Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.05951 v3 pith:5AMTYPH2 submitted 2020-05-12 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords offlinelearningmorelp-mdppolicymodel-basedadvancesdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In offline reinforcement learning (RL), the goal is to learn a highly rewarding policy based solely on a dataset of historical interactions with the environment. The ability to train RL policies offline can greatly expand the applicability of RL, its data efficiency, and its experimental velocity. Prior work in offline RL has been confined almost exclusively to model-free RL approaches. In this work, we present MOReL, an algorithmic framework for model-based offline RL. This framework consists of two steps: (a) learning a pessimistic MDP (P-MDP) using the offline dataset; and (b) learning a near-optimal policy in this P-MDP. The learned P-MDP has the property that for any policy, the performance in the real environment is approximately lower-bounded by the performance in the P-MDP. This enables it to serve as a good surrogate for purposes of policy evaluation and learning, and overcome common pitfalls of model-based RL like model exploitation. Theoretically, we show that MOReL is minimax optimal (up to log factors) for offline RL. Through experiments, we show that MOReL matches or exceeds state-of-the-art results in widely studied offline RL benchmarks. Moreover, the modular design of MOReL enables future advances in its components (e.g. generative modeling, uncertainty estimation, planning etc.) to directly translate into advances for offline RL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning to Theorize the World from Observation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    NEO is a probabilistic neural model that induces compositional programs as a learned Language of Thought from non-textual observations and executes them via a shared transition model to enable explanation-driven gener...

  2. UBP2: Uncertainty-Balanced Preference Planning for Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    UBP2 uses ensembles of reward, dynamics, and value models to score trajectories on a unified objective of reward plus uncertainty, yielding sublinear regret bounds and higher sample efficiency on Meta-World than prior...

  3. SC3-Eval: Evaluating Robot Foundation Models via Self-Consistent Video Generation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SC3-Eval enforces three consistency constraints on video world models to evaluate robot manipulation policies, achieving 0.929 Pearson correlation with real-world rollouts across seven policies.

  4. SC3-Eval: Evaluating Robot Foundation Models via Self-Consistent Video Generation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SC3-Eval enforces three consistencies on a video model to produce policy rollouts that correlate 0.929 with real-world performance across seven vision-language-action policies and reproduce observed failure modes.

  5. Learning to Theorize the World from Observation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    NEO induces compositional latent programs as world theories from observations and executes them to enable explanation-driven generalization.

  6. Safety, Security, and Cognitive Risks in World Models

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    World models enable efficient AI planning but create risks from adversarial corruption, goal misgeneralization, and human bias, demonstrated via attacks that amplify errors and reduce rewards on models like RSSM and D...

  7. What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation

    cs.RO 2021-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A comprehensive benchmark study of offline imitation learning methods on multi-stage robot manipulation tasks identifies key sensitivities to algorithm design, data quality, and stopping criteria while releasing all d...

  8. Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems

    cs.LG 2020-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Offline RL promises to extract high-utility policies from static datasets but faces fundamental challenges that current methods only partially address.

Pith tools