REVIEW 1 cited by
Information Extraction of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Information Extraction of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria
read the original abstract
Clinical trials predicate subject eligibility on a diversity of criteria ranging from patient demographics to food allergies. Trials post their requirements as semantically complex, unstructured free-text. Formalizing trial criteria to a computer-interpretable syntax would facilitate eligibility determination. In this paper, we investigate an information extraction (IE) approach for grounding criteria from trials in ClinicalTrials(dot)gov to a shared knowledge base. We frame the problem as a novel knowledge base population task, and implement a solution combining machine learning and context free grammar. To our knowledge, this work is the first criteria extraction system to apply attention-based conditional random field architecture for named entity recognition (NER), and word2vec embedding clustering for named entity linking (NEL). We release the resources and core components of our system on GitHub at https://github.com/facebookresearch/Clinical-Trial-Parser. Finally, we report our per module and end to end performances; we conclude that our system is competitive with Criteria2Query, which we view as the current state-of-the-art in criteria extraction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
$\texttt{AMEND++}$: Benchmarking Eligibility Criteria Amendments in Clinical Trials
Initial eligibility-criteria text is weakly predictive of later protocol amendments, and a change-aware masked-language-modeling pretraining step improves prediction by about 1.4% relative AUROC.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.