Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14486 v1 pith:4X2J2UKT submitted 2022-10-26 cs.CL

Leveraging Affirmative Interpretations from Negation Improves Natural Language Understanding

classification cs.CL
keywords affirmativeinterpretationslanguagenaturalpairsunderstandingnegationclassifier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Negation poses a challenge in many natural language understanding tasks. Inspired by the fact that understanding a negated statement often requires humans to infer affirmative interpretations, in this paper we show that doing so benefits models for three natural language understanding tasks. We present an automated procedure to collect pairs of sentences with negation and their affirmative interpretations, resulting in over 150,000 pairs. Experimental results show that leveraging these pairs helps (a) T5 generate affirmative interpretations from negations in a previous benchmark, and (b) a RoBERTa-based classifier solve the task of natural language inference. We also leverage our pairs to build a plug-and-play neural generator that given a negated statement generates an affirmative interpretation. Then, we incorporate the pretrained generator into a RoBERTa-based classifier for sentiment analysis and show that doing so improves the results. Crucially, our proposal does not require any manual effort.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. QueryBandits for Hallucination Mitigation: Exploiting Semantic Features for No-Regret Rewriting

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    A contextual bandit that chooses among five query-rewrite strategies, conditioned on 17 linguistic features, reduces LLM hallucination on QA benchmarks and beats static prompting and no-rewrite baselines.