Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Fractional anomalous Hall crystals can be competitive in real rhombohedral graphene without an external magnetic field.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 06:25 UTC pith:57NSXR3V

load-bearing objection Solid variational energetics paper: FAHC trial states can sit near polarized FLs under Mexican-hat kinetics, with a clean moiré-selection picture; hybrid ideal geometry is the real soft spot, not a fatal one. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08822 v1 pith:57NSXR3V submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Energetics of fractional anomalous Hall crystals in rhombohedral graphene

F\'elix Desrochers , Ashvin Vishwanath This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fractional anomalous Hall crystalrhombohedral graphenequantum anomalous HallMexican-hat dispersionmomentum-space lockingmoiré commensurationcontinuum interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that fractional anomalous Hall crystals—states that spontaneously form a crystal while each unit cell holds a fractional electron number and carry fractional quantum Hall topological order without a magnetic field—are energetically plausible in real rhombohedral pentalayer graphene. Until now they existed mainly as theoretical constructions. The authors take exact zero-mode wavefunctions of an idealized contact-interaction model of the material, then restore the physical Mexican-hat dispersion and dual-gated screened Coulomb interactions and evaluate energies by Monte Carlo and a semi-analytic quantum-Hall correspondence. They find these fractional crystals sit close in energy to integer anomalous Hall crystals and polarized Fermi liquids. Kinetic energy is minimized when the crystal reciprocal-lattice scale locks to the finite-momentum ring of the Mexican-hat minimum, while interaction energy is largely inherited from the parent quantum Hall liquid. A weak commensurate periodic potential can then pin and selectively lower the matching fractional crystals. The same picture predicts how integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall windows should move with twist angle and displacement field, matching trends seen in recent devices.

Core claim

In rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, variational fractional anomalous Hall crystal states that are exact contact-interaction zero modes of the ideal parent band remain energetically competitive with integer anomalous Hall crystals and spin- and valley-polarized Hartree–Fock Fermi liquids once realistic dispersion and screened Coulomb interactions are restored; a weak commensurate periodic potential can selectively pin the fractional crystals below the Fermi liquid.

What carries the argument

AHC–QH correspondence: each crystal maps onto a parent quantum Hall liquid that fixes its interaction energy, while the crystal period sets the unfolded parent-band momentum distribution that controls kinetic energy, producing momentum-space locking to the Mexican-hat minimum.

Load-bearing premise

The trial wavefunctions and band form factors come from an idealized single-sublattice parent band with a fixed crystal texture that is never relaxed, while only the kinetic energy uses the physical dispersion.

What would settle it

A microscopic calculation that restores full band geometry, warping, remote hoppings, and a free Abrikosov texture and finds fractional crystals no longer competitive with the Fermi liquid or ordinary Wigner crystals at experimentally relevant densities and displacement fields would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs integer and fractional anomalous Hall crystal (IAHC/FAHC) variational states as contact-interaction zero modes of the ideal holomorphic parent band of rhombohedral pentalayer graphene, then evaluates their energies after restoring a physical Mexican-hat dispersion and dual-gated screened Coulomb interactions. Monte Carlo sampling (up to Ne=500) is used to benchmark kinetic and interaction energies against a semi-analytic AHC–QH correspondence, which attributes interaction energy largely to the parent quantum Hall liquid and kinetic energy to the unfolded parent-band occupation set by the crystal period. Applied to R5G, the framework finds FAHCs near-degenerate with polarized Hartree–Fock Fermi liquids over experimentally relevant densities and displacement fields; a weak commensurate periodic potential can selectively pin fractional crystals. The authors identify a momentum-space-locking mechanism that favors periods matching the dispersion minimum, and use it to predict twist-angle and displacement-field trends for IQAHE/FQAHE windows, which they compare to recent experiments.

Significance. If the competitiveness and selection mechanism hold under more complete band geometry, the work supplies a concrete continuum-and-interactions-first route to fractional anomalous Hall order in rhombohedral graphene, complementary to moiré-miniband starting points. Strengths include: (i) explicit, reproducible variational wavefunctions with Monte Carlo benchmarks that agree with the semi-analytic kinetic and interaction estimators to high precision (interaction within ~0.4% in the SM); (ii) a bounded AHC–QH correspondence with a posteriori MC validation; (iii) a simple, falsifiable momentum-locking principle that organizes preferred fillings and predicts how stability windows move with twist angle and displacement field, with qualitative experimental consistency. These are genuine advances beyond purely engineered or speculative FAHC constructions.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. IV opening and Discussion Sec. V: the central competitiveness claim (Fig. 6; |U0|~15 meV pin) rests on a hybrid scheme—ideal holomorphic form factors and fixed Abrikosov texture χ0=φ_LLL_0 for the trial states, with only the kinetic energy using the physical minimal-model dispersion. The Mexican-hat minimum that drives momentum locking sits near |γq|∼1 (Fig. 7; SM Fig. S1), precisely where SM S.I.C–E and Fig. S3 show the ideal single-sublattice description becoming marginal (λ_mix∼1). The few-meV FL–AHC windows in Fig. 6(b,c) are smaller than plausible shifts from physical Berry curvature, form factors, trigonal warping, or Abrikosov/QH relaxation. Please quantify (or bound) the sensitivity of E_kin and E_int to non-ideal geometry at the momenta that dominate the kinetic minimum, or reframe the phase diagrams more explicitly as rankings within the ideal-geometry ansatz class rather
  2. Sec. IV and Fig. 6: the reported AHC–FL phase diagrams compare only the discrete AHC filling set {1,2/3,3/5,2/5,1/3,1/5,1/7,1/9} against spin- and valley-polarized Hartree–Fock Fermi liquids (disk/annulus). At low density the authors correctly note that trivial Wigner crystals (and disorder) are likely competitors, but the intermediate-density region where FAHCs sit only slightly above the FL is still presented as the regime where a weak moiré pin can select FAHCs. Without even a rough estimate of competing crystalline or partially polarized states, or of variational relaxation of the Abrikosov texture (Eq. 14), the claim that a |U0|∼15 meV first-harmonic potential can make FAHCs the lowest among realistic candidates remains under-supported. A clearer statement of the competitor set and of what would falsify the pin-selection scenario would strengthen the central experimental implication
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 6(c) and Sec. IIIB4: the illustrative |U0|=15 meV and moiré density 1/A_p.p._u.c.=0.68×10^12 cm^−2 are phenomenological; a short note on how these compare to estimated graphene/hBN first-harmonic strengths in the literature would help readers gauge realism.
  2. Eq. (32) and Fig. 4: the zeroth-harmonic kinetic formula is very useful; stating the maximum relative error versus MC in the main text (not only SM) would make the semi-analytic pipeline easier to trust at a glance.
  3. Fig. 8(c): experimental displacement-field windows are shown as vertical bars with different markers; adding device twist angles next to each bar (or in a small table) would make the comparison to panel (b) more direct.
  4. Notation: ν is used both as QH filling and electrons per crystal unit cell (intentional and clear once stated), but ne A_u.c. versus ne A_p.p._u.c. in Fig. 6 axes could be spelled out once in the caption to avoid confusion with moiré filling conventions.
  5. The parton SC and correlated FL constructions in Sec. IIC are intriguing but left unevaluated; either a brief estimate of why they are deferred or a pointer that they are outside the present energy comparison would avoid leaving a dangling competitor class.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: FAHC/IAHC energies are independently evaluated (MC + semi-analytics) against external dispersion and interactions; ideal-limit ansätze are legitimate variational inputs, not tautologies of the ranking.

full rationale

The central claim is a variational energy ranking: contact-interaction zero modes of the ideal R5G parent band are used as trial states, then kinetic and interaction energies are recomputed with the physical Mexican-hat dispersion and dual-gated screened Coulomb, and compared to an optimized Hartree–Fock Fermi liquid (Sec. III–IV; Figs. 4–6). Monte Carlo sampling of the same wavefunctions independently benchmarks the semi-analytic AHC–QH estimators (interaction energy within ~0.4%, kinetic moments within ~6%; SM S.VI). Interaction energy is not forced equal to a fitted target; it is inherited approximately from tabulated QH pair correlations via a correspondence that is derived and checked, not assumed as a definition. The |U0|=15 meV pin and illustrative moiré density are phenomenological selection fields, not parameters fitted to the same observables then re-predicted. Self-citations (related AHC/ideal-band work by overlapping authors) supply context and related models but do not replace the energy evaluation or uniqueness-force the phase diagram. Hybrid ideal-geometry + physical-dispersion is a correctness/limitation issue (Discussion), not circularity: the ranking is not equivalent to the inputs by construction. Score 1 only for minor non-load-bearing self-citation of the broader AHC program.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a restricted variational manifold from the ideal holomorphic R5G limit, a hybrid energy functional, screened Coulomb parameters, and a phenomenological first-harmonic moiré. Free parameters set interaction strength and pinning scale; axioms include the ideal-band projection, contact-zero-mode restriction, AHC–QH isometry approximation, and HF Fermi-liquid competitor set. Invented entities are the FAHC/IAHC trial states themselves as continuum candidates—standard theoretical constructs with independent experimental handles only at the level of QAH phenomenology, not direct crystal imaging here.

free parameters (4)
  • dual-gate dielectric and distance (ε, ds)
    Interaction scale is set by ε=4 and ds=30 nm (main R5G scans); MC benchmarks also use ds=1/√ne. These are standard material/device choices, not fitted to FAHC energies, but they control absolute energy differences vs the Fermi liquid.
  • first-harmonic periodic potential amplitude |U0|
    Illustrative pinning uses |U0|=15 meV (Fig. 6c) and |U0|crit curves (Fig. 8a). Not microscopically derived from graphene/hBN; chosen to demonstrate selective lowering of commensurate crystals.
  • illustrative moiré density 1/A_p.p._u.c.
    0.68×10^12 cm−2 (~0.47° graphene/hBN) sets the upper axis of Fig. 6 and commensurate fillings; a hand-chosen reference scale for commensuration demos.
  • microscopic band parameters (vD, t1, γ, uD range)
    vD=0.66 eV·nm, t1=0.38 eV, γ=1.73 nm taken as standard inputs; uD scanned. Not fitted to FAHC data, but they fix the Mexican-hat q⋆ that drives momentum locking.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Ideal holomorphic single-sublattice parent band is a valid variational starting point for strong-displacement R5G conduction states (t1|γq|^Nℓ ≪ (Nℓ−1)uD ≪ t1).
    Sec. II and SM S.I justify the ideal limit; hybrid scheme keeps ideal geometry while using physical dispersion (Sec. IV).
  • ad hoc to paper Contact-interaction chiral zero modes of the form Φ_QH × Abrikosov condensate (χ0=φ_LLL_0 only) are representative FAHC/IAHC candidates.
    Sec. IIC fixes the simplest Abrikosov texture with no variational cn mixing; Discussion notes this restriction may overstate kinetic density dependence.
  • domain assumption AHC–QH correspondence: neglect N_k momentum dependence so correlators map to LLL quantum Hall states while retaining lattice form-factor harmonics.
    Sec. IIIB and SM S.IV; bounded by E^∞_n and validated by MC agreement.
  • ad hoc to paper Relevant competitors for the reported phase diagrams are spin- and valley-polarized Hartree–Fock Fermi liquids (disk/annulus) plus the discrete AHC filling set.
    Sec. IV; trivial Wigner crystals, superconductors, and unpolarized states are acknowledged but not energy-ranked in the main diagrams.
  • domain assumption First-order pinning energy of a real triangular first-harmonic potential captures the essential moiré selection effect.
    Sec. IIIB4 and IV; authors explicitly call it phenomenological, not a microscopic hBN model.
invented entities (2)
  • Fractional anomalous Hall crystal (FAHC) trial states in continuum R5G no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide explicit zero-field continuum wavefunctions with fractional electrons per cell and inherited QH topological order for energy comparison.
    Constructed as Φ_QH × Abrikosov product in the ideal limit (Eq. 16); independent evidence is indirect (experimental FQAHE/IQAHE and metallic Wigner-crystal reports), not direct observation of fractional unit-cell filling crystals.
  • Momentum-space-locking selection of crystal period by Mexican-hat q⋆ independent evidence
    purpose: Explain why fractional fillings can lower kinetic energy and track moiré-commensurate densities.
    Heuristic |b1|~q⋆ and n_min_e ∝ ν (Eq. 39, Fig. 7); falsifiable via twist-angle and uD window trends, which the paper compares qualitatively to experiment.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 61460 in / 4063 out tokens · 37578 ms · 2026-07-13T06:25:23.792650+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fractional anomalous Hall crystals (FAHCs) replicate the topological order of the fractional quantum Hall effect in the continuum without requiring any external magnetic field. They spontaneously break continuous translation symmetry like a Wigner crystal, but are distinguished by each unit cell holding a fixed fractional number of electrons. Until now, these states have been confined to theoretical speculation or engineered models, leaving open the question of whether they can plausibly emerge in actual physical systems. Here, we establish them as energetically competitive candidate states in a realistic material setting. We study rhombohedral pentalayer graphene (R5G) with variational wavefunctions that are exact zero modes of a recently proposed ideal model of R5G. We evaluate their energies using Monte Carlo, after reinstating realistic dispersion and screened Coulomb interactions. We find FAHCs to be energetically competitive with integer anomalous Hall crystals and Fermi liquids, and their stability follows a simple principle. Each crystal maps onto a parent quantum Hall liquid that fixes its interaction energy, while the kinetic energy favors crystal periods that match the finite-momentum minimum of R5G's Mexican-hat dispersion. A weak periodic potential can then selectively lower and pin the commensurate fractional crystals. This picture predicts how the integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall stability windows evolve with twist angle and displacement field, which we compare to recent experiments. These results support a continuum-and-interactions-first route to fractional anomalous Hall states in rhombohedral graphene.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08822 by Ashvin Vishwanath, F\'elix Desrochers.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    We denote byNΦ the Landau-level degeneracy, NΦ = L1∧L2 2πl2 B ∈Z,(S61) where the orientation is chosen so thatL1∧L2 >0

    Magnetic translations After projection to a fixed Landau level, magnetic translations on a particlejact only on the guiding-center coordinate and are represented by Tj(u) = exp [ −i l2 B u∧Rj ] .(S58) For a single-particle, these operators obey Tj(u)Tj(v) = exp ( i 2l2 B u∧v ) Tj(u+v),(S59) hence Ti(u)Tj(v) =T j(v)Ti(u) exp (iδij l2 B u∧v ) .(S60) We plac...

  2. [2]

    Indeed, Tj(Lα)Tj(u)|ϕj⟩= exp [ iΦα+ i l2 B Lα∧u ] Tj(u)|ϕj⟩.(S67) ThusT j(u)preserves fixed boundary conditions only ifL α∧u/l2 B is an integer multiple of2πfor bothα= 1,2

    Flux-preserving translations A generic magnetic translation changes the twist sector. Indeed, Tj(Lα)Tj(u)|ϕj⟩= exp [ iΦα+ i l2 B Lα∧u ] Tj(u)|ϕj⟩.(S67) ThusT j(u)preserves fixed boundary conditions only ifL α∧u/l2 B is an integer multiple of2πfor bothα= 1,2. Modulo translations by the full periodsLα, the boundary-condition-preserving magnetic translations...

  3. [3]

    In this basis,Tj(d1)is a clock operator andT j(d2)is a shift operator

    One-dimensional orbital labelling A particularly convenient parametrization is obtained by choosing N1 =N Φ, N 2 = 1,a 1 =d 1,a 2 =L 2.(S70) For zero twists, theNΦ states in a Landau level are then labeled by km = m NΦ b1, m= 0,1,...,N Φ−1.(S71) Twist angles simply shift this grid. In this basis,Tj(d1)is a clock operator andT j(d2)is a shift operator. Wit...

  4. [4]

    In particular, the two elementary boundary-condition- preserving center-of-mass translations R≡TMB(d1), S≡T MB(d2)(S76) commute withH

    Center-of-mass degeneracy For a translationally invariant interaction projected into a Landau level,TMB(u)commutes with the Hamilto- nian whenever it preserves the chosen boundary conditions. In particular, the two elementary boundary-condition- preserving center-of-mass translations R≡TMB(d1), S≡T MB(d2)(S76) commute withH. Their algebra follows from Eq....

  5. [5]

    One-body density correlations The distinction between a single pure ground state and a translation-invariant ground state density matrix is important. LetH 0 be the full exactly degenerate ground state subspace of a translationally invariant Hamiltonian on the torus, and let P0 = D∑ µ=1 |Ψµ⟩⟨Ψµ|(S82) be the projector onto this subspace. Since[H,R] = [H,S]...

  6. [6]

    Periodicity of magnetic Bloch states Using the magnetic Bloch states (S96) and the periodicity of the modified Weierstrassσ-function (S97), it directly follows that the magnetic Bloch states obey φLLL k+bj(r) =φLLL k (r) exp ( −il2 B 2k∧bj ) .(S99) More generally, for a general shift byg=n 1b1 +n 2b2, we can first apply all translations byb1 successively,...

  7. [7]

    emergent

    Lowest Landau level form factor Using the periodicity relation (S102) and denotinggk,q =k+q−⌈k+q⌉with⌈q⌉denoting folding back in the 1BZ, the lowest Landau level (LLL) form factor is FLLL(k+q,k) = ⣨ φLLL ⌈k+q⌉ ⏐⏐⏐ exp(iq·r) ⏐⏐φLLL k ⟩ = exp ( iωgk,q ) exp [ −il2 B 2 (k+q)∧gk,q ] ⟨ φLLL k+q ⏐⏐ exp(iq·r) ⏐⏐φLLL k ⟩ = exp ( iωgk,q ) exp [ −il2 B 2 (k+q)∧gk,q...

  8. [8]

    S.IIIB, one should be able to rewrite it following the general form (S139)

    General form The form factor for the AHC basis states is given by FAHC n (k+q,k) = ⟨ ψ⌈k+q⌉,n ⏐⏐exp(iq·r) ⏐⏐ψk,n ⟩ .(S164) 22 Based on our previous discussion in Sec. S.IIIB, one should be able to rewrite it following the general form (S139). Using our previous expression, we have FAHC n (k+q,k) = ∑ g1,g2 a∗ g1,n(⌈k+q⌉)ag2,n(k)⟨⌈k+q⌉|exp(iq·r)|k⟩ = ∑ g1,g...

  9. [9]

    This form is particularly useful since the Poisson resummation can be truncated to yield some useful approximations forRn,q(k)

    Poisson resummation forR n,q(k) We now derive a Poisson resummed form forRn,q(k). This form is particularly useful since the Poisson resummation can be truncated to yield some useful approximations forRn,q(k). SinceR n,q(k)is periodic underk→k+g, we can reexpress it as Rn,q(k) = ∑ R bn,q(R)eik·R,(S173) where bn,q(R) = 1 Ω BZ ∫ BZ d2pRn,q(p)e−ip·R= 1 Ω BZ ...

  10. [10]

    Kinetic energy The kinetic energy is evaluated by measuring local derivative estimators. For a dispersion expanded as a polynomial in momentum, E(p) =c 2|p|2 +c 4|p|4 +···,(S258) the kinetic energy per particle is Ekin Ne =c 2 ⟨ −∇2⟩ +c 4 ⟨ (−∇2)2⟩ +···.(S259) Here ⟨ (−∇2)α⟩ = ⟨ Kloc α(C) ⟩ ρ (S260) with a local estimator Kloc α(C) = 1 NK(C) Ne∑ i=1 Θ (K)...

  11. [11]

    Interaction energy The interaction energy is evaluated directly from the sampled particle coordinates. For a two-body interaction V(r), the full finite-droplet local estimator is Vloc(C) = 1 Ne ∑ i<j V(|ri−rj|).(S269) This estimator gives the interaction energy per particle of the finite droplet. However, because the droplet has an edge, the full estimato...

  12. [12]

    int=(V0 p ne ) º = 1 1.7025 1.7050 1.7075 1.7100 º = 1=3 1.6500 1.6525 1.6550 º = 1=5 1.6225 1.6250 1.6275 1.6300 º = 1=7 1.610 1.615 1.620 N`=2 º = 1=9 1.9005 1.9010 1.9015

    Thermalization and uncertainties Before measuring any observable, we discard an initial thermalization segment of the Markov chain. In the sim- ulations reported below, the burn-in consists ofNtherm∼103–104 sweeps, with one sweep defined asNe attempted single-particle updates. During thermalization, the proposal step size is adjusted to achieve a reasonab...

  13. [13]

    E. N. Economou,Green’s Functions in Quantum Physics, 3rd ed., Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 7 (Springer, 2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Noschese, L

    S. Noschese, L. Pasquini, and L. Reichel, Tridiagonal toeplitz matrices: properties and novel applications, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications20, 302 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Z. Han, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Q. Gao, and E. Khalaf, Exact models of chiral flat-band superconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21127 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Desrochers, J

    F. Desrochers, J. Huxford, M. R. Hirsbrunner, and Y. B. Kim, Electronic crystal phases in the presence of nonuniform berry curvature and tunable berry flux: TheλN-jellium model, Phys. Rev. B113, 045148 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    T. Tan, P. J. Ledwith, and T. Devakul, The ideal limit of rhombohedral graphene: Interaction-induced layer-skyrmion lattices and their collective excitations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07402 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional Chern insulators and theW∞algebra, Phys. Rev. B85, 241308 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Fractional quantum Hall physics in topological flat bands, Comptes Rendus Physique14, 816 (2013)

    2013

  21. [21]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    P. J. Ledwith, G. Tarnopolsky, E. Khalaf, and A. Vishwanath, Fractional chern insulator states in twisted bilayer graphene: An analytical approach, Physical Review Research2, 023237 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vortexability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Many-particle translational symmetries of two-dimensional electrons at rational landau-level filling, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2095 (1985)

    2095

  25. [25]

    Haldane, A modular-invariant modified weierstrass sigma-function as a building block for lowest-landau-level wavefunc- tions on the torus, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018)

    F. Haldane, A modular-invariant modified weierstrass sigma-function as a building block for lowest-landau-level wavefunc- tions on the torus, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Haldane, The origin of holomorphic states in landau levels from non-commutative geometry and a new formula for their overlaps on the torus, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018)

    F. Haldane, The origin of holomorphic states in landau levels from non-commutative geometry and a new formula for their overlaps on the torus, Journal of Mathematical Physics59(2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Periodic laughlin-jastrow wave functions for the fractional quantized hall effect, Physical Review B31, 2529 (1985)

    1985

  28. [28]

    C. Fang, M. J. Gilbert, and B. A. Bernevig, Bulk topological invariants in noninteracting point group symmetric insulators, Phys. Rev. B86, 115112 (2012). 39

    2012

  29. [29]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. De Boer, J. Van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological classification of crystalline insulators through band structure combinatorics, Phys. Rev. X7, 041069 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry-based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nature communications8, 50 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and V. Crépel, Ideal Chern bands as Landau levels in curved space, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L032048 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Cano and J

    J. Cano and J. Wang, Ideal quantum geometry for fractional chern insulators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.05496 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    F. W. Olver,NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM(Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  35. [35]

    T. Tan, J. May-Mann, and T. Devakul, Variational wave-function analysis of the fractional anomalous hall crystal, Physical Review Letters135, 036604 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    S. Girvin, Anomalous quantum hall effect and two-dimensional classical plasmas: Analytic approximations for correlation functions and ground-state energies, Physical Review B30, 558 (1984)

    1984

  37. [37]

    Girvin, A

    S. Girvin, A. MacDonald, and P. Platzman, Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum hall effect, Physical Review B33, 2481 (1986)

    1986

  38. [38]

    Fulsebakke, M

    J. Fulsebakke, M. Fremling, N. Moran, and J. K. Slingerland, Parametrization and thermodynamic scaling of pair corre- lation functions for the fractional quantum hall effect, SciPost Physics14, 149 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations, Physical Review Letters50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  40. [40]

    R. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and B. Halperin, Microscopic wave functions for the fractional quantized hall states atν=2/5 and 2/7, Physical Review B34, 3037 (1986)

    1986

  41. [41]

    Morf and B

    R. Morf and B. Halperin, Monte carlo evaluation of trial wave functions for the fractional quantized hall effect: Disk geometry, Physical Review B33, 2221 (1986)

    1986

  42. [42]

    Levesque, J

    D. Levesque, J. Weis, and A. MacDonald, Crystallization of the incompressible quantum-fluid state of a two-dimensional electron gas in a strong magnetic field, Physical Review B30, 1056 (1984)

    1984

  43. [43]

    Jain and R

    J. Jain and R. Kamilla, Composite fermions in the hilbert space of the lowest electronic landau level, International Journal of Modern Physics B11, 2621 (1997)

    1997

  44. [44]

    J. Wang, S. D. Geraedts, E. Rezayi, and F. Haldane, Lattice monte carlo for quantum hall states on a torus, Physical Review B99, 125123 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    R. E. Prange, S. M. Girvin, and M. E. Cage,The quantum Hall effect, Vol. 1 (Springer, 1990)

    1990

  46. [46]

    J. K. Jain,Composite fermions(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  47. [47]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, The journal of chemical physics21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  48. [48]

    Ceperley and B

    D. Ceperley and B. Alder, Quantum monte carlo, Science231, 555 (1986)

    1986

  49. [49]

    Becca and S

    F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum monte carlo approaches for correlated systems (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational studies of quantum spin systems, inAIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1297 (American Institute of Physics, 2010) pp. 135–338

    2010