REVIEW 1 cited by
GraphSHA: Synthesizing Harder Samples for Class-Imbalanced Node Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
GraphSHA: Synthesizing Harder Samples for Class-Imbalanced Node Classification
read the original abstract
Class imbalance is the phenomenon that some classes have much fewer instances than others, which is ubiquitous in real-world graph-structured scenarios. Recent studies find that off-the-shelf Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) would under-represent minor class samples. We investigate this phenomenon and discover that the subspaces of minor classes being squeezed by those of the major ones in the latent space is the main cause of this failure. We are naturally inspired to enlarge the decision boundaries of minor classes and propose a general framework GraphSHA by Synthesizing HArder minor samples. Furthermore, to avoid the enlarged minor boundary violating the subspaces of neighbor classes, we also propose a module called SemiMixup to transmit enlarged boundary information to the interior of the minor classes while blocking information propagation from minor classes to neighbor classes. Empirically, GraphSHA shows its effectiveness in enlarging the decision boundaries of minor classes, as it outperforms various baseline methods in class-imbalanced node classification with different GNN backbone encoders over seven public benchmark datasets. Code is avilable at https://github.com/wenzhilics/GraphSHA.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
OpenRTAG: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Text-Attributed Graph Learning under Data Quality Degradation
OpenRTAG is a benchmark that organizes text-attributed-graph data-quality issues into a 3x3 taxonomy (text/structure/label by sparsity/noise/imbalance) and evaluates model robustness across nine datasets and three tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.