REVIEW 1 cited by
Investigating GW190425 with numerical-relativity simulations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Investigating GW190425 with numerical-relativity simulations
read the original abstract
The third observing run of the LIGO-Virgo collaboration has resulted in about hundred gravitational-wave triggers including the binary neutron star merger GW190425. However, none of these events have been accompanied with an electromagnetic transient found during extensive follow-up searches. In this article, we perform new numerical-relativity simulations of binary neutron star and black hole - neutron star systems that have a chirp mass consistent with GW190425. Assuming that the GW190425's sky location was covered with sufficient accuracy during the electromagnetic follow-up searches, we investigate whether the non-detection of the kilonova is compatible with the source parameters estimated through the gravitational-wave analysis and how one can use this information to place constraints on the properties of the system. Our simulations suggest that GW190425 is incompatible with an unequal mass binary neutron star merger with a mass ratio $q<0.8$ when considering stiff or moderately stiff equations of state if the binary was face-on and covered by the observation. Our analysis shows that a detailed observational result for kilonovae will be useful to constrain the mass ratio of binary neutron stars in future events.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A story about a tipsy kangaroo: Reversible jump MCMC for model selection in the analysis of gravitational-wave signals from the coalescence of compact objects
A single RJMCMC run can rank BBH, NSBH, and BNS waveform models and deliver the favored model's parameter posteriors, validated on injections and two real GW events.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.