Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Towards Reliable Local Security Agents: Verifiable Post-Training for Linux Privilege Escalation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the Russian Doll model, a Bethe quantum number both counts renormalization-group cycles and serves as an order parameter for the fractal phase.

desk verdict Metadata mismatch: the body is a solid integrable-systems Letter on RD-model RG cycles and fractality, not the security-agent abstract; the math is clean and publishable within stated scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.17673 v2 pith:554AR4UC submitted 2026-03-18 cs.CR cs.AI

Philipp Normann , Andreas Happe , Jürgen Cito , Daniel Arp This is my paper
classification cs.CRcs.AI PACS 05.10.Cc05.45.Df74.20.Fg
keywords RussianDollmodelcyclicrenormalizationgroupfractaleigenstatesBetheansatzorderparametertime-reversalsymmetrybreakingEfimovscalinglocalizationtransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Russian Doll model is an exactly solvable pairing Hamiltonian with time-reversal symmetry breaking that supports a cyclic renormalization group. The authors solve the RG flows in closed form and show that the integer Q that appears when the Bethe equations are written with the principal branch of arctan simultaneously counts how many RG cycles have been completed and labels towers of eigenstates. Acting with the RG on the lowest-energy eigenstate converts that counting into a direct relation between Q and the fractal dimension of the wave function. Localized, fractal, and delocalized phases are thereby distinguished by the size of Q relative to system size, giving a clean deterministic example in which cyclic RG and spatial fractality are two faces of the same quantum number.

What carries the argument

The exact solution of the cyclic RG recurrence for the couplings (expressed through the imaginary part of the log-Gamma function) together with the multi-valued arctan that defines Q in the Bethe equation; this pair converts successive eliminations of high-energy sites into a winding count that equals 1 − Q_min and thereby equals the fractal dimension.

What would settle it

For large finite N with deliberately non-equidistant diagonals, extract both the exact fractal dimension of the lowest eigenstate and the integer Q_min from the Bethe root; a systematic violation of D ≈ ln(1 − Q_min)/ln N beyond the stated error term would falsify the order-parameter claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the one-pair sector of the Russian Doll model the Bethe quantum number Q counts renormalization-group cycles and functions as an order parameter for localization: the fractal dimension satisfies D = ln(1 − Q_min)/ln N + O(ln ln N / ln N). Consequently Q_min vanishes in the localized phase, is extensive but sub-linear in N in the fractal phase, and scales as N in the delocalized phase.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed equality between fractal dimension and the logarithm of Q_min rests on a special large-N limit taken under the RG, equidistant diagonal levels, and the side condition that the TRS-breaking angle stays away from 0 and π.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fractal phases in deterministic integrable systems can be diagnosed by a discrete quantum number rather than only by multifractal spectra.
  • Cyclic RG with logarithmic versus linear period cleanly separates the fractal regime from the delocalized regime.
  • The same Q labels both Efimov-like towers of states and the winding number of the RG map on the cylindrical coupling space.
  • TRS-breaking strength (the θ parameter) controls the height of the Q towers and therefore the extent of the fractal phase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Q–D relation may hold in other Bethe-ansatz integrable models that possess cyclic RG, such as anyon-pairing or twisted XXZ chains.
  • In the SQCD vortex-string interpretation sketched by the authors, electric flux on the world-sheet would act as a geometric order parameter for vacuum delocalization.
  • Checking D versus ln|Q_min|/ln N at intermediate N and for disordered diagonals would quantify how far the order-parameter relation survives outside the special continuum limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the Bethe-ansatz integrable Russian Doll (RD) model of superconductivity with time-reversal symmetry breaking, which exhibits a cyclic renormalization group. The authors obtain an exact closed-form solution for the RG flow of the couplings (expressed via the complex Gamma function), analyze the one-pair sector, and identify localized, fractal, and delocalized phases. They show that the integer quantum number Q arising from the branch of the BA logarithm both counts RG cycles and parametrizes towers of states, and argue that Q_min serves as an order parameter for the fractal phase via the relation D = ln(1−Q_min)/ln N + O(ln ln N / ln N). Exact Breit–Wigner eigenstates, phase-dependent RG times (logarithmic vs linear), and numerical checks of Q(E) and γ flows support the analysis.

Significance. If the claimed Q–D relation holds under the stated conventions, the paper supplies a clean, deterministic, integrable example in which cyclic RG and Hilbert-space fractality coexist and are linked by a single quantum number. Strengths include: (i) exact eigenstates (Eq. 4 / S4) rather than a perturbative Breit–Wigner ansatz; (ii) a closed-form Gamma-function solution of the θ-recurrence (Eq. 16 / S28) that generalizes earlier energy-dependent cyclic RG results; (iii) explicit matching of integral vs exact Q (Fig. 1) and of IPR vs |Q_min| on the (γ, θ) plane (Fig. 3). These are concrete, checkable contributions. The SQCD/vortex-string remarks are speculative and not required for the central claim, but the one-pair RD analysis itself is a useful addition to the literature on fractal phases and limit-cycle RG.

major comments (2)
  1. Order parameter section and Supplement “Remark on the definition of γ and the limit N→∞”: The central claim D = ln(1−Q_min)/ln N + O(ln ln N / ln N) is derived under a specialized large-N procedure in which phases and D_q are read at fixed γ* after flowing N, together with the side condition ln(sin θ)/ln N ≪ 1 and equidistant levels ε_i = δ(i−N/2). This limiting procedure is load-bearing for the order-parameter identification and for the phase diagram in γ. It should be stated explicitly in the main text (not only the Supplement), with a clear domain of validity and a short discussion of what fails if the spectrum is non-equidistant or if θ approaches 0 or π so that the side condition is violated.
  2. Eq. (15) and the paragraph “Order parameter”: The RG step is constructed to preserve the BA equations, so “each cycle changes Q by ±1” is partly by design of the map (θ_{N−1}−θ_N = arctan(y/(E−ε_N))+π Q_N). The non-circular content is the independent computation of D_q from |ψ|^{2} (IPR asymptotics) and its matching to ln(1−Q_min)/ln N. The manuscript should separate these two layers more carefully—e.g., by stating first the independent fractal-dimension calculation, then the RG winding interpretation—so that the order-parameter claim is not read as a tautology of the RG definition.
minor comments (5)
  1. Affiliation line: “Technolodgy” is misspelled (twice in the author block).
  2. Eq. (4) / (S4): the product/sum index notation for the phase factors is hard to parse in the compiled text (broken subscripts and missing delimiters). Please re-typeset the eigenstate formula for readability.
  3. Fig. 1 caption: “Q int” / “Q exact” would be clearer as Q_int / Q_exact; the same applies to γ* in Fig. 2.
  4. The SQCD / vortex-string discussion in the Supplement is interesting but loosely connected to the one-pair RD results. Consider shortening it or moving a one-paragraph version to the main-text outlook so the Letter stays focused on the RG–fractality claim.
  5. Several large-N expansions (e.g., after Eq. (17) and in (S29)–(S31)) quote O(…) remainders without specifying the regime in γ; a short table or sentence listing which remainder is controlled in which phase would help the reader.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Q counting RG cycles is partly by design of the BA-preserving RG map; phase structure and Q–phase link are imported from the authors’ prior work [22]; the D ∼ ln(1−Q_min)/ln N matching via cycle counting still has independent content.

  1. self definitional [RG cycles section, Eqs. (15)–(16) and surrounding text; Supplement S25–S33]
    "θ_{N−1} − θ_N = arctan y/(E−ε_N) + πQ_N ... Since we define θ to be in [0, π], one cycle corresponds to the return of θ to the initial value with the change of Q by ±1. The term containing πQ_N can be absorbed into the lhs by introducing a new variable θ̃_N ... the number of cycles is determined by |θ_N − θ̃_N|/π."

    Q is defined as the integer branch of the multivalued arctan sum in the BA equation. The RG map is constructed precisely so that it preserves the BA equations and so that the branch jump is written as πQ_N. Absorbing that term into θ̃ then makes “Q counts the number of cycles” true by the definition of the RG step and of the branch, not by an independent dynamical prediction.

  2. self citation load bearing [Introduction and Fractality of the RDM model; Order parameter section; citations [22]]
    "In [22] it was shown that the deterministic RD model exhibits localized, fractal, and delocalized phases in the Hilbert space of the interacting fermionic system. ... Moreover, it was demonstrated in [22] that the mode number Q is related to the phases of the model. ... Finally, we prove the connection between Q_min and fractal dimension: D = ln(1−Q_min)/ln N + O(ln ln N / ln N) using renormalization group arguments."

    The phase diagram (localized/fractal/delocalized in γ) and the claim that Q is already related to those phases are imported from the authors’ prior paper [22]. That prior identification is load-bearing for interpreting the present RG cycle count as an order parameter; without [22] the present work would only have an exact RG flow and a tower-height formula, not the phase-order-parameter narrative.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim is that the Bethe quantum number Q both counts RG cycles and serves as an order parameter for the fractal phase, with D = ln(1−Q_min)/ln N + O(ln ln N / ln N). Two load-bearing ingredients reduce partly to inputs: (i) the RG step is defined to preserve the BA equations, so absorbing πQ_N into θ̃ makes “one cycle changes Q by ±1” true by construction of the map rather than an independent dynamical discovery; (ii) the localized/fractal/delocalized phase diagram and the prior statement that Q is related to those phases are taken from the authors’ own [22], which is load-bearing for the order-parameter interpretation. Against that, the exact eigenstates (Breit–Wigner form), the closed-form Gamma-function solution of the RG recurrence, the independent computation of D_q from |ψ|^{2}, and the non-trivial matching of tower height under RG flow to that D_q are self-contained within the stated large-N/equidistant conventions. No fitted-input-as-prediction or uniqueness-theorem smuggling appears. Score 3 reflects partial self-definitional and self-citation structure without collapsing the main matching argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is almost entirely analytic. Load-bearing inputs are standard BA integrability and fractal-dimension definitions from the literature, the LeClair-style RG step that drops the largest diagonal entry while preserving BA, equidistant single-particle levels, and a nonstandard large-N limiting procedure under flowing γ. No parameters are fitted to experimental data; γ and θ are model coordinates. No new particles or forces are postulated—Q is an existing BA branch index reinterpreted as order parameter and winding number.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Russian Doll Hamiltonian is Bethe-ansatz integrable; spectrum and eigenstates follow from the twisted XXX-type BA equations (Eq. 3).
    Taken from Dunning–Links and prior RD literature; used throughout for E and ψ.
  • standard math Fractal dimension D_q is defined from IPR moments I_q ∼ N^{D_q(1−q)} in the thermodynamic limit.
    Standard Anderson/multifractality definition (Evers–Mirlin); applied to exact |ψ|^{2}.
  • domain assumption RG step: remove largest diagonal ε_N and renormalize (x,y) or θ so that the remaining BA/eigenstate equations are preserved (Eqs. 13–15).
    Procedure of LeClair et al. / Glazek–Wilson style; integrability-preserving by construction.
  • domain assumption Diagonal energies are equidistant, ε_i = δ(i−N/2), bandwidth ω = Nδ, for phase diagram and Q integrals.
    Stated under Fractality and Towers; needed for closed-form Q_int and D_q asymptotics.
  • ad hoc to paper Special large-N limit under RG: phases and D_q are read at fixed γ* after flowing N, with ln(sin θ)/ln N ≪ 1 (Supplement).
    Authors explicitly note this is not the usual fixed-γ thermodynamic limit; the Q–D order-parameter claim depends on it.
invented entities (1)
  • Q as fractal order parameter / RG winding number
    purpose: Unify cycle counting of cyclic RG with the height of spectral towers and the fractal dimension via D ≈ ln(1−Q_min)/ln N.
    Q already exists as a BA branch index; the paper elevates it to an order parameter by RG arguments. Independent handle is numerical IPR vs |Q_min| on the (γ,θ) plane (Fig. 3), which is internal to the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Reliable Local Security Agents: Verifiable Post-Training for Linux Privilege Escalation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/554AR4UC

@misc{pith2026260317673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Reliable Local Security Agents: Verifiable Post-Training for Linux Privilege Escalation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/554AR4UC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.17673}
}
read the original abstract

LLM agents are becoming increasingly important in the security domain, but leading systems are often closed-source, cloud-based, hard to reproduce or use with sensitive code. This creates a need for small, local models that can perform security tasks under strict resource constraints, though effective methods for developing them remain unexplored. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a two-stage post-training recipe that turns a small local language model into a security agent. To this end, we focus on Linux privilege escalation as a representative setting to systematically study the training of local models, as the task is both automatically verifiable and requires multi-step interactive reasoning. Using an experimental setup that mitigates data leakage, we post-train a small 4B model in two stages: supervised fine-tuning on traces from procedural privilege-escalation environments, followed by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. On a held-out benchmark of 12 Linux privilege-escalation scenarios, supervised fine-tuning doubles the baseline success rate under a tight budget of 20 interaction rounds, and subsequent reinforcement learning training improves our model, PrivEsc-LLM 4B, to 93.3% success, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 at this budget. At the same time, the expected inference cost per successful escalation decreases by more than 80x. Our findings not only show that small local models can be adapted to complex security tasks, but also document the challenges involved, offering guidance for transferring this recipe to other settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Ethics of Autonomous AI Agents for Offensive Security

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Autonomous AI hacking tools combine three kinds of indeterminacy—action, impact, and users—making moral responsibility diffuse and giving attackers a short-term advantage under current cost asymmetries.

  2. A Survey of LLM-Driven Penetration Testing: Taxonomy, Co-Evolution, and Open Challenges

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    LLM pentest agents co-evolved through four bottleneck-driven phases into RLVR systems, while CTF platforms became dual evaluation/training infrastructure and three linked reliability gaps remain.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Ferdinand Evers and Alexander D. Mirlin. Anderson transitions.Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(4):1355–1417, October 2008

    2008

  2. [2]

    A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions.New Journal of Physics, 17(12):122002, De- cember 2015

    V E Kravtsov, I M Khaymovich, E Cuevas, and M Amini. A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions.New Journal of Physics, 17(12):122002, De- cember 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Fragile extended phases in the log-normal rosenzweig-porter model.Physical Review Research, 2(4):043346, 2020

    Ivan M Khaymovich, VE Kravtsov, BL Altshuler, and LB Ioffe. Fragile extended phases in the log-normal rosenzweig-porter model.Physical Review Research, 2(4):043346, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    C´ ecile Monthus. Multifractality of eigenstates in the de- localized non-ergodic phase of some random matrix mod- els: Wigner–weisskopf approach.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50(29):295101, 2017

    2017

  5. [5]

    L´ evy-rosenzweig- porter random matrix ensemble.Physical Review B, 103(10):104205, 2021

    Giulio Biroli and Marco Tarzia. L´ evy-rosenzweig- porter random matrix ensemble.Physical Review B, 103(10):104205, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Bogomolny and M

    E. Bogomolny and M. Sieber. Eigenfunction distribu- tion for the Rosenzweig-Porter model.Phys. Rev. E, 98:032139, Sep 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    Non- ergodic extended phase of the quantum random energy model.Annals of Physics, 409:167916, 2019

    Lara Faoro, Mikhail V Feigel’man, and Lev Ioffe. Non- ergodic extended phase of the quantum random energy model.Annals of Physics, 409:167916, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Gorsky, and Ivan Khay- movich

    Vedant Motamarri, Alexander S. Gorsky, and Ivan Khay- movich. Localization and fractality in disordered russian doll model.SciPost Physics, 13(5), November 2022

    2022

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Multifractal phase in the weighted adjacency matrices of random erd¨ os-r´ enyi graphs.Phys- 6 ical Review B, 110(17):174202, 2024

    Leticia F Cugliandolo, Gr´ egory Schehr, Marco Tarzia, and Davide Venturelli. Multifractal phase in the weighted adjacency matrices of random erd¨ os-r´ enyi graphs.Phys- 6 ical Review B, 110(17):174202, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Hilbert space geometry and quantum chaos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11968, Phys.Rev.Res

    Rustem Sharipov, Anastasiia Tiutiakina, Alexander Gorsky, Vladimir Gritsev, and Anatoli Polkovnikov. Hilbert space geometry and quantum chaos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11968, Phys.Rev.Res. to appear, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Tuning the phase diagram of a rosenzweig- porter model with fractal disorder.Physical Review B, 108(6):L060203, 2023

    Madhumita Sarkar, Roopayan Ghosh, and Ivan M Khay- movich. Tuning the phase diagram of a rosenzweig- porter model with fractal disorder.Physical Review B, 108(6):L060203, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Emergent multifractality in power-law de- caying eigenstates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17242, 2025

    Adway Kumar Das, Anandamohan Ghosh, and Ivan M Khaymovich. Emergent multifractality in power-law de- caying eigenstates.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17242, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Russian doll renormalization group and superconductiv- ity.Phys

    Andr´ e LeClair, Jos´ e Mar´ia Rom´ an, and Germ´ an Sierra. Russian doll renormalization group and superconductiv- ity.Phys. Rev. B, 69:020505, Jan 2002

    2002

  6. [14]

    Log-periodic behavior of finite size effects in field theories with rg limit cycles.Nuclear Physics B, 700(1-3):407–435, 2004

    Andr´ e LeClair, Jos´ e Mar´ia Rom´ an, and Germ´ an Sierra. Log-periodic behavior of finite size effects in field theories with rg limit cycles.Nuclear Physics B, 700(1-3):407–435, 2004

    2004

  7. [15]

    Russian doll renormalization group and Kosterlitz- Thouless flows.Nucl

    Andr´ e LeClair, Jos´ e Mar´ia Rom´ an, and Germ´ an Sierra. Russian doll renormalization group and Kosterlitz- Thouless flows.Nucl. Phys. B, 675(3):584–606, 2003

    2003

  8. [16]

    Dunning and J

    C. Dunning and J. Links. Integrability of the Russian doll BCS model.Nucl. Phys. B, 702(3):481–494, 2004

    2004

  9. [17]

    Richardson

    R.W. Richardson. A restricted class of exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian.Phys. Lett., 3(6):277– 279, 1963

    1963

  10. [18]

    Richardson and N

    R.W. Richardson and N. Sherman. Exact eigenstates of the pairing-force Hamiltonian.Nuclear Physics, 52:221– 238, 1964

    1964

  11. [19]

    Bcs-to-bec crossover from the exact bcs solution.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 72(4):043611, 2005

    Gerardo Ortiz and Jorge Dukelsky. Bcs-to-bec crossover from the exact bcs solution.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 72(4):043611, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Colloquium: Exactly solvable richardson-gaudin models for many-body quan- tum systems.Reviews of modern physics, 76(3):643–662, 2004

    J Dukelsky, S Pittel, and G Sierra. Colloquium: Exactly solvable richardson-gaudin models for many-body quan- tum systems.Reviews of modern physics, 76(3):643–662, 2004

    2004

  13. [21]

    Exact solution of the p+ ip pairing hamiltonian and a hierarchy of integrable mod- els.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Exper- iment, 2010(08):P08025, 2010

    Clare Dunning, Miguel Ibanez, Jon Links, Germ´ an Sierra, and Shao-You Zhao. Exact solution of the p+ ip pairing hamiltonian and a hierarchy of integrable mod- els.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Exper- iment, 2010(08):P08025, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Theta-term in rus- sian doll model: phase structure, quantum metric and bps multifractality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20758, JHEP to appear, 2026

    Alexander Gorsky and Ilya Liubimov. Theta-term in rus- sian doll model: phase structure, quantum metric and bps multifractality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20758, JHEP to appear, 2026

    2026

  15. [23]

    K. M. Bulycheva and A. S. Gorskii. Limit cycles in renor- malization group dynamics.Phys. Usp., 57(2):171–182, 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length.Physics Re- ports, 428(5-6):259–390, 2006

    Eric Braaten and H-W Hammer. Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length.Physics Re- ports, 428(5-6):259–390, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Limit cycles in quantum theories.Physical review letters, 89(23):230401, 2002

    Stanis law D G lazek and Kenneth G Wilson. Limit cycles in quantum theories.Physical review letters, 89(23):230401, 2002

    2002

  18. [26]

    The elementary excitations of the exactly solvable russian doll bcs model of superconductivity.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(05):P05011, 2005

    Alberto Anfossi, Andr´ e LeClair, and Germ´ an Sierra. The elementary excitations of the exactly solvable russian doll bcs model of superconductivity.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(05):P05011, 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    Refined cyclic renormalization group in russian doll model.SciPost Physics, 17(6):157, 2024

    Vedant Motamarri, Ivan M Khaymovich, and Alexan- der S Gorsky. Refined cyclic renormalization group in russian doll model.SciPost Physics, 17(6):157, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Su- persymmetric vacua and bethe ansatz.arXiv preprint arXiv:0901.4744, 2009

    Nikita A Nekrasov and Samson L Shatashvili. Su- persymmetric vacua and bethe ansatz.arXiv preprint arXiv:0901.4744, 2009

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Quanti- zation of integrable systems and four dimensional gauge theories

    Nikita A Nekrasov and Samson L Shatashvili. Quanti- zation of integrable systems and four dimensional gauge theories. InXVIth International Congress On Mathemat- ical Physics: (With DVD-ROM), pages 265–289. World Scientific, 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    Quantization of integrable systems and a 2d/4d duality

    Nick Dorey, Sungjay Lee, and Timothy J Hollowood. Quantization of integrable systems and a 2d/4d duality. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(10):1–42, 2011

    2011

  23. [31]

    Khay- movich

    Madhumita Sarkar, Roopayan Ghosh, and Ivan M. Khay- movich. Tuning the phase diagram of a rosenzweig-porter model with fractal disorder.Phys. Rev. B, 108:L060203, Aug 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Supplementary material: Exactly solvable rd model: Rg cycles meet frac- tality

    Ilya Liubimov and Alexander Gorsky. Supplementary material: Exactly solvable rd model: Rg cycles meet frac- tality. 2026

    2026

  25. [33]

    Instatons, the quark model, and the 1/n expansion.Nuclear Physics B, 149(2):285–320, 1979

    Edward Witten. Instatons, the quark model, and the 1/n expansion.Nuclear Physics B, 149(2):285–320, 1979

    1979

  26. [34]

    The bps spectra of gauge theories in two and four di- mensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 1999(05):006, 1999

    Nicholas Dorey, Timothy J Hollowood, and David Tong. The bps spectra of gauge theories in two and four di- mensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 1999(05):006, 1999

    1999

  27. [35]

    Quasiparticle lifetime in a finite sys- tem: A nonperturbative approach.Physical review let- ters, 78(14):2803, 1997

    Boris L Altshuler, Yuval Gefen, Alex Kamenev, and Leonid S Levitov. Quasiparticle lifetime in a finite sys- tem: A nonperturbative approach.Physical review let- ters, 78(14):2803, 1997

    1997

  28. [36]

    Flowing between string vacua for the critical non-abelian vortex with a deformation of n= 2 liouville theory.Physical Review D, 110(2):025004, 2024

    A Yung. Flowing between string vacua for the critical non-abelian vortex with a deformation of n= 2 liouville theory.Physical Review D, 110(2):025004, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    String baryon in four-dimensional n= 2 supersymmetric qcd from the 2d- 4d correspondence.Physical Review D, 102(5):054026, 2020

    E Ievlev, M Shifman, and A Yung. String baryon in four-dimensional n= 2 supersymmetric qcd from the 2d- 4d correspondence.Physical Review D, 102(5):054026, 2020

    2020

  30. [38]

    Chiral phase transition and instanton–anti- instanton molecules.Physical Review D, 51(3):1267, 1995

    Thomas Sch¨ afer, Edward V Shuryak, and JJM Ver- baarschot. Chiral phase transition and instanton–anti- instanton molecules.Physical Review D, 51(3):1267, 1995

    1995

  31. [39]

    Instan- ton interactions in dense-matter qcd.Physics Letters B, 510(1-4):167–172, 2001

    DT Son, Misha A Stephanov, and AR Zhitnitsky. Instan- ton interactions in dense-matter qcd.Physics Letters B, 510(1-4):167–172, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    High-density qcd and instantons.Annals of Physics, 280(1):35–99, 2000

    R Rapp, Thomas Sch¨ afer, Edward V Shuryak, and M Velkovsky. High-density qcd and instantons.Annals of Physics, 280(1):35–99, 2000. 7 ������������� ��������� ������� ��� � ���� �� ������ �� ������ ���� ���������� ����������� We start by reproducing the expression for the eigen...

    2000

  33. [41]

    The RG period corresponds to the change in ln n0 n1 = πδ y

    arctan y δ(n+ 1) − y δ (S29) In the fractal and localized phases y δ ≪n(γ >−1): ˜θn = Θ + y δ (lnn+O( 1 n , y2 δ2n2 )) (S30) Then ˜θdepends on the logarithm of the size of the system. The RG period corresponds to the change in ln n0 n1 = πδ y . In the delocalized phase y δ ≫n(...

  34. [42]

    arctan δ(N−1 + 1) y −(N −2 + 3

  35. [43]

    arctan δ(N−2 + 1) y (S34) We also have the condition thatyremain constant:y=N 2 −2 sinθ f =N −1 sinθ 0 with final valuesθ f andθ f +π/2. Beyond the pointγ ∗ =−2, after many steps, we attain large negative values ofγ, which corresponds to the limit of the plane-wave Eq.(S6) wit...

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.