REVIEW 1 cited by
Testing regular black holes with X-ray and GW data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Testing regular black holes with X-ray and GW data
read the original abstract
The presence of spacetime singularities in physically relevant solutions of the Einstein Equations is normally interpreted as a symptom of the breakdown of classical general relativity at very high densities/curvatures. However, despite significant efforts in the past decades, we do not have yet any robust theoretical framework to solve the problem of spacetime singularities. In this context, the past few years have seen an increasing interest in the study of phenomenological scenarios to describe singularity-free black holes, gravitational collapses, and cosmological models. In the present work, we consider the recent proposal by Mazza, Franzin & Liberati for a rotating regular black hole and we measure their regularization parameter $l$ from the available X-ray and gravitational wave black hole data. For $l = 0$, we recover the singular Kerr solution of general relativity, while for $l \neq 0$ we can have a regular black hole or a regular wormhole. Our analysis shows that the available data are consistent with a vanishing regularization parameter $l$ and we can constrain its value. From a NuSTAR spectrum of the Galactic black hole in EXO 1846-031, we find $l/M < 0.49$ (90% CL). From the gravitational wave event GW190707A, we find $l/M < 0.72$ (90% CL).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Testing non-circular black hole spacetime with X-ray reflection
X-ray reflection data for EXO 1846–031 cannot distinguish the non-circular deformation parameter ℓ_NP from zero, remaining consistent with the Kerr hypothesis.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.