Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Nonlinear trident using WKB and worldline instantons

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Nonlinear trident, previously solved only in plane waves, is extended to time- and space-dependent electric fields by two saddle-point methods that agree with the plane-wave result at high energy.

desk verdict First real treatment of nonlinear trident beyond plane waves; a few derivational gaps to fix, but the cross-checks hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19758 v2 pith:52IXNZIF submitted 2024-12-27 hep-ph hep-th

Gianluca Degli Esposti , Greger Torgrimsson This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords nonlineartridentstrong-fieldQEDWKBapproximationworldlineinstantonselectricbackgroundfieldssaddle-pointmethodplane-wavelimitGamow-Sommerfeldfactor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that nonlinear trident — a single electron converting into two electrons and one positron in a strong background field — can be computed beyond plane-wave backgrounds with two semiclassical methods. For purely time-dependent electric fields $E(t)$, it derives closed-form WKB probabilities for both the exponential and pre-exponential parts of the spectrum, including the direct and exchange contributions. In the high-energy limit those results reproduce the known plane-wave trident results of [6] exactly, while the limit of high energy parallel to the electric field does not, exposing where plane-wave approximations fail. For fields depending on both time and space, an open-worldline instanton method computes the same leading-order probabilities far more efficiently than WKB. The paper also derives the Gamow-Sommerfeld Coulomb suppression between the two final-state electrons from worldline instantons.

What carries the argument

Two semiclassical devices carry the argument. The first is a single complex-time saddle point at $p_1=p_2=p_3=p/3$ with an on-shell intermediate photon ($X=0$), around which all $E(t)$ spectra are Gaussian fluctuations; the photon pole turns the off-shell photon-energy integral into complementary error functions, producing the distinctive momentum widths of the direct and exchange terms. The second is a pair of open worldline instantons, meaning classical trajectories in complex proper time that connect the asymptotic fermion states through the background field, with a kink at the photon vertex. These instantons replace Volkov solutions for fields that depend on both $t$ and $z$, and they supply the exponent of the probability, the shifted saddle-point momenta, and the Hessian matrix that gives the spectrum widths.

What would settle it

Evaluate the original momentum-time integrals (12) numerically without the saddle-point expansion for a Sauter pulse at a moderately weak field, and compare the resulting spectrum with (28)–(29); a mismatch, or an additional stationary point of the exponent, would show that the $p/3$, $X=0$ saddle point is not the whole story.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that leading-order weak-field probabilities for nonlinear trident in non-plane-wave electric backgrounds share one saddle-point structure: the three final-state particles carry momentum $p/3$ each, and the intermediate photon is on shell ($X=0$). Expanding around this saddle point in $E(t)$ fields yields the WKB spectra (28)–(29) and integrated probabilities (44)–(45), with complementary error functions arising from the photon propagator pole as a new feature. The direct and exchange parts are the same order of magnitude, confirming that the historically neglected exchange term remains important beyond plane waves. In the limit where the transverse momentum is large, the formulas reduce exactly to the plane-wave trident results of [6]; in the limit where the momentum is large but parallel to the field, they do not, so high energy alone does not justify a plane-wave approximation. For spacetime-dependent fields, the same probabilities follow from a pair of open worldline instantons — one for photon emission, one for pair production — obeying the Lorentz-force equation with a kink at the photon vertex, which yields the exponential action, saddle-point momenta, and Hessian momentum widths.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the educated-guess saddle point $p_1=p_2=p_3=p/3$ with $X=0$; if other stationary points of the momentum integrals contribute, or if this point is only approximate, the claimed leading-order probabilities and widths must be modified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The plane-wave trident results of [6] are recovered as the high-energy limit of the $E(t)$ result whenever the energy is high and transverse, so the new formulas place the plane-wave approximation inside a larger, testable family.
  • When the electron momentum is large but parallel to the electric field, the plane-wave result is not recovered, so estimates based on Volkov solutions can be wrong for electrons accelerated along the field.
  • Direct and exchange contributions to the spectrum are the same order in the weak-field regime, so the historically omitted exchange term cannot be neglected in non-plane-wave backgrounds.
  • In the locally-constant-field limit the leading-order probability is the incoherent product of nonlinear Compton scattering and Breit-Wheeler pair production, while the one-step correction splits into direct and exchange parts of comparable size.
  • Higher-order effects such as the Coulomb repulsion between the two final-state electrons can be included as a multiplicative Gamow-Sommerfeld factor, derived here from worldline instantons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to apply the same open-worldline instanton construction to other second-order strong-field processes, such as double Compton scattering, where no exact Volkov-like solution is available for multidimensional fields.
  • The failure of the high-energy parallel limit suggests that luminosity estimates for trident in laser-electron collisions should be rechecked when the electron is accelerated along the field, a regime the paper leaves implicit.
  • The error-function momentum widths may be observable as a characteristic broadening of the direct peak and narrowing of the exchange peak in the produced-electron spectrum.
  • The worldline derivation of the Gamow-Sommerfeld factor suggests the same technique can resum Coulomb corrections in other multiparticle strong-field processes, for example pair production near threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops two semiclassical methods for the nonlinear trident process e^- -> e^- e^- e^+ in background electric fields that are not plane waves. For time-dependent E(t), the authors use WKB wave functions and saddle-point evaluation to obtain the momentum spectrum and the integrated probability, separating direct and exchange contributions; a distinctive feature is the erfc function produced by the intermediate-photon pole. They then take high-energy, locally-constant-field, and longitudinal limits, showing that the high-energy limit reproduces the plane-wave trident results of [6], that the LCF limit contains the expected two-step incoherent-product structure, and that certain limits do not commute when p0 ~ 1/gamma. For fields with a slow spatial dependence, they add a WKB correction and then formulate an open-worldline instanton approach with numerical instanton trajectories, saddle-point equations, and a Hessian that is checked to be symmetric under electron exchange. The paper also derives the Gamow-Sommerfeld suppression from the worldline action. The central results are analytic and cross-checked against published plane-wave and constant-crossed-field results.

Significance. If the methods are correct, this is a substantial methodological advance for strong-field QED beyond plane-wave backgrounds. The paper gives the first systematic WKB treatment of trident for E(t) backgrounds, explicit direct/exchange spectra with nontrivial erfc structure, and an open-worldline instanton framework for fields depending on both time and space. The cross-checks are extensive and are a genuine strength: the high-energy limit matches the plane-wave results of [6], the LCF limit matches constant-crossed-field results, the longitudinal limit has the same structure as earlier Breit-Wheeler analogs, and the worldline Hessian is symmetric under electron exchange and converges to the WKB widths as gamma_z -> 0. The derivations use no fitted parameters. The main weakness is that one load-bearing saddle point in the WKB derivation is asserted rather than derived; this is fixable and is partly mitigated by independent support from the worldline-instanton section.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, text before Eq. (17)] The momentum saddle point p1 = p2 = p3 = p/3 with X = 0 is introduced by the statement 'By an educated guess or otherwise, we find a saddle point', but no stationary-phase equations, second-derivative matrix, or uniqueness argument is shown. Every E(t) spectrum and integrated probability, Eqs. (28)-(45), and the limits in Secs. II.A-II.F, are built as Gaussian and erfc expansions around this single point. The plane-wave comparison in Sec. II.B cannot by itself certify this saddle, because Eq. (11) of [6] is also expanded around the same equal-momentum, on-shell-photon saddle. The worldline-instanton section does independently produce the same equal-momentum structure, Eqs. (217)-(218), and Fig. 3 shows agreement with WKB, which is genuine supporting evidence; nevertheless, the WKB derivation as written is not self-contained. Please add a derivation of the saddle-point equations from F1(p1, l0) = 0 and F'_1(p1, p2, l0) = 0, and state explicitly whether this saddle is unique or which saddle dominates in the regime considered.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (206) and (247)] For general gamma_z, the worldline-instanton section computes the exponential part A and the Hessian d^{-2}, but it does not give the overall prefactor of the Gaussian spectrum; Eq. (247) only states proportionality. Since the paper's WKB treatment provides complete prefactors for E(t), the worldline method is presented to the same level only in the gamma_z -> 0 comparison. Please state whether the prefactor can be obtained within the present worldline framework and, if not, clarify that for general gamma_z only the exponential and the momentum widths are computed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, text around Eqs. (17) and (22)-(23)] Calling X = 0 a 'saddle point' is imprecise: X = 0 is a pole of the photon propagator, and the integral (23) is evaluated exactly via the erfc representation rather than by a saddle-point expansion in X. The terminology should be adjusted to avoid implying that a standard stationary-phase analysis in X has been performed.
  2. [Sec. V, Eqs. (260)-(276)] The worldline derivation in Sec. V gives the exponential factor exp(-2*pi*alpha/v) but not the prefactor 2*pi*alpha/v that appears in the approximation C^2_exp = x e^{-x} in Eq. (264). Please state explicitly that only the leading exponential suppression is derived and that the prefactor would require the fluctuation determinant around the nonrelativistic saddle.
  3. [Sec. III, text after Eq. (164)] The sentence 'By comparing this with the zeroth order (2), we see that the positron state is obtained by replacing ...' is quite terse; expanding the comparison would help the reader verify the sign and momentum substitutions for the positron wave function.
  4. [Fig. 1 and Sec. IV, Eqs. (48), (64), (206)] The symbol A is used both for the field amplitude, Eq. (48) and Eq. (64), and for the instanton action, Eq. (206) and Fig. 1. This is confusing; please rename one of them, for example using S for the instanton action.
  5. [General] The paper states that several intermediate algebraic steps were performed with Mathematica but does not provide the corresponding expressions or an ancillary file. Given the length of the derivations, a supplementary notebook or an appendix with the key saddle-point equations would improve verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WKB and worldline-instanton derivations are self-contained and checked against independent plane-wave results.

full rationale

I find no circular step that reduces a prediction to an input. The WKB calculation starts from the Dirac-equation wave functions (2) and the Feynman-rule amplitude (4), and the saddle-point results, Eqs. (28)-(45), contain no fitted parameters and no quantity defined to be the target probability. The high-energy/plane-wave limit is not asserted by construction: Sec. II.B re-derives the plane-wave trident spectrum starting from Eq. (11) of [6] and shows agreement with the E(t) high-energy limit, so the published plane-wave result is used as an independent benchmark. Similarly, the worldline-instanton section derives the momentum saddle-point conditions (217)-(218) and the Hessian widths (246)-(247) from the Lorentz-force equations rather than importing the WKB result, and Fig. 3 shows convergence to the WKB widths as gamma_z -> 0. The sentence "By an educated guess or otherwise, we find a saddle point for the momentum variables at p1 = p2 = p3 = p/3" (Eq. (17)) is an asserted stationary-phase point without a displayed derivation, and Eq. (14) is cited from [19] rather than re-derived; these are expositional gaps or correctness risks, not circularity, because the later independent worldline calculation and the plane-wave comparison provide supporting evidence. The manuscript also states that intermediate algebraic steps are omitted and "calculations have been done with Mathematica", which is a transparency limitation, not a circular reduction. Self-citations [6,15-19,23,27-29] are used for methods, notation, and benchmarks; none of them is invoked as an unverified premise that defines the trident result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted to data; background fields are specified inputs. The axioms are the standard semiclassical approximation and the asserted momentum saddle point. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Weak-field saddle-point approximation (E << 1) governs all amplitudes.
    Invoked in Sec. II: after rescaling t and t' by 1/E, exponents are O(1/E), justifying the saddle-point method. This is the core approximation; it limits validity to weak fields.
  • ad hoc to paper Momentum saddle point p1 = p2 = p3 = p/3 and on-shell photon X = 0.
    Sec. II before Eq. (17): found by 'educated guess'; not derived in text. All spectra (28)-(45) expand around it. Indirectly supported by plane-wave limit.
  • domain assumption Worldline instantons obey the Lorentz-force equation and physical-einbein contours; saddle-point equivalence with WKB at leading order.
    Sec. IV uses open worldlines with complex proper-time contours and a bump einbein (188)-(189); relies on prior works [27-29] for validity. Internal checks via Hessian symmetry and gamma_z small.
  • domain assumption Coulomb effects factor as a Gamow-Sommerfeld factor because the formation length is short compared to the Coulomb repulsion time.
    Sec. V, Eq. (277) estimates t_C/t_E >> 1; this justifies multiplying by C^2. This is a standard assumption but is load-bearing for the Coulomb section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear trident using WKB and worldline instantons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/52IXNZIF

@misc{pith2026241219758,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear trident using WKB and worldline instantons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/52IXNZIF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19758}
}
abstract

We consider nonlinear trident, $e^{\scriptscriptstyle -}\to e^{\scriptscriptstyle -} e^{\scriptscriptstyle -} e^{\scriptscriptstyle +}$, in various electric background fields. This process has so far been studied for plane-wave backgrounds, using Volkov solutions. Here we first use WKB for trident in time-dependent electric fields, and then for fields which vary slowly in space. Then we show how to use worldline instantons for more general fields which depend on both time and space. For time-dependent fields the WKB approach is at least as simple to use as the worldline approach, but already the relatively modest step of including a slow spatial dependence makes the worldline approach much more efficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19758 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Instanton quantities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Instantons for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The widths (246), or rather [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. In-in worldline formalism in pair creating fields

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In-in observables in pair-creating QED backgrounds are re-expressed exactly as in-out matrix elements with a universal non-local insertion, yielding a first-quantized formula for the probability of producing N pairs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [6]

    Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems,

    A. Di Piazza, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan and C. H. Keitel, “Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177 (2012) [arXiv:1111.3886 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    (100) Then from arccos[−(1 − δ2)] ≈ π − √ 2δ arccos[1 − δ2] ≈ √ 2δ (101) we obtain terms which scale as γ rather than γ2 with respect to LO. We thus find Pdir = Ptwo + P dir one Pex = P ex one , (102) where the two-step term (which only has a direct part) is given by Ptwo = πα2A2Ef ′4(1 + 3p′2 ⊥ )2 96 √ 3(−f ′′′)m⊥m′ ⊥p′4 ⊥arccot(p′ ⊥) × eELCF (m′2 ⊥arcco...

    work page

  3. [2]

    p′2 1 − γp′ 3p (1 + p′2 1 )([1 + γ2]p′2 1 + [γp′ 3]2) # + 1 2γ q (1 − γp′ 3)2 + γ2(1 + p′2 1 ) ×arccos

    limit. Is theγ ≪ 1 limit of thep0 ≫ 1 result equal to the p0 ≫ 1 limit of theγ ≪ 1 limit? Consider the exact result for a Sauter pulse,f (u) = tanh(u), J0 = 1 2γ q (1 + γp′ 3)2 + γ2(1 + p′2 1 ) ×arccos " p′2 1 − γp′ 3p (1 + p′2 1 )([1 + γ2]p′2 1 + [γp′ 3]2) # + 1 2γ q (1 − γp′ 3)2 + γ2(1 + p′2 1 ) ×arccos " p′2 1 + γp′ 3p (1 + p′2 1 )([1 + γ2]p′2 1 + [γp′...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Advances in QED with in- tense background fields,

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya and G. Torgrimsson, “Advances in QED with in- tense background fields,” Phys. Rept.1010, 1-138 (2023) [arXiv:2203.00019 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Higher-order effects in external field: pair production by a particle

    V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. M. Strakhovenko, “Higher-order effects in external field: pair production by a particle”, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.14, 572 (1972)

    work page 1972

  6. [5]

    Vacuum polarization correction to elastic electron and muon scattering in an intense field and pair electro- and muoproduction,

    V. I. Ritus, “Vacuum polarization correction to elastic electron and muon scattering in an intense field and pair electro- and muoproduction,” Nucl. Phys. B44 (1972) 236

    work page 1972

  7. [7]

    Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields,

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund and S. S. Bulanov, “Charged particle motion and radiation in strong electromagnetic fields,” Rev. Mod. Phys.94, no.4, 045001 (2022) [arXiv:2107.02161 [physics.plasm-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Complete QED theory of multiphoton trident pair production in strong laser fields

    H. Hu, C. Muller and C. H. Keitel, “Complete QED theory of multiphoton trident pair production in strong laser fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 080401 (2010) [arXiv:1002.2596 [physics.atom-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Trident pair production in strong laser pulses,

    A. Ilderton, “Trident pair production in strong laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020404 (2011) [arXiv:1011.4072 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Trident pair production in a con- stant crossed field,

    B. King and H. Ruhl, “Trident pair production in a con- stant crossed field,” Phys. Rev. D 88, no. 1, 013005 (2013) [arXiv:1303.1356 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Trident pair production in plane waves: Coherence, exchange, and spacetime in- homogeneity,

    V. Dinu and G. Torgrimsson, “Trident pair production in plane waves: Coherence, exchange, and spacetime in- homogeneity,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no. 3, 036021 (2018) [arXiv:1711.04344 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Effect of interference on the trident process in a constant crossed field,

    B. King and A. M. Fedotov, “Effect of interference on the trident process in a constant crossed field,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no. 1, 016005 (2018) [arXiv:1801.07300 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Nonlinear trident pair production in an arbitrary plane wave: a focus on the properties of the transition amplitude,

    F. Mackenroth and A. Di Piazza, “Nonlinear trident pair production in an arbitrary plane wave: a focus on the properties of the transition amplitude,” Phys. Rev. D98, no. 11, 116002 (2018) [arXiv:1805.01731 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Laser pulse- length effects in trident pair production,

    U. Hernandez Acosta and B. Kämpfer, “Laser pulse- length effects in trident pair production,” Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 61, no. 8, 084011 (2019) [arXiv:1901.08860 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Trident process in laser pulses,

    V. Dinu and G. Torgrimsson, “Trident process in laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.5, 056017 (2020) [arXiv:1912.11017 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Trident pair production in colliding bright x-ray laser beams,

    H. Hu and J. Huang, “Trident pair production in colliding bright x-ray laser beams,” Phys. Rev. A89 (2014) no.3, 033411 [arXiv:1308.5324 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Circular dichroism in nonlinear electron-positron pair creation

    K. Krajewska and J. Z. Kamiński, “Circular dichroism in nonlinear electron-positron pair creation”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series594 012024 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Resummation of the α expansion for nonlinear pair production by an electron in a strong electromagnetic field,

    G. Torgrimsson, “Resummation of the α expansion for nonlinear pair production by an electron in a strong electromagnetic field,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.1, 016019 (2023) [arXiv:2207.05031 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    PlasmadynamicsattheSchwingerlimit and beyond,

    G. Brodin, H. Al-Naseri, J. Zamanian, G. Torgrimsson andB.Eliasson, “PlasmadynamicsattheSchwingerlimit and beyond,” Phys. Rev. E 107, no.3, 035204 (2023) [arXiv:2209.07872 [physics.plasm-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Resonance Effects in the Field of an Intense Laser Beam

    V. Oleinik, “Resonance Effects in the Field of an Intense Laser Beam”, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.25, 697 (1967)

    1967

  13. [21]

    Approximating higher- order nonlinear QED processes with first-order build- ing blocks,

    V. Dinu and G. Torgrimsson, “Approximating higher- order nonlinear QED processes with first-order build- ing blocks,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.1, 016018 (2020) [arXiv:1912.11015 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nonlinear trident in the high-energy limit: Nonlocality, Coulomb field and resummations,

    G. Torgrimsson, “Nonlinear trident in the high-energy limit: Nonlocality, Coulomb field and resummations,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.9, 096008 (2020) [arXiv:2007.08492 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Momentum spec- trum of Schwinger pair production in four-dimensional e-dipole fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Momentum spec- trum of Schwinger pair production in four-dimensional e-dipole fields,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.1, 016013 (2024) [arXiv:2308.01659 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Pair creation and axial anomaly in light cone QED(2),

    T. N. Tomaras, N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, “Pair creation and axial anomaly in light cone QED(2),” JHEP 11, 008 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0108090 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Localisation in worldline pair produc- tion and lightfront zero-modes,

    A. Ilderton, “Localisation in worldline pair produc- tion and lightfront zero-modes,” JHEP 09, 166 (2014) [arXiv:1406.1513 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Two-photon Compton process in pulsed intense laser fields,

    D. Seipt and B. Kampfer, “Two-photon Compton process in pulsed intense laser fields,” Phys. Rev. D85, 101701 (2012) [arXiv:1201.4045 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Reso- nant Effect of High-Energy Electron–Positron Pairs Pro- duction in Collision of Ultrarelativistic Electrons with an X-ray Electromagnetic Wave,

    G. K. Sizykh, S. P. Roshchupkin and V. V. Dubov, “Reso- nant Effect of High-Energy Electron–Positron Pairs Pro- duction in Collision of Ultrarelativistic Electrons with an X-ray Electromagnetic Wave,” Universe7, no.7, 210 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Worldline instan- tons for nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production and Compton scattering,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Worldline instan- tons for nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production and Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.9, 096036 (2022) [arXiv:2112.11433 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Momentum spec- trum of nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production in spacetime fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Momentum spec- trum of nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production in spacetime fields,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.7, 076017 (2024) [arXiv:2312.17186 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Dis- crete worldline instantons,

    C. Schneider, G. Torgrimsson and R. Schützhold, “Dis- crete worldline instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.8, 085009 (2018) [arXiv:1806.00943 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    non-physical

    We find ps 11 = ps 21 = p1 3 + δP s 1 ps 31 = p1 3 − δP s 1 , (184) where p′ 1 = p1/3 is the saddle point to zeroth order, and δP s 1 = p′ 1 m′ br ar ∂br ∂m′ γtγ2 z Y . (185) We will compare theO(γ2 z ) results in this section with the resultsobtained in the nextsection with t...

    2020

  24. [32]

    + (J1 − p′2 1 J2)(δp2 21 + δp2 31) + m′2 ⊥ J2(δp2 23 + δp2

  25. [33]

    From the two Mueller vectors,MC and MBW, we now construct a two-step approximation as (cf

    + 2p′ 1JA(δp21δp23 + δp31δp33) − δl2 2 l0 − 4 l3 0 − 3 2 + 2p′2 3 l2 0p′2 1 Ω p′2 1 (p′ 3δl1 − p′ 1δl3)2 − Ω p′2 1 1 2 (p′ 3δp1 − p′ 1δp3)2 + 6(p′ 3δP1 − p′ 1δP3)2 , (135) where δpij = ej · δpi, δl = −δp = δp2 + δp3. From the two Mueller vectors,MC and MBW, we now construct a ...

  26. [34]

    Sauter-Schwinger Effect for Collid- ing Laser Pulses,

    C. Kohlfürst, N. Ahmadiniaz, J. Oertel and R. Schützhold, “Sauter-Schwinger Effect for Collid- ing Laser Pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no.24, 241801 (2022) [arXiv:2107.08741 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Worldline instan- tons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair pro- duction in spacetime dependent fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Worldline instan- tons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair pro- duction in spacetime dependent fields,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.5, 056019 (2023) [arXiv:2212.11578 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen,

    A. Sommerfeld, “Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen,” Annalen Phys.403, no.3, 257-330 (1931)

    1931

  29. [37]

    Interaction of an Electron and Positron in Pair Production,

    A. D. Sakharov, “Interaction of an Electron and Positron in Pair Production,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18, 631-635 (1948)

    1948

  30. [38]

    Quantum mechanics

    E. Merzbacher, “Quantum mechanics”, Third edition, John Wiley & Sons

  31. [39]

    Quantum mechanics – non-relativistic theory

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum mechanics – non-relativistic theory”, Third edition, Pergamon press

  32. [40]

    Quantum electrody- namics

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Quantum electrody- namics”, Second edition, Pergamon press

  33. [41]

    Quantum mechanics

    L. I. Schiff, “Quantum mechanics”, Third edition, McGraw-Hill

  34. [42]

    TOPICS IN TAU PHYSICS AT A TAU 30 CHARM FACTORY,

    M. B. Voloshin, “TOPICS IN TAU PHYSICS AT A TAU 30 CHARM FACTORY,” TPI-MINN-89-33-T

  35. [43]

    e+ e- —> tau+ tau- at the threshold and beyond,

    B. H. Smith and M. B. Voloshin, “e+ e- —> tau+ tau- at the threshold and beyond,” Phys. Lett. B324, 117- 120 (1994) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 333, 564 (1994)] [arXiv:hep-ph/9312358 [hep-ph]]

    1994 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Production of the Small- est QED Atom: True Muonium (mu+ mu-),

    S. J. Brodsky and R. F. Lebed, “Production of the Small- est QED Atom: True Muonium (mu+ mu-),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213401 (2009) [arXiv:0904.2225 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Un- expected features of e+ e- —> p anti-p and e+ e- —> Lambdaanti-Lambdacrosssectionsnearthreshold,

    R. Baldini, S. Pacetti, A. Zallo and A. Zichichi, “Un- expected features of e+ e- —> p anti-p and e+ e- —> Lambdaanti-Lambdacrosssectionsnearthreshold,” Eur. Phys. J. A39, 315-321 (2009) [arXiv:0711.1725 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A Study ofe+e− → p¯p using initial state radiation with BABAR,

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], “A Study ofe+e− → p¯p using initial state radiation with BABAR,” Phys. Rev. D73, 012005 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ex/0512023 [hep-ex]]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Study of e+e− → Λ ¯Λ, Λ ¯Σ0, Σ0 ¯Σ0 using initial state radiation with BABAR,

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], “Study of e+e− → Λ ¯Λ, Λ ¯Σ0, Σ0 ¯Σ0 using initial state radiation with BABAR,” Phys. Rev. D76, 092006 (2007) [arXiv:0709.1988 [hep-ex]]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Measurement of thee+e− → Λ ¯Λ cross section from threshold to 3.00 GeV using events with initial-state radiation,

    M. Ablikimet al. [BESIII], “Measurement of thee+e− → Λ ¯Λ cross section from threshold to 3.00 GeV using events with initial-state radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.7, 072005 (2023) [arXiv:2303.07629 [hep-ex]]

    2023

  41. [49]

    A Theory of Dark Matter,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, “A Theory of Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009) [arXiv:0810.0713 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Lagrangian of an intense electromagnetic field and quantum electrodynamics at short distances,

    V. Ritus, “Lagrangian of an intense electromagnetic field and quantum electrodynamics at short distances,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys.42, no.5, 774 (1975)

    1975

  43. [51]

    Pair Produc- tion at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,

    I. K. Affleck, O. Alvarez and N. S. Manton, “Pair Produc- tion at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B197, 509-519 (1982)

    1982

  44. [52]

    VIRIAL REPRE- SENTATION OF THE IMAGINARY PART OF THE LAGRANGE FUNCTION OF THE ELECTROMAG- NETIC FIELD,

    S. L. Lebedev and V. I. Ritus, “VIRIAL REPRE- SENTATION OF THE IMAGINARY PART OF THE LAGRANGE FUNCTION OF THE ELECTROMAG- NETIC FIELD,” Sov. Phys. JETP59, 237-244 (1984)

    1984

  45. [53]

    Euler- Heisenberg lagrangians and asymptotic analysis in 1+1 QED, part 1: Two-loop,

    I. Huet, D. G. C. McKeon and C. Schubert, “Euler- Heisenberg lagrangians and asymptotic analysis in 1+1 QED, part 1: Two-loop,” JHEP 12, 036 (2010) [arXiv:1010.5315 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Three-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in 1+1 QED, part 1: single fermion-loop part,

    I. Huet, M. Rausch De Traubenberg and C. Schubert, “Three-loop Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in 1+1 QED, part 1: single fermion-loop part,” JHEP03, 167 (2019) [arXiv:1812.08380 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Thermal Schwinger pair pro- duction at arbitrary coupling,

    O. Gould and A. Rajantie, “Thermal Schwinger pair pro- duction at arbitrary coupling,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.7, 076002 (2017) [arXiv:1704.04801 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homo- genen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,

    F. Sauter, “Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homo- genen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,” Z. Phys.69 (1931) 742

    1931

  49. [57]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum po- larization,

    J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po- larization,” Phys. Rev.82 (1951) 664

    1951

  50. [58]

    Magnetic Charge and the Charge Quan- tization Condition,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Magnetic Charge and the Charge Quan- tization Condition,” Phys. Rev. D12, 3105 (1975)

    1975

  51. [59]

    The Lorentz-Dirac and Landau-Lifshitz equations from the perspective of modern renormal- ization theory,

    C. W. Nakhleh, “The Lorentz-Dirac and Landau-Lifshitz equations from the perspective of modern renormal- ization theory,” Am. J. Phys. 81, 180-185 (2013) [arXiv:1207.1745 [physics.class-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.