Potential Surge Preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features

Pankaj Saha; Yuko Urakawa

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Potential Surge Preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A small dip in the inflaton potential can drive preheating to radiation-like behavior.

desk verdict A solid lattice proof-of-principle that Gaussian dips near the minimum can push a quadratic inflaton's preheating EOS toward 1/3, but the headline plateau claim outruns the simulation and the paper has a few internal inconsistencies. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17359 v2 pith:55M4EAIJ submitted 2024-12-23 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Pankaj Saha , Yuko Urakawa This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

keywords preheatingparametricresonanceinflatonpotentialfeaturesequationofstategravitationalwaveseffectivenumberrelativisticspecieslatticesimulationscalarfieldfragmentation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a small, localized deformation of the inflaton potential — a Gaussian bump or dip near the minimum — can change how preheating proceeds even when the underlying potential is the prototypical quadratic $m^2\phi^2$ model. The central demonstration is that with a dip of height $h\simeq -0.78$ placed at $\phi_S = 10^{-3}M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$, the oscillation- and volume-averaged equation of state reaches and stays near $w = 1/3$ for an extended time, something the pure quadratic model cannot achieve because its EOS falls back to matter-like values. The paper names this mechanism 'potential surge preheating': the feature effectively contributes localized higher-power terms to the potential, which slow the redshift of the inflaton amplitude, strengthen parametric and self-resonance, and improve energy transfer to daughter fields. Because the deformation is confined to field values far below CMB scales, it leaves large-scale inflationary predictions intact while producing gravitational-wave and $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ signatures that could expose the small-field shape of the potential.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-Gaussian deformation $\delta(\phi)=2h\,\exp(-\phi_S^2/2\sigma^2)\,\cosh(\phi_S\phi/\sigma^2)\,\exp(-\phi^2/2\sigma^2)$ with $\sigma=|\phi_S|$, a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric dip/bump pair placed at $\pm\phi_S$. This ansatz turns a pure harmonic potential into one whose local slope $d\ln V/d\ln\phi$ is field-dependent, so the oscillation-averaged EOS $w=(n-2)/(n+2)$ is no longer locked to zero. The mechanism does its work by slowing the amplitude redshift for dips and by seeding self-resonance through the time-dependent effective mass $d^2V/d\phi^2(t)$, which keeps the Floquet exponent positive for longer; the paper tracks this through the resonance parameter $q$, the emergent exponent $n$ computed from virial relations, and lattice simulations.

What would settle it

Run the same lattice setup including metric backreaction, or with a different localized deformation (step, asymmetric bump, inflection point) of similar size at the same field position; if the EOS no longer plateaus at $w\approx 1/3$ or the GW peaks disappear, the mechanism is specific to the Gaussian ansatz rather than generic. Observationally, a future high-frequency GW search that sees no signal where the model predicts $h^2\Omega_{\mathrm{GW}}\sim 10^{-11}$ to $10^{-9}$ at $f\sim 0.1$–$10$ GHz, together with a $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ measurement below the predicted values, would falsify the benchmark parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Placing a symmetric Gaussian deformation $\delta(\phi) = h[\exp(-(\phi-\phi_S)^2/2\sigma^2) + \exp(-(\phi+\phi_S)^2/2\sigma^2)]$ with $\sigma=|\phi_S|$ on top of $V_0 = \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2$ with a $g^2\phi^2\chi^2$ interaction, the authors show that the local slope $d\ln V/d\ln\phi$ becomes field-dependent: dips ($h<0$) make the potential locally behave like a higher-power $|\phi|^n$ with $n>2$ near $\pm\phi_S$, while bumps ($h>0$) make it narrower and effectively lower-power. That change alters the coherent oscillation: the amplitude redshifts more slowly for dips, the resonance parameter $q = g^2\Phi^2/m^2$ stays effective longer, and self-resonance in the inflaton sector appears because $d^2V/d\phi^2$ oscillates. In lattice simulations with $\phi_S = 10^{-3}M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ and $h\simeq -0.78$, the EOS reaches $w\simeq 1/3$ and plateaus there for thousands of $mt$, both in the two-field case and in single-field self-resonance. The generated gravitational-wave spectra show multiple peaks whose amplitudes and frequencies shift systematically with $h$, and the paper converts those GW densities into a $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ contribution that varies nearly linearly with the feature height.

Load-bearing premise

The whole radiation-like plateau depends on the specific symmetric Gaussian shape of Eq. (2.3) with $\sigma=|\phi_S|$ and on tuning the height $h$ to about $-0.78$ and the location $\phi_S$ to about $10^{-3}M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$; if a realistic microphysical feature has a different shape or these parameters are not realized, the plateau and its observables need not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Preheating after a quadratic inflationary potential can transition to a radiation-like equation of state without trilinear interactions, if the potential has a suitable localized dip.
The gravitational-wave spectrum from scalar fragmentation acquires multiple peaks in the GHz range whose amplitudes and peak frequencies respond systematically to the feature height and position, so a high-frequency GW detector could observe the feature.
The induced gravitational-wave background translates into a contribution to $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ that varies nearly linearly with $h$; current Planck bounds and future CMB-S4-style sensitivities bracket the allowed feature parameters.
Because the feature is localized near the minimum, it leaves CMB-scale inflationary predictions unchanged, making preheating observables a complementary probe of the small-field part of the inflaton potential.
The same mechanism also produces a radiation-like EOS in single-field self-resonance, suggesting that features can drive fragmentation even without coupling to daughter fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the EOS plateau survives simulations with metric backreaction, the usual assumption that quadratic-model preheating needs a perturbative decay channel to complete reheating would have to be revisited for potentials with small-scale structure.
The working parameter values ($h\approx -0.78$, $\phi_S\approx 10^{-3}M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$) are specific enough that a microphysical model producing a feature of that amplitude and width could be supported or excluded by combining $\Delta N_{\mathrm{eff}}$ measurements with high-frequency GW searches.
The same Gaussian-feature idea could be applied to spectator scalars or axion-like fields oscillating during radiation domination, where enhanced self-resonance would alter the gravitational-wave output from those fields.
One could test whether the feature shape can be reconstructed by inverting the GW spectrum: because the peak structure reflects the time-dependent effective power $n(t)$, a grid of simulations mapping $h$ and $\phi_S$ to spectral moments might allow a direct small-scale potential inversion.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. First: this is a genuine new mechanism. The paper puts Gaussian dips/bumps near the minimum of a quadratic inflaton potential (field values ~10^-3 M_Pl, far from CMB scales), and shows they locally act like φ^n terms with n>2, which strengthens self-resonance and can push the oscillation-averaged equation of state up to w≈1/3 even with just a φ^2χ^2 coupling. Earlier feature papers target inflation dynamics and PBHs; preheating near the minimum is a new application. Second: the qualitative result is credible, but the paper's sharpest quantitative claim—that the EOS stabilizes at 1/3—is shown only to mt≈4000 for one tuned parameter set, and the text has a couple of internal inconsistencies that need fixing.

What's good. The lattice work is solid: 256^3 with convergence checks in App. C, energy conservation monitored at 10^-5, and a nice virial diagnostic (Eq. 3.15) that independently confirms the higher-power terms are doing the work. The physics is plausible and consistent with known anharmonic-resonance results. The paper is honest about some limitations and does not oversell its model-building scope.

Soft spots. (1) The plateau: at mt≈1300 the homogeneous amplitude falls below φ_S, so the late-time plateau is carried by inhomogeneous modes. Those redshift as a^-4 while the condensate behaves like matter, so the EOS should eventually fall back toward 0. The paper does not quantify this; 'asymptotically stabilize' is an extrapolation from a 5-e-fold run. That said, a transient radiation-like phase could still be phenomenologically interesting, but the claim needs to be softened or extended. (2) Internal inconsistency: Sec. 3.2 says q_in=10^4 for g^2=10^-8, m=5×10^-6 M_Pl, Φ_in=0.965 M_Pl, but those numbers give q≈3.7×10^2—a factor of 27 off. Also, Sec. 3.3 says h=-0.780 for the φ_S=10^-3 result, while the Fig. 12 caption says h=-0.815. (3) The abstract says 'detectable imprints,' but the paper's own Sec. 4 states the GHz GWs and ΔN_eff are beyond current and planned sensitivities. (4) Genericity: only one Gaussian shape with σ=|φ_S| and h tuned near -0.8 is explored; no microphysical origin is given. For a proof-of-principle that's fine, but it should be stated as such.

Bottom line: the central mechanism holds up as a proof-of-principle, and the diagnostics are convincing. The specific quantitative claims need revision, not rejection. I'd send this to a serious referee; it deserves the attention, and a careful referee will catch the issues above. I would cite it if I worked on preheating or GWs from fragmentation.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies preheating in a quadratic inflaton potential with a localized Gaussian feature (bump or dip) placed symmetrically about the minimum. Using Floquet analysis and lattice simulations with CosmoLattice, the authors argue that a sufficiently deep dip locally increases the effective power-law index of the potential, slowing the decay of the inflaton amplitude, extending the parametric resonance of a coupled daughter field, and triggering self-resonance in the inflaton sector. The central quantitative result is that for a feature at φ_S = 10^-3 M_Pl with height h ≈ -0.8, the oscillation- and volume-averaged equation of state reaches and stays at w ≈ 1/3 up to mt = 4000, even in the absence of trilinear interactions, and that the gravitational-wave spectra and ΔN_eff depend systematically on the feature parameters. The paper also presents convergence tests for the lattice simulations and a virial-based diagnostic for the effective potential power index.

Significance. If the radiation-like plateau persists for a sufficiently large number of e-folds, the paper establishes a novel and physically interesting mechanism: small-scale features in the inflaton potential that are unconstrained by CMB observations can qualitatively change the preheating history, the equation of state, and the gravitational-wave background. The paper's strengths include the use of lattice simulations with explicit convergence checks (Appendix C), a clean diagnostic for the emergent higher-power terms (Eq. 3.15 and Fig. 9), and concrete predictions for GW spectra and ΔN_eff. The main limitations are that the result is demonstrated only for a specific Gaussian deformation ansatz (Eq. 2.3 with σ = |φ_S|), without a microphysical derivation, and that the duration of the radiation-like plateau is not quantified in e-folds. These limitations do not undermine the validity of the numerical demonstration, but they temper the generality of the claim.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3.2, Sec. 3.1.1] The stated resonance parameter is internally inconsistent. The text says 'This choice will fix our resonance parameter as q_in = 10^4' for m = 5e-6 M_Pl, g^2 = 1e-8, and Φ_in = 0.965 M_Pl. Direct evaluation gives q_in = g^2 Φ_in^2/m^2 ≈ 3.7e2, a factor of ~27 smaller. This discrepancy changes the critical amplitude Φ_* = Φ_in/√q_in from 0.01 Φ_in (as claimed, coinciding with φ_S = 10^-2 M_Pl) to about 0.052 Φ_in. Since the two-field resonance and the resulting GW/ΔN_eff results (Figs. 6, 10, 13) depend on the value of q_in, the authors must either correct the stated q_in or change the model parameters so that the numbers are mutually consistent.
[Sec. 3.3, Fig. 12] The central claim that the equation of state is 'brought' to w ≈ 1/3 rests on the plateau shown in Fig. 12 up to mt = 4000, which corresponds to roughly 5 e-folds of expansion from the start of the simulation. The paper states that 'very long-term simulations' confirm the plateau, but it provides no plot, no e-fold count, and no estimate of when the system eventually returns to matter domination. Because the homogeneous amplitude falls below the feature position (φ_S = 10^-3 M_Pl) already at mt ~ 10^3 (as Φ(t) ≈ Φ_in/(mt) during matter domination), the late-time plateau is maintained by inhomogeneous fluctuations. The authors should quantify the duration of the plateau in e-folds and show that the radiation-like behavior persists long enough to justify the abstract's claim, or otherwise bound the eventual return to w = 0.
[Sec. 3.1.1] The narrative describing which sign of h produces 'higher-power terms' is internally contradictory. The text states that 'the potential will be shallower than quadratic around the position of the features when h > 0', then says 'For h < 0, the potential is dominated by higher power terms with n > 2 around φ = φ_S', and later 'In contrast, for φ > 0, the potential is dominated by terms smaller than quadratic n < 2'. These statements are mutually inconsistent (and 'φ > 0' appears to be a typo for 'h > 0'). Since the surge of higher-power terms is the paper's central mechanism, the local power index n(φ) should be derived from Eq. (2.3) and described consistently; otherwise the reader cannot follow the physical explanation of why dips slow the amplitude decay and extend the resonance.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 4.1] The paper says the redshift factor N_e→RD is 'neglected for simplicity' but then uses an ad hoc factor-of-20 expansion in Fig. 13. The definition of the adjusted ΔN_eff points should be stated clearly.
[Sec. 3.1.1] The sentence 'In contrast, for φ > 0, the potential is dominated by terms smaller than quadratic n < 2' seems to contain a typo ('φ' should likely be 'h'), given the surrounding discussion of h values.
[Sec. 4.1] The text 'Eucild' is a typo; it should be 'Euclid'.
[Abstract and Sec. 5] The abstract and conclusions describe the GW and ΔN_eff signals as 'detectable imprints', but the GW spectra peak at 10^8–10^10 Hz (beyond any planned detector) and the ΔN_eff values in Fig. 13 are below the sensitivities of Planck, CMB-S4, and even proposed satellite missions for most of the parameter space. The wording should be softened to 'potentially observable with futuristic high-frequency GW detectors' or similar, to match the paper's own statements.
[Sec. 2] The paper calls dips with |h| ≤ 0.815 'small features', but a 70–80% localized reduction of the potential is quite deep; the term 'small' refers too the field-space width rather than the amplitude. This should be clarified to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the EOS plateau and GW spectra are measured simulation outputs, and the feature parameters are inputs rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (2.2)-(2.3) defines the deformed potential; Sec. 3.1 solves the linear mode equations; Sec. 3.2 and Appendix C evolve the full nonlinear system with the publicly available CosmoLattice code. The equation of state (3.11), the energy fractions (Fig. 8), the virial-based exponent (3.15), and the GW spectra (4.1)-(4.4) are all measured outputs, not imposed or fitted quantities. The w ~ 1/3 plateau for phi_S = 10^-3 M_Pl and h = -0.78 is a simulation result; h and phi_S are scanned inputs, and the paper explicitly describes the parameters as 'carefully chosen' rather than as predictions derived from the conclusion. The 'surge of higher-power terms' is diagnosed from the local log-log slope of the potential (Fig. 3) and from the virial combination (3.15), which are diagnostics independent of the EOS claim itself. The self-citations [121, 123, 130, 135-136, 147] support standard results such as EOS evolution, virial relations, and GW redshift formulas, and they are accompanied by independent references (e.g., [18, 19, 122, 124]); none is load-bearing or invoked as a uniqueness theorem. The paper's own stated limitations - taking the Gaussian deformation as a phenomenological ansatz without a microphysical derivation, and not exploring feature origins - are generality limitations, not circularity. The stated value qin = 10^4 in Sec. 3.2 appears inconsistent with the inputs g^2 = 10^-8, Phi_in = 0.965 M_Pl, and m = 5 x 10^-6 M_Pl by a factor ~27; this is a numerical consistency or parameterization concern, not a reduction of the output to the input. No equation in the paper defines a prediction in terms of the quantity it is said to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore the paper is not circular; the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological potential with hand-picked parameters (h, φ_S, g^2, σ) and standard lattice/classical-field approximations. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The main 'free parameter' is the feature shape and its location, which are scanned rather than derived.

free parameters (4)

h (Gaussian feature height) = scanned: -0.815, -0.78, -0.75, -0.5, 0, 0.4, 0.815 (EOS plateau at h=-0.78)
Controls the depth/height of the local potential deformation. Hand-picked and scanned to find the parameter range where the EOS reaches w~1/3 (Sec. 3.3).
φ_S (feature location) = 10^-2 M_Pl and 10^-3 M_Pl
Sets the field value where the Gaussian bump/dip is placed. The EOS plateau and GW spectra depend on this choice (Sec. 3.3, Sec. 4).
g^2 (inflaton-daughter coupling) = 10^-8
Chosen to keep the radiative corrections to the inflationary potential below CMB constraints. Determines the resonance parameter q (Sec. 3.2).
σ (Gaussian width) = σ = |φ_S|
Set equal to φ_S for simplicity; not scanned independently.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The Universe is described by a homogeneous FLRW background with the scalar fields evolving classically on it.
Standard for lattice preheating studies; used throughout Sec. 3.2.
domain assumption Gravitational backreaction from the produced tensor and scalar perturbations is negligible for the field dynamics.
Invoked in Sec. 4 when solving tensor perturbations on a rigid background; supported by refs. 63-67.
ad hoc to paper The Gaussian deformation in Eq. (2.3) is a representative model for small-scale features in the inflaton potential.
The paper states 'we will not explore the origins of these deformations but rather focus on the phenomenological aspects' (Sec. 2). The results are not shown to be independent of this shape.
domain assumption The lattice simulation uses the initial conditions and parameters of CosmoLattice with the stated box size and resolution.
Initial quantum vacuum fluctuations and integration scheme follow CosmoLattice defaults (App. C).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Potential Surge Preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/55M4EAIJ

@misc{pith2026241217359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Potential Surge Preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/55M4EAIJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17359}
}

abstract

We investigate the effects of local features in the inflationary potential on the preheating dynamics after inflation. We show that a small feature in the potential can enhance the resonance and bring the radiation-like state equation during preheating despite the inflationary potential being a quadratic one. Such localized features may naturally arise due to various physical effects without altering the large-scale predictions of the original model for cosmic microwave background (CMB) observables. We demonstrate that these features effectively introduce localized higher-power terms in the potential, significantly influencing the preheating dynamics $\unicode{x2013}$ a phenomenon we term potential surge preheating. We outline the resulting modifications in energy distribution among different components. We further show that these small-scale features leave detectable imprints in the form of gravitational wave signals. These signals influence CMB measurements of the effective number of relativistic species, $N_{\mathrm{eff}}$, offering a way to reconstruct the shape of the inflaton potential at small scales. Finally, we argue that these modifications to the scalar potential provide a framework to explore preheating dynamics and the fragmentation of scalar fields using simple scalar potentials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Gravitational waves from self-resonance during reheating with a quantum-corrected inflaton potential
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A Coleman-Weinberg correction that cancels the inflaton's quadratic term at the potential minimum triggers quartic self-resonance and a peaked GW background at 10^8-10^10 Hz; a negative quadratic term instead gives a ...
Gravitational Photon Polarization Twist to Probe the Early Universe and the Galactic Center
hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A long-baseline laser pulse whose polarization is twisted by gravitational waves could detect galactic-center pulsar and early-universe gravitational wave backgrounds.
High-Frequency Gravitational Waves on BREAD
hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

BREAD with single photon detectors could detect high-frequency gravitational waves at 0.05 to 200 THz, with projected strains as low as 1e-25 at 200 THz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys

A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99

1980
[2]

Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 347

1981
[3]

Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon

K. Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467

1981
[4]

Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys

A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. 108B (1982) 389

1982
[5]

Albrecht and P.J

A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

1982
[6]

Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys

A.D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. 129B (1983) 177

1983
[7]

Abbott, E

L.F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M.B. Wise, Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Lett. 117B (1982) 29

1982
[8]

Dolgov and A.D

A.D. Dolgov and A.D. Linde, Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. 116B (1982) 329

1982

Show all 149 references

[9]

Albrecht, P.J

A. Albrecht, P.J. Steinhardt, M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Reheating an Inflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1437

1982
[10]

Traschen and R.H

J.H. Traschen and R.H. Brandenberger, Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 2491

1990
[11]

Kofman, A.D

L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 3195 [hep-th/9405187]

1994 arXiv
[12]

Shtanov, J.H

Y . Shtanov, J.H. Traschen and R.H. Brandenberger,Universe reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 5438 [hep-ph/9407247]

1995 arXiv
[13]

Kaiser, Post inflation reheating in an expanding universe, Phys

D.I. Kaiser, Post inflation reheating in an expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 1776 [astro-ph/9507108]. – 25 –

1996 arXiv
[14]

Kofman, A.D

L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3258 [hep-ph/9704452]

1997 arXiv
[15]

Greene, L

P.B. Greene, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky, Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 6175 [hep-ph/9705347]

1997 arXiv
[16]

Kaiser, Preheating in an expanding universe: Analytic results for the massless case, Phys

D.I. Kaiser, Preheating in an expanding universe: Analytic results for the massless case, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 706 [hep-ph/9702244]

1997 arXiv
[17]

Kaiser, Resonance structure for preheating with massless fields, Phys

D.I. Kaiser, Resonance structure for preheating with massless fields, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 702 [hep-ph/9707516]

1998 arXiv
[18]

Lozanov and M.A

K.D. Lozanov and M.A. Amin, Equation of State and Duration to Radiation Domination after Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 061301 [1608.01213]

2017 arXiv
[19]

Lozanov and M.A

K.D. Lozanov and M.A. Amin, Self-resonance after inflation: oscillons, transients and radiation domination, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 023533 [1710.06851]

2018 arXiv
[20]

DeCross, D.I

M.P. DeCross, D.I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E.I. Sfakianakis, Preheating after Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings, I: Covariant Formalism and Attractor Behavior, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023526 [1510.08553]

2018 arXiv
[21]

DeCross, D.I

M.P. DeCross, D.I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E.I. Sfakianakis, Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, III: Dynamical spacetime results, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023528 [1610.08916]

2018 arXiv
[22]

DeCross, D.I

M.P. DeCross, D.I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod-Weinstein and E.I. Sfakianakis, Preheating after multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings, II: Resonance Structure, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023527 [1610.08868]

2018 arXiv
[23]

Dufaux, G.N

J.F. Dufaux, G.N. Felder, L. Kofman, M. Peloso and D. Podolsky,Preheating with trilinear interactions: Tachyonic resonance, JCAP 0607 (2006) 006 [hep-ph/0602144]

2006 arXiv
[24]

Croon, V

D. Croon, V . Sanz and E.R.M. Tarrant,Reheating with a composite Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 045010 [1507.04653]

2016 arXiv
[25]

Antusch, F

S. Antusch, F. Cefala, D. Nolde and S. Orani, Parametric resonance after hilltop inflation caused by an inhomogeneous inflaton field, JCAP 02 (2016) 044 [1510.04856]

2016 arXiv
[26]

Enqvist, M

K. Enqvist, M. Karciauskas, O. Lebedev, S. Rusak and M. Zatta, Postinflationary vacuum instability and Higgs-inflaton couplings, JCAP 11 (2016) 025 [1608.08848]

2016 arXiv
[27]

Antusch, D.G

S. Antusch, D.G. Figueroa, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti,Characterizing the postinflationary reheating history: Single daughter field with quadratic-quadratic interaction, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 043532 [2112.11280]

2022 arXiv
[28]

Antusch, K

S. Antusch, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti,Characterizing the post-inflationary reheating history. Part II. Multiple interacting daughter fields, JCAP 02 (2023) 019 [2206.06319]

2023 arXiv
[29]

Cosme, D.G

C. Cosme, D.G. Figueroa and N. Loayza, Gravitational wave production from preheating with trilinear interactions, JCAP 05 (2023) 023 [2206.14721]

2023 arXiv
[30]

Bassett and S

B.A. Bassett and S. Liberati, Geometric reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 021302 [hep-ph/9709417]

1998 arXiv
[31]

Tsujikawa, K.-i

S. Tsujikawa, K.-i. Maeda and T. Torii,Resonant particle production with nonminimally coupled scalar fields in preheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 063515 [hep-ph/9901306]

1999 arXiv
[32]

C. Fu, P. Wu and H. Yu, Nonlinear preheating with nonminimally coupled scalar fields in the Starobinsky model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 123526 [1906.00557]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Figueroa, A

D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, T. Opferkuch and B.A. Stefanek, Lattice simulations of non-minimally coupled scalar fields in the Jordan frame, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 077 [2112.08388]. – 26 –

2023 arXiv
[34]

Felder, J

G.N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P.B. Greene, L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and I. Tkachev, Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011601 [hep-ph/0012142]

2001 arXiv
[35]

Felder, L

G.N. Felder, L. Kofman and A.D. Linde, Tachyonic instability and dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123517 [hep-th/0106179]

2001 arXiv
[36]

Garcia-Bellido, M

J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Garcia Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, Symmetry breaking and false vacuum decay after hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 103501 [hep-ph/0208228]

2003 arXiv
[37]

Copeland, S

E.J. Copeland, S. Pascoli and A. Rajantie, Dynamics of tachyonic preheating after hybrid inflation, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 103517 [hep-ph/0202031]

2002 arXiv
[38]

Bezrukov, D

F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov,On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang, JCAP 0906 (2009) 029 [0812.3622]

2009 arXiv
[39]

Garcia-Bellido, D.G

J. Garcia-Bellido, D.G. Figueroa and J. Rubio, Preheating in the Standard Model with the Higgs-Inflaton coupled to gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 063531 [0812.4624]

2009 arXiv
[40]

Braden, L

J. Braden, L. Kofman and N. Barnaby, Reheating the Universe After Multi-Field Inflation, JCAP 07 (2010) 016 [1005.2196]

2010 arXiv
[41]

Giblin, Jr, L.R

J.T. Giblin, Jr, L.R. Price and X. Siemens, Gravitational Radiation from Preheating with Many Fields, JCAP 08 (2010) 012 [1006.0935]

2010 arXiv
[42]

Krajewski, K

T. Krajewski, K. Turzy ´nski and M. Wieczorek, On preheating in α-attractor models of inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 654 [1801.01786]

2019 arXiv
[43]

Iarygina, E.I

O. Iarygina, E.I. Sfakianakis, D.-G. Wang and A. Achucarro, Universality and scaling in multi-field α-attractor preheating, JCAP 06 (2019) 027 [1810.02804]

2019 arXiv
[44]

Figueroa, A

D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, N. Loayza and M. Pieroni, Spectroscopy of particle couplings with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 063522 [2202.05805]

2022 arXiv
[45]

Krajewski and K

T. Krajewski and K. Turzy ´nski, (P)reheating and gravitational waves in α-attractor models, JCAP 10 (2022) 005 [2204.12909]

2022 arXiv
[46]

Rajantie, P.M

A. Rajantie, P.M. Saffin and E.J. Copeland, Electroweak preheating on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 123512 [hep-ph/0012097]

2001 arXiv
[47]

Copeland, D

E.J. Copeland, D. Lyth, A. Rajantie and M. Trodden, Hybrid inflation and baryogenesis at the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 043506 [hep-ph/0103231]

2001 arXiv
[48]

Smit and A

J. Smit and A. Tranberg, Chern-Simons number asymmetry from CP violation at electroweak tachyonic preheating, JHEP 12 (2002) 020 [hep-ph/0211243]

2002 arXiv
[49]

Garcia-Bellido, M

J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Garcia-Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, Chern-Simons production during preheating in hybrid inflation models, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 023504 [hep-ph/0304285]

2004 arXiv
[50]

Tranberg and J

A. Tranberg and J. Smit, Baryon asymmetry from electroweak tachyonic preheating, JHEP 11 (2003) 016 [hep-ph/0310342]

2003 arXiv
[51]

Skullerud, J

J.-I. Skullerud, J. Smit and A. Tranberg, W and Higgs particle distributions during electroweak tachyonic preheating, JHEP 08 (2003) 045 [hep-ph/0307094]

2003 arXiv
[52]

van der Meulen, D

M. van der Meulen, D. Sexty, J. Smit and A. Tranberg, Chern-Simons and winding number in a tachyonic electroweak transition, JHEP 02 (2006) 029 [hep-ph/0511080]

2006 arXiv
[53]

Diaz-Gil, J

A. Diaz-Gil, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Garcia Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, Magnetic field production during preheating at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 241301 [0712.4263]

2008 arXiv
[54]

Diaz-Gil, J

A. Diaz-Gil, J. Garcia-Bellido, M. Garcia Perez and A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, Primordial magnetic fields from preheating at the electroweak scale, JHEP 07 (2008) 043 [0805.4159]

2008 arXiv
[55]

Dufaux, D.G

J.-F. Dufaux, D.G. Figueroa and J. Garcia-Bellido, Gravitational Waves from Abelian Gauge Fields and Cosmic Strings at Preheating, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 083518 [1006.0217]. – 27 –

2010 arXiv
[56]

Adshead, J.T

P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, T.R. Scully and E.I. Sfakianakis, Gauge-preheating and the end of axion inflation, JCAP 12 (2015) 034 [1502.06506]

2015 arXiv
[57]

Tranberg, S

A. Tranberg, S. T ¨ahtinen and D.J. Weir, Gravitational waves from non-Abelian gauge fields at a tachyonic transition, JCAP 04 (2018) 012 [1706.02365]

2018 arXiv
[58]

Cuissa and D.G

J.R.C. Cuissa and D.G. Figueroa, Lattice formulation of axion inflation. Application to preheating, JCAP 06 (2019) 002 [1812.03132]

2019 arXiv
[59]

Adshead, J.T

P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z.J. Weiner, Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083534 [1909.12842]

2020 arXiv
[60]

Cui and E.I

Y . Cui and E.I. Sfakianakis, Detectable gravitational wave signals from inflationary preheating, Phys. Lett. B 840 (2023) 137825 [2112.00762]

2023 arXiv
[61]

Frolov,DEFROST: A New Code for Simulating Preheating after Inflation, JCAP 0811 (2008) 009 [0809.4904]

A.V . Frolov,DEFROST: A New Code for Simulating Preheating after Inflation, JCAP 0811 (2008) 009 [0809.4904]

2008 arXiv
[62]

Huang, The Art of Lattice and Gravity Waves from Preheating, Phys

Z. Huang, The Art of Lattice and Gravity Waves from Preheating, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 123509 [1102.0227]

2011 arXiv
[63]

Giblin and A.J

J.T. Giblin and A.J. Tishue, Preheating in Full General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 063543 [1907.10601]

2019 arXiv
[64]

X.-X. Kou, C. Tian and S.-Y . Zhou,Oscillon Preheating in Full General Relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 045005 [1912.09658]

2021 arXiv
[65]

Joana, Gravitational dynamics in Higgs inflation: Preinflation and preheating with an auxiliary field, Phys

C. Joana, Gravitational dynamics in Higgs inflation: Preinflation and preheating with an auxiliary field, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 023504 [2202.07604]

2022 arXiv
[66]

Aurrekoetxea, K

J.C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough and F. Muia, Oscillon formation during inflationary preheating with general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 023501 [2304.01673]

2023 arXiv
[67]

Adshead, J.T

P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, R. Grutkoski and Z.J. Weiner, Gauge preheating with full general relativity, JCAP 03 (2024) 017 [2311.01504]

2024 arXiv
[68]

Starobinsky, Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential, JETP Lett

A.A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential, JETP Lett. 55 (1992) 489

1992
[69]

Adams, B

J.A. Adams, B. Cresswell and R. Easther, Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 123514 [astro-ph/0102236]

2001 arXiv
[70]

Garcia-Bellido and E

J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation, Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 47 [1702.03901]

2017 arXiv
[71]

Germani and T

C. Germani and T. Prokopec, On primordial black holes from an inflection point, Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 6 [1706.04226]

2017 arXiv
[72]

Ballesteros and M

G. Ballesteros and M. Taoso, Primordial black hole dark matter from single field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 023501 [1709.05565]

2018 arXiv
[73]

Hertzberg and M

M.P. Hertzberg and M. Yamada, Primordial Black Holes from Polynomial Potentials in Single Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 083509 [1712.09750]

2018 arXiv
[74]

V . Atal, J. Garriga and A. Marcos-Caballero, Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations, JCAP 09 (2019) 073 [1905.13202]

2019 arXiv
[75]

Mishra and V

S.S. Mishra and V . Sahni,Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential, JCAP 04 (2020) 007 [1911.00057]

2020 arXiv
[76]

Kefala, G.P

K. Kefala, G.P. Kodaxis, I.D. Stamou and N. Tetradis, Features of the inflaton potential and the power spectrum of cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023506 [2010.12483]

2021 arXiv
[77]

Dalianis, G.P

I. Dalianis, G.P. Kodaxis, I.D. Stamou, N. Tetradis and A. Tsigkas-Kouvelis,Spectrum oscillations from features in the potential of single-field inflation, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 103510 [2106.02467]. – 28 –

2021 arXiv
[78]

Inomata, E

K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu, Amplification of primordial perturbations from the rise or fall of the inflaton, JCAP 02 (2022) 031 [2110.14641]

2022 arXiv
[79]

Boutivas, I

K. Boutivas, I. Dalianis, G.P. Kodaxis and N. Tetradis, The effect of multiple features on the power spectrum in two-field inflation, JCAP 08 (2022) 021 [2203.15605]

2022 arXiv
[80]

Karam, N

A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V . Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ae, Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes, JCAP 03 (2023) 013 [2205.13540]

2023 arXiv
[81]

Gu, F.-W

B.-M. Gu, F.-W. Shu, K. Yang and Y .-P. Zhang,Primordial black holes from an inflationary potential valley, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 023519 [2207.09968]

2023 arXiv
[82]

Inomata, M

K. Inomata, M. Braglia, X. Chen and S. Renaux-Petel, Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case, JCAP 04 (2023) 011 [2211.02586]

2023 arXiv
[83]

Pi and J

S. Pi and J. Wang, Primordial black hole formation in Starobinsky’s linear potential model, JCAP 06 (2023) 018 [2209.14183]

2023 arXiv
[84]

Bassett and S

B.A. Bassett and S. Tsujikawa, Inflationary preheating and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 123503 [hep-ph/0008328]

2001 arXiv
[85]

Suyama, T

T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, B. Bassett and H. Kudoh, Are black holes over-produced during preheating?, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063507 [hep-ph/0410247]

2005 arXiv
[86]

Jedamzik, M

K. Jedamzik, M. Lemoine and J. Martin, Generation of gravitational waves during early structure formation between cosmic inflation and reheating, JCAP 04 (2010) 021 [1002.3278]

2010 arXiv
[87]

Jedamzik, M

K. Jedamzik, M. Lemoine and J. Martin, Collapse of Small-Scale Density Perturbations during Preheating in Single Field Inflation, JCAP 09 (2010) 034 [1002.3039]

2010 arXiv
[88]

Martin, T

J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou and V . Vennin,Primordial black holes from the preheating instability in single-field inflation, JCAP 01 (2020) 024 [1907.04236]

2020 arXiv
[89]

Martin, T

J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, L. Pinol and V . Vennin,Metric preheating and radiative decay in single-field inflation, JCAP 05 (2020) 003 [2002.01820]

2020 arXiv
[90]

Papanikolaou, V

T. Papanikolaou, V . Vennin and D. Langlois,Gravitational waves from a universe filled with primordial black holes, JCAP 03 (2021) 053 [2010.11573]

2021 arXiv
[91]

Chluba, J

J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S.P. Patil, Features and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observables: Theory and Observation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

2015 arXiv
[92]

Slosar et al., Scratches from the Past: Inflationary Archaeology through Features in the Power Spectrum of Primordial Fluctuations, Bull

A. Slosar et al., Scratches from the Past: Inflationary Archaeology through Features in the Power Spectrum of Primordial Fluctuations, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51 (2019) 98 [1903.09883]

2019 arXiv
[93]

X. Chen, C. Dvorkin, Z. Huang, M.H. Namjoo and L. Verde, The Future of Primordial Features with Large-Scale Structure Surveys, JCAP 11 (2016) 014 [1605.09365]

2016 arXiv
[94]

Ballardini, F

M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, C. Fedeli and L. Moscardini, Probing primordial features with future galaxy surveys, JCAP 10 (2016) 041 [1606.03747]

2016 arXiv
[95]

Palma, D

G.A. Palma, D. Sapone and S. Sypsas, Constraints on inflation with LSS surveys: features in the primordial power spectrum, JCAP 06 (2018) 004 [1710.02570]

2018 arXiv
[96]

L’Huillier, A

B. L’Huillier, A. Shafieloo, D.K. Hazra, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky, Probing features in the primordial perturbation spectrum with large-scale structure data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 477 (2018) 2503 [1710.10987]

2018 arXiv
[97]

Ballardini, F

M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, R. Maartens and L. Moscardini, Probing primordial features with next-generation photometric and radio surveys, JCAP 04 (2018) 044 [1712.07425]

2018 arXiv
[98]

Debono, D.K

I. Debono, D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky, Constraints on features in the inflationary potential from future Euclid data, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 496 (2020) 3448 [2003.05262]. – 29 –

2020 arXiv
[99]

Braglia, X

M. Braglia, X. Chen, D.K. Hazra and L. Pinol, Back to the features: assessing the discriminating power of future CMB missions on inflationary models, JCAP 03 (2023) 014 [2210.07028]

2023 arXiv
[100]

Astrophys

EUCLID collaboration, Euclid: The search for primordial features, Astron. Astrophys. 683 (2024) A220 [2309.17287]

2024 arXiv
[101]

Adshead, C

P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E.A. Lim, Non-Gaussianity from Step Features in the Inflationary Potential, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 023531 [1110.3050]

2012 arXiv
[102]

Cicoli, V .A

M. Cicoli, V .A. Diaz and F.G. Pedro,Primordial Black Holes from String Inflation, JCAP 06 (2018) 034 [1803.02837]

2018 arXiv
[103]

Caravano, K

A. Caravano, K. Inomata and S. Renaux-Petel, Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 151001 [2403.12811]

2024 arXiv
[104]

Bartolo, D

N. Bartolo, D. Cannone and S. Matarrese, The Effective Field Theory of Inflation Models with Sharp Features, JCAP 10 (2013) 038 [1307.3483]

2013 arXiv
[105]

Pi and M

S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 011002 [2211.13932]

2023 arXiv
[106]

Espinosa, D

J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto, Cosmological Signature of the Standard Model Higgs Vacuum Instability: Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121301 [1710.11196]

2018 arXiv
[107]

Espinosa, D

J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto, A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves, JCAP 09 (2018) 012 [1804.07732]

2018 arXiv
[108]

Cicoli, C.P

M. Cicoli, C.P. Burgess and F. Quevedo, Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications, JCAP 03 (2009) 013 [0808.0691]

2009 arXiv
[109]

Figueroa, J

D.G. Figueroa, J. Garcia-Bellido and F. Torrenti,Decay of the standard model Higgs field after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 083511 [1504.04600]

2015 arXiv
[110]

Boyanovsky, H.J

D. Boyanovsky, H.J. de Vega, R. Holman, D.S. Lee and A. Singh,Dissipation via particle production in scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4419 [hep-ph/9408214]

1995 arXiv
[111]

Boyanovsky, M

D. Boyanovsky, M. D’Attanasio, H.J. de Vega, R. Holman and D.S. Lee,Reheating and thermalization: Linear versus nonlinear relaxation, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6805 [hep-ph/9507414]

1995 arXiv
[112]

Boyanovsky, H.J

D. Boyanovsky, H.J. de Vega, R. Holman and J.F.J. Salgado,Analytic and numerical study of preheating dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 7570 [hep-ph/9608205]

1996 arXiv
[113]

Boyanovsky, D

D. Boyanovsky, D. Cormier, H.J. de Vega and R. Holman, Out-of-equilibrium dynamics of an inflationary phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 3373 [hep-ph/9610396]

1997 arXiv
[114]

Kaiser, Primordial spectral indices from generalized Einstein theories, Phys

D.I. Kaiser, Primordial spectral indices from generalized Einstein theories, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 4295 [astro-ph/9408044]

1995 arXiv
[115]

McLachlan, Theory and Application of Mathieu Functions, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1947)

N.W. McLachlan, Theory and Application of Mathieu Functions, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1947)

1947
[116]

Magnus and S

W. Magnus and S. Winkler, Hill’s Equation, Dover Books on Mathematics Series, Dover Publications (2004)

2004
[117]

Figueroa, A

D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg, CosmoLattice, Comput. Phys. Commun. 283 (2023) 108586 [2102.01031]

2023 arXiv
[118]

Figueroa, A

D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg,The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I, JCAP 04 (2021) 035 [2006.15122]

2021 arXiv
[119]

Amin, M.P

M.A. Amin, M.P. Hertzberg, D.I. Kaiser and J. Karouby,Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24 (2014) 1530003 [1410.3808]

2014 arXiv
[120]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005)

V . Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005). – 30 –

2005
[121]

P. Saha, S. Anand and L. Sriramkumar, Accounting for the time evolution of the equation of state parameter during reheating, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 103511 [2005.01874]

2020 arXiv
[122]

Antusch, D.G

S. Antusch, D.G. Figueroa, K. Marschall and F. Torrenti,Energy distribution and equation of state of the early Universe: matching the end of inflation and the onset of radiation domination, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135888 [2005.07563]

2020 arXiv
[123]

Maity and P

D. Maity and P. Saha, (P)reheating after minimal Plateau Inflation and constraints from CMB, JCAP 1907 (2019) 018 [1811.11173]

2019 arXiv
[124]

Figueroa and F

D.G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti,Parametric resonance in the early Universe-a fitting analysis, JCAP 1702 (2017) 001 [1609.05197]

2017 arXiv
[125]

Misner, K.S

C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1973)

1973
[126]

Easther and E.A

R. Easther and E.A. Lim, Stochastic gravitational wave production after inflation, JCAP 04 (2006) 010 [astro-ph/0601617]

2006 arXiv
[127]

Easther, J.T

R. Easther, J.T. Giblin, Jr. and E.A. Lim,Gravitational Wave Production At The End Of Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 221301 [astro-ph/0612294]

2007 arXiv
[128]

Easther, J.T

R. Easther, J.T. Giblin and E.A. Lim, Gravitational Waves From the End of Inflation: Computational Strategies, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 103519 [0712.2991]

2008 arXiv
[129]

Dufaux, A

J.F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G.N. Felder, L. Kofman and J.-P. Uzan,Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 123517 [0707.0875]

2007 arXiv
[130]

Ghoshal and P

A. Ghoshal and P. Saha, Detectable gravitational waves from preheating probes nonthermal dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023526 [2203.14424]

2024 arXiv
[131]

Berlin, D

A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. Tito D’Agnolo, S.A.R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y . Kahn et al.,Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavities, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 116011 [2112.11465]

2022 arXiv
[132]

Ito and J

A. Ito and J. Soda, Exploring high-frequency gravitational waves with magnons, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 766 [2212.04094]

2023 arXiv
[133]

A. Ito, K. Kohri and K. Nakayama, Probing high frequency gravitational waves with pulsars, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 063026 [2305.13984]

2024 arXiv
[134]

Capdevilla, G.B

R. Capdevilla, G.B. Gelmini, J. Hyman, A.J. Millar and E. Vitagliano, Gravitational Wave Detection With Plasma Haloscopes, 2412.14450

arXiv
[135]

Y . Cui, P. Saha and E.I. Sfakianakis,Gravitational Wave Symphony from Oscillating Spectator Scalar Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 021004 [2310.13060]

2024 arXiv
[136]

Kitajima, J

N. Kitajima, J. Soda and Y . Urakawa, Gravitational wave forest from string axiverse, JCAP 10 (2018) 008 [1807.07037]

2018 arXiv
[137]

Caprini and D.G

C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001 [1801.04268]

2018 arXiv
[138]

Akita and M

K. Akita and M. Yamaguchi, A precision calculation of relic neutrino decoupling, JCAP 08 (2020) 012 [2005.07047]

2020 arXiv
[139]

Froustey, C

J. Froustey, C. Pitrou and M.C. V olpe,Neutrino decoupling including flavour oscillations and primordial nucleosynthesis, JCAP 12 (2020) 015 [2008.01074]

2020 arXiv
[140]

Bennett, G

J.J. Bennett, G. Buldgen, P.F. De Salas, M. Drewes, S. Gariazzo, S. Pastor et al., Towards a precision calculation of Neff in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED, JCAP 04 (2021) 073 [2012.02726]

2021 arXiv
[141]

P LANCK collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

2020 arXiv
[142]

Pagano, L

L. Pagano, L. Salvati and A. Melchiorri, New constraints on primordial gravitational waves from Planck 2015, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 823 [1508.02393]. – 31 –

2016 arXiv
[143]

Abazajian et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan, 1907.04473

K. Abazajian et al., CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan, 1907.04473

1907 arXiv
[144]

CO RE collaboration, COrE (Cosmic Origins Explorer) A White Paper, 1102.2181

arXiv
[145]

EUCLID collaboration, Euclid Definition Study Report, 1110.3193

arXiv
[146]

Ben-Dayan, B

I. Ben-Dayan, B. Keating, D. Leon and I. Wolfson, Constraints on scalar and tensor spectra from Nef f, JCAP 06 (2019) 007 [1903.11843]

2019 arXiv
[147]

Y . Cui, A. Ghoshal, P. Saha and E.I. Sfakianakis,The Origin Symphony: Probing Baryogenesis with Gravitational Waves, 2412.12287
[148]

Kallosh and A

R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Universality Class in Conformal Inflation, JCAP 1307 (2013) 002 [1306.5220]

2013 arXiv
[149]

R.-G. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki, Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 083528 [1909.13728]. – 32 –

2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys

A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99

1980

[2] [2]

Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 347

1981

[3] [3]

Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon

K. Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467

1981

[4] [4]

Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys

A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. 108B (1982) 389

1982

[5] [5]

Albrecht and P.J

A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

1982

[6] [6]

Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys

A.D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. 129B (1983) 177

1983

[7] [7]

Abbott, E

L.F. Abbott, E. Farhi and M.B. Wise, Particle Production in the New Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Lett. 117B (1982) 29

1982

[8] [8]

Dolgov and A.D

A.D. Dolgov and A.D. Linde, Baryon Asymmetry in Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. 116B (1982) 329

1982