Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 112 references

Quantum simulation of real-world nonlinear dynamics via Koopman method

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A data-driven quantum Koopman method embeds moderately nonlinear dynamics into learned linear observables and runs them as shallow parallel circuits on a superconducting processor, capturing multiscale patterns while mapping a noise-to-theo

desk verdict Solid hardware-validated hybrid pipeline for moderately nonlinear continuum dynamics; the amenability boundary is empirical, not theorem-controlled, but the experiments and error bookkeeping are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07338 v1 pith:4UR5NLJK submitted 2026-07-08 quant-ph cs.AIphysics.flu-dyn

Baoyang Zhang , Dong An , Zhaoyuan Meng , Yefei Yu , Xiaoxiao Xiao , Zhen Lu , Yue Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcs.AIphysics.flu-dyn
keywords quantumKoopmanmethodnonlineardynamicslinearcombinationofHamiltoniansimulationNISQshallowcircuitsreaction-diffusionshallow-waterequationsGulfStream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum computers evolve states unitarily, so they cannot directly simulate the nonlinear, often dissipative dynamics that dominate chemistry, fluids, and oceans. This paper introduces the quantum Koopman method: it learns a finite set of observables from trajectory data that lift the nonlinear system into a linear evolution, then decomposes the resulting non-unitary propagator into a handful of spectral channels, each realized by a shallow circuit whose time evolution is just a single layer of phase rotations. On a superconducting chip the method is run with as many as 32 parallel 10-qubit circuits for three real-world-scale problems—a three-dimensional reaction-diffusion system, shallow-water flow on a sphere, and satellite Gulf Stream currents—recovering the dominant spatial patterns, energy spectra, and one-point statistics. Accuracy is limited first by hardware noise in the weakly nonlinear case and then by the finite Koopman subspace and the shallow circuit ansatz once scale interactions strengthen, thereby drawing a practical boundary for which nonlinear problems remain quantum-amenable on near-term devices. The claimed evolution-step speedup relative to classical dense Koopman propagation scales as roughly 2^n over n cubed when the single-layer ansatz already suffices.

What carries the argument

The quantum Koopman method (QKM): learn Koopman observables that embed the nonlinear flow into a finite linear system, then realize the non-unitary propagator as a weighted sum of diagonal unitaries (Theorems 1–3), each executed by a topology-native circuit whose only time-evolution gates are a single layer of Rz rotations.

What would settle it

Increase the retained interaction order in the time-evolution block (or enlarge the observable dimension) on a system already in the intermediate regime; if the measured training loss and long-horizon relative L2 error do not drop below the stated 10^{-3} threshold while the circuit remains shallow enough for the claimed speedup, the amenability boundary claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The quantum Koopman method, by jointly learning finite observables and compiling the non-unitary propagator via a diagonalized linear-combination-of-Hamiltonian-simulation decomposition into parallel shallow circuits, can simulate moderately nonlinear dynamics on present superconducting hardware (up to 32×10-qubit circuits) while capturing dominant multiscale patterns; as nonlinearity increases, the dominant error source transitions from hardware noise to the finite-dimensional Koopman representation itself, thereby delineating a practical quantum-amenable regime.

Load-bearing premise

That a finite set of learned observables plus a single layer of phase-rotation gates can capture enough of the spectral weight of a moderately nonlinear system that the theoretical error stays scientifically useful without needing exponentially many higher-order multi-qubit interactions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the quantum Koopman method (QKM): nonlinear dynamics are lifted via learned Koopman observables into a finite N=2^n linear system, the non-unitary propagator e^{At} is rewritten by a diagonalized LCHS (Theorems 1–2) and approximated by parallel shallow circuits whose time-evolution block is a single-layer R_z sandwich (Theorem 3), and physical fields are prepared/decoded by a classical NN autoencoder. The pipeline is executed on the superconducting processor “Yudu” for three systems—3D Gray–Scott reaction–diffusion (6 qubits × 8 circuits), spherical shallow-water flow (10 × 32), and satellite Gulf Stream velocities (10 × 8)—reporting energy, enstrophy spectra, L2 error, and Hellinger fidelity, and arguing a transition from hardware-noise-limited to finite-Koopman/ansatz-limited accuracy that defines QKM-amenable / intermediate / prohibitive regimes with theoretical evolution speedup S ∼ O(2^n/n^3) versus classical Koopman propagation.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work is a meaningful hardware-validated step for moderately nonlinear dynamics on NISQ devices: it unifies data-driven Koopman lifting with LCHS-derived, topology-native parallel circuits rather than heuristic VQAs; Theorems 1–3 are stated with SI proofs that match the circuit design; experiments expand prior nonlinear/fluid demos to up to 32 parallel 10-qubit circuits and include real observational data; SI provides noiseless baselines, ablation on h and R_zz, and an explicit error budget. Code is deposited. These strengths make the paper of interest even if the “practical boundary” interpretation must be qualified.

major comments (4)
  1. Abstract, Discussion, and Fig. 5: the central claim that the experiments “identify a practical boundary for quantum-amenable nonlinear dynamics” (noise-limited → representation-limited) and partition systems into QKM-amenable/intermediate/prohibitive regimes rests on ε_th ≲ ε^*=10^{-3}, operationalized by training loss ℓ_train (Tab. I; SI §8C). Theorems 1–3 rigorously bound only spectral sampling (ε_spec) and single-layer R_z residual (ε_ansatz via high-order Pauli-Z coefficients). Projection error ε_proj from truncating the infinite-dimensional Koopman generator to the learned N-dimensional observables is uncontrolled; the Discussion and SI §8 explicitly leave rigorous bounds on ε_proj open. Without a controlled separation of ε_proj from autoencoder capacity, the regime partition and the claim of reach beyond analytical linearizations remain empirical. Please either (i) provide a quanti
  2. Methods “Complexity analysis” and Tab. I: the advertised speedup S ∼ O(2^n/n^3) (and S_evo = 2^n/(h n)) is relative to classical dense/sparse propagation of the same finite-N Koopman system, not to classical simulation of the original nonlinear PDE/DNS. Experimental S in Tab. I is 0.14, 0.22, and 0.88—all below unity—so no end-to-end wall-clock advantage is demonstrated. The manuscript should state the baseline explicitly in the abstract/results, report classical Koopman wall-clock cost for the same N,h, and avoid language that could be read as advantage over classical nonlinear solvers. Clarify also that S_total includes M shots and that practical advantage requires N ≳ O(1/ε_meas^2).
  3. Results (spherical fluid, Gulf Stream) and SI §9: for the two more nonlinear cases, noiseless emulation L2 errors are already comparable to hardware (sphere ≲0.06 vs hardware ~0.1; ocean ~0.21 matching hardware), so the “transition to theory-limited” is largely the autoencoder+ansatz residual. A load-bearing comparison is missing: classical NN/Koopman (or the same encoder–decoder with classical matrix exp(At)) at identical N and training budget. Without it, one cannot attribute multiscale fidelity to the quantum LCHS circuits rather than to the learned reduced model. Please add this classical baseline for at least one intermediate case and discuss what the quantum step uniquely contributes at current n.
  4. Theorem 1 and SI §1A: the LCHS form requires L ⪯ 0, obtained by a global shift u(t)=e^{bt}c(t). For chaotic/unstable geophysical flows this rescaling changes the observable magnitudes and the Cauchy–Lorentz weights; the manuscript does not report the chosen b, the resulting ||L||_2 used in the Theorem 2 bound, or sensitivity of ε_spec and training loss to b. Please document the shift for each benchmark and verify that the reported spectral-sampling bound remains meaningful after rescaling.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 captions/labels contain garbled text (“Λinear”, “efiolution”, “hared operator”, “Yudu” layout labels). Clean for production.
  2. Tab. I: define Sevo vs S consistently in the caption; “theoretical evolution speedup” vs “quantum speedup” is easy to conflate with end-to-end runtime.
  3. SI §3 Table S1: “Moderate (physical space)” for QKM vs Carleman/KvN is qualitative; a one-sentence quantitative criterion (e.g., spectral radius or Reynolds/reaction number range) would help.
  4. Hellinger fidelity is reported as a hardware-vs-ideal quantum distribution metric; briefly note in Methods that it does not measure physical-field accuracy (that is ε_L2), to avoid conflation.
  5. References: several arXiv preprints of related quantum-fluid work are cited; ensure final versions are updated where available and that the authors’ prior data-driven Koopman preprint is clearly distinguished from the present hardware contribution.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circular reduction in the theorems or hardware claims; mild fitted-proxy use of training loss for the amenability partition plus non-load-bearing self-citation of the authors’ prior data-driven Koopman preprint.

  1. fitted input called prediction [SI §8C (Eqs. S49–S50) + Results ‘Pathway to quantum utility’ + Tab. I + Fig. 5]
    "we estimate the relative theoretical and optimization error as ε_th :=relative L2-ε_th ≈ L_train ≈ ℓ_train ... With measured training losses ℓ_train ranging from 10^{-3} to 2×10^{-2} (see Tab. I), the 3D reaction-diffusion benchmark falls within the QKM-amenable regime, whereas the spherical shallow-water and Gulf Stream benchmarks lie in the QKM-intermediate regime."

    The operational criterion ε_th ≲ 10^{-3} that partitions systems into QKM-amenable/intermediate/prohibitive (and thereby ‘identifies a practical boundary’) is defined to be the training loss of the model fitted to trajectories of those same systems. The regime labels are therefore the fit quality by construction, not an independent prediction or theorem-derived quantity (Theorems 1–3 bound only ε_spec and ε_ansatz; ε_proj remains open).

  2. self citation load bearing [Introduction (paragraph on existing approaches) + Ref. [41]]
    "Although a recent Koopman-inspired approach [41] has explored embedding physical priors into variational circuits, a unified framework that can simultaneously access moderately nonlinear regimes and compile into hardware-feasible circuits remains absent. ... [41] B. Zhang, Z. Lu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Yang, Data-driven quantum Koopman method for simulating nonlinear dynamics, preprint arXiv:2507.21890 (2025)."

    The data-driven quantum Koopman premise is introduced via citation to the authors’ own prior preprint; however the citation is not load-bearing for Theorems 1–3, the LCHS circuit construction, the hardware experiments, or the regime analysis, which go beyond the prior work. Mild only.

full rationale

Theorems 1–3 (diagonalized LCHS, spectral sampling bound, single-layer Rz residual via Walsh/Pauli-Z coefficients) are self-contained mathematical derivations with explicit proofs in SI §1 and do not reduce to fitted constants or self-citations. The end-to-end pipeline is explicitly data-driven (joint training of encoder/decoder/circuit parameters on trajectories, Alg. 1), with train/val/test splits and a 2024 held-out Gulf Stream window providing external checks; hardware L2/Hellinger metrics and noiseless-vs-hardware comparisons are independent of the training objective. The only mild circularity is operationalizing the QKM-amenable/intermediate partition (ε_th ≲ 10^{-3}) directly by the fitted training loss ℓ_train (Tab. I, Fig. 5, SI §8C), so the regime labels are by construction the fit quality rather than an independent first-principles prediction. Self-citation of the authors’ prior arXiv:2507.21890 is present but not load-bearing for the new theorems, hardware results, or regime analysis. Projection-error openness is an acknowledged assumption, not a circular step. Overall the derivation chain is not forced by definition or self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Koopman/LCHS math plus several domain and paper-specific modeling choices: finite learnable invariant subspaces, L ⪯ 0 after rescaling, spectral compressibility into low-order Pauli-Z terms for the shallow ansatz, structured physical initial conditions for poly(n) state prep, and operational hyperparameters (n,h,R,r,ε*) that define the amenability boundary. No new physical particles; the invented objects are the QKM pipeline and the three-regime taxonomy.

free parameters (6)
  • Observable dimension N = 2^n and qubit count n
    Chosen per benchmark (n=6 or 10) to match grid size under n = O(log D); directly sets expressivity and claimed speedup.
  • Number of spectral channels h
    Hyperparameter balancing Theorem 2 error vs cost; set to 8 or 32 with scaling h = O(n).
  • State-prep depth factors R, r
    Chosen so Rr = O(n); trade expressibility against gate error (Tab. I).
  • Shot count M
    6144 or 10240 shots; controls measurement error bound.
  • Operational accuracy threshold ε* = 10^{-3}
    Hand-set criterion (via training loss) that partitions QKM-amenable vs intermediate regimes in Fig. 5.
  • NN encoder/decoder and circuit rotation parameters
    Fitted end-to-end on trajectory data; define the learned Koopman embedding and V(k), Λ(k).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Koopman generator admits a useful finite-N projection learned from data that preserves dominant dynamics.
    Methods ‘Koopman operator theory’; authors note optimal dimension remains open.
  • standard math Hermitian part L of A can be made ⪯ 0 by rescaling so diagonalized LCHS (Theorem 1) applies.
    Theorem 1 and SI §1A; standard LCHS hypothesis after shift.
  • domain assumption Physical initial fields are structured (smooth/symmetric) so poly(n)-depth PQCs plus NN encoder suffice for state preparation.
    Results ‘Quantum-circuit realization’ and SI §4 oracle argument.
  • ad hoc to paper Target diagonal Hamiltonians concentrate spectral weight in low-order Pauli-Z strings so single-layer Rz error is small (Theorem 3).
    Defines QKM-amenable regime; ablation shows Rzz reduces train loss, confirming residual high-order content.
  • standard math Uniform h-point Cauchy–Lorentz quadrature of the LCHS integral converges as in Theorem 2 bound.
    Theorem 2 / SI §1B.
invented entities (2)
  • Quantum Koopman method (QKM) pipeline independent evidence
    purpose: Jointly trained encoder, parallel LCHS spectral circuits, and decoder for non-unitary nonlinear evolution on NISQ hardware.
    Core contribution; builds on prior Koopman/LCHS pieces but packages a specific hardware-native ansatz.
  • QKM-amenable / intermediate / prohibitive regimes
    purpose: Taxonomy of nonlinear systems by spectral compressibility under shallow Rz ansatz and ε_th threshold.
    Operational partition from training loss and Fig. 5; not an independent physical law.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum simulation of real-world nonlinear dynamics via Koopman method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4UR5NLJK

@misc{pith2026260707338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum simulation of real-world nonlinear dynamics via Koopman method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4UR5NLJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07338}
}
read the original abstract

Nonlinear dynamics is ubiquitous in nature, ranging from chemical pattern formation to ocean circulation, yet its simulation on quantum computers is fundamentally limited by the unitary nature of quantum evolution. We propose the quantum Koopman method, a data-driven framework that embeds nonlinear dynamics into a learned linear representation and implements the resulting evolution using shallow quantum circuits. This method learns Koopman observables from trajectory data, projects the lifted dynamics onto a finite-dimensional subspace, and decomposes the corresponding non-unitary propagator into parallel spectral channels. We utilize the Koopman method on a superconducting processor to simulate three distinct nonlinear systems, comprising reaction-diffusion dynamics, fluid motion on a sphere, and satellite-derived observations of Gulf Stream currents, employing up to 32 parallel circuits of 10 qubits. These quantum simulations capture the dominant multiscale patterns and statistical signatures of the underlying dynamics, and reveal a transition from performance limited by hardware noise in weakly nonlinear systems to performance limited by finite-dimensional Koopman representations as nonlinear scale interactions increase. This transition identifies a practical boundary for quantum-amenable nonlinear dynamics, establishing a hardware-validated route for simulating moderately nonlinear dynamics on near-term quantum hardware.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An , author J.-P

    author author D. An , author J.-P. \ Liu ,\ and\ author L. Lin ,\ title title black Linear combination of Hamiltonian Simulation for Nonunitary Dynamics with Optimal State Preparation Cost ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 150603 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    author author R. M. \ Wilcox ,\ title title black Exponential operators and parameter differentiation in quantum physics ,\ @noop journal journal J. Math. Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 962 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    O'Donnell ,\ @noop title Analysis of boolean functions \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    author author R. O'Donnell ,\ @noop title Analysis of boolean functions \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Data-driven quantum Koopman method for simulating nonlinear dynamics

    author author B. Zhang , author Z. Lu , author Y. Zhao ,\ and\ author Y. Yang ,\ title title black Data-driven quantum Koopman method for simulating nonlinear dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal preprint arXiv:2507.21890 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Ronneberger , author P

    author author O. Ronneberger , author P. Fischer ,\ and\ author T. Brox ,\ title title black U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Interv. (MICCAI) \ ( organization Springer ,\ year 2015 )\ pp.\ pages 234--241 NoStop

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Li , author J

    author author H. Li , author J. Xie , author C. Zhang , author Y. Zhang ,\ and\ author Y. Zhao ,\ title title black A transformer-based convolutional method to model inverse cascade in forced two-dimensional turbulence ,\ @noop journal journal J. Comput. Phys. \ volume 520 ,\ pages 113475 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Xie , author W

    author author E. Xie , author W. Wang , author Z. Yu , author A. Anandkumar , author J. M. \ Alvarez ,\ and\ author P. Luo ,\ title title black SegFormer : simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. \ volume 34 ,\ pages 12077 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    author author BAQIS ,\ @noop title black Quafu superconducting quantum computing ,\ howpublished https://quafu-sqc.baqis.ac.cn https://quafu-sqc.baqis.ac.cn/home ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page 2024

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    \ Liu , author H

    author author J.-P. \ Liu , author H. . \ Kolden , author H. K. \ Krovi , author N. F. \ Loureiro , author K. Trivisa ,\ and\ author A. M. \ Childs ,\ title title black Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. ...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Jennings , author K

    author author D. Jennings , author K. Korzekwa , author M. Lostaglio , author A. T. \ Sornborger , author Y. Subasi ,\ and\ author G. Wang ,\ title title black Quantum algorithms for general nonlinear dynamics based on the Carleman embedding ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv prep...

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Joseph ,\ title title black Koopman–von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author I. Joseph ,\ title title black Koopman–von Neumann approach to quantum simulation of nonlinear classical dynamics ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 043102 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  4. [12]

    Novikau \ and\ author I

    author author I. Novikau \ and\ author I. Joseph ,\ title title black Quantum algorithm for the advection-diffusion equation and the Koopman-von Neumann approach to nonlinear dynamical systems ,\ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 309 ,\ pages 109498 ( year 2...

    2025

  5. [13]

    Gray \ and\ author S

    author author P. Gray \ and\ author S. Scott ,\ title title black Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: isolas and other forms of multistability ,\ @noop journal journal Chem. Eng. Sci. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 29 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  6. [14]

    @noop title black The code is available at https://github.com/YYgroup/QKM https://github.com/YYgroup/QKM. Stop

  7. [15]

    Galewsky , author R

    author author J. Galewsky , author R. K. \ Scott ,\ and\ author L. M. \ Polvani ,\ title title black An initial-value problem for testing numerical models of the global shallow-water equations ,\ @noop journal journal Tellus Ser. A-Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. \ volume 56 ,\ pages...

    2004

  8. [16]

    author author K. J. \ Burns , author G. M. \ Vasil , author J. S. \ Oishi , author D. Lecoanet ,\ and\ author B. P. \ Brown ,\ title title black Dedalus: a flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 2 ,\...

    2020

  9. [17]

    author author E.U. Copernicus Marine Service (CMEMS) ,\ @noop title black Global ocean gridded L4 sea surface heights and derived variables reprocessed 1993 ongoing ,\ howpublished https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148 https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  10. [18]

    Hersbach , author B

    author author H. Hersbach , author B. Bell , author P. Berrisford , author S. Hirahara , author A. Hor \'a nyi , author J. Mu \ n oz-Sabater , author J. Nicolas , author C. Peubey , author R. Radu , author D. Schepers , et al. ,\ title title black The ERA5 global reanalysis ,\...

    1999

  11. [19]

    \ Zhang , author T

    author author X.-M. \ Zhang , author T. Li ,\ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ title title black Quantum state preparation with optimal circuit depth: implementations and applications ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 129 ,\ pages 230504 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  12. [20]

    Sun , author G

    author author X. Sun , author G. Tian , author S. Yang , author P. Yuan ,\ and\ author S. Zhang ,\ title title black Asymptotically optimal circuit depth for quantum state preparation and general unitary synthesis ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr....

    2023

  13. [22]

    Meng , author L

    author author Z. Meng , author L. Chen , author J.-P. \ Liu ,\ and\ author G. He ,\ title title black Toward end-to-end quantum simulation of rapidly distorted turbulence ,\ @noop journal journal J. Comput. Phys. \ volume 558 ,\ pages 114888 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026

  14. [23]

    Sim , author P

    author author S. Sim , author P. D. \ Johnson ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ title title black Expressibility and entangling capability of parameterized quantum circuits for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Quantum Technol. \ volume 2 ,\ pag...

    2019

  15. [24]

    \.Z yczkowski \ and\ author H.-J

    author author K. \.Z yczkowski \ and\ author H.-J. \ Sommers ,\ title title black Average fidelity between random quantum states ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 71 ,\ pages 032313 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  16. [25]

    Goodfellow , author Y

    author author I. Goodfellow , author Y. Bengio , author A. Courville ,\ and\ author Y. Bengio ,\ @noop title Deep learning ,\ Vol. volume 1 \ ( publisher MIT press Cambridge ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  17. [26]

    2015 , journal =

    Read the fine print , author =. 2015 , journal =

    2015

  18. [27]

    Quantum Mach

    Future of quantum computing , author=. Quantum Mach. Intell. , volume=

  19. [28]

    Akiba, Takaki and Morii, Youhi and Maruta, Kaoru , year =. Sci. Rep. , volume =

  20. [29]

    Quantum dynamics simulation of the advection-diffusion equation , author=. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  21. [30]

    Linear combination of

    An, Dong and Liu, Jin-Peng and Lin, Lin , year =. Linear combination of. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =

  22. [31]

    Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  23. [32]

    Improving vision transformers by revisiting high-frequency components , author =. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV) , pages =. 2022 , organization =

    2022

  24. [33]

    Elementary gates for quantum computation , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  25. [34]

    Long-term evolution of ocean eddy activity in a warming world , author=. Nat. Clim. Chang. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  26. [35]

    Compact quantum algorithms for time-dependent differential equations , author=. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  27. [36]

    Hybrid quantum algorithms for flow problems , author=. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  28. [37]

    Machine learning for the physics of climate , author=. Nat. Rev. Phys. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  29. [38]

    Nature , volume=

    Quantum machine learning , author=. Nature , volume=

  30. [39]

    Quantum algorithm for solving the advection equation using

    Brearley, Peter and Laizet, Sylvain , year =. Quantum algorithm for solving the advection equation using. Phys. Rev. A , volume =

  31. [40]

    and Budi

    Brunton, Steven L. and Budi. Modern. 2022 , journal =

    2022

  32. [41]

    Quantum algorithm for the advection--diffusion equation simulated with the lattice

    Budinski, Ljubomir , journal=. Quantum algorithm for the advection--diffusion equation simulated with the lattice. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  33. [42]

    Application de la th

    Carleman, Torsten , journal =. Application de la th

  34. [43]

    Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning , author=. Nat. Comput. Sci. , volume=

  35. [44]

    Chen, Shiyi and Doolen, Gary D , journal=. Lattice

  36. [45]

    Enabling large-scale and high-precision fluid simulations on near-term quantum computers , author=. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  37. [46]

    Symbolic analysis of

    Chen, Min and Cheng, Jinglei and Li, Pingzhi and Wang, Haoran and Chen, Tianlong and Liu, Junyu , journal=. Symbolic analysis of. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  38. [47]

    Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision , author=. SIAM J. Comput. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  39. [48]

    Global ocean gridded

  40. [49]

    The code is available at

  41. [50]

    Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , author=. Math. Control Signals Syst. , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  42. [51]

    2022 , journal =

    Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation , author =. 2022 , journal =

    2022

  43. [52]

    PRX Quantum , volume=

    Quantum computing for high-energy physics: state of the art and challenges , author=. PRX Quantum , volume=

  44. [53]

    1982 , journal =

    Simulating physics with computers , author =. 1982 , journal =

    1982

  45. [54]

    2022 , journal =

    Towards quantum computing of turbulence , author =. 2022 , journal =

    2022

  46. [55]

    Neural Netw

    On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks , author=. Neural Netw. , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  47. [56]

    Finding flows of a

    Gaitan, Frank , journal=. Finding flows of a. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  48. [57]

    Tellus Ser

    An initial-value problem for testing numerical models of the global shallow-water equations , author=. Tellus Ser. A-Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  49. [58]

    2020 , journal =

    Quantum speedup for aeroscience and engineering , author =. 2020 , journal =

    2020

  50. [59]

    2025 , journal =

    Quantum. 2025 , journal =

    2025

  51. [60]

    A quantum-inspired approach to exploit turbulence structures , author=. Nat. Comput. Sci. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  52. [61]

    Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: isolas and other forms of multistability , author =. Chem. Eng. Sci. , volume =. 1983 , publisher =

    1983

  53. [62]

    Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  54. [63]

    2023 , journal =

    Disentangling hype from practicality: on realistically achieving quantum advantage , author =. 2023 , journal =

    2023

  55. [64]

    Neural Netw

    Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , author=. Neural Netw. , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

  56. [65]

    Variational quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics , author=. AIAA J. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  57. [66]

    Jennings, David and Korzekwa, Kamil and Lostaglio, Matteo and Wang, Guoming , year =. Quantum

  58. [67]

    Time complexity analysis of quantum algorithms via linear representations for nonlinear ordinary and partial differential equations , author =. J. Comput. Phys. , volume =

  59. [68]

    Quantum simulation of partial differential equations via

    Jin, Shi and Liu, Nana and Yu, Yue , journal=. Quantum simulation of partial differential equations via

  60. [69]

    Joseph, Ilon , journal =

  61. [70]

    Koopman, Bernard O , journal =

  62. [71]

    Barren plateaus in variational quantum computing , author=. Nat. Rev. Phys. , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  63. [72]

    A multiple-circuit approach to quantum resource reduction with application to the quantum lattice

    Lee, Melody and Song, Zhixin and Kocherla, Sriharsha and Adams, Austin and Alexeev, Alexander and Bryngelson, Spencer H , journal=. A multiple-circuit approach to quantum resource reduction with application to the quantum lattice. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  64. [73]

    Learning spatiotemporal dynamics with a pretrained generative model , author=. Nat. Mach. Intell. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  65. [74]

    Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations , author=. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR) , year=

  66. [75]

    2004 , journal =

    On the homotopy analysis method for nonlinear problems , author =. 2004 , journal =

    2004

  67. [76]

    Data-driven learning for the

    Lin, Yen Ting and Tian, Yifeng and Livescu, Daniel and Anghel, Marian , journal=. Data-driven learning for the. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  68. [77]

    Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations , author =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , volume =. 2021 , publisher =

    2021

  69. [78]

    2017 , journal =

    Analysis of operator splitting errors for near-limit flame simulations , author =. 2017 , journal =

    2017

  70. [79]

    Quantum computing of reacting flows via

    Lu, Zhen and Yang, Yue , year =. Quantum computing of reacting flows via. Proc. Combust. Inst. , volume =

  71. [80]

    Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems , author=. Phys. Rev. A , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  72. [81]

    Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  73. [82]

    1927 , journal =

    Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form , author =. 1927 , journal =

    1927

  74. [83]

    Noise-induced shallow circuits and the absence of barren plateaus , author=. Nat. Phys. , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  75. [84]

    Quantum computing of fluid dynamics using the hydrodynamic

    Meng, Zhaoyuan and Yang, Yue , journal=. Quantum computing of fluid dynamics using the hydrodynamic. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  76. [85]

    Quantum spin representation for the

    Meng, Zhaoyuan and Yang, Yue , journal=. Quantum spin representation for the. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  77. [86]

    2025 , journal =

    Challenges of simulating fluid flows on near-term quantum computer , author =. 2025 , journal =

    2025

  78. [87]

    2024 , journal =

    Simulating unsteady flows on a superconducting quantum processor , author =. 2024 , journal =

    2024

  79. [88]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05346 , year=

    Geometric encoding of turbulence for end-to-end quantum simulation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05346 , year=

    arXiv

  80. [89]

    Toward end-to-end quantum simulation of rapidly distorted turbulence , author=. J. Comput. Phys. , volume =. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  81. [90]

    Quantum computation and quantum information , year =

  82. [91]

    and Joseph, I

    Novikau, I. and Joseph, I. , year =. Quantum algorithm for the advection-diffusion equation and the. Comput. Phys. Commun. , volume =

  83. [92]

    Reduced-order modeling of two-dimensional turbulent

    Pfeffer, Philipp and Heyder, Florian and Schumacher, J. Reduced-order modeling of two-dimensional turbulent. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  84. [93]

    Quantum computing in the

    Preskill, John , year =. Quantum computing in the. Quantum , volume =

  85. [94]

    2018 , journal =

    Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations , author =. 2018 , journal =

    2018

  86. [95]

    Expressibility and entangling capability of parameterized quantum circuits for hybrid quantum-classical algorithms , author=. Adv. Quantum Technol. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  87. [96]

    preprint arXiv:2509.02112 , year=

    Efficient quantum state tomography with Chebyshev polynomials , author=. preprint arXiv:2509.02112 , year=

    arXiv

  88. [97]

    Quantum state encoding of vortical flows with the spinor field , author=. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  89. [98]

    2023 , journal =

    Quantum computing for fluids: where do we stand? , author =. 2023 , journal =

    2023

  90. [99]

    2024 , journal =

    Ensemble fluid simulations on quantum computers , author =. 2024 , journal =

    2024

  91. [100]

    IEEE Trans

    Asymptotically optimal circuit depth for quantum state preparation and general unitary synthesis , author=. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  92. [101]

    Solving nonlinear differential equations on quantum computers: A

    Tennie, Felix and Magri, Luca , year=. Solving nonlinear differential equations on quantum computers: A

  93. [102]

    2025 , journal =

    Quantum computing for nonlinear differential equations and turbulence , author =. 2025 , journal =

    2025

  94. [103]

    and Steijl, Ren

    Todorova, Blaga N. and Steijl, Ren. Quantum algorithm for the collisionless. 2020 , journal =

    2020

  95. [104]

    2017 , journal =

    Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on. 2017 , journal =

    2017

  96. [105]

    npj Quantum Inf

    Wang, Boyuan and Meng, Zhaoyuan and Zhao, Yaomin and Yang, Yue , title =. npj Quantum Inf. , year =

  97. [106]

    Simulating fluid vortex interactions on a superconducting quantum processor , author=. Nat. Commun. , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  98. [107]

    Quantum-informed machine learning for predicting spatiotemporal chaos with practical quantum advantage , author=. Sci. Adv. , volume=

  99. [108]

    Noisy intermediate-scale quantum simulation of the one-dimensional wave equation , author=. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  100. [109]

    Xiong, Wei and Huang, Xiaomeng and Zhang, Ziyang and Deng, Ruixuan and Sun, Pei and Tian, Yang , journal=

  101. [110]

    The Innovation , volume=

    Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research , author=. The Innovation , volume=

  102. [111]

    Quantum state preparation with optimal circuit depth: implementations and applications , author=. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  103. [112]

    Data-driven quantum

    Zhang, Baoyang and Lu, Zhen and Zhao, Yaomin and Yang, Yue , journal=. Data-driven quantum

  104. [113]

    2025 , publisher =

    Zhao, Sunan and Li, Zhijie and Fan, Boyu and Wang, Yunpeng and Yang, Huiyu and Wang, Jianchun , journal =. 2025 , publisher =

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.