Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Unearthing large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings with Machine Learning

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A machine-learning scan of a CP-violating three-Higgs-doublet model finds experimentally allowed parameter points with large pseudoscalar Higgs couplings and shows that a previously reported correlation was a scanning artifact.

desk verdict Genuine new scan regions in the C3HDM, but the abstract overclaims all known constraints because the ttH CP-odd limits are drawn, not enforced in the loss. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10625 v2 pith:4ZPON5VE submitted 2025-05-15 hep-ph physics.comp-ph

Fernando Abreu de Souza , Rafael Boto , Miguel Crispim Romão , Pedro N. Figueiredo , Jorge C. Romão , João P. Silva This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords three-Higgs-doubletmodelCPviolationpseudoscalarHiggscouplingsevolutionarystrategynoveltyrewardelectronelectricdipolemomentsignalstrengthsLHCphenomenology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a CP-violating three-Higgs-doublet model has far more experimentally viable parameter space than earlier scans indicated, and that a machine-learning search can find it. The authors replace the slow random-scan strategy, which could only find valid points by starting near the real-scalar alignment limit, with an evolutionary-strategy optimiser augmented by a novelty reward that pushes the search into unexplored regions. Using this tool on the model's 20 free parameters, they obtain points that pass all implemented theoretical and experimental constraints while displaying large pseudoscalar couplings of the 125 GeV Higgs to bottom quarks, top quarks, and tau leptons. They conclude that a correlation previously found between the bottom and tau pseudoscalar couplings was an artifact of the old sampling method, not a property of the model. If correct, this matters because it reopens experimentally testable channels (large CP-odd Higgs couplings to $b$, $t$, and $\tau$) that earlier scans had effectively ruled out.

What carries the argument

The engine is a black-box loss function $L(\theta)=\sum_i C(O_i(\theta))$, where each constraint function $C$ returns zero inside the allowed interval and a positive penalty proportional to the distance outside it; a point is valid exactly when $L=0$. This loss is minimised by a covariance-matrix-adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES), a derivative-free optimiser suited to rough, high-dimensional landscapes. To prevent the optimiser from collapsing into the first valid basin, a novelty reward is added: a histogram-based outlier score estimates the local density of previously found valid points in parameter and observable space, and the loss is shifted so that revisiting dense regions carries a penalty. Seeded runs, which start from already valid points and optionally include extra constraints forcing large $|c^o_{bb}|$ or negative $c^e_{bb}$, then populate the coupling planes systematically. This machinery carries the argument because it explores the full 20-dimensional domain with no hierarchy of constraints, which is what uncovers the regions that alignment-limit seeding could not reach.

What would settle it

Take a representative published point with large $|c^o_{bb}|$ or $|c^o_{tt}|$ and recompute its electron electric dipole moment, $B\to X_s\gamma$ rate, Higgs signal strengths, and direct new-scalar search exclusions with independent published codes; if any recomputed observable exceeds its experimental bound, the claim that such regions satisfy all known constraints falls. A separate direct measurement excluding $|c^o_{bb}|$ near one would rule against the model space itself, not against the search technique.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the softly-broken $Z_2\times Z_2'$ three-Higgs-doublet model with CP-violating coefficients (a type-Z model in which the up-type, down-type, and lepton Yukawa sectors each couple to their own doublet), the paper claims that the full scalar-pseudoscalar coupling plane of the 125 GeV Higgs to bottom quarks can be populated with points consistent with every constraint it implements, including the electron electric dipole moment, $B\to X_s\gamma$, oblique parameters, signal strengths, and direct scalar searches. The previous scan had found only a limited wedge and an apparent anticorrelation between $c^o_{\tau\tau}$ and $c^o_{bb}$, which was traced to $c^o_{tt}\approx 0$; the new search finds points with $|c^o_{tt}|\gtrsim 0.3$, filling the $c^o_{\tau\tau}$--$c^o_{bb}$ plane and showing that Eq. (38), $c^o_{\tau\tau}/c^o_{bb}=-\tan^2\beta_1$, is a property of the old scanning strategy rather than of the model. The scan also populates wrong-sign couplings for leptons and down quarks while respecting the tau CP-phase bound $|\theta_\tau|<34^\circ$, and it finds that large $|c^o_{tt}|$ forces a second neutral scalar to approach degeneracy with the 125 GeV Higgs.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the in-house black-box code implements every relevant constraint correctly and completely as used---especially the electron electric dipole moment at the Z-boson mass scale---since the paper releases neither the code nor the data; the direct CP-odd top-Higgs limits, shown only as contours, are not among the implemented constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The whole $c^e_{bb}$--$c^o_{bb}$ circle, including pure-pseudoscalar $hbb$ couplings and the wrong-sign region, is compatible with all implemented constraints, making large CP-odd $hbb$ couplings a live experimental target.
  • Large $|c^o_{tt}|$ is not excluded by current $t\bar t H$ CP measurements, so dedicated CP-odd top-Higgs searches are further justified.
  • $c^o_{\tau\tau}$ and $c^o_{bb}$ are not forced to anticorrelate, restoring the type-Z model's three decoupled fermion sectors.
  • The CP-violating angles $\alpha_{14}$ and $\alpha_{15}$ must remain small, while the other CP-violating parameters can fill their full ranges.
  • The method produces on the order of $10^5$ valid points in under 100 CPU hours, compared with fewer than one per $10^{13}$ for random sampling, making full-domain scans feasible for other high-dimensional models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim holds, similar artifacts may lurk in other high-dimensional BSM scans: regions dismissed because an earlier sampler could not reach them should be re-examined with novelty-guided exploration.
  • A natural extension is to re-run the same machinery on the complex two-Higgs-doublet model with the scalar mass range opened below 125 GeV, since the paper's check excluded the near-degenerate configurations where it did find large $|c^o_{tt}|$.
  • The generated points carry no statistical weight; the plots demonstrate existence of parameter regions, not likelihood, so they should not be read as probability distributions.
  • Releasing the constraint code and the valid-point samples would turn the claim into a reproducible benchmark: independent implementations could then recompute the observables for the published points and confirm that every bound is respected.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper applies a machine-learning black-box optimization scheme (CMA-ES with a histogram-based novelty reward) to explore the 20-dimensional parameter space of the softly-broken Z2×Z2' three-Higgs-doublet model with explicit CP violation. The authors claim that this method finds points satisfying all implemented theoretical and experimental constraints at orders-of-magnitude higher efficiency than previous random scans, and, more importantly, uncovers new phenomenologically viable regions: large CP-odd couplings of the 125 GeV Higgs to b quarks, tau leptons, and top quarks, including the wrong-sign regime for hbb and htautau. They further claim that the earlier correlation co_tautau = -tan^2(beta1) co_bb reported in Ref. [13] is not a property of the model but an artifact of starting scans near the real alignment limit with co_tt ≈ 0, and that by allowing large co_tt this correlation dissolves. The methodology, the constraint list, the loss function, and the resulting coupling-plane plots are presented in Sections II-V.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a useful methodological demonstration that evolutionary strategies combined with novelty rewards can find previously unreachable CP-violating regions in a high-dimensional multi-Higgs model, and the claim that Eq. (38) is an artifact of the earlier scanning strategy is physically interesting and instructive for future phenomenology scans. The authors deserve credit for being explicit that the generated points have no statistical interpretation and for cross-checking the Higgs-signal part with HiggsTools-1.1.3. However, the central claim of concordance with 'all known experimental constraints' is not yet established: the direct CP-odd ttH limits from Refs. [26-28] appear only as contours in Fig. 6 and are not enforced in the loss, and the black-box implementation is not released, so its completeness cannot be independently verified. The headline regions with large |co_tt| are therefore conditional on missing validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III/V.D, Eq. (42), Fig. 6] The direct CP-odd ttH limits from Refs. [26-28] are described in Section III but are not included in the constraint loss L(theta) of Eq. (44); they appear only as contour lines in Fig. 6. The only ttH-related expression, Eq. (42), rescales the ttH production rate by (ce_tt)^2 + 0.416 (co_tt)^2, which is a rate-level rescaling and does not encode the CP-sensitive angular observables used in Refs. [26-28]. Consequently, the red/green points with |co_tt| larger than about 0.3 shown in Fig. 6 and discussed in Section V.D are not demonstrated to satisfy the CP-odd ttH constraints, and the abstract's claim of concordance with all known experimental constraints is unsupported for those points. This is load-bearing because large co_tt is one of the two headline new phenomenological features, so the paper should either implement the CP-sensitive constraints, restrict the claim to the implemented constraints, or explicitly verify that the displayed points satisfy the contours.
  2. [Section IV/V (reproducibility)] The central existence claim depends on an in-house black-box implementation of the eEDM calculation at the MZ scale and on the HiggsTools/HiggsSignals/HiggsBounds interfaces, but no code, configuration files, or generated parameter sets are released. The completeness and correctness of the implemented constraints therefore cannot be checked by a reader. In particular, Section IV.A's black-box treatment and Section V's color-code definition of red points as passing all constraints in Section III require either a data release of the surviving points together with the exact constraint list, or a detailed validation of the eEDM and collider-constraint routines. I recommend release of at least the generated point files and the precise list of constraints with their bounds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 captions] The caption fragment 'Blue the paper.' is incomplete and should be reworded, for example as 'Blue points are taken from Ref. [13].'.
  2. [Section IV (text)] There is a typo in the sentence 'we make the choice of optmising a single loss function'; it should read 'optimising'.
  3. [Section III, 'Direct searches for CP-violation'] The bullet on CP-violation gives an explicit bound for the tau-channel angle but merely says the ttH limits from Refs. [26-28] are shown as contours; it should state explicitly whether these limits are enforced as constraints or are only overlays for comparison.
  4. [Section V.D, Fig. 6 discussion] The sentence 'The experimental results are shown as 1σ (solid) and 2σ contour lines [26], indicate consistency with co_tt≠0' is grammatically ambiguous; clarify whether the data allow co_tt nonzero or whether the plotted points are required to lie inside the contours.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: outputs are constrained-existence results, with the hbb steering fully disclosed.

full rationale

No circular step was found. The model points are generated by minimizing the loss function L(theta) in Eq. (44), whose terms C(O_i(theta)) are independent theoretical and experimental constraints; a point with L = 0 is a genuine constrained-existence result, not a tautology. The large |co_tt| region in Fig. 6 is not imposed as a C(O) target; it emerges from novelty-reward exploration and is then compared with external CP-sensitive ttH contours. The large-|co_bb| and wrong-sign ce_bb regions are explicitly generated by adding C(O) terms that force those couplings, as disclosed in Section V.A, so they are presented as a search target rather than as an unanticipated prediction; the nontrivial content, namely that such points also satisfy all the other implemented constraints, is not equivalent to the input. Self-citations to Refs. [13], [16], [21], and [32] are mathematical constraint inputs, method descriptions, or comparison baselines, and they are not used to forbid alternatives or to justify the new phenomenological claims. The omission of the direct CP-odd ttH differential limits from the loss is a completeness or correctness caveat, not a circularity, and the unshipped black-box code is a reproducibility concern rather than a circular-derivation concern. Overall, the paper's derivation chain does not reduce any central claim to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The existence claims rest on the model, the parametrization, and the constraint machinery imported from prior papers. The main scanned domain is the 20 parameters of Eqs. (17)-(21), and the target-specific constraints used to steer runs are disclosed. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced; the extra scalars are part of the pre-existing C3HDM.

free parameters (3)
  • 20 scanned C3HDM parameters = Ranges: angles in [-pi,pi]; tan(beta1,2) in [0.3,10]; m_h2 in [126,1000] GeV; m_H+ in [100,1000] GeV; Re(m2_ij) in…
    All claimed valid points lie inside these ranges, so the domain choice bounds the discovery. Regions outside, such as tan beta below 0.3 or strongly degenerate masses, are excluded by construction.
  • Focusing constraints for co_bb and wrong-sign ce_bb = Added as C(O) terms in Eq. (44)
    The full circle in Figs. 1 and 2 was populated by explicitly adding constraints that force large |co_bb| and negative ce_bb. This is a search-steering choice, disclosed in Section V.A.
  • CMA-ES and novelty hyperparameters = sigma = 1 unseeded, 0.1 and 0.01 seeded; HBOS binning and penalty scales p in [0,1]
    These affect convergence and coverage but not the physical model; they are part of the method description.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bounded-from-below sufficiency conditions from Ref. [13] are correctly implemented and are sufficient for the model.
    Used to accept scanned points. Because they are only sufficient, some valid regions may be missed, which weakens completeness but not individual accepted points.
  • domain assumption Unitarity bounds from Ref. [32] based on Ref. [33] are valid for the Z2xZ2' C3HDM.
    The scan rejects points with |lambda_i| above 8 pi. If that bound derivation is wrong, accepted points could be unphysical.
  • domain assumption The eEDM and Barr-Zee calculations used at the MZ scale are correct.
    The electron EDM is a key constraint shaping the allowed CP-odd couplings. The paper relies on formulas from Refs. [40-44] and the scale choice of Ref. [56].
  • domain assumption HiggsTools-1.1.3, HiggsSignals and HiggsBounds correctly encode the LHC limits used in the scan.
    The red and green point definitions depend on these external packages, and no independent check is provided.
  • domain assumption The parametrization equations (22)-(27), imported from Ref. [13], cover the neutral mass matrix except degenerate cases.
    The scan uses derived masses for the three heavier neutral scalars. The footnote admits non-generality of the mass matrices, so special parameter choices may be missed.
  • domain assumption The type-Z Yukawa assignment is the model under study.
    The CP-odd coupling results are specific to this assignment; other Yukawa types would give different constraints and different allowed regions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unearthing large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings with Machine Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ZPON5VE

@misc{pith2026250510625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unearthing large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings with Machine Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ZPON5VE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10625}
}
read the original abstract

With the Large Hadron Collider's Run 3 in progress, the 125 GeV Higgs boson couplings are being examined in greater detail, while searching for additional scalars. Multi-Higgs frameworks allow Higgs couplings to significantly deviate from Standard Model values, enabling indirect probes of extra scalars. We consider the possibility of large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings in the softly-broken Z2xZ2' three-Higgs doublet model with CP violating coefficients. To explore the parameter space of the model, we employ a Machine Learning algorithm that significantly enhances sampling efficiency. Using it, we find new regions of parameter space and observable consequences, not found with previous techniques. This method leverages an Evolutionary Strategy to quickly converge towards valid regions with an additional Novelty Reward mechanism. We use this model as a prototype to illustrate the potential of the new techniques, applicable to any Physics Beyond the Standard Model scenario.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10625 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES, novelty detection and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES. The points shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Combined seeded plots with CMA-ES. The points shown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    R. Boto, L. Lourenco, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva, Large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings in the complex 3HDM , JHEP 11 (2024) 106, [ arXiv:2407.19856]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1–29, [ arXiv:1207.7214]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys

    CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30–61, [ arXiv:1207.7235]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [3]

    Aad et al., A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery , Nature 607 (2022), no

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery , Nature 607 (2022), no. 7917 52–59, [ arXiv:2207.00092]. [Erratum: Nature 612, E24 (2022)]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    Tumasyan et al., A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022), no

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022), no. 7917 60–68, [ arXiv:2207.00043]. [Erratum: Nature 623, (2023)]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    Aad et al., Test of CP-invariance of the Higgs boson in vector-boson fusion production and in its decay into four leptons , JHEP 05 (2024) 105, [ arXiv:2304.09612]

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Test of CP-invariance of the Higgs boson in vector-boson fusion production and in its decay into four leptons , JHEP 05 (2024) 105, [ arXiv:2304.09612]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    CMS Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Analysis of the CP structure of the Yukawa coupling between the Higgs boson and τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2022) 012, [ arXiv:2110.04836]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [7]

    Aad et al., Measurement of the CP properties of Higgs boson interactions with τ-leptons with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of the CP properties of Higgs boson interactions with τ-leptons with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 7 563, [ arXiv:2212.05833]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 56 references
  1. [8]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, R. Pittau, and P. Torrielli, Scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs production in association with a top–antitop pair , Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 427–433, [ arXiv:1104.5613]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Broggio, A

    A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, M. C. N. Fiolhais, and A. Onofre, Pseudoscalar couplings in t¯tH production at NLO+NLL accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017), no. 7 073005, [ arXiv:1707.01803]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Fontes, J

    D. Fontes, J. C. Rom˜ ao, R. Santos, and J. P. Silva,Large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings in the complex 2HDM , JHEP 06 (2015) 060, [ arXiv:1502.01720]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Andreev et al., Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron , Nature 562 (2018), no

    ACME Collaboration, V. Andreev et al., Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron , Nature 562 (2018), no. 7727 355–360

    2018

  5. [12]

    T. S. Roussy et al., An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment , Science 381 (2023), no. 6653 adg4084, [arXiv:2212.11841]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Crispim Rom˜ ao, N

    M. Crispim Rom˜ ao, N. F. Castro, and R. Pedro, Finding New Physics without learning about it: Anomaly Detection as a tool for Searches at Colliders , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 1 27, [ arXiv:2006.05432]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 81, 1020 (2021)]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    F. A. de Souza, M. Crispim Rom˜ ao, N. F. Castro, M. Nikjoo, and W. Porod, Exploring parameter spaces with artificial intelligence and machine learning black-box optimization algorithms , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 3 035004, [arXiv:2206.09223]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. C. Rom˜ ao and M. Crispim Rom˜ ao,Combining evolutionary strategies and novelty detection to go beyond the alignment limit of the Z3 3HDM , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 9 095040, [ arXiv:2402.07661]. 17

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. A. Diaz, G. Cerro, S. Dasmahapatra, and S. Moretti, Bayesian Active Search on Parameter Space: a 95 GeV Spin-0 Resonance in the (B−L)SSM, arXiv:2404.18653

  10. [18]

    AbdusSalam, S

    S. AbdusSalam, S. Abel, and M. Crispim Rom˜ ao, Symbolic regression for beyond the standard model physics , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 1 015022, [ arXiv:2405.18471]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Batra, B

    N. Batra, B. Coleppa, A. Khanna, S. K. Rai, and A. Sarkar, Constraining the 3HDM Parameter Space , arXiv:2504.07489

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    F. J. Botella and J. P. Silva, Jarlskog - like invariants for theories with scalars and fermions , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3870–3875, [hep-ph/9411288]

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. Boto, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva,Bounded from below conditions on a class of symmetry constrained 3HDM , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022), no. 11 115010, [ arXiv:2208.01068]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Georgi and D

    H. Georgi and D. V. Nanopoulos, Suppression of Flavor Changing Effects From Neutral Spinless Meson Exchange in Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 95–96

    1979

  15. [23]

    J. F. Donoghue and L. F. Li, Properties of Charged Higgs Bosons , Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 945

    1979

  16. [24]

    Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays , Phys

    N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays , Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (Jun, 1963) 531–533

    1963

  17. [25]

    Kobayashi and T

    M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction , Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652–657

    1973

  18. [26]

    Aad et al., cp properties of higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the tth and th processes usingh→γγ with the atlas detector , Phys

    ATLAS Collaboration Collaboration, G. Aad et al., cp properties of higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the tth and th processes usingh→γγ with the atlas detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (Aug, 2020) 061802

    2020

  19. [27]

    CMS Collaboration Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Measurements of tth production and the cp structure of the yukawa interaction between the higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (Aug,

  20. [28]

    Aad et al., Probing the CP nature of the top–Higgs Yukawa coupling in tt ¯H and tH events with H→bb¯ decays using the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Probing the CP nature of the top–Higgs Yukawa coupling in tt ¯H and tH events with H→bb¯ decays using the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138469, [ arXiv:2303.05974]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    F. A. de Souza, N. F. Castro, M. Crispim Rom˜ ao, and W. Porod, Exploring Scotogenic Parameter Spaces and Mapping Uncharted Dark Matter Phenomenology with Multi-Objective Search Algorithms , arXiv:2505.08862

  22. [30]

    Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria , The European Physical Journal C 72 (July, 2012)

    K. Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria , The European Physical Journal C 72 (July, 2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    K. G. Klimenko, On Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Some Higgs Potentials to Be Bounded From Below , Theor. Math. Phys. 62 (1985) 58–65

    1985

  24. [32]

    M. P. Bento, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva,Unitarity bounds for all symmetry-constrained 3hdms , Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (Aug., 2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    P. M. Ferreira and J. P. Silva, Discrete and continuous symmetries in multi-higgs-doublet models , Physical Review D 78 (Dec., 2008)

    2008

  26. [34]

    Grimus, L

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, A precision constraint on multi-higgs-doublet models , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 35 (May, 2008) 075001

    2008

  27. [35]

    M. Baak, J. C´ uth, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. M¨ onig, M. Schott, and J. Stelzer,The global electroweak fit at nnlo and prospects for the lhc and ilc , The European Physical Journal C 74 (Sept., 2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    R. R. Florentino, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva,Off diagonal charged scalar couplings with the Z boson: Zee-type models as an example, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 12 1148, [ arXiv:2106.08332]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    R. Boto, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva,Current bounds on the type-Z Z3 three-Higgs-doublet model , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 9 095006, [ arXiv:2106.11977]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. G. Akeroyd, S. Moretti, T. Shindou, and M. Song, CP asymmetries of B→Xs/Xdγ in models with three Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 1 015035, [ arXiv:2009.05779]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Chakraborti, D

    M. Chakraborti, D. Das, M. Levy, S. Mukherjee, and I. Saha, Prospects for light charged scalars in a three-Higgs-doublet model with Z3 symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021), no. 7 075033, [ arXiv:2104.08146]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21–24. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 65, 2920 (1990)]

    1990

  33. [41]

    Yamanaka, Analysis of the Electric Dipole Moment in the R-parity Violating Supersymmetric Standard Model

    N. Yamanaka, Analysis of the Electric Dipole Moment in the R-parity Violating Supersymmetric Standard Model . PhD thesis, Osaka U., 2013

    2013

  34. [42]

    T. Abe, J. Hisano, T. Kitahara, and K. Tobioka, Gauge invariant Barr-Zee type contributions to fermionic EDMs in the two-Higgs doublet models , JHEP 01 (2014) 106, [ arXiv:1311.4704]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 161 (2016)]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Inoue, M

    S. Inoue, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and Y. Zhang, CP-violating phenomenology of flavor conserving two Higgs doublet models, Phys.Rev. D89 (2014), no. 11 115023

    2014

  36. [44]

    Altmannshofer, S

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, N. Hamer, and H. H. Patel, Electron EDM in the complex two-Higgs doublet model , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 11 115042

    2020

  37. [45]

    Fontes, M

    D. Fontes, M. M¨ uhlleitner, J. C. Rom˜ ao, R. Santos, J. P. Silva, and J. Wittbrodt,The C2HDM revisited, JHEP 02 (2018) 073, [ arXiv:1711.09419]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Spira, HIGLU: A program for the calculation of the total Higgs production cross-section at hadron colliders via gluon fusion including QCD corrections , hep-ph/9510347

    M. Spira, HIGLU: A program for the calculation of the total Higgs production cross-section at hadron colliders via gluon fusion including QCD corrections , hep-ph/9510347

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fontes and J

    D. Fontes and J. C. Rom˜ ao,Renormalization of the C2HDM with FeynMaster 2 , JHEP 06 (2021) 016, [arXiv:2103.06281]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 005 (2021)]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fontes and J

    D. Fontes and J. C. Rom˜ ao,FeynMaster Manual, 4, 2025. arXiv:2504.01865

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Fontes, J

    D. Fontes, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva,h→Zγ in the complex two Higgs doublet model , JHEP 12 (2014) 043, [arXiv:1408.2534]

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hansen and A

    N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies , Evolutionary 18 Computation 9 (2001), no. 2 159–195

    2001

  43. [51]

    Hansen, The cma evolution strategy: A tutorial , 2023

    N. Hansen, The cma evolution strategy: A tutorial , 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Nomura and M

    M. Nomura and M. Shibata, cmaes : A simple yet practical python library for cma-es , 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Goldstein and A

    M. Goldstein and A. Dengel, Histogram-based outlier score (hbos): A fast unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm , 09, 2012

    2012

  46. [54]

    R. Boto, P. N. Figueiredo, J. C. Rom˜ ao, and J. P. Silva, Novel two component dark matter features in the Z2×Z2 3HDM, Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024), no. 108

    2024

  47. [55]

    Das and I

    D. Das and I. Saha, Alignment limit in three Higgs-doublet models , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 3 035021, [arXiv:1904.03970]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Biek¨ otter, D

    T. Biek¨ otter, D. Fontes, M. M¨ uhlleitner, J. C. Rom˜ ao, R. Santos, and J. P. Silva,Impact of new experimental data on the C2HDM: the strong interdependence between LHC Higgs data and the electron EDM , JHEP 05 (2024) 127, [arXiv:2403.02425]. 19

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.