Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 119 references

Spectral theory of imperfect diffusion-controlled reactions on heterogeneous catalytic surfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An exact formula reduces diffusion toward a heterogeneous reactive surface to the simpler Dirichlet problem.

desk verdict Solid, honestly scoped theory paper: the central identity is standard Dirichlet-to-Neumann resolvent machinery, but the p>0 exterior spectral development is genuinely useful; the exterior patchy-surface figure needs convergence support. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01143 v1 pith:57SDK7DN submitted 2019-08-03 physics.chem-ph math-phmath.MP

Denis S. Grebenkov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords diffusion-controlledreactionsheterogeneoussurfacereactivityRobinboundaryconditionDirichlet-to-NeumannoperatorspectraldecompositionpartiallyreflectedBrownianmotionreactiontimedistributionspherical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish an exact operator identity: the propagator of a molecule diffusing toward a surface with spatially varying reactivity (Robin boundary condition) equals the propagator toward a perfectly absorbing surface plus a boundary correction built from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator and the reactivity. The correction isolates chemical kinetics from the purely diffusive first-passage motion in the bulk. If the identity is right, it yields new spectral representations of the survival probability, the distribution of reaction times, and the reaction rate that remain valid in exterior domains, where the Laplace operator has continuous spectrum and standard eigenfunction expansions are unavailable. For a spherical surface, all ingredients are explicit, giving semi-analytical formulas for patchy or continuously varying reactivity.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator $M_p$, which sends a boundary concentration to the normal derivative of its extension into the bulk; for bounded boundaries it has a discrete spectrum with eigenbasis $\{v_n^{(p)}\}$. The paper represents the surface reactivity $\kappa(s)/D$ as a matrix $K$ in this eigenbasis, so the resolvent $(M_p + K)^{-1}$ becomes a matrix inverse. Equation (16) is the machinery's main output. In spherical geometry the eigenfunctions are spherical harmonics and the eigenvalues are ratios of modified spherical Bessel functions, so the matrix elements of $K$ are computed analytically for single targets, multiple circular patches, stripes, and axisymmetric reactivity. This matrix machinery is what produces the semi-analytical formulas for the reaction-time statistics and rates.

What would settle it

Compute the reaction probability $\tilde{H}(0|x_0)$ for the exterior of a sphere with one partially reactive cap of angular size $\varepsilon = 0.01$ and $\kappa R/D = 1000$, using the truncated matrices at increasing $n_{\max}$, and compare with a high-resolution boundary-element or random-walk simulation; if the spectral sum does not converge to the independent reference as $n_{\max}$ grows, the truncation premise fails. Alternatively, take a smooth reactivity and compare the predicted Laplace-transformed rate $\tilde{J}(p)$ from Eq. (51) with a finite-element solution of the Robin problem in the same exterior geometry over two decades of $p$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is equation (16): $$\tilde{G}(x,p|x_0) = \tilde{G}_0(x,p|x_0) + \frac{1}{D} \bigl(\tilde{j}_0(\cdot,p|x) \cdot (M_p + K)^{-1} \tilde{j}_0(\cdot,p|x_0)\bigr)_{$L^{2}$(\partial\$\Omega$)},$$ where $\tilde{G}_0$ is the Dirichlet propagator for a perfectly reactive boundary, $\tilde{j}_0$ is its flux density, $M_p$ is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator, and $K$ is multiplication by $\kappa(s)/D$. This identity rewrites the heterogeneous Robin problem as a Dirichlet problem plus a boundary operator resolvent, disentangling diffusion from reaction. From it the paper derives spectral decompositions for the flux density, reaction-time density, spread harmonic measure, and reaction rate; specialises them to the interior and exterior of a sphere; and validates the truncation of the infinite matrices against finite-element solutions for two interior test cases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the boundary is smooth and the reactivity is regular enough that the infinite matrix representing K in the Dirichlet-to-Neumann eigenbasis can be truncated at moderate order (nmax = 20) with controlled error, a premise validated only for two interior spherical cases and acknowledged to fail for very small targets and mixed Dirichlet-Neumann conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Heterogeneous Robin problems are reduced to one Dirichlet computation per domain, so the Dirichlet propagator for a given shape can be reused for many different reactivity patterns.
  • Full Laplace-domain formulas for the reaction-time distribution, spread harmonic measure, and reaction rate become available for arbitrary smooth or piecewise constant reactivity, not just the mean reaction time.
  • The spectral description applies to exterior domains, where the reaction rate factors into the perfect-sink rate times a factor $h_{00}^{(0)}$ that encodes the reactivity pattern.
  • For spherical surfaces, piecewise constant reactivity with many reactive patches is handled by explicit matrices built from 3j-symbols and rotated spherical harmonics, avoiding numerical quadrature in the matrix construction.
  • The pole condition $\det(M + K) = 0$ determines the eigenvalues of the Robin Laplacian, offering a route to time-domain dynamics via residue inversion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identity survives further testing, the boundary-to-boundary kernel $G(s_2,t|s_1)$ becomes the only geometry-dependent quantity to compute, suggesting that boundary-integral or spectral methods for that kernel could supersede full volumetric solvers for complex surfaces; the paper does not pursue this.
  • The exterior-sphere steady-state rate $J(\infty)=4\pi D R c_0 h_{00}^{(0)}$ could be matched against narrow-capture asymptotics for small targets, providing an interpolation between the target-wise and homogenised descriptions; this link is not made in the paper.
  • One can test the method's breakdown threshold explicitly: for very small targets the truncation order must grow, and the paper's own discussion implies a quantifiable trade-off between target size and required $n_{\max}$; a systematic convergence study would turn that caveat into a practical error estimator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a spectral theory for diffusion-controlled reactions with a heterogeneous, partially reactive boundary. Its central result, Eq. (16), expresses the Laplace-transformed propagator for a Robin boundary value problem with position-dependent reactivity κ(s) as the sum of the Dirichlet propagator and a boundary scalar product involving the resolvent (Mp+K)^{-1}, where Mp is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator and K is multiplication by κ(s)/D. From this representation the paper derives spectral decompositions of the flux density, reaction-time density, survival probability, and reaction rate, and then specializes to spherical boundaries, treating both the interior problem (escape from a ball) and the exterior problem (hitting a sphere from outside). Explicit matrix elements for single and multiple circular reactive patches are constructed with Wigner 3j symbols, and the interior problem is validated against finite-element solutions in Fig. 3. The homogeneous limits recover the Collins-Kimball and Smoluchowski results.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper offers a genuinely useful viewpoint: the difficult heterogeneous Robin problem is reduced to the Dirichlet problem plus a matrix inversion, and the spectral representation works for exterior domains, where the Laplace operator has continuous spectrum and standard eigenfunction expansions are unavailable. The central identity (16) is exact and is derived by a straightforward linearity argument; no parameter is fitted, and the classical limits in Appendix E are correct external checks. The explicit formulas for the reactivity matrix K for circular patches are valuable and should allow researchers to compute reaction-time statistics semi-analytically. The interior FEM comparison in Fig. 3, covering five decades in p for two target sizes, is a genuine validation. The main risk concerns the numerical truncation for discontinuous reactivity in the exterior problem, which is exactly the regime the paper itself identifies as problematic.

major comments (2)
  1. [III.B, Fig. 2] The exterior patchy-surface results in Fig. 2 are computed with a truncation order nmax=20 for a piecewise-constant reactivity (ten circular targets of angular size ε=0.2). This is precisely the regime that Section IV warns is problematic: a step function has slowly decaying spherical-harmonic projections, and the text concedes that a large number of eigenfunctions may be needed to project even a smooth surface reactivity. Unlike the interior test in Fig. 3, Fig. 2 is not validated against FEM, boundary-element, or stochastic simulations, and no convergence study in nmax is reported. Since the exterior heterogeneous kinetics is the paper's advertised advantage, this numerical support is load-bearing. Please add a convergence test (e.g., nmax=10, 20, 40, 80 for at least one of the three reactivity values) or an independent numerical check for the reaction probability shown in Fig. 2.
  2. [II.C, Eq. (29)] The truncation error for the infinite matrix M+K is not quantified. In the spherical basis the matrix elements of K for a step-function reactivity decay only polynomially in the harmonic degree, and Section IV explicitly concedes that the approach is not well suited to mixed boundary conditions and very small targets. Because all subsequent spectral decompositions, including Eqs. (45), (50)-(52), rely on truncating this matrix, the paper should state a practical error estimate or at least a criterion in terms of target size, reactivity contrast, and nmax under which the truncated matrix is reliable. Without such a criterion, the accuracy of the exterior patchy-target results remains uncontrolled.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the Robin condition 'includes in particular mixed Robin-Neumann condition.' In the common chemical-physics usage, mixed Dirichlet-Neumann conditions mean κ=∞ on the reactive part, a limit the paper explicitly says is not well handled. Consider rephrasing to clarify that the finite-κ Robin-Neumann case (κ finite on targets and zero elsewhere) is covered, or state the κ→∞ limit as a separate asymptotic issue.
  2. [III.B, Eq. (48) and Appendix E] The minus sign in the exterior eigenvalues (48) follows from the choice of outward normal pointing into the ball for the exterior domain, but this sign convention is not stated explicitly in the text. A brief sentence defining ∂/∂n for the exterior domain would help readers avoid sign errors when comparing with other conventions.
  3. [Appendix B, Eq. (B3)] Equation (B3) contains the typographical artifact 'bracehtipupleft/bracehtipdownright' in the displayed formula. This should be cleaned up to show the standard expression with μ_{0}^{(0)}=0.
  4. [Section IV] The limitations discussion is candid and welcome, but it appears after the figures that already rely on the problematic regime. Consider moving the narrow-escape and discontinuous-reactivity warning to the beginning of Section III.B, before Fig. 2, so readers are alerted to the truncation issue before interpreting the exterior results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (16) is an exact resolvent identity, and the numerical truncation caveats are accuracy issues, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained algebraically. Equation (16) is obtained by writing the Robin propagator as the Dirichlet propagator plus a regular part, solving the regular part as a Dirichlet problem whose boundary data are fixed by the Robin condition, and then using the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator to close the system. The matrix K is constructed directly from the prescribed heterogeneous reactivity κ(s) via Eq. (29b), so no parameter is fitted and no target quantity is used as an input. The subsequent spectral representations (27), (30), (32), (45), (50)-(52) are algebraic consequences of expanding Eq. (16) in the eigenbasis of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator, not independent assumptions. The homogeneous limits in Appendix E reproduce the Collins-Kimball and Smoluchowski results, and Fig. 3 compares the semi-analytical solution against an independent FEM calculation, providing genuinely external checks. The extensive self-citations (Refs. 14, 34, 83, 86, among others) supply background, p=0 special cases, and a Bessel-function summation identity; none of these is load-bearing for the heterogeneous-reactivity derivation itself. The paper's own admission in Sec. IV that the method is not well suited to mixed Dirichlet-Neumann conditions and to very small targets, and the use of nmax=20 truncation for the discontinuous patchy-reactivity results in Fig. 2, are numerical-convergence caveats rather than circular reasoning. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is light. No constant is fitted to any measurement, and no new entity is postulated. The only hand-chosen numerical parameter is the truncation order nmax = 20, which affects accuracy but not the formal content. The framework presupposes smooth boundaries and bounded reactivity, both stated by the author, and builds on standard spectral facts about the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator and spherical Bessel functions, one of which is cited to the author's own companion paper.

free parameters (1)
  • truncation order nmax = 20
    The infinite matrix (M_p + K) is inverted after truncation at nmax = 20 in all displayed computations (Appendix D, Figs. 1-3). The formulas are formally exact at infinite order, so this is a numerical accuracy parameter rather than a fitted constant, but its adequacy is not quantified.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The boundary ∂Ω is smooth and the reactivity κ(s) is bounded, so the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator M_p is self-adjoint with a complete discrete eigenbasis in L2(∂Ω) for bounded boundaries.
    Stated in Sec. II just before Eq. (4) ('we assume that the boundary ∂Ω is smooth') and used to justify the spectral expansion (26) that underlies every matrix formula in the paper.
  • domain assumption The Robin boundary value problem describes a well-defined diffusion-reaction process (partially reflected Brownian motion) for each bounded 0 ≤ κ(s) < ∞.
    Invoked in the probabilistic interpretation in Sec. II and in the definition of reaction-time quantities (21)-(25); the PDE derivations do not strictly need this, but the physical interpretation of H(t|x0) as a probability density relies on it. The paper cites Refs. [13,14,81-85].
  • standard math Standard elliptic regularity and Green's identities hold for the modified Helmholtz operator on the domains considered, so boundary trace and normal derivative manipulations are legitimate.
    Used throughout Sec. II A and Appendix A to pass from the PDE (6) to the boundary integral representation (14)-(16) without stating Sobolev-level hypotheses.
  • standard math The eigenbasis and spectral data of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on the sphere are the spherical harmonics with eigenvalues in Eqs. (42a) and (48), and the summation formula over zeros of spherical Bessel functions (Eq. C10) is valid.
    Used in Appendices C and E; the Bessel summation identity is cited to the author's companion work arXiv:1904.11190, an external but self-authored reference.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral theory of imperfect diffusion-controlled reactions on heterogeneous catalytic surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57SDK7DN

@misc{pith2026190801143,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral theory of imperfect diffusion-controlled reactions on heterogeneous catalytic surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57SDK7DN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01143}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a general theoretical description of chemical reactions occurring on a catalytic surface with heterogeneous reactivity. The propagator of a diffusion-reaction process with eventual absorption on the heterogeneous partially reactive surface is expressed in terms of a much simpler propagator toward a homogeneous perfectly reactive surface. In other words, the original problem with general Robin boundary condition that includes in particular mixed Robin-Neumann condition, is reduced to that with Dirichlet boundary condition. Chemical kinetics on the surface is incorporated as a matrix representation of the surface reactivity in the eigenbasis of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator. New spectral representations of important characteristics of diffusion-controlled reactions, such as the survival probability, the distribution of reaction times, and the reaction rate, are deduced. Theoretical and numerical advantages of this spectral approach are illustrated by solving interior and exterior problems for a spherical surface that may describe either an escape from a ball or hitting its surface from outside. The effect of continuously varying or piecewise constant surface reactivity (describing, e.g., many reactive patches) is analyzed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01143 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Diffusion inside a ball of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Diffusion outside a ball of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Laplace-transformed probability density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    On one hand, the action of Mp onto a given function can be expressed via Eq

    Dirichlet propagator and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator The Laplace-transformed Dirichlet propagator ˜G0(x, p |x0) and the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator Mp are closely related. On one hand, the action of Mp onto a given function can be expressed via Eq. (13) in terms of the propagator ˜G0(x, p |x0) by solving the corresponding Dirichlet boundary value ...

  2. [2]

    General Robin boundary value problem Similarly, for a given function ˜f (s, p ) on the boundary ∂Ω, the solution ˜ u(x, p ) of a general Robin boundary value problem (p − D∆)˜u = 0 ( x ∈ Ω) , (A7a)( D ∂ ∂n + κ(x) ) ˜u = ˜f (x ∈ ∂Ω) , (A7b) 10 can be obtained by multiplying Eqs. (A3, A7a) by ˜u(x, p ) and ˆGf (x, p |x0) respectively, subtracting them, inte...

  3. [3]

    (D3) yields Kn0,n ′0 = κ D √ (n + 1/ 2)(n′ + 1/ 2) 1∫ cos ε dx Pn(x) Pn′ (x)

    Single circular target To model a single circular partially reactive target of angular size ε at the North pole (with the remaining inert boundary), one sets κ(θ, φ ) = κ Θ( ε − θ), (D8) so that Eq. (D3) yields Kn0,n ′0 = κ D √ (n + 1/ 2)(n′ + 1/ 2) 1∫ cos ε dx Pn(x) Pn′ (x). (D9) To compute explicitly the matrix K, one can use the Adams-Neumann’s product...

  4. [4]

    For any bounded domain, a diffusing molecule cannot avoid the reaction event so that ˜H(0|x0) = 1, ensuring the correct normal- ization of the probability density H(t|x0)

    Reaction probability The reaction probability can be obtained by integrat- ing the probability density H(t|x0) of reaction times over t from 0 to infinity, giving ˜H(0|x0). For any bounded domain, a diffusing molecule cannot avoid the reaction event so that ˜H(0|x0) = 1, ensuring the correct normal- ization of the probability density H(t|x0). This property ...

  5. [5]

    ingredients

    Laplace-transformed reaction rate We briefly discuss how Eq. (34) for the Laplace- transformed reaction rate ˜J(p) can be further simplified when the initial concentration is uniform: c0(x0) = c0. Integrating Eq. (6a) for the propagator ˜G0(x, p |x0) over x ∈ Ω yields p ∫ Ω dx0 ˜G0(x, p |x0) = 1 + D ∫ ∂ Ω dx0 ∂ ˜G0(x, p |x0) ∂nx0 , (B4) where we exchanged x...

  6. [6]

    Geometry-controlled kinetics

    O. B´ enichou, C. Chevalier, J. Klafter, B. Meyer, and R. Voituriez, “Geometry-controlled kinetics”, Nature Chem. 2, 472-477 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    23), and different reactivities

    0025) and a large target of angular size ε = 1 (with σ ≈ 0. 23), and different reactivities. Appendix D: Computation of the matrix K The key element of the spectral approach is the possi- bility to disentangle first-passage diffusive steps from the heterogeneous reactivity which is incorporated via the matrix K. In this Appendix, we compute this matrix for s...

  8. [8]

    General setting In general, the reactivity κ(θ, φ ) can be expanded over the complete basis of spherical harmonics, κ(θ, φ ) = ∞∑ n=0 n∑ m=−n κ nmYmn(θ, φ ), (D1) with coefficients κ nm. When this expansion can be trun- cated at a low order n∗, one can compute the elements of the matrix K explicitly, without numerical quadrature 10-2 10-1 100 101 10210-8 10...

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    (43) yields 2 πδm,m ′, and 14 the matrix K has a block structure

    Axially symmetric problems When the reactivity is axially symmetric, κ(θ, φ ) = κ(θ), the integral over φ in Eq. (43) yields 2 πδm,m ′, and 14 the matrix K has a block structure. If in addition one is interested in axially symmetric quantities (e.g., ˜H(p|x0) which does not de...

  2. [10]

    Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, “Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 251-341 (1990)

    1990

  3. [11]

    In fact, the additivity of the integral in Eq

    Multiple targets of circular shape The matrix K can also be computed explicitly for mul- tiple partially reactive non-overlapping targets of circular shape. In fact, the additivity of the integral in Eq. (43) implies that contributions for all targets are just summed up. We co...

  4. [12]

    Versuch einer Mathematischen The- orie der Koagulations Kinetic Kolloider L¨ osungen

    M. Smoluchowski, “Versuch einer Mathematischen The- orie der Koagulations Kinetic Kolloider L¨ osungen”, Z. Phys. Chem. 129, 129-168 (1917)

    1917

  5. [13]

    Rice, Diffusion-Limited Reactions (Elsevier, Amster- dam, 1985)

    S. Rice, Diffusion-Limited Reactions (Elsevier, Amster- dam, 1985)

    1985

  6. [14]

    ingredients

    for the case p = 0, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann oper- ator can also be interpreted as the continuous limit of the Brownian self-transport operator Qij which was in- troduced in [12, 13] to describe the probability of the first arrival to a site j of a discretized boundary from ano...

  7. [15]

    Redner, A Guide to First Passage Processes (Cam- bridge University press, 2001)

    S. Redner, A Guide to First Passage Processes (Cam- bridge University press, 2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    Brownian flights over a fractal nest and first passage statistics on irregular surfaces

    P. Levitz, D. S. Grebenkov, M. Zinsmeister, K. Kol- wankar, and B. Sapoval, “Brownian flights over a fractal nest and first passage statistics on irregular surfaces”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 180601 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    First-passage time in complex scale- invariant media

    S. Condamin, O. B´ enichou, V. Tejedor, R. Voituriez, and J. Klafter, “First-passage time in complex scale- invariant media”, Nature 450, 77-80 (2007)

    2007

  10. [18]

    From first-passage times of random walks in confinement to geometry-controlled kinetics

    O. B´ enichou and R. Voituriez “From first-passage times of random walks in confinement to geometry-controlled kinetics”, Phys. Rep. 539, 225-284 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Metzler, G

    R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, S. Redner (Eds.) First-Passage Phenomena and Their Applications (World Scientific Press, 2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Overview of theoretical models for reac- tion rates

    G. H. Weiss, “Overview of theoretical models for reac- tion rates”, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 3-36 (1986)

    1986

  13. [21]

    Diffusion-Reaction in Branched Structures: The- ory and Application to the Lung Acinus

    D. S. Grebenkov, M. Filoche, B. Sapoval, and M. Fe- lici, “Diffusion-Reaction in Branched Structures: The- ory and Application to the Lung Acinus”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 050602 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    Diffusion-controlled reaction rates

    F. C. Collins and G. E. Kimball, “Diffusion-controlled reaction rates”, J. Colloid Sci. 4, 425-437 (1949)

    1949

  15. [23]

    Can One Hear the Shape of an Electrode? II. Theoretical Study of the Laplacian Transfer

    M. Filoche and B. Sapoval, “Can One Hear the Shape of an Electrode? II. Theoretical Study of the Laplacian Transfer”, Eur. Phys. J. B 9, 755-763 (1999)

    1999

  16. [24]

    Spectral Properties of the Brownian Self-Transport Operator

    D. S. Grebenkov, M. Filoche, and B. Sapoval, “Spectral Properties of the Brownian Self-Transport Operator”, Eur. Phys. J. B 36, 221-231 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Partially Reflected Brownian Mo- tion: A Stochastic Approach to Transport Phenomena

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Partially Reflected Brownian Mo- tion: A Stochastic Approach to Transport Phenomena”, in Focus on Probability Theory, Ed. L. R. Velle, pp. 135- 169 (Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, 2006)

    2006

  18. [26]

    D. A. Lauffenburger and J. Linderman, Receptors: Mod- els for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1993)

    1993

  19. [27]

    Partially diffusion-controlle d recombination

    H. Sano and M. Tachiya, “Partially diffusion-controlle d recombination”, J. Chem. Phys. 71, 1276-1282 (1979)

    1979

  20. [28]

    Theory of diffusion-controlled reactions on spherical surfaces and its application to re- actions on micellar surfaces

    H. Sano and M. Tachiya, “Theory of diffusion-controlled reactions on spherical surfaces and its application to re- actions on micellar surfaces”, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2870- 2878 (1981)

    1981

  21. [29]

    Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors

    D. Shoup and A. Szabo, “Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors”, Biophys. J. 40, 33-39 (1982)

    1982

  22. [30]

    General Formulation of Laplacian Transfe r Across Irregular Surfaces

    B. Sapoval, “General Formulation of Laplacian Transfe r Across Irregular Surfaces”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3314- 3317 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    Smaller is bet- ter – but not too small: A physical scale for the design of the mammalian pulmonary acinus

    B. Sapoval, M. Filoche, and E. Weibel, “Smaller is bet- ter – but not too small: A physical scale for the design of the mammalian pulmonary acinus”, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci. USA 99, 10411-10416 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Diffusion- controlled bimolecular reaction rates. The effect of ro- tational diffusion and orientation constraints

    D. Shoup, G. Lipari, and A. Szabo, “Diffusion- controlled bimolecular reaction rates. The effect of ro- tational diffusion and orientation constraints”, Biophys. J. 36, 697-714 (1981)

    1981

  25. [33]

    Time dependent diffusion in a disordered medium with partially absorbing walls: A perturbative approach

    J. Qian and P. N. Sen, “Time dependent diffusion in a disordered medium with partially absorbing walls: A perturbative approach”, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 194508 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Exact solution for anisotropic diffusion-controlled reactions with partiall y reflecting conditions

    S. D. Traytak and W. Price, “Exact solution for anisotropic diffusion-controlled reactions with partiall y reflecting conditions”, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 184508 (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    Diffu- sion of protein receptors on a cylindrical dendritic mem- brane with partially absorbing traps

    P. C. Bressloff, B. A. Earnshaw, and M. J. Ward, “Diffu- sion of protein receptors on a cylindrical dendritic mem- brane with partially absorbing traps”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68, 1223-1246 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Theory of diffusion-influenced reactions in complex ge- ometries

    M. Galanti, D. Fanelli, S. D. Traytak, and F. Piazza, “Theory of diffusion-influenced reactions in complex ge- ometries”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 15950-15954 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Semi-analytical computation of Laplacian Green functions in three- dimensional domains with disconnected spherical boundaries

    D. S. Grebenkov and S. D. Traytak, “Semi-analytical computation of Laplacian Green functions in three- dimensional domains with disconnected spherical boundaries”‘ J. Comput. Phys. 379, 91-117 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Kinetics of stochastically gated diffusion-limited reactions and geometry of random walk trajectories

    O. B´ enichou, M. Moreau, and G. Oshanin, “Kinetics of stochastically gated diffusion-limited reactions and geometry of random walk trajectories”, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3388-3406 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    Gated Narrow Escape Time for Molecular Signaling

    J. Reingruber and D. Holcman, “Gated Narrow Escape Time for Molecular Signaling”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 148102 (2009)

    2009

  32. [40]

    A New Derivation of Robin Boundary Conditions through Homogenization of a Stochastically Switching Boundary

    S. D. Lawley and J. P. Keener, “A New Derivation of Robin Boundary Conditions through Homogenization of a Stochastically Switching Boundary”, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Sys. 14, 1845-1867 (2015). 18

    2015

  33. [41]

    Stochastic switching in biology: from genotype to phenotype

    P. C. Bressloff, “Stochastic switching in biology: from genotype to phenotype”, J. Phys. A. 50, 133001 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Physics of chemorecep- tion

    H. C. Berg and E. M. Purcell, “Physics of chemorecep- tion”, Biophys. J. 20, 193-239 (1977)

    1977

  35. [43]

    Narrow Es- cape, Part II The circular disk

    A. Singer, Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman, “Narrow Es- cape, Part II The circular disk”, J. Stat. Phys. 122, 465 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Time dependent rate of diffusion-influenced ligand binding to receptors on cell surfaces

    R. Zwanzig and A. Szabo, “Time dependent rate of diffusion-influenced ligand binding to receptors on cell surfaces”, Biophys. J. 60, 671-678 (1991)

    1991

  37. [45]

    In turn, Eq

    imply ˜Hhom(p|x0) = κ i0(r0 √ p/D )√pD i′ 0(R √ p/D ) + κ i0(R √ p/D ) (C14) (since i0(z) = sinh( z)/z , one can further simplify this expression). In turn, Eq. (51) gives ˜Jhom(p) = 4 πDRc 0 ( i0(R √ p/D ) R √ p/D i 1(R √ p/D ) + D κR ) −1 , (C15) and its inverse Laplace tran...

  38. [46]

    Imperfect Diffusion-Controlled Reac - tions

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Imperfect Diffusion-Controlled Reac - tions”, in Chemical Kinetics: Beyond the Textbook , Eds. K. Lindenberg, R. Metzler, and G. Oshanin (World Sci- entific, 2019; available online as ArXiv: 1806.11471)

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd Ed. (Oxford University Press, 1959)

    1959

  40. [48]

    Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1956)

    J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1956)

    1956

  41. [49]

    I. N. Sneddon, Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Po- tential Theory (Wiley, NY, 1966)

    1966

  42. [50]

    D. G. Duffy, Mixed boundary value problems (CRC, 2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    The Narrow Escape Prob- lem

    D. Holcman and Z. Schuss, “The Narrow Escape Prob- lem”, SIAM Rev. 56, 213-257 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Schuss, Brownian Dynamics at Boundaries and In- terfaces in Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Springer, New York, 2013)

    Z. Schuss, Brownian Dynamics at Boundaries and In- terfaces in Physics, Chemistry and Biology (Springer, New York, 2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Holcman and Z

    D. Holcman and Z. Schuss, Stochastic Narrow Escape in Molecular and Cellular Biology (Springer, New York, 2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Narrow Escape, Part I

    A. Singer, Z. Schuss, D. Holcman, and R. S. Eisenberg, “Narrow Escape, Part I”, J. Stat. Phys. 122, 437-463 (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    Narrow Escape, Part III Riemann surfaces and non-smooth domains

    A. Singer, Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman, “Narrow Escape, Part III Riemann surfaces and non-smooth domains”, J. Stat. Phys. 122, 491 (2006)

    2006

  48. [56]

    An Asymptotic Analysis of the Mean First Pas- sage Time for Narrow Escape Problems: Part I: Two- Dimensional Domains

    S. Pillay, M. J. Ward, A. Peirce, and T. Kolokol- nikov, “An Asymptotic Analysis of the Mean First Pas- sage Time for Narrow Escape Problems: Part I: Two- Dimensional Domains”, SIAM Multi. Model. Simul. 8, 803-835 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    An Asymptotic Analysis of the Mean First Passage Time for Narrow Escape Problems: Part II: The Sphere

    A. F. Cheviakov, M. J. Ward, and R. Straube, “An Asymptotic Analysis of the Mean First Passage Time for Narrow Escape Problems: Part II: The Sphere”, SIAM Multi. Model. Simul. 8, 836-870 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Math- ematical modeling and numerical computation of nar- row escape problems

    A. F. Cheviakov, A. S. Reimer, and M. J. Ward, “Math- ematical modeling and numerical computation of nar- row escape problems”, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021131 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Analytical and Numerical Results for an Escape Problem

    C. Caginalp and X. Chen, “Analytical and Numerical Results for an Escape Problem”, Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. 203, 329-342 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    Analytical Solutions for an Escape Problem in a Disc with an Arbitrary Distribution of Exit Holes Along Its Boundary

    J. S. Marshall, “Analytical Solutions for an Escape Problem in a Disc with an Arbitrary Distribution of Exit Holes Along Its Boundary”, J. Stat. Phys. 165, 920-952 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Universal formula for the mean first passage time in planar domains

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Universal formula for the mean first passage time in planar domains”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 260201 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Diffusion-controlled ligand binding to spheres partially covered by receptors: an effective medium treatment

    R. Zwanzig, “Diffusion-controlled ligand binding to spheres partially covered by receptors: an effective medium treatment”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 5856 (1990)

    1990

  55. [63]

    Boundary homogenization for trapping by patchy surfaces

    A. Berezhkovskii, Y. Makhnovskii, M. Monine, V. Zit- serman, and S. Shvartsman, “Boundary homogenization for trapping by patchy surfaces”, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11390 (2004)

    2004

  56. [64]

    Homogenization of boundary condi- tions for surfaces with regular arrays of traps

    A. M. Berezhkovskii, M. I. Monine, C. B. Muratov, and S. Y. Shvartsman, “Homogenization of boundary condi- tions for surfaces with regular arrays of traps”, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 036103 (2006)

    2006

  57. [65]

    Boundary homoge- nization for periodic arrays of absorbers

    C. Muratov and S. Shvartsman, “Boundary homoge- nization for periodic arrays of absorbers”, Multiscale Model. Simul. 7, 44-61 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    Boundary Homogenization and Capture Time Distributions of Semipermeable Membranes with Periodic Patterns of Reactive Sites

    A. Bernoff, A. Lindsay, and D. Schmidt, “Boundary Homogenization and Capture Time Distributions of Semipermeable Membranes with Periodic Patterns of Reactive Sites”, Multiscale Model. Simul. 16, 1411-1447 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Boundary homogenization for a sphere with an absorbing cap of arbitrary size

    L. Dagdug, M. V´ azquez, A. Berezhkovskii, and V. Zit- serman, “Boundary homogenization for a sphere with an absorbing cap of arbitrary size”, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 214101 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    First Passage Statistics for the Capture of a Brownian Parti- cle by a Structured Spherical Target with Multiple Sur- face Traps

    A. E. Lindsay, A. J. Bernoff, and M. J. Ward, “First Passage Statistics for the Capture of a Brownian Parti- cle by a Structured Spherical Target with Multiple Sur- face Traps”, Multiscale Model. Simul. 15, 74-109 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Numerical approxima- tion of diffusive capture rates by planar and spherical surfaces with absorbing pores

    A. J. Bernoff and A. E. Lindsay, “Numerical approxima- tion of diffusive capture rates by planar and spherical surfaces with absorbing pores”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 78, 266-290 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Exploration and trapping of mortal random walkers

    S. B. Yuste, E. Abad, and K. Lindenberg, “Exploration and trapping of mortal random walkers”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 220603 (2013)

    2013

  63. [71]

    Mortality, redundancy, and diversity in stochastic search

    B. Meerson and S. Redner, “Mortality, redundancy, and diversity in stochastic search”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 198101 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    The escape problem for mortal walkers

    D. S. Grebenkov and J.-F. Rupprecht, “The escape problem for mortal walkers”, J. Chem. Phys. 146, 084106 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Exit time distribution in spherically sym- metric two-dimensional domains

    J.-F. Rupprecht, O. B´ enichou, D. S. Grebenkov, and R. Voituriez, “Exit time distribution in spherically sym- metric two-dimensional domains”, J. Stat. Phys. 158, 192-230 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    Diffusive escape through a narrow opening: new insights into a clas- sic problem

    D. S. Grebenkov and G. Oshanin, “Diffusive escape through a narrow opening: new insights into a clas- sic problem”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 2723-2739 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Narrow Escape of In- teracting Diffusing Particles

    T. Agranov and B. Meerson, “Narrow Escape of In- teracting Diffusing Particles”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120601 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    Effects of the target aspect ratio and intrinsic reactivity onto diffusive search in bounded domains

    D. S. Grebenkov, R. Metzler, and G. Oshanin, “Effects of the target aspect ratio and intrinsic reactivity onto diffusive search in bounded domains”, New J. Phys. 19, 103025 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    First passage times for multiple par- ticles with reversible target-binding kinetics

    D. S. Grebenkov, “First passage times for multiple par- ticles with reversible target-binding kinetics”, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 134112 (2017)

    2017

  70. [78]

    First passage time dis- tribution of multiple impatient particles with reversible binding

    S. D. Lawley and J. B. Madrid, “First passage time dis- tribution of multiple impatient particles with reversible binding”, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 214113 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Optimal Reaction Time for Surface- Mediated Diffusion

    O. B´ enichou, D. S. Grebenkov, P. Levitz, C. Loverdo, and R. Voituriez, “Optimal Reaction Time for Surface- Mediated Diffusion”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150606 (2010). 19

    2010

  72. [80]

    Mean First-Passage Time of Surface- Mediated Diffusion in Spherical Domains

    O. B´ enichou, D. S. Grebenkov, P. Levitz, C. Loverdo, and R. Voituriez, “Mean First-Passage Time of Surface- Mediated Diffusion in Spherical Domains”, J. Stat. Phys. 142, 657-685 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    Kinetics of Active Surface-Mediated Diffu- sion in Spherically Symmetric Domains

    J.-F. Rupprecht, O. B´ enichou, D. S. Grebenkov, and R. Voituriez, “Kinetics of Active Surface-Mediated Diffu- sion in Spherically Symmetric Domains”, J. Stat. Phys. 147, 891-918 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    Exact mean exit time for surface-mediated diffusion

    J.-F. Rupprecht, O. B´ enichou, D. S. Grebenkov, and R. Voituriez, “Exact mean exit time for surface-mediated diffusion”, Phys. Rev. E 86, 041135 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    First-Passage Times in d-Dimensional Heterogeneous Media

    G. Vaccario, C. Antoine, and J. Talbot, “First-Passage Times in d-Dimensional Heterogeneous Media”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240601 (2015)

    2015

  76. [84]

    Diffusing Diffusivity: Sur- vival in a Crowded Rearranging and Bounded Domain

    R. Jain and K. L. Sebastian, “Diffusing Diffusivity: Sur- vival in a Crowded Rearranging and Bounded Domain”, J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 9215-9222 (2016)

    2016

  77. [85]

    Diffusion-limited reactions in dynamic heterogeneous media

    Y. Lanoisel´ ee, N. Moutal, and D. S. Grebenkov, “Diffusion-limited reactions in dynamic heterogeneous media”, Nature Commun. 9, 4398 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    First passage statistics for diffusing diffusivity

    V. Sposini, A. Chechkin and R. Metzler, “First passage statistics for diffusing diffusivity”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 04LT01 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Universal Proximity Effect in Target Search Kinetics in the Few-Encounter Limit

    A. Godec and R. Metzler, “Universal Proximity Effect in Target Search Kinetics in the Few-Encounter Limit”, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041037 (2016)

    2016

  80. [88]

    First passage time distribu- tion in heterogeneity controlled kinetics: going beyond the mean first passage time

    A. Godec and R. Metzler, “First passage time distribu- tion in heterogeneity controlled kinetics: going beyond the mean first passage time”, Sci. Rep. 6, 20349 (2016)

    2016

  81. [89]

    To- wards a full quantitative description of single-molecule reaction kinetics in biological cells

    D. S. Grebenkov, R. Metzler, and G. Oshanin, “To- wards a full quantitative description of single-molecule reaction kinetics in biological cells”, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 16393-16401 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Strong defocusing of molecular reaction times results from an interplay of geometry and reaction control

    D. S. Grebenkov, R. Metzler, and G. Oshanin, “Strong defocusing of molecular reaction times results from an interplay of geometry and reaction control”, Commun. Chem. 1, 96 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    Duality between relax- ation and first passage in reversible Markov dynamics: rugged energy landscapes disentangled

    D. Hartich and A. Godec, “Duality between relax- ation and first passage in reversible Markov dynamics: rugged energy landscapes disentangled”, New J. Phys. 20, 112002 (2018)

    2018

  84. [92]

    The probabilistic solution of the third boundary value problem for second order elliptic equations

    V. G. Papanicolaou, “The probabilistic solution of the third boundary value problem for second order elliptic equations”, Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 87, 27-77 (1990)

    1990

  85. [93]

    On the Robin problem in Fractal Domains

    R. F. Bass, K. Burdzy, and Z.-Q. Chen, “On the Robin problem in Fractal Domains”, Proc. London Math. Soc. 96, 273-311 (2008)

    2008

  86. [94]

    Residence times and other function- als of reflected Brownian motion

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Residence times and other function- als of reflected Brownian motion”, Phys. Rev. E 76, 041139 (2007)

    2007

  87. [95]

    Par- tially reflected diffusion

    A. Singer, Z. Schuss, A. Osipov, and D. Holcman, “Par- tially reflected diffusion”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 68, 844- 868 (2008)

    2008

  88. [96]

    Laplacian Eigenfunctions in NMR. II Theoretical Advances

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Laplacian Eigenfunctions in NMR. II Theoretical Advances”, Conc. Magn. Reson. 34A, 264- 296 (2009)

    2009

  89. [97]

    Mathe- matical Basis for a General Theory of Laplacian Trans- port towards Irregular Interfaces

    D. S. Grebenkov, M. Filoche, and B. Sapoval, “Mathe- matical Basis for a General Theory of Laplacian Trans- port towards Irregular Interfaces”, Phys. Rev. E 73, 021103 (2006)

    2006

  90. [98]

    Egorov, Pseudo-differential Operators, Singulari- ties, Applications (Berlin: Birkhauser, Basel, Boston, 1997)

    Yu. Egorov, Pseudo-differential Operators, Singulari- ties, Applications (Berlin: Birkhauser, Basel, Boston, 1997)

    1997

  91. [99]

    Jacob, Pseudo-differential Operators and Markov Processes (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1996)

    N. Jacob, Pseudo-differential Operators and Markov Processes (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1996)

    1996

  92. [100]

    M. E. Taylor, Pseudodifferential Operators (Princeton, New Jersey: Prince-ton University Press, 1981)

    1981

  93. [101]

    Eigenvalue problems on exterior domains and Dirichlet to Neumann maps

    M. Marletta, “Eigenvalue problems on exterior domains and Dirichlet to Neumann maps”, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 171, 367-391 (2004)

    2004

  94. [102]

    Spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on Lipschitz domains

    W. Arendt, R. Mazzeo, “Spectral properties of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator on Lipschitz domains”, Ulmer Seminare 12, 23-37 (2007)

    2007

  95. [103]

    The Dirichlet-to- Neumann Operator on Exterior Domains

    W. Arendt and A. F. M. ter Elst, “The Dirichlet-to- Neumann Operator on Exterior Domains”, Potential Anal. 43, 313-340 (2015)

    2015

  96. [104]

    Spectral asymptotics for the semiclassical Dirichlet to Neumann operator

    A. Hassell and V. Ivrii, “Spectral asymptotics for the semiclassical Dirichlet to Neumann operator”, J. Spectr. Theory 7, 881-905 (2017)

    2017

  97. [105]

    Scaling Properties of the Spread Har- monic Measures

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Scaling Properties of the Spread Har- monic Measures”, Fractals 14, 231-243 (2006)

    2006

  98. [106]

    Analytical representations of the spread harmonic measure

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Analytical representations of the spread harmonic measure”, Phys. Rev. E 91, 052108 (2015)

    2015

  99. [107]

    J. B. Garnett and D. E. Marshall, Harmonic Measure (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  100. [108]

    Multifractal Properties of the Harmonic Mea- sure on Koch Boundaries in Two and Three Dimen- sions

    D. S. Grebenkov, A. A. Lebedev, M. Filoche, and B. Sapoval, “Multifractal Properties of the Harmonic Mea- sure on Koch Boundaries in Two and Three Dimen- sions”, Phys. Rev. E 71, 056121 (2005)

    2005

  101. [109]

    What Makes a Boundary Less Ac- cessible

    D. S. Grebenkov, “What Makes a Boundary Less Ac- cessible”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200602 (2005)

    2005

  102. [110]

    A Spectral Approach to Survival Probability in Porous Media

    B. T. Nguyen, D. S. Grebenkov, “A Spectral Approach to Survival Probability in Porous Media”, J. Stat. Phys. 141, 532-554 (2010)

    2010

  103. [111]

    The toposcopy, a new tool to probe the geometry of an irregular interface by measuring its transfer impedance

    M. Filoche and D. S. Grebenkov, “The toposcopy, a new tool to probe the geometry of an irregular interface by measuring its transfer impedance”, Eur. Phys. Lett. 81, 40008 (2008)

    2008

  104. [112]

    New Simple Properties of a Few Irregular Sys- tems

    B. Sapoval, J. S. Andrade Jr, A. Baldassari, A. Desol- neux, F. Devreux, M. Filoche, D. S. Grebenkov, and S. Russ, “New Simple Properties of a Few Irregular Sys- tems”, Physica A 357, 1-17 (2005)

    2005

  105. [113]

    Laplacian Eigenfunctions in NMR I. A Numerical Tool

    D. S. Grebenkov, “Laplacian Eigenfunctions in NMR I. A Numerical Tool”, Conc. Magn. Reson. 32A, 277-301 (2008)

    2008

  106. [114]

    NMR Survey of Reflected Brownian Motion

    D. S. Grebenkov, “NMR Survey of Reflected Brownian Motion”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1077-1137 (2007)

    2007

  107. [115]

    From the microstructure to diffu- sion NMR, and back

    D. S. Grebenkov, “From the microstructure to diffu- sion NMR, and back”, in Diffusion NMR of confined systems, Ed. R. Valiullin (RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2016)

    2016

  108. [116]

    A physicist’s guide to explicit sum- mation formulas involving zeros of Bessel functions and related spectral sums

    D. S. Grebenkov, “A physicist’s guide to explicit sum- mation formulas involving zeros of Bessel functions and related spectral sums” (submitted; available online as arXiv:1904.11190)

    1904 arXiv

  109. [117]

    On the product of two Legendre poly- nomials

    W. A. Al-Salam, “On the product of two Legendre poly- nomials”, Math. Scand 4, 239-242 (1957)

    1957

  110. [118]

    Rotation and Translation of Regular and Irregular Solid Spherical Harmonics

    E. O. Steinborn and K. Ruedenberg, “Rotation and Translation of Regular and Irregular Solid Spherical Harmonics”, Adv. Quantum. Chem. 7, 1-81 (1973)

    1973

  111. [119]

    D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum , 2nd Ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968)

    1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.