5. [General] No data/code availability statement is provided. Sharing simulation code and the fit data would materially help verification of the quantitative claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the DSI claim rests on measured log-periodic fits plus an admittedly heuristic but independently motivated front-interaction law.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: fit the domain-wall density ρ(t) to a log-periodic form and extract δ, ω (Table 1); compute λ = exp(2π/ω) from the definition of log-periodicity; separately measure the average disappearing-domain length as a function of cascade index (Fig. 5); invoke the standard exponentially weak front-interaction law dL/dt = -v0 e^{-κL} (Eq. 7, Appendix A) to convert the observed approximately one-site-per-cascade growth of disappearing-domain lengths into geometric cascade spacing; and then compare λ_t ≈ 3.476 with λ ≈ 3.465. The two ratios are presented as an internal consistency check, not as one being definitionally the other. The front-interaction law is admittedly heuristic: the appendix states that κ is 'only qualitative' and 'does not provide a quantitative prediction of cascade times.' That is a limitation in the strength of the derivation, but it is not circularity: the exponential law is an external physical assumption, not a parameter fitted to the very quantity being predicted. The fitted log-periodic parameters come from the density time series, while the cascade-spacing ratio is claimed to be observed from the cascade data; without a quotation showing that λ_t was computed from the fitted ω or from the unvalidated κ, the specific reduction required for a circularity finding is not exhibited. Cross-references to the authors' earlier work (refs. 23, 25, 26) are contextual or supportive, not the load-bearing justification for the central DSI claim. Thus no step in the paper can be shown, by its own equations or by self-citation, to reduce to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on tuned simulation couplings, least-squares fitted scaling parameters, and an unquantified exponential collapse law. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • D_c (critical diffusive coupling per α) = 0.0622061688 (α=20), 0.092071296 (α=10), 0.116808885 (α=5), 0.097617898 (α=3)
    Table 1; selected manually/iteratively 'close to the depinning threshold'. The cascade/DSI regime is only exhibited at these tuned values; no independent criterion or error bar is given.
  • Log-periodic fit parameters δ, c0, c1, ω, φ = δ: 0.456, 0.47, 0.425, 0.278; ω: 4.33166, 5.05515, 5.59412, 6.12832; c0,c1,φ in Table 1
    Nonlinear least-squares fits to t^δρ(t). δ, the central deviation-from-Allen–Cahn claim, is a fitting output, not a derived exponent.
  • v0 (velocity prefactor in collapse law)
    Eq. (7)-(8); unspecified kinetic prefactor. The Appendix says κ is only qualitative, so v0 and κ do not yield a quantitative prediction.
  • Slope of average disappearing-domain length vs cascade index = ≈1 lattice site per cascade
    Measured linear trend in Fig. 5 used to obtain constant geometric spacing λ_t=e^κ; no uncertainty or robustness analysis reported.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The single-cell toggle has an effective cubic phase portrait: two stable fixed points separated by an unstable fixed point for α1=α2=10, n=m=2.
    Section 2.1; asserted from a fifth-degree polynomial, the basis for treating the lattice as a two-state (spin) system with fronts.
  • domain assumption B can be eliminated by its quasi-steady state B_i=α2/[γ(1+A_i^m)] with no diffusion.
    Equations (4)-(6); reduces the two-variable cell to an effective scalar reaction term f(A); invalid if B's timescale is not fast or B diffuses.
  • domain assumption Front interaction is governed by linearized exponential tails and linear velocity response: dL/dt=-v0 e^{-κL}.
    Appendix A.2-A.4; explicitly heuristic; produces the exponential cascade-time law that is load-bearing for DSI.
  • domain assumption A sharp depinning threshold D_c separates pinned, cascading, and mobile regimes near which exponents are measured.
    Sections 2.1 and 7; no stability or bifurcation calculation determines D_c; the scaling results depend on operating 'near D_c'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deterministic cascade coarsening in a Bistable Gene Toggle model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4TTHK5C7

@misc{pith2026260718891,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deterministic cascade coarsening in a Bistable Gene Toggle model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4TTHK5C7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18891}
}
abstract

We investigate deterministic coarsening dynamics in a spatially extended bistable gene toggle model with diffusive coupling. Unlike classical curvature-driven coarsening, where domain walls move continuously and annihilate gradually, the present system exhibits a qualitatively different mechanism. The domain walls remain pinned for long intervals and disappear abruptly through collective cascade events. The density of domain walls decays approximately as $\rho(t)\sim t^{-\delta}$, but the coarsening exhibits clear log-periodic oscillations superimposed on the power-law behavior. For all values of the promoter strength $\alpha$ considered, the measured exponent satisfies $\delta<0.5$, indicating a systematic deviation from the classical Allen--Cahn prediction $\delta=1/2$ for curvature-driven coarsening. We show that log-periodic oscillations are not controlled by the density of domain walls, but by the \emph{domains that disappear} in each cascade. The average size of disappearing domains grows roughly linearly with cascade index, producing a constant geometric spacing of cascade times, consistent with discrete scale invariance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18891 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Qualitative shape of the reaction term f(A) (solid line) and shifted versions f(A) + 0.67 and f(A) + 1.3. The dashed line shows f(A) = −0.67. The shift illustrates the disappearance of small roots corresponding to front depinning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatiotemporal evolution of concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. compares the coarsening dynamics for α = 3 and α = 10 near the depinning threshold. In both cases, the domain-wall density decays algebraically, ρ(t) ∼ t −δ , but with markedly different exponents. While the α = 10 case exhibits a decay close to the classical Allen–Cahn value δ = 1/2, the α = 3 case displays significantly slower coarsening, characterized by an effective exponent δ ≈ 0.278. The dashed lines in [PITH… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rescaled domain density t δρ(t) versus log t for (a) α = 20 (Dc = 0.0622061688), together with the fitted form 0.81680 − 0.14642 cos(4.33166 log t + 15.40398) and δ = 0.456; (b) α = 10 (Dc = 0.092071296), together with the fitted form 0.81871 + 0.12053 cos(5.05515 log …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average disappearing-domain length ⟨Ldis⟩ versus cascade index for α = 3, 5, 10, and 20 at their respective critical coupling strengths. the domains that disappear in successive cascades increases approximately linearly with cascade index for all values of α studied. T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references

  1. [1]

    General conclusions: Teleonomic mechanisms in cellu- lar metabolism, growth, and differentiation.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 26:389–401, 1961

    Jacques Monod and Fran¸ cois Jacob. General conclusions: Teleonomic mechanisms in cellu- lar metabolism, growth, and differentiation.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 26:389–401, 1961

    1961

  2. [2]

    Gardner, Charles R

    Timothy S. Gardner, Charles R. Cantor, and James J. Collins. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in escherichia coli.Nature, 403:339–342, 2000

    2000

  3. [3]

    Oxford University Press, 5th edition, 2015

    Lewis Wolpert, Cheryll Tickle, and Alfonso Martinez Arias.Principles of Development. Oxford University Press, 5th edition, 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    American Society for Cell Biology, 2004

    American Society for Cell Biology.Molecular biology of the cell, volume 15. American Society for Cell Biology, 2004

    2004

  5. [5]

    Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for under- standing biological pattern formation.Science, 329:1616–1620, 2010

    Shigeru Kondo and Takashi Miura. Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for under- standing biological pattern formation.Science, 329:1616–1620, 2010. 13

    2010

  6. [6]

    Tank, Eric F

    Thomas Gregor, David W. Tank, Eric F. Wieschaus, and William Bialek. Probing the limits to positional information.Cell, 130:153–164, 2007

    2007

  7. [7]

    A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation.Nature, 434(7037):1130– 1134, 2005

    Subhayu Basu, Yoram Gerchman, Cynthia H Collins, Frances H Arnold, and Ron Weiss. A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation.Nature, 434(7037):1130– 1134, 2005

    2005

  8. [8]

    A. M. Turing. The chemical basis of morphogenesis.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 237:37–72, 1952

    1952

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    L. Wolpert. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation.Jour- nal of Theoretical Biology, 25:1–47, 1969

    1969

  2. [10]

    Cross and Pierre C

    Michael C. Cross and Pierre C. Hohenberg. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65:851–1112, 1993

    1993

  3. [11]

    J. D. Murray.Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction. Springer, New York, 3 edition, 2002

    2002

  4. [12]

    Nature, nurture, or chance: Stochastic gene expression and its consequences.Cell, 135(2):216–226, 2008

    Arjun Raj and Alexander van Oudenaarden. Nature, nurture, or chance: Stochastic gene expression and its consequences.Cell, 135(2):216–226, 2008

    2008

  5. [13]

    Dynamics of the p53-mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells.Nature genetics, 36(2):147–150, 2004

    Galit Lahav, Nitzan Rosenfeld, Alex Sigal, Naama Geva-Zatorsky, Arnold J Levine, Michael B Elowitz, and Uri Alon. Dynamics of the p53-mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells.Nature genetics, 36(2):147–150, 2004

    2004

  6. [14]

    A. J. Bray. Theory of phase-ordering kinetics.Advances in Physics, 43:357–459, 1994

    1994

  7. [15]

    Allen and John W

    Samuel M. Allen and John W. Cahn. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening.Acta Metallurgica, 27:1085–1095, 1979

    1979

  8. [16]

    James E. Ferrell. Bistability, bifurcations, and waddington’s epigenetic landscape.Current Biology, 22:R458–R466, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    Cherry and Frederick R

    Joshua L. Cherry and Frederick R. Adler. How to make a biological switch.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 203:117–133, 2000

    2000

  10. [18]

    Fife.Mathematical Aspects of Reacting and Diffusing Systems

    Paul C. Fife.Mathematical Aspects of Reacting and Diffusing Systems. Springer, Berlin, 1979

    1979

  11. [19]

    Discrete-scale invariance and complex dimensions.Physics reports, 297(5):239–270, 1998

    Didier Sornette. Discrete-scale invariance and complex dimensions.Physics reports, 297(5):239–270, 1998

    1998

  12. [20]

    Spatially distributed cell signalling.FEBS letters, 583(24):4006–4012, 2009

    Boris N Kholodenko. Spatially distributed cell signalling.FEBS letters, 583(24):4006–4012, 2009

    2009

  13. [21]

    Front interaction and nonho- mogeneous equilibria for tristable reaction-diffusion equations.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 53(6):1669–1685, 1993

    Jacob Rubinstein, Peter Sternberg, and Joseph B Keller. Front interaction and nonho- mogeneous equilibria for tristable reaction-diffusion equations.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 53(6):1669–1685, 1993

    1993

  14. [22]

    Front interactions in a three-component system.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 9(2):292–332, 2010

    Peter van Heijster, Arjen Doelman, Tasso J Kaper, and Keith Promislow. Front interactions in a three-component system.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 9(2):292–332, 2010

    2010

  15. [23]

    Synchronization transitions in coupled q-deformed logistic maps.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 181:114703, 2024

    Naval R Sabe, Sumit S Pakhare, and Prashant M Gade. Synchronization transitions in coupled q-deformed logistic maps.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 181:114703, 2024. 14

    2024

  16. [24]

    Discrete scale invariance, com- plex fractal dimensions, and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B8):17661–17677, 1996

    Hubert Saleur, Charles G Sammis, and Didier Sornette. Discrete scale invariance, com- plex fractal dimensions, and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B8):17661–17677, 1996

    1996

  17. [25]

    Bhoyar and Prashant M

    Priyanka D. Bhoyar and Prashant M. Gade. Dynamic phase transition in the contact process with spatial disorder: Griffiths phase and complex persistence exponents.Phys. Rev. E, 101:022128, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Emergence of logarithmic-periodic oscillations in contact process with topological disorder.Physical Review E, 103(2):022115, 2021

    Priyanka D Bhoyar and Prashant M Gade. Emergence of logarithmic-periodic oscillations in contact process with topological disorder.Physical Review E, 103(2):022115, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Universal log-periodic correction to renormalization group scaling for rupture stress prediction from acoustic emissions.Journal de Physique I, 5(6):631–638, 1995

    J-C Anifrani, C Le Floc’h, Didier Sornette, and Bernard Souillard. Universal log-periodic correction to renormalization group scaling for rupture stress prediction from acoustic emissions.Journal de Physique I, 5(6):631–638, 1995

    1995

  20. [28]

    Precursors, aftershocks, criti- cality and self-organized criticality.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 41(1):43–48, 1998

    Y Huang, H Saleur, Charles Sammis, and Didier Sornette. Precursors, aftershocks, criti- cality and self-organized criticality.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 41(1):43–48, 1998

    1998

  21. [29]

    Predicting financial crashes using discrete scale invariance.Journal of Risk, 1, 1999

    Anders Johansen, Didier Sornette, et al. Predicting financial crashes using discrete scale invariance.Journal of Risk, 1, 1999

    1999

  22. [30]

    Crashes as critical points.Interna- tional Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 3(02):219–255, 2000

    Anders Johansen, Olivier Ledoit, and Didier Sornette. Crashes as critical points.Interna- tional Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 3(02):219–255, 2000. 15

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.