Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Quantification of Bias in Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Case Study of Renal Failure Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.07679 v1 pith:4Y3WR7KQ submitted 2019-11-18 cs.LG stat.APstat.ML

Towards Quantification of Bias in Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Case Study of Renal Failure Prediction

classification cs.LG stat.APstat.ML
keywords learningmachinemodelsbiasescomparefailurepracticequantify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As machine learning (ML) models, trained on real-world datasets, become common practice, it is critical to measure and quantify their potential biases. In this paper, we focus on renal failure and compare a commonly used traditional risk score, Tangri, with a more powerful machine learning model, which has access to a larger variable set and trained on 1.6 million patients' EHR data. We will compare and discuss the generalization and applicability of these two models, in an attempt to quantify biases of status quo clinical practice, compared to ML-driven models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.