pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.13297 · v3 · pith:5AUEIPOFnew · submitted 2025-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · gr-qc· hep-th

Emergent quantum field theories on curved spacetimes in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates: from scalar to Proca fields

Christian F. Schmidt , Simon Brunner , Stefan Floerchinger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 00:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas gr-qchep-th
keywords spinor Bose-Einstein condensateanalogue gravityProca fieldcurved spacetimeNambu-Goldstone bosonsquantum simulationFLRW metricparticle production
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spinor Bose-Einstein condensates map excitations to Proca fields on emergent curved spacetimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives mappings from excitations near different mean-field states in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensate to relativistic quantum field theories minimally coupled to curved acoustic spacetimes. These fields are identified as Nambu-Goldstone bosons whose structure follows the symmetry breaking pattern of the ground state. In the polar phase the spin-nematic rotation mode maps to a massive vector Proca field on a curved spacetime that appears beyond the spin-healing length. Spacetime-dependent Zeeman couplings and trap potentials are shown to produce an FLRW metric, which permits simulation of cosmological particle production through quenches that create spin-nematic squeezed states.

Core claim

In the polar phase of a spin-1 BEC the spin-nematic rotation mode can be cast into a Proca field that is minimally coupled to a curved spacetime emerging on length scales larger than the spin-healing length. The paper shows that different phases produce independent emergent geometries with bi-metricity in the polar and antiferromagnetic cases and tri-metricity in the ferromagnetic case. Specifying spacetime-dependent Zeeman couplings and the condensate trap realizes an FLRW metric, enabling quantum simulation of particle production of Proca quanta via quenching the quadratic Zeeman coefficient or magnetic field ramps.

What carries the argument

The Nambu-Goldstone bosons tied to the spontaneous symmetry breaking pattern of the mean-field ground state, mapped onto quantum fields in analogue relativistic theories on curved acoustic spacetimes.

If this is right

  • The emergent spacetime geometries are independent of each other and exhibit bi-metricity in the polar and antiferromagnetic phases and tri-metricity in the ferromagnetic phase.
  • Spinor degrees of freedom allow study of massive vector and scalar fields in addition to the scalar fields familiar from ordinary BECs.
  • Cosmological particle production of Proca quanta can be simulated by quenching the quadratic Zeeman coefficient or performing magnetic field ramps, both of which create spin-nematic squeezed states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Laboratory tests of quantum field theory on curved spacetime can now include massive vector fields rather than only scalars.
  • The same tuning of couplings might be used to model other expanding geometries or different epochs in analogue cosmology.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of excitations as Nambu-Goldstone bosons whose dynamics follow the spontaneous symmetry breaking pattern of the mean-field ground state remains valid when the trap and Zeeman couplings are made spacetime-dependent.

What would settle it

A dispersion or correlation measurement of the spin-nematic mode at wavelengths much larger than the spin-healing length that deviates from the expected Proca propagation on the calculated acoustic metric would falsify the mapping.

read the original abstract

We consider excitations of a spin-1 Bose-Einstein-condensate (BEC) in the vicinity of different mean-field configurations and derive mappings to emergent relativistic quantum field theories minimally coupled to curved acoustic spacetimes. The quantum fields are typically identified with Nambu-Goldstone bosons, such that the structure of the analogue quantum field theories on curved spacetimes depends on the (spontaneous) symmetry breaking pattern of the respective ground-state. The emergent spacetime geometries are independent of each other and exhibit bi-metricity in the polar and antiferromagnetic phase, whereas one has tri-metricity in the ferromagnetic phase. Compared to scalar BECs, the spinor degrees of freedom allow to investigate massive vector and scalar fields where the former is a spin-nematic rotation mode in the polar phase which can be cast into a Proca field that is minimally coupled to a curved spacetime that emerges on length scales larger than the spin-healing length. Finally, we specify the Zeeman couplings and the condensate trap to be spacetime-dependent such that a cosmological FLRW-metric can be achieved. This work enables a pathway towards quantum-simulating cosmological particle production of Proca quanta via quenching the quadratic Zeeman-coefficient or via magnetic field ramps, which both result in the creation of spin-nematic squeezed states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives mappings from linear excitations around mean-field configurations in spin-1 BECs to emergent relativistic quantum field theories minimally coupled to curved acoustic spacetimes. The emergent fields are identified with Nambu-Goldstone modes whose structure follows the spontaneous symmetry-breaking pattern of the ground state, producing bi-metric geometries in the polar and antiferromagnetic phases and tri-metric geometry in the ferromagnetic phase. In the polar phase the spin-nematic rotation mode is recast as a Proca field on an emergent metric valid for wavelengths much larger than the spin-healing length. By promoting the quadratic Zeeman coefficient and trapping potential to spacetime-dependent functions, an FLRW geometry is realized, opening a route to analog simulation of cosmological particle production of Proca quanta via quenching or magnetic-field ramps.

Significance. If the claimed minimal coupling survives the introduction of spacetime-dependent parameters, the work would furnish a concrete platform for analog-gravity studies of massive vector fields, extending scalar BEC analogs to Proca dynamics and providing an explicit FLRW construction together with a falsifiable protocol for generating spin-nematic squeezed states. The explicit link between symmetry-breaking patterns and multi-metric structure is a clear conceptual advance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Polar-phase Proca mapping and FLRW construction (sections following the mean-field analysis)] The assertion that the spin-nematic mode maps exactly onto a minimally coupled Proca field once the quadratic Zeeman coefficient q and the trap are made spacetime-dependent is load-bearing for the central claim. The linearization of the spin-1 Gross-Pitaevskii equations around a position-dependent mean-field background generically produces additional first-derivative terms and a position-dependent mass contribution that mix with the emergent curvature; the manuscript invokes scale separation ≫ spin-healing length but supplies neither an explicit bound on the rate of variation of q(x) nor a calculation demonstrating that these extra terms can be absorbed or remain negligible while preserving minimal Proca coupling.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'bi-metricity' and 'tri-metricity' without a brief definition or forward reference to the sections where the distinct metrics are derived and compared.
  2. [Emergent-metric derivations] Notation for the emergent metrics in the multi-metric phases would be clearer if a consistent labeling (e.g., g_μν^(1), g_μν^(2)) were introduced at first appearance and used uniformly in subsequent equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's constructive feedback, which helps to strengthen the presentation of our results on emergent Proca fields in spinor BECs. Below we respond to the major comment regarding the validity of the minimal coupling in the presence of spacetime-dependent parameters.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Polar-phase Proca mapping and FLRW construction (sections following the mean-field analysis)] The assertion that the spin-nematic mode maps exactly onto a minimally coupled Proca field once the quadratic Zeeman coefficient q and the trap are made spacetime-dependent is load-bearing for the central claim. The linearization of the spin-1 Gross-Pitaevskii equations around a position-dependent mean-field background generically produces additional first-derivative terms and a position-dependent mass contribution that mix with the emergent curvature; the manuscript invokes scale separation ≫ spin-healing length but supplies neither an explicit bound on the rate of variation of q(x) nor a calculation demonstrating that these extra terms can be absorbed or remain negligible while preserving minimal Proca coupling.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. The linearization is performed around the locally adjusted mean-field configuration that minimizes the energy for the position-dependent q(x) and trapping potential. As a result, gradients of the background enter only through the slow spatial variation of these parameters. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit perturbative expansion of the linearized spin-1 Gross-Pitaevskii equations that isolates the first-derivative and position-dependent mass corrections. We will show that these terms are suppressed by factors of order ξ_s/L (where ξ_s is the spin-healing length and L the characteristic scale of variation of q and the trap) and by ξ_s/λ for the excitation wavelength λ. Under the stated scale separation λ, L ≫ ξ_s the corrections remain negligible and the minimal Proca coupling to the emergent metric is recovered at leading order. We will also state a quantitative bound on |∇q|/q that keeps the relative error below a few percent for the wavelengths of interest. This material will be inserted in the sections following the mean-field analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper performs a standard linearization of the spin-1 Gross-Pitaevskii equations around mean-field backgrounds to obtain effective equations for Nambu-Goldstone modes, then rewrites those equations in the form of a Proca field on an acoustic metric whose components are explicitly constructed from the background density, phase gradients, and spin-healing length. This construction is derived rather than presupposed, and the subsequent choice of spacetime-dependent Zeeman and trap profiles is presented explicitly as a design choice to realize an FLRW geometry for simulation purposes, not as a fitted or predicted output. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional loops, or renamings of known results appear in the derivation chain; the mapping to minimally coupled Proca is obtained by direct expansion and identification of terms on scales larger than the healing length.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central mappings rest on standard mean-field theory for spin-1 BECs and the assumption that low-energy excitations are Goldstone modes; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond conventional healing lengths and coupling constants already present in the literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mean-field ground states in polar, antiferromagnetic, and ferromagnetic phases are stable and their symmetry breaking patterns determine the Goldstone mode content.
    Invoked to classify the emergent field content and metric signatures in each phase.
  • domain assumption The effective description remains valid on length scales larger than the spin-healing length.
    Used to justify the Proca field identification and minimal coupling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5781 in / 1443 out tokens · 50829 ms · 2026-05-22T00:33:01.853205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 138 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    As expected, the structure of the acoustic spacetime experienced by the phononic excitation is identical to [57]

    Scalar field: phonon Similar to the treatment of the scalar BEC in previous work[57], choosingthespatialprofile f(r)ofthetrapping potential Vext (11) to bef(r) = ±2r2 + r4/R2 is the first step to transform the phonon line element into that of a curved FLRW-Universe, thus we have ds2 0 = − dt2 + M ¯n0c0(t) 1 ∓ r2 R2 0 −2 d2x (102) 11 Performing a radial co...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Proca field: magnons a. Quench An experimentally feasible way to real- ize temporal curvature for analogue Proca bosons (rep- resented via the transversal degree of freedom of the two magnons in the spinor BEC) consists of the well-known quantum quench of the quadratic Zeeman coefficientq via off-resonant microwave pulses [80, 89, 91, 92, 106– 108] which ...

    work page doi:10.55776/fg5

  3. [3]

    The stationary background solutions are parametrized via ¯Φ(r) = p ¯n(r) ξ+ ξ0/ √ 2 ξ0/ √ 2 ξ− !

    Note that we introduced ˜µ = µ − Vext − ¯nc0 for the sake of brevity. The stationary background solutions are parametrized via ¯Φ(r) = p ¯n(r) ξ+ ξ0/ √ 2 ξ0/ √ 2 ξ− ! . (B2) and contrained by the normalization |ξ0|2 + |ξ−|2 + |ξ+|2 = 1. (B3) Assuming a sufficiently smooth background density pro- file ¯n(r)(whichisreasonableforlong-wavelengtheffective theo...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Polar phase Here, the density fluctuation reads δn(1) = √ 2¯n ϕre 0 , (C11) whereas the spin-density fluctuations are δF (1) x = √ ¯n(ϕre − + ϕre +), (C12) δF (1) y = √ ¯n(ϕim − − ϕim + ), (C13) δF (1) z = 0. (C14) For the diagonal spin-nematic fluctuations we have δQ(1) ij = − δn(1) ¯n ¯Qij (for i = j), (C15) where ¯Q = −2¯n diag(1/3, 1/3, −2/3) (C16) is...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Ferromagnetic phase Similar to the polar phase, the density fluctuation is δn(1) = √ 2¯n ϕre + , (C20) For the spin-density fluctuations, one finds δF (1) x = √ ¯n ϕre 0 , (C21) δF (1) y = √ ¯n ϕim 0 , (C22) δF (1) z = √ 2¯n ϕre + . (C23) For the diagonal spin-nematic fluctuations we have δQ(1) ij = − δn(1) ¯n ¯Qij + √ 2¯n (ϕre −δix − ϕre −δiy) (C24) with...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (C30) for the density-fluctuation

    Anti-Ferromagnetic phase Abbreviating ϕ+ ≡ ϕre + + iϕim + , (C27) ϕ0 ≡ ϕre 0 + iϕim 0 , (C28) ϕ− ≡ ϕre − + iϕim − , (C29) we find δn(1) √¯n = p 1 + fz Re(e−iχ+ ϕ+) + p 1 − fz Re(e−iχ− ϕ−). (C30) for the density-fluctuation. The spin-density fluctuations are δF (1) xp ¯n/2 = p 1 + fz Re(e−iχ+ ϕ0) + p 1 − fz Re(e−iχ− ϕ0), (C31) δF (1) yp ¯n/2 = p 1 + fz Im(...

    work page

  7. [7]

    (C42) Appendix D: Excitations of explicit symmetry-breaking mean field states

    Quadratic fluctuations The background-independent quadratic fluctuations read explicitly δn(2) = 1 2(|ϕ+|2 + |ϕ0|2 + |ϕ−|2), δF (2) x = 1√ 2 ϕre 0 (ϕre + + ϕre −) + 1√ 2 ϕim 0 (ϕim + + ϕim − ), δF (2) y = 1√ 2 ϕim 0 (ϕre + − ϕre −) + 1√ 2 ϕre 0 (ϕim − − ϕim + ), δF (2) z = 1 2(|ϕ+|2 − |ϕ−|2), δQ(2) xx = 1 6(2|ϕ0|2 − |ϕ+|2 − |ϕ−|2) + (ϕim + ϕim − + ϕre + ϕ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Hence, Γ∥ 2 is equivalent to the case were p = q = 0 , whereas Γ⊥ 2 = Z t,r ℏ⟨Im φ⊥, ∂t Re φ⊥⟩ + ℏ2 4M ⟨φ∗ ⊥, ∇2φ⊥⟩ − c1¯n(Im φ⊥)2 + p 2 ⟨φ∗ ⊥, ϵ φ⊥⟩ − q 2 ⟨φ∗ ⊥, φ⊥⟩

    Polar phase At finite magnetic field,p ̸= 0 and q ̸= 0, the potential terms evaluate to δU + Vextδn(2) = ¯nc0(Re φ∥)2 + ¯nc1(Im φ⊥)2 + 1 2 ⟨φ∗ ⊥, q − p ϵ φ⊥⟩, (D1) where ϵ is the two-dimensional Levi-Civita symbol. Hence, Γ∥ 2 is equivalent to the case were p = q = 0 , whereas Γ⊥ 2 = Z t,r ℏ⟨Im φ⊥, ∂t Re φ⊥⟩ + ℏ2 4M ⟨φ∗ ⊥, ∇2φ⊥⟩ − c1¯n(Im φ⊥)2 + p 2 ⟨φ∗ ⊥...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Ferromagnetic phase For the positively polarized case,¯fz = 1, the effective potential for the fluctuations reads U(¯Φ + δΦ) − U(¯Φ) + Vextδn(2) = ¯n (c0 + c1) ϕre + 2 + 1 2 (p − q) (ϕre 0 )2 + ϕim 0 2 + (p − ¯nc1) ϕre − 2 + ϕim − 2 , (D6) 17 in the ferromagnetic phase. Here, the quadratic action for the fluctuating fields can be written as Γ2 = Z t,r − ℏ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    (93), and introduced the U(1)-transformed field φ± ≡ e−iχ± ϕ±

    Anti-Ferromagnetic phase In the anti-ferromagnetic phase, one finds U(¯Φ + δΦ) − U(¯Φ) + Vextδn(2) = 1 2(q− − q)(ϕre 0 )2 + 1 2(q+ − q)(ϕim 0 )2 + 1 2 ¯n(c0 + c1) (1 + fz)(φre +)2 + (1 − fz)(φre −)2 + ¯n(c0 − c1) p 1 − f2z φre + φre − (D15) where we replaced the external potential by eq. (93), and introduced the U(1)-transformed field φ± ≡ e−iχ± ϕ±. (D16)...

    work page

  11. [11]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1982)

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    S. A. Fulling, Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space- Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics,

    R. M. "Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space- Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics, "Chicago Lec- tures in Physics" ("University of Chicago Press", "Chicago, IL", "1995")

    work page 1995

  14. [14]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Parker, Phys

    L. Parker, Phys. Rev.183, 1057 (1969)

    work page 1969

  16. [16]

    S. W. Hawking, Comm. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    work page 1975

  17. [17]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351 (1981)

    work page 1981

  18. [18]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D51, 2827 (1995)

    work page 1995

  19. [19]

    T. G. Philbin, C. Kuklewicz, S. Robertson, S. Hill, F. Koenig, and U. Leonhardt, Science319, 1367–1370 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Horstmann, B

    B. Horstmann, B. Reznik, S. Fagnocchi, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 250403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Weinfurtner, E

    S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh, and G. A. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 021302 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    L.-P. Euvé, F. Michel, R. Parentani, T. G. Philbin, and G. Rousseaux, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 121301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner, Nature Physics13, 833–836 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Leonhardt, Phys

    J.Drori, Y.Rosenberg, D.Bermudez, Y.Silberberg,and U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Wittemer, F

    M. Wittemer, F. Hakelberg, P. Kiefer, J.-P. Schröder, C. Fey, R. Schützhold, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 180502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Steinhauer, M

    J. Steinhauer, M. Abuzarli, T. Aladjidi, T. Bien- aimé, C. Piekarski, W. Liu, E. Giacobino, A. Bra- mati, and Q. Glorieux, Nature Communications 13, 10.1038/s41467-022-30603-1 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30603-1 2022

  27. [27]

    Jacquet, M

    M. Jacquet, M. Joly, F. Claude, L. Giacomelli, Q. Glo- rieux, A. Bramati, I. Carusotto, and E. Giacobino, The European Physical Journal D76, 10.1140/epjd/s10053- 022-00477-5 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/s10053- 2022

  28. [28]

    Haller, S

    A. Haller, S. Hegde, C. Xu, C. De Beule, T. L. Schmidt, and T. Meng, SciPost Physics14, 119 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Tajik, M

    M. Tajik, M. Gluza, N. Sebe, P. Schüttelkopf, F. Cataldini, J. Sabino, F. Møller, S.-C. Ji, S. Erne, G. Guarnieri, S. Sotiriadis, J. Eisert, and J. Schmied- mayer,Proceedingsofthe NationalAcademyofSciences 120, e2301287120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Tajik, I

    M. Tajik, I. Kukuljan, S. Sotiriadis, B. Rauer, T. Schweigler, F. Cataldini, J. Sabino, F. Møller, P. Schüttelkopf, S.-C. Ji, D. Sels, E. Demler, and J. Schmiedmayer, Nature Physics19, 1022–1026 (2023). 19

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Jacquet, L

    M. Jacquet, L. Giacomelli, Q. Valnais, M. Joly, F. Claude, E. Giacobino, Q. Glorieux, I. Caru- sotto, and A. Bramati, Physical Review Letters130, 10.1103/physrevlett.130.111501 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.111501 2023

  32. [32]

    Shi, R.-Q

    Y.-H. Shi, R.-Q. Yang, Z. Xiang, Z.-Y. Ge, H. Li, Y.-Y. Wang, K. Huang, Y. Tian, X. Song, D. Zheng, K. Xu, R.-G. Cai, and H. Fan, Nature Communications 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-39064-6 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39064-6 2023

  33. [33]

    Tolosa-Simeón, M

    M. Tolosa-Simeón, M. M. Scherer, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. B110, 085421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Falque, A

    K. Falque, A. Delhom, Q. Glorieux, E. Gia- cobino, A. Bramati, and M. J. Jacquet, (2024), arXiv:2311.01392 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Visser, Classical and Quantum Gravity 15, 1767–1791 (1998)

    M. Visser, Classical and Quantum Gravity 15, 1767–1791 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living reviews in relativity14, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Visser, C

    M. Visser, C. Barceló, and S. Liberati, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 1719 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    R. S. William G. Unruh, ed., Quantum Analogues: From Phase Transitions to Black Holes and Cosmology (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    G. E. Volovik,The universe in a helium droplet, Vol. 117 (OUP Oxford, 2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 1137 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    M.Novello, M.Visser,andG.E.Volovik, Artificial black holes (World Scientific, 2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, International Journal of Modern Physics A18, 3735 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 240407 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Visser and S

    M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Classical and Quantum Gravity 22, 2493 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Uhlmann, Y

    M. Uhlmann, Y. Xu, and R. Schützhold, New Journal of Physics7, 248 (2005)

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    E. A. Calzetta and B. Hu, International Journal of The- oretical Physics44, 1691 (2005)

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    Prain, S

    A. Prain, S. Fagnocchi, and S. Liberati, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105018 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Bilić and D

    N. Bilić and D. Tolić, Phys. Rev. D88, 105002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Jaskula, G

    J.-C. Jaskula, G. B. Partridge, M. Bonneau, R. Lopes, J. Ruaudel, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 220401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    C.-L. Hung, V. Gurarie, and C. Chin, Science341, 1213 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Nature569, 688 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman, and G. K. Campbell, Phys. Rev. X8, 021021 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    J. Hu, L. Feng, Z. Zhang, and C. Chin, Nature Physics 15, 785 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    C.-A. Chen, S. Khlebnikov, and C.-L. Hung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    C.C.H.Ribeiro, S.-S.Baak,andU.R.Fischer,Physical Review D105, 10.1103/physrevd.105.124066 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.124066 2022

  56. [56]

    Viermann, M

    C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, Á. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, N. Sánchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, H. Strobel, S. Floerchinger, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nature611, 260 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    A. C. Jenkins, J. Braden, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen, M. C. Johnson, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. D109, 023506 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Sparn, E

    M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, C. F. Schmidt, M. Tolosa-Simeón, A. Parra-López, S. Flo- erchinger, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, International Journal of Modern Physics D12, 1641 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. A68, 053613 (2003)

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Phys. Rev. A69, 033602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    U. R. Fischer, Modern Physics Letters A 19, 1789 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    P. Jain, S. Weinfurtner, M. Visser, and C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A76, 033616 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Weinfurtner, A

    S. Weinfurtner, A. White, and M. Visser, Physical Re- view D76, 10.1103/physrevd.76.124008 (2007)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.124008 2007

  65. [65]

    Weinfurtner, P

    S. Weinfurtner, P. Jain, M. Wisser, and C. W. Gardiner, Class. Quantum Gravity26, 065012 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    Chatrchyan, K

    A. Chatrchyan, K. T. Geier, M. K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Tolosa-Simeón, A

    M. Tolosa-Simeón, A. Parra-López, N. Sánchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Flo- erchinger, Phys. Rev. A106, 033313 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Sánchez-Kuntz, A

    N. Sánchez-Kuntz, A. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, T. Haas, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. D105, 105020 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    C. F. Schmidt, A. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123523 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    work page 2010

  71. [71]

    P. O. Fedichev, Y. Kagan, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2913 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    Theis, G

    M. Theis, G. Thalhammer, K. Winkler, M. Hellwig, G. Ruff, R. Grimm, and J. H. Denschlag, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 123001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  73. [73]

    J. c. v. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, J. A. P. Glid- den, L. H. Dogra, J. M. Hutson, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013174 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Kawaguchi and M

    Y. Kawaguchi and M. Ueda, Physics Reports520, 253 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    D. M. Stamper-Kurn and M. Ueda, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1191 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Classical and Quantum Gravity18, 3595 (2001)

    work page 2001

  77. [77]

    Barceló, S

    C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Classical and Quantum Gravity19, 2961 (2002)

    work page 2002

  78. [78]

    U. R. Fischer and R. Schützhold, Phys. Rev. A 70, 063615 (2004)

    work page 2004

  79. [79]

    Liberati, M

    S. Liberati, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, Class. Quan- tum Gravity23, 3129 (2006)

    work page 2006

  80. [80]

    Liberati, M

    S. Liberati, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 151301 (2006)

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.