REVIEW 2 cited by
Constraining New Physics models from $\mu\to e$ observables in bottom-up EFT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Upcoming experiments will improve the sensitivity to $\mu\to e$ processes by several orders of magnitude, and could observe lepton flavour-changing contact interactions for the first time. In this paper, we investigate what could be learned about New Physics from the measurements of these $\mu\to e$ observables, using a bottom-up effective field theory (EFT) approach and focusing on three popular models with new particles around the TeV scale (the type II seesaw, the inverse seesaw and a scalar leptoquark). We showed in a previous publication that $\mu\to e$ observables have the ability to rule out these models because none can fill the whole experimentally accessible parameter space. In this work, we give more details on our EFT formalism and present more complete results. We discuss the impact of some observables complementary to $\mu\to e$ transitions (such as the neutrino mass scale and ordering, and LFV $\tau$ decays) and draw attention to the interesting appearance of Jarlskog-like invariants in our expressions for the low-energy Wilson coefficients.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards the Swampland of Flavour Symmetries
A thesis claiming flavour theories with explicitly broken (or absent) symmetries can be as predictive and TeV-testable as symmetry-protected ones, demonstrated via type-II seesaw textures, minimal SO(10) with leptoqua...
-
Probing Type II Seesaw Leptogenesis Through Lepton Flavor Violation
A scan over 3σ neutrino parameters yields the most conservative lower bounds on the triplet-Higgs cubic coupling from μ→eγ, μ→3e, and μ-e conversion.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.