Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Scalable Fabrication of Diamond-on-Silica Heterostructures via High-Selectivity Deep ICP-RIE and Room-Temperature Bonding

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A thin silica mask can etch cleanly through a 16-micron diamond membrane, and the leftover oxide bonds the diamond to silica at room temperature without degrading its embedded NV centers.

desk verdict Solid process-integration paper; the new trick is using the leftover SiO2 etch mask for room-temperature silicate bonding to diamond, but 'transparent' and 'coherence-preserving' are overstatements relative to the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14978 v1 pith:57UWO7AA submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

R. Chembra Vasudevan , A. Hammouti , J. Le Pouliquen , T. Batte , P. Pirasteh , Y. Dumeige , P. Huillery This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords diamondNVcentersICP-RIEsilicondioxidehardmaskthrough-etchinghydroxide-catalysisbondingdiamond-on-silicaheterostructuresquantumphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a fabrication route that etches entirely through a 16-micron-thick, nitrogen-vacancy (NV)-doped single-crystal diamond membrane using only a 2-micron silicon-dioxide hard mask and a multi-step oxygen-based plasma process, with a diamond-to-silica selectivity around 15:1 and sidewall angles near 22 degrees. The authors then repurpose the oxide that survives etching as the bonding surface: etched diamond pieces are attached to silica substrates at room temperature via a sodium-silicate hydroxide-catalysis bond, forming a siloxane interlayer. They show the resulting heterostructure is optically transparent, adds no parasitic fluorescence, and keeps the NV centers' spin coherence time around 1 microsecond. If correct, this is a scalable, metal-free route from commercial bulk diamond to diamond-on-silica devices for quantum sensing and integrated photonics.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the dual-function silicon dioxide hard mask. It first enables deep, clean diamond etching by resisting the O2 plasma and avoiding the sputter redeposition typical of metallic masks; after etching, its remaining ~1.2 microns serve as the bonding surface for hydroxide-catalysis bonding. The bond itself runs through surface silanol chemistry: hydroxide ions catalyse dissolution of silica, silicate ions polymerize into Si(OH)4, and dehydration condenses these into a tangled siloxane network joining diamond and silica at room temperature. A three-step plasma sequence—CHF3 to transfer the pattern into the oxide, SF6+O2 to strip residue, and pure O2 to etch the diamond in 1

What would settle it

Measure T2* or a Hahn-echo coherence time on the same diamond membrane before and after the full etch-and-bond sequence; a significant drop would overturn the no-degradation claim. As a second check, optically resolve NV centers within about 100 nanometres of the bonded interface and look for line broadening from magnetic noise in the silicate layer.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a single-layer PECVD silica mask, only 2 microns thick, can survive a complete through-etch of a 16-micron NV-doped diamond membrane in pure O2 inductively coupled plasma reactive-ion etching, without the micromasking and metal redeposition that plague metal masks. Etch selectivity is 15:1, the sidewall angle is 21.6 ± 1.8 degrees, and the etched sidewall roughness is no worse than the starting diamond surface. The roughly 1.2 microns of silica that remain after etching are deliberately kept to serve as both an optical-quality interface and a chemically compatible bonding layer; oxygen-plasma activation plus an aqueous sodium silicate solution pro

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that matching the measured 1.07-microsecond spin coherence time to the supplier's nominal 1-microsecond rating proves the etch and bond did not damage the NV centers—a comparison that would miss degradation if the pristine sample was actually better than its rating.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 1.5 × 1.5 mm commercial membrane can be partitioned into many individual microstructures, lowering the diamond cost per device.
  • Diamond-on-silica heterostructures pair a high-index material (n ≈ 2.4) with a low-index cladding (n ≈ 1.45), a geometry suited to waveguides and resonators after further thinning.
  • Room-temperature bonding avoids high-temperature annealing and pressure-assisted equipment, so it is compatible with NV centers and with silica fibre endoscopes for sensing.
  • Bonded membranes survive piranha cleaning, brief hydrofluoric-acid exposure, and SF6 plasma, so conventional microfabrication steps can follow the bond.
  • No parasitic photoluminescence appears in the NV emission range, and NV coherence time stays near 1 microsecond, supporting quantum readout after integration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the reported etch-rate and selectivity spread (106–220 nm/min, 10:1 to 19.5:1) is attributed to uneven thermal contact, scaling to thicker or larger membranes will likely require better thermal mounting; etch-uniformity measurements with different adhesives or clamping schemes would test this directly.
  • The no-degradation conclusion rests on comparing the post-process T2* of 1.07 ± 0.03 microseconds to the supplier's nominal 1 microsecond rating; a same-sample before-and-after coherence measurement would settle whether any hidden degradation occurred.
  • The authors note that NV centers close to the bonding interface have not yet been probed; resolving NV centers within roughly 100 nanometres of the siloxane layer could reveal interface-induced magnetic noise that the present whole-membrane measurement averages away.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fabrication process for through-etching a 16 μm-thick commercial NV-doped single-crystal diamond membrane using a 2 μm PECVD SiO2 hard mask and a three-step oxygen-based ICP-RIE process. The authors demonstrate pattern transfer, a measured diamond-to-SiO2 selectivity of 15:1, a sidewall angle of about 21.6°, RMS sidewall roughness of 3.1 nm, and negligible visible micromasking in SEM inspection. The residual SiO2 layer is then used as the bonding surface for room-temperature sodium-silicate hydroxide-catalysis bonding to SiO2 substrates; all four bonding attempts succeeded, and the bonds survived piranha cleaning, brief HF immersion, and SF6 plasma exposure. PL spectra of the bonded heterostructure show no parasitic features in the NV emission range, and CW-ODMR gives T2* = 1.07 ± 0.03 μs, which the authors compare with the supplier-rated value of about 1 μs for the unprocessed diamond. The paper claims a scalable, contamination-free route to diamond-on-silica heterostructures for quantum photonics and sensing.

Significance. The manuscript has substantial strengths: the etch parameters are reported in detail (Table 1), the selectivity and etch-rate ranges are quantified, the SEM and AFM data support the through-etch and roughness claims, the 4/4 bonding success rate is encouraging, and the PL/ODMR data are presented with clear spectral fits. Using the residual dielectric hard mask as the bonding layer is an elegant idea that avoids the contamination risks of metallic masks. If the coherence-preservation and optical-transparency claims were fully supported, this would be a practically valuable fabrication route for NV-diamond integration. The technical core of the etch and bonding demonstration is credible and likely reproducible from the provided parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4) and final sentence of §4; also §5] The central claim that the etching and bonding processes 'did not significantly affect the NV centers coherence time' is not adequately supported. The T2* value of 1.07 ± 0.03 μs is obtained only after processing and is compared with a supplier-rated value of about 1 μs, for which no measurement conditions or uncertainty are given. No same-membrane pre-process T2* measurement is reported, so a process-induced degradation from, say, 1.5 μs to 1.07 μs would be completely missed by this comparison. In addition, the CW-ODMR measurement uses a ~50 μm spot and a Rayleigh range exceeding 1 mm, so it averages over the entire 16 μm membrane thickness; any coherence degradation localized near the bonded interface—the region most relevant for integrated photonics—would be diluted and undetectable. The authors themselves note in §5 that probing NV centers close to the interface is needed, but that d
  2. [Abstract; §1 'interlayer remains optically inert'; §4, Fig. 4b] The abstract states that the siloxane film is 'optically transparent across the visible spectrum,' but no direct transmittance, absorptance, or scattering measurement of the bonding layer is presented. What is shown is a normalized PL spectrum (550–900 nm) of the processed heterostructure compared with a bare diamond sample; this establishes only the absence of parasitic photoluminescence features in the NV emission range, not visible-wavelength transparency. Normalization also removes any information about absolute throughput. Please either add a direct optical measurement of the bonded stack (e.g., transmission or reflection through a bonded silica/diamond control) or revise the claim to 'no detectable parasitic photoluminescence in the NV spectral range.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §5] The wording 'preserving the optical readout' and 'coherence time T2* exceeding 1 μs' is stronger than the evidence supports. Please align the abstract and conclusion wording with the actual comparison to the supplier specification.
  2. [§4, Fig. 4d] Please report the microwave power, the magnetic-field value, and the fit bounds for the hyperfine ODMR measurement so that Eq. (4) can be assessed; the Gaussian FWHM alone is not sufficient to judge whether power broadening was fully avoided.
  3. [Fig. 2 and §2] 'Negligible micromasking' is supported only by SEM images at selected locations. A statement about how many sidewalls/regions were inspected, or a large-area SEM overview, would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Throughout] Typos and minor wording issues: 'pholithography' in Fig. 1 caption; 'sincerity CCD camera' in §4 (likely 'synchrony' or 'sensitivity'); 'descent signal-to-noise' in §4 (should be 'decent'); '10??m' in Ref. [21] appears corrupted; '1.5 x 1.5 mm2' should be formatted as mm^2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's claims rest on direct experimental measurements and external references, not on fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: a 16 μm diamond membrane is through-etched with a SiO2 hard mask, the remaining oxide is used for room-temperature silicate bonding, and the bonded heterostructure is characterized by SEM, AFM, PL, and ODMR. No derivation chain reduces a prediction to its inputs. The only quantitative inference is T2* = 1.07 ± 0.03 μs, obtained from the measured CW-ODMR Gaussian FWHM of 0.49 ± 0.01 MHz using the standard textbook relation T2* = 2√ln2/(π·FWHM) (Eq. 4), which is not fitted to the conclusion. The comparison with the supplier-rated ~1 μs is an external benchmark, not an input to the measurement; although the lack of a same-sample pre-process baseline weakens the claim that coherence is preserved, that is a measurement-design limitation, not circularity. No self-citations are used to justify load-bearing premises, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The PL spectra are compared directly with a bare diamond sample. Thus the analysis finds no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on standard plasma-etching and bonding chemistry plus a small set of hand-chosen process parameters. The most fragile input is the supplier's coherence rating used as a pre-process baseline. No new physical entities, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the siloxane interlayer is a known product of sodium-silicate condensation.

free parameters (4)
  • SiO2 hard-mask thickness = 2 μm
    Chosen to provide enough etch endurance for ~16 μm diamond at 15:1 selectivity while leaving a ~1.2 μm bonding layer; not systematically optimized in this work.
  • Sodium silicate dilution ratio = 1:6 v/v in H2O
    Hand-chosen process parameter from Preston et al.; not varied here, yet it directly affects the bonding-layer thickness and bond strength.
  • Dehydration time = 4 days in desiccator
    Hand-chosen duration for polycondensation of the silicate interlayer; not varied, so its necessity for the claimed bond stability is untested.
  • O2 plasma activation durations = 10 minutes (substrate), 1 minute (membrane)
    Hand-chosen to balance silanol generation against PDMS-stamp and thin-membrane damage; not optimized.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math In the weak microwave excitation limit, the Gaussian FWHM of a CW-ODMR resonance gives T2* = 2√ln(2)/(π·FWHM)
    Invoked in §4 to convert the measured 0.49 ± 0.01 MHz linewidth into T2* = 1.07 ± 0.03 μs; quoted from Dréau et al. [27]. This is a standard physics relation.
  • domain assumption The supplier-rated T2* ≈ 1 μs for the NV-doped diamond sample is a valid pre-process baseline
    Used in §4 to conclude the etch/bonding processes did not significantly affect coherence. The paper does not measure the same membrane before processing; if the pristine value were higher, the conclusion would overstate preservation.
  • domain assumption PECVD SiO2 stress measured on Si (100 MPa) also applies to the SiO2 layer deposited on diamond
    §2 states stress could not be measured on diamond because suitable large diamond substrates were unavailable. The mask's mechanical integrity is assumed to match the Si-calibrated value.
  • domain assumption O2 plasma activation produces surface silanol groups on PECVD SiO2 that enable sodium-silicate condensation
    The bonding mechanism relies on this standard surface chemistry, cited to Matinfar and Nychka [26]; no direct surface characterization is provided for the activated layers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scalable Fabrication of Diamond-on-Silica Heterostructures via High-Selectivity Deep ICP-RIE and Room-Temperature Bonding." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57UWO7AA

@misc{pith2026260714978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scalable Fabrication of Diamond-on-Silica Heterostructures via High-Selectivity Deep ICP-RIE and Room-Temperature Bonding},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57UWO7AA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14978}
}
read the original abstract

Single-crystal diamond is a leading material platform for high-power electronics and solid-state quantum technologies, yet many device architectures require micrometer-scale membranes with deeply etched features, patterned from commercially available substrates. In this work, we demonstrate a complete through-etch of a 16 {\mu}m -thick NV-doped single-crystal diamond membrane using a single-layer SiO2 hard mask combined with a multi-step oxygen-based ICPRIE process. With a diamond-to-SiO2 selectivity of 15:1, this non-metallic mask strategy can achieve etch depths of few tens of {\mu}m with well-defined sidewalls, conserved surface roughness and negligible micromasking. Furthermore, we use the oxide layer that remains after etching to serve as the bonding surface in a subsequent integration step. The etched microstructures are transferred onto SiO2 substrates and bonded at room temperature using O2 plasma surface activation and a sodium silicate interlayer. The resulting siloxane film is optically transparent across the visible spectrum and introduces no detectable parasitic photoluminescence, preserving the optical readout of the embedded NV centers. Together, this deep-etch and room-temperature bonding process provides a scalable and contaminationfree route from bulk diamond membranes to diamond-on-silica heterostructures for integrated quantum photonics and sensing applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14978 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the diamond patterning and etching process. (i) Diamond substrate with deposited SiO2 layer and spin-coated photoresist attached to a silicon carrier wafer. (ii) Pattern definition in the photoresist using photolithography. (iii) Transfer of the pattern into the SiO2 layer via ICP-RIE using CHF3 plasma. (iv) Brief cleaning step of SF6+O2 plasma. (v) Transfer of the pattern into the diamond subs… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Characterization of the etched diamond membrane. (a) SEM image of the diamond membrane after the etching process. (b,c) SEM images of some regions of interest of the etched membrane, viewed at a 35◦ tilt angle. Sidewall angle is overlaid on panel (b). 3. Diamond-on-silica Heterostructures via Room-Temperature Sodium Silicate Bonding After the etching process, a 1.2 µm thick layer of SiO2 remains on the diamond surfa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Room-Temperature Sodium Silicate Bonding. (a) Schematic illustration of the room-temperature sodium silicate bonding sequence. (i-ii) Transfer of a membrane piece onto a PDMS stamp using a vacuum tool. (iii) Activation of the silica surface of the diamond membrane by exposure to an O2 plasma. (iv) Activation of the silica surface of the host substrate by exposure to an O2 plasma. (v) The diamond membrane is brought … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characterization of NV centers in the fabricated heterostructures. a) Scheme of the experimental setup used for the characterization of the heterostructures. b) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra acquired from the bare diamond sample (red solid line) and from a fabricated …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Xu, D. Wang, K. Fu, D. H. Mudiyanselage, H. Fu, Y . Zhao, A review of ultrawide bandgap materials: prop- erties, synthesis and devices, Oxford Open Materials Science 2 (1) (2022) itac004. doi:10.1093/oxfmat/itac004

    doi:10.1093/oxfmat/itac004 2022

  2. [2]

    M. E. Thomas, W. J. Tropf, Optical properties of diamond, in: Optics & Photonics, 1993

    1993

  3. [3]

    Gruber, A

    A. Gruber, A. Drabenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, C. von Borczyskowski, Scanning confocal op- tical microscopy and magnetic resonance on single defect centers, Science 276 (5321) (1997) 2012–2014. doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2012

    arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    P. K. Shandilya, S. Flagan, N. Carvalho, E. Zohari, V . K. Kavatamane, J. Losby, P. Barclay, Diamond integrated quantum nanophotonics: Spins, photons and phonons, Journal of Lightwave Technology 40 (2022) 7538–7571. doi:10.1109/jlt.2022.3210466

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Kuwahata, T

    A. Kuwahata, T. Kitaizumi, K. Saichi, T. Sato, R. Igarashi, T. Ohshima, Y . Masuyama, T. Iwasaki, M. Hatano, F. Jelezko, M. Kusakabe, T. Yatsui, M. Sekino, Magnetometer with nitrogen-vacancy center in a bulk di- amond for detecting magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications, Scientific Reports 10 (2020) 2483. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59064-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59064-6 2020

  6. [6]

    Hatano, J

    Y . Hatano, J. Shin, J. Tanigawa, Y . Shigenobu, A. Nakazono, T. Sekiguchi, S. Onoda, T. Ohshima, K. Arai, T. Iwasaki, M. Hatano, High-precision robust monitoring of charge/discharge current over a wide dynamic range for electric vehicle batteries using diamond quantum sensors, Scientific Reports 12 (1) (2022) 13991. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18106-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18106-x 2022

  7. [7]

    Vindolet, B

    B. Vindolet, B. Ducharne, H. N. Nguyen, X. Mougenot, C. Gallais, T. Hingant, High-resolution non-destructive detection of grinding burns with NV diamond quantum magnetometer, NDT & E International 155 (2025) 103439. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103439

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Newman, S

    A. Newman, S. Graham, C. Stephen, A. Edmonds, M. Markham, G. Morley, Endoscopic diamond magnetometer for cancer surgery, Physical Review Applied 24 (2) (2025) 024029. doi:10.1103/znt3-988w

    work page doi:10.1103/znt3-988w 2025

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    A. H. Piracha, K. Ganesan, D. W. M. Lau, A. Stacey, L. P. McGuinness, S. Tomljenovic-Hanic, S. Prawer, Scalable fabrication of high-quality, ultra-thin single crystal diamond membrane windows, Nanoscale 8 (2016) 6860–6865. doi:10.1039/C5NR08348F

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    H. Sun, Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, G. Chen, T. Li, M. Liao, Diamond mems: From classical to quantum, Advanced Quantum Technologies 6 (2023). doi:10.1002/qute.202300189

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Challier, S

    M. Challier, S. Sonusen, A. Barfuss, D. Rohner, D. Riedel, J. Koelbl, M. Ganzhorn, P. Appel, P. Maletinsky, E. Neu, Advanced Fabrication of Single-Crystal Diamond Membranes for Quantum Technologies, Microma- chines 9 (4) (2018) 148. doi:10.3390/mi9040148

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    M. Ruf, M. IJspeert, S. V . van Dam, N. de Jong, H. van den Berg, G. Evers, R. Hanson, Optically coherent nitrogen-vacancy centers in micrometer-thin etched diamond membranes, Nano Letters 19 (2019) 3987 – 3992. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01316. 10

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Polikarpov, V

    M. Polikarpov, V . Polikarpov, I. Snigireva, A. Snigirev, Diamond x-ray refractive lenses with high acceptance, Physics Procedia 84 (2016) 213–220. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2016.11.040

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    Toros, M

    A. Toros, M. Kiss, T. Graziosi, H. Sattari, P. Gallo, N. Quack, Precision micro-mechanical components in single crystal diamond by deep reactive ion etching, Microsystems & Nanoengineering 4 (2018). doi:10.1038/s41378- 018-0014-5

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    L. Zhao, X. Wang, N. Jiang, K. Nishimura, J. Yi, S. Fang, Experimental study of inductively coupled plasma etching of patterned single crystal diamonds, Scientific Reports 15 (1) (2025) 21062, publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08066-3

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Toros, M

    A. Toros, M. Kiss, T. Graziosi, S. Mi, R. Berrazouane, M. Naamoun, J. Vukajlovic Plestina, P. Gallo, N. Quack, Reactive ion etching of single crystal diamond by inductively coupled plasma: State of the art and catalog of recipes, Diamond and Related Materials 108 (2020) 107839...

    2020

  9. [17]

    S. J. Pearton, E. A. Douglas, R. J. Shul, F. Ren, Plasma etching of wide bandgap and ultrawide bandgap semi- conductors, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 38 (2) (2020) 020802. doi:10.1116/1.5131343

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    A. V . Golovanov, V . S. Bormashov, N. V . Luparev, S. A. Tarelkin, S. Y . Troschiev, S. G. Buga, V . D. Blank, Diamond microstructuring by deep anisotropic reactive ion etching, physica status solidi (a) 215 (22) (2018) 1800273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201800273

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    D. Tran, C. Fansler, T. Grotjohn, D. Reinhard, J. Asmussen, Investigation of mask selectivities and diamond etching using microwave plasma-assisted etching, Diamond and Related Materials 19 (7) (2010) 778–782, pro- ceedings of Diamond 2009, The 20th European Conference on Diam...

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    X. Wang, S. Fang, B. Wang, M. Qiu, K. Nishimura, N. Jiang, J. Yi, Diamond etching with near-zero micromasking, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 33 (2024) 6559–6564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.11.011

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Hicks, A

    M.-L. Hicks, A. Pakpour-Tabrizi, R. Jackman, Diamond etching beyond 10??m with near-zero micromasking, Scientific Reports 9 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51970-8

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Corazza, S

    A. Corazza, S. Ruffieux, Y . Zhu, C. A. Jaramillo Concha, Y . Fontana, C. Galland, R. J. Warburton, P. Maletinsky, Homogeneous free-standing nanostructures from bulk diamond over millimeter scales for quantum technologies, Nano Letters 25 (40) (2025) 14526–14533, pMID: 4100575...

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    E. J. Elliffe, J. Bogenstahl, A. Deshpande, J. Hough, C. Killow, S. Reid, D. Robertson, S. Rowan, H. Ward, G. Cagnoli, Hydroxide-catalysis bonding for stable optical systems for space, Classical and Quantum Gravity 22 (10) (2005) S257. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/10/018

    2005 doi

  16. [24]

    Preston, B

    A. Preston, B. Balaban, G. Mueller, Hydroxide-Bonding Strength Measurements for Space-Based Optical Missions, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology 5 (4) (2008) 365–372. doi:10.1111/j.1744- 7402.2008.02256.x

    2008

  17. [25]

    Preston, G

    A. Preston, G. Mueller, Bonding sic to sic using a sodium silicate solution, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology 9 (4) (2012) 764–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02644.x

    2012

  18. [26]

    Matinfar, J

    M. Matinfar, J. A. Nychka, A review of sodium silicate solutions: Structure, gelation, and syneresis, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 322 (2023) 103036. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2023.103036

    2023

  19. [27]

    Dréau, M

    A. Dréau, M. Lesik, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, O. Arcizet, J.-F. Roch, V . Jacques, Avoiding power broadening in optically detected magnetic resonance of single nv defects for enhanced dc magnetic field sensitivity, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 195204. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.84.195204. 11

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Faraon, P

    A. Faraon, P. E. Barclay, C. Santori, K.-M. C. Fu, R. G. Beausoleil, Resonant enhancement of the zero- phonon emission from a colour centre in a diamond cavity, Nature Photonics 5 (5) (2011) 301–305. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.52

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    Giakoumaki, G

    A. Giakoumaki, G. Coccia, V . Bharadwaj Shivakumar, J. Hadden, A. Bennett, B. Sotillo, R. Yoshizaki, P. Oliv- ero, O. Jedrkiewicz, R. Ramponi, S. Pietralunga, M. Bollani, A. Bifone, P. Barclay, A. Kubanek, S. Eaton, Quantum technologies in diamond enabled by laser processing, ...

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Mitchell, D

    M. Mitchell, D. P. Lake, P. E. Barclay, Realizing Q>300 000 in diamond microdisks for optomechanics via etch optimization, APL Photonics 4 (1) (2019) 016101. doi:10.1063/1.5053122

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    S. W. Ding, M. Haas, X. Guo, K. Kuruma, C. Jin, Z. Li, D. D. Awschalom, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, A. A. High, M. Loncar, High-Q cavity interface for color centers in thin film diamond, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 6358. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50667-5

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    X. Guo, M. Xie, A. Addhya, A. Linder, U. Zvi, S. Wang, X. Yu, T. D. Deshmukh, Y . Liu, I. N. Hammock, Z. Li, C. T. DeVault, A. Butcher, A. P. Esser-Kahn, D. D. Awschalom, N. Delegan, P. C. Maurer, F. J. Heremans, A. A. High, Direct-bonded diamond membranes for heterogeneous qu...

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Katsumi, K

    R. Katsumi, K. Takada, S. Naruse, K. Kawai, D. Sato, T. Hizawa, T. Yatsui, Hybrid integration of ensem- ble nitrogen-vacancy centers in single-crystal diamond based on pick-flip-and-place transfer printing, Applied Physics Letters 123 (11) (2023) 111108. doi:10.1063/5.0161268. 12

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.