Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The NLP Task Effectiveness of Long-Range Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.07856 v2 pith:4YTNX5SN submitted 2022-02-16 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords attentionlong-rangemodelstransformercomplexityeffectivenesstaskstransformers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformer models cannot easily scale to long sequences due to their O(N^2) time and space complexity. This has led to Transformer variants seeking to lower computational complexity, such as Longformer and Performer. While such models have theoretically greater efficiency, their effectiveness on real NLP tasks has not been well studied. We benchmark 7 variants of Transformer models on 5 difficult NLP tasks and 7 datasets. We design experiments to isolate the effect of pretraining and hyperparameter settings, to focus on their capacity for long-range attention. Moreover, we present various methods to investigate attention behaviors to illuminate model details beyond metric scores. We find that the modified attention in long-range transformers has advantages on content selection and query-guided decoding, but they come with previously unrecognized drawbacks such as insufficient attention to distant tokens and accumulated approximation error.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contextualized Early Detection of Online Firestorms: A Sequential LLM-Based Approach

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM judging sliding windows of Reddit threads can flag escalating firestorm threads early (recall 0.98 at a mean 8.56 comments) and classify complete threads retrospectively with 0.915 accuracy.

Pith tools