REVIEW 2 cited by
Modular forms and hierarchical Yukawa couplings in heterotic Calabi-Yau compactifications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the modular symmetry in heterotic string theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. In particular, we examine whether moduli-dependent holomorphic Yukawa couplings are described by modular forms in the context of heterotic string theory with standard embedding. We find that $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ modular symmetry emerges in asymptotic regions of the Calabi-Yau moduli space. The instanton-corrected holomorphic Yukawa couplings are then given by modular forms under $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ or its congruence subgroups such as $\Gamma_0(3)$ and $\Gamma_0(4)$. In addition to the modular symmetry, it turns out that another coupling selection rule controls the structure of holomorphic Yukawa couplings. Furthermore, the coexistence of both the positive and negative modular weights for matter fields leads to a hierarchical structure of matter field K\"ahler metric. Thus, these holomorphic modular forms and the matter field K\"ahler metric play an important role in realizing a hierarchical structure of physical Yukawa couplings.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Stringy Constraints on Modular Flavor Models
Heterotic one-loop threshold corrections imply upper bounds on the modulus in modular flavor models, ruling out tau near i infinity for typical dilaton and beta-function values and disfavoring tau = i at large volume.
-
Inflationary constraints on the moduli-dependent species scale in modular invariant theories
For SL(2,Z) modular inflation models, the CMB spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio imply a gravitational species scale of about 10^16 GeV.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.