Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.15540 v1 pith:4ZTLVWMP submitted 2022-05-31 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords counterfactualexplanationmaceapplicationsattributescategoricalframeworkmachine-learning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterfactual explanation is an important Explainable AI technique to explain machine learning predictions. Despite being studied actively, existing optimization-based methods often assume that the underlying machine-learning model is differentiable and treat categorical attributes as continuous ones, which restricts their real-world applications when categorical attributes have many different values or the model is non-differentiable. To make counterfactual explanation suitable for real-world applications, we propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE), which adopts a newly designed pipeline that can efficiently handle non-differentiable machine-learning models on a large number of feature values. in our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Don't Just Translate, Agitate: Using Large Language Models as Devil's Advocates for AI Explanations

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMs should interrogate XAI outputs as constructive adversaries, presenting alternative interpretations and limitations, rather than serving as passive translators of feature-attribution explanations.

Pith tools