A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$

Manish Ramchander; Ronak M Soni

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 142 references

A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes an explicit holographic map from semiclassical pure gravity in AdS3 to a single CFT2, so that geodesic lengths become conformal weights and bulk and boundary inner products agree for semiclassical states.

desk verdict A careful, honest synthesis that makes an implicit AdS3/CFT2 map explicit; the central isometry claim is conditional on an unproven conjecture, but it deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29635 v1 pith:5CZEBDKE submitted 2026-07-31 hep-th gr-qc

Manish Ramchander , Ronak M Soni This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thgr-qc

keywords AdS3/CFT2holographicmapfixed-areastatesWheeler-DeWittquantizationOPEcoefficientssemiclassicalgravitycloseduniversesconformalbootstrap

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes an explicit holographic map from the semiclassical Hilbert space of pure general relativity in three-dimensional anti-de Sitter space to the Hilbert space of a single two-dimensional conformal field theory. On a Cauchy slice, states are labelled by a fixed-area network — a maximal set of non-intersecting geodesics with prescribed lengths and angular momenta — and the map sends external geodesics to primary conformal weights while building the wavefunction from OPE coefficients. The map is highly non-isometric in general, but the paper argues it becomes approximately isometric on semiclassical states, so bulk and boundary inner products agree. If correct, this gives a concrete state-level dictionary for pure AdS3 gravity, turns bulk gauge choices into emergent basis changes, provides boundary operators for interior geodesic lengths, and explains a striking failure of semiclassicality for closed universes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fixed-area network: a maximal non-intersecting set of geodesics on a Cauchy slice, with each geodesic's length and angular momentum fixed. Each pair of pants in the network becomes a trivalent vertex carrying an OPE coefficient, and each external geodesic length ℓ is identified with a Liouville momentum P via ℓ = 4πbP, making it a conformal weight. The load-bearing identity is conjecture (4.5): the microcanonical average of the four-vertex OPE network equals the square root of OPE coefficient products times the bulk inner-product diagram (a Virasoro 6j-symbol / double tetrahedron), which is what lets the boundary inner product reproduce the bulk path integral. This

What would settle it

Compute the microcanonical average E_μc[C_{12s}C_{s34}C^*_{12s'}C^*_{s'34}] at leading order in 1/c in any large-c CFT with a known spectrum, for weights h, h̄ near c; if it does not equal the square-root combination of OPE coefficients times the bulk double-tetrahedron diagram, the central conjecture (4.5) is false. A cleaner observable: the norm of a closed-universe coherent state should be dominated by the factorized saddle; seeing the kinematical inner product dominate would signal a breakdown consistent with the paper's closed-universe claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is equation (4.1)/(1.4): a fixed-area network on a Cauchy slice maps to a sum over primaries, V|network⟩ = Σ_P N(P) ∏_I δ(ℓ_I − 4πbP_I) C_{12s}C_{s34}|P1...P4⟩, where external geodesic lengths become conformal weights and internal geodesic lengths appear only through the wavefunction. For 'sufficiently semiclassical' states — those with O(G_N) smearing of lengths — the paper claims that bulk and boundary inner products agree, term by term, in a transseries sense. The agreement rests on the conjecture that microcanonical averages of OPE coefficients in a single holographic CFT reproduce the bulk gravitational path integral including a sum over topologies. The paper is explic

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is conjecture (4.5) — that microcanonical averages of OPE coefficients in a single holographic CFT reproduce the bulk gravitational path integral, including the sum over topologies — which the paper notes is established only for identity-block-dominated channels and is not rigorously proven for h∼c or h≠h̄; if it fails outside a narrow semiclassical window, the map's approximate isometry collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bulk Hamiltonian gauge transformations — changing which geodesics are fixed — map to changes between emergent, overcomplete bases in the boundary, not exact basis changes.
Boundary operators can be constructed whose matrix elements reproduce interior geodesic-length operators on semiclassical states, making lengths behind horizons boundary-measurable at this level.
For closed universes without matter, any two semiclassical pure states are exponentially close to parallel and no classical phase space emerges; adding a massive probe below the black-hole threshold restores semiclassicality.
The map annihilates most fixed-area basis elements, so the bulk Hilbert space contains many non-semiclassical states with no direct boundary meaning; only microcanonically smeared semiclassical states lie in the approximate-isometry domain.
The same construction can be adapted to a map into an ensemble of CFTs, connecting the single-CFT map to ensemble-averaged descriptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If conjecture (4.5) survives direct checks in the h∼c window, the map would make the bulk 'sum over topologies' an emergent consequence of OPE statistics in one CFT, not an added rule.
A testable extension: in any large-c CFT with a known spectrum, compute the microcanonical four-vertex OPE density at O(c^0) and compare directly with the bulk 6j-symbol expression; agreement outside identity-dominated channels would strengthen the map.
The closed-universe result suggests a general criterion: a bulk topology yields a classical phase space only if a probe or boundary anchor breaks the factorization that makes all pure states parallel; this could be checked in boundary-CFT models with end-of-the-world branes.
The reconstruction of interior length operators via typicality assumes OPE densities factorize; verifying this factorization in a concrete CFT would also sharpen the relation between bulk relational observables and boundary operators.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the quick read. The paper is a careful, honest synthesis that makes an implicit dictionary explicit: an explicit holographic map from fixed-area networks in AdS3 to OPE-coefficient networks in a single CFT2, with a clean external/internal geodesic split. The applications—emergent bases, interior length operators, closed universes—are new, and the closed-universe analysis gives a concrete, surprising result. The authors are transparent about the status: the central isometry claim rests on conjecture (4.5), imported from earlier work, and they list three regimes where it is known to fail. Footnote 18 also concedes the spectrum formula lacks a rigorous derivation for h≠h̄.

The bulk Hilbert space construction and the worked examples in Appendix A are genuinely careful. The angular momentum quantization via braiding phases is a nice touch. The writing is plain and honest; no overclaiming.

The soft spot is the load-bearing one. The agreement between bulk and boundary inner products is largely a consistency condition: the bulk side is assembled from degenerate double tori and Virasoro 6j symbols, which are the same crossing kernels used to compute OPE statistics on the boundary. So the agreement is partly built in, and conjecture (4.5) is the unproven bridge. It fails in the very regimes—h~c, non-handlebody, off-shell—where the claimed new physics (interior operators, closed universes with probes) lives. The paper would be much stronger with one independent test of (4.5) that does not share the same technology. That said, the authors do not pretend otherwise; the map is explicitly a proposal, and the limitations are flagged.

Who should read it: anyone working on AdS3/CFT2, tensor network models of holography, or closed universes. It deserves a serious referee. The central claim is conditional, but the paper is important enough and honest enough to warrant the referee time. I would engage with it and would want the referee to focus on (4.5) and on independent evidence for the isometry.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a holographic map from a semiclassical bulk Hilbert space of pure AdS3 gravity with ETW branes, quantized in a fixed-area network basis, to the primary Hilbert space of a single holographic CFT2. The map, given in (4.1) and exemplified for four-boundary wormholes, sends external geodesic lengths and angular momenta to conformal weights and charges, and assigns to each pair-of-pants vertex a normalized OPE coefficient; internal geodesic lengths appear only in the wavefunction. The central claim is that this map becomes approximately isometric on semiclassical states, with the justification reduced to conjecture (4.5), which equates microcanonical OPE averages to the bulk GPI four-vertex diagram. The paper then applies the map to bulk gauge transformations as emergent basis changes, constructs boundary operators for interior geodesic lengths under a typicality assumption, and studies closed universes, finding a breakdown of semiclassicality that can be partially cured by massive probes.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a substantial contribution: it packages recent results on OPE statistics and Virasoro TQFT into a concrete, state-dependent bulk-to-boundary map for pure 3d gravity, and it gives explicit proposals for emergent bases and interior length operators. The paper is commendably explicit about the conjectural inputs and the regimes in which they may fail, and the tensor-network formulation in §4.1 is a useful conceptual simplification. However, the approximate isometry is not derived within the paper but imported as conjecture (4.5), and the applications in §§5–6 inherit the same unproven statistical assumptions. As it stands, the paper establishes a framework and a research program rather than a fully established dictionary, though the framework is well-motivated and carefully developed.

major comments (4)

[§1, Eq. (1.4) vs §4, Eq. (4.2)] There is an inconsistency of a factor of 2 in the central definition of the map. For a non-rotating scalar geodesic (ℓ = ℓ̄, P = P̄), Eq. (4.2) gives δ(2ℓ − 4πbP) = δ(ℓ − 2πbP), whereas Eq. (1.4) states δ(ℓ − 4πbP). Since (4.1)–(4.2) are the operative definition of the map and the identification of external lengths with conformal weights is load-bearing for every application, this must be corrected or the conventions reconciled.
[§4, Eq. (4.5)] The approximate isometry of the holographic map is precisely the content of conjecture (4.5), not a derived consequence. The paper lists three regimes where (4.5) is known to fail, and the semiclassicality conditions (4.3) do not exclude those regimes: states smeared over O(G_N) windows can have support at h ∼ c or on configurations where identity-block domination is not established (see footnote 18 and App. B). The abstract's statement that 'there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products' is therefore conditional on a conjecture that is not proved here. The authors should either prove (4.5) in a sharply delimited regime of validity, add an independent check, or state the isometry as a conjecture in the abstract and conclusions.
[§6, Eq. (6.11)] The reconstruction of interior length operators relies on the typicality/factorization assumption (6.11), which the text immediately admits is not known how to calculate for a single CFT. Since interior operators are one of the advertised applications, this is a second load-bearing unproven input. The reconstruction should be presented as conditional on (6.11), and ideally a testable consequence of that assumption should be identified so that the claim 'we have found a candidate reconstruction' is not read as a derivation.
[§2.4, §3.3, App. B; Eq. (4.5)] There is a circularity concern that deserves attention: the bulk inner products are assembled from degenerate double tori and Virasoro 6j symbols, and those same crossing kernels are used to derive the OPE statistics (Eqs. (3.18)–(3.22), App. B). Equation (4.5) then identifies two objects with essentially identical diagrammatic content. The paper would be materially strengthened by an independent check in a case where the bulk and boundary sides are evaluated without invoking the same elementary kernels — for example, a four-boundary example with non-trivial moduli where the OPE density is not simply the kernel used to construct the bulk inner product. Without such a check, the 'agreement' may be partly a consistency condition of the diagrammatic calculus.

minor comments (5)

[Footnote 8] Attributing a mathematical proof to 'Deepseek v4' inside a proof footnote is unconventional and may conflict with journal policy on AI assistance/disclosure. Please clarify authorship or remove the attribution.
[Eq. (2.43) and surrounding text] The exponential factor appears as 'e^{ℓ_s+ℓ'_s}_{8GN}' without a clearly typeset denominator/division symbol. This makes the formula hard to read; please reformat.
[Eq. (3.19)] The displayed OPE-statistics formula is garbled: the terms involving δ-functions, ρ_p factors, and the C_{123} coefficient are not cleanly separated. A clearer layout or an explicit 'where' block would improve readability.
[§4.1] The tensor-network notation involving abstract indices and the FANOUT and Π_spec operators is terse. A figure explicitly matching the network of (4.11) to the map (4.1) would help the reader verify that the tensor network represents the same object.
[§A.1] Small grammar issue: 'there is an infinity of saddles' should be 'there is an infinite number of saddles' or 'there are infinitely many saddles.'

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Approximate isometry is the conjecture (4.5) restated: the bulk and boundary inner products are assembled from the same Virasoro 6j symbols, so the claimed agreement reduces to an input assumption.

self definitional [§4, eqs. (4.4)–(4.5)]
"By the conjecture of [13, 14, 45], E [four-vertex OPE network] = sqrt(C12s Cs34 C*_{12s'} C*_{s'34}) [bulk inner-product diagram] so that (4.4) has the same transseries as (ϕ|η|ψ)."

The central claim 'there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products' is exactly the content of (4.5), not a consequence derived from the map. Equation (4.4) only rewrites the V†V matrix element as a microcanonical average of OPE coefficients; (4.5) then asserts that this boundary average equals the bulk GPI diagram. Substituting (4.5) into (4.4) produces the advertised agreement verbatim. The paper's own failure list (bulk-field condensation, non-handlebody contributions without CFT derivation, off-shell topologies) shows that the isometry domain is precisely the domain where (4.5) is assumed to hold. Thus the abstract's prediction reduces, by construction, to the input conjecture.
other [§2.4 (2.60) and App. B (B.20)]
"'The Generalised Tetrahedron ... the RHS is known as the Virasoro 6j-symbol [85,86]' and 'Fst(2 1 / 3 4) = ρp(s) sqrt(C12s Cs34 / C41t Ct23) {2 3s / 1 4t}. The last factor is known as the Virasoro 6j-symbol, already seen in the bulk inner product.'"

The bulk inner product's non-degenerate building block is the Virasoro 6j-symbol, and the CFT OPE-statistics crossing kernel Fst is the same Virasoro 6j-symbol. Therefore (4.5) equates two expressions whose diagrammatic content is already the same 6j data. The 'agreement' is a consistency condition between two imported formalisms (bulk GPI ≃ Virasoro TQFT and CFT OPE statistics ≃ Virasoro TQFT), not an independent first-principles verification that the bulk GPI and the single-CFT OPE statistics agree.

full rationale

The central result is conditional rather than independently established: eq. (4.5) is explicitly labeled a conjecture from [13,14,45] and is admitted to fail in known regimes. Because (4.4) is only a rewriting of the map's inner product in terms of that same conjecture, the approximate-isometry theorem is the input assumption restated. This is a genuine circular reduction of the main claim. However, the paper is transparent about the status: it never pretends (4.5) is proved, and some independent anchors exist (Wilson-loop/Verlinde-loop identification for external geodesics, on-shell classical action checks). The one author self-citation [20] is used in the interior-operator application, not in the central isometry step. The structural reuse of Virasoro 6j symbols on both sides makes the equality diagrammatically self-consistent, while reducing the 'prediction' to an equality of objects defined from the same CFT representation-theoretic kernel. Weighting the centrality of (4.5), score 6: the central prediction reduces to an input conjecture, but the paper's claims are conditional and partly anchored by independent checks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proposal contributes a dictionary rather than a parameter-free derivation: its central matching depends on previously conjectured OPE statistics and on two unspecified ingredients (the exact microcanonical smearing partition of unity and the N(P) normalisations). The geometry axioms are standard, but one uniqueness proof is LLM-generated and unverified.

free parameters (2)

Microcanonical smearing functions f_ℓ(P) = width O(G_N^0), peaked at P = ℓ/(4πb)
Used to define semiclassical states and the reconstructed operator (6.7)–(6.9); the exact partition of unity is a choice that affects normalisation of V and the reconstruction, with no canonical prescription given.
Normalisation factors N(P) in the map
In (1.4) and (4.1) N(P) 'collect[s] primary densities of states and averages of three-point functions' but is never specified; the approximate isometry claim depends on this unknown normalisation.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption A single holographic CFT2 exists with sparse spectrum and universal OPE statistics (3.4), (3.5), extended to h, h̄ ~ c even though a rigorous derivation is lacking.
§3.1 and footnote 18; the universality of density and OPE averages in the h~c regime is assumed from [33,37,38] and related works.
domain assumption Identity block domination in some channel (App. B (B.6)) for the OPE-statistics calculations.
Used throughout §3.3 and App. B; known to fail when a light bulk field condenses ([91,105]) as acknowledged in §4.
ad hoc to paper Conjecture (4.5): OPE statistics of a single CFT equal the bulk fixed-area gravitational path integral.
Central matching condition making V approximately isometric; not derived in the paper, and listed failure modes accompany it in §4.
ad hoc to paper Typicality of OPE densities with repeated primaries (6.11).
Needed for interior operator reconstruction; paper states 'It is currently not known how to calculate these for a single CFT' (§6).
standard math Standard 3d hyperbolic geometry facts: uniqueness of maximal slices, hyperbolic pair-of-pants metrics, uniqueness of geodesics in a homotopy class in AdS3/H3, uniqueness of the holomorphic quadratic differential (footnote 8).
Used in §2.2–2.4 to define phase space coordinates and simplify inner products; footnote 8's proof is attributed to an LLM and is not machine-checked.
domain assumption GKPW/AdS-CFT dictionary maps EPI states to GPI boundary conditions.
Background throughout §2–4.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5CZEBDKE

@misc{pith2026260729635,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Holographic Map from AdS$_3$ to CFT$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5CZEBDKE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29635}
}

abstract

We propose a holographic map from the semiclassical Hilbert space of pure general relativity in $\text{AdS}_{3}$ to that of $\text{CFT}_{2}$. We define the bulk Hilbert space by semiclassically quantising the phase space in the basis of a fixed-area network on a Cauchy slice $\Sigma$. A fixed-area network is a maximal non-intersecting set of geodesics on $\Sigma$ whose lengths and angular momenta have been fixed. Our holographic map differentiates between `external' geodesics that are homotopic to a connected component of $\partial \Sigma$, and `internal' geodesics which are not. The lengths and angular momenta of external geodesics become conformal weights of primaries in the Hilbert space of the CFT living on the corresponding component of $\partial \Sigma$. The fixed-area network determines the wave function, which is given by a network of OPE coefficients of primaries whose weights are determined by the corresponding lengths. For sufficiently semiclassical states, there is an agreement between bulk and boundary inner products. We apply this proposal to various physics questions. The boundary dual of a bulk gauge turns out to be an emergent basis for sufficiently semiclassical states. We also define boundary operators that measure the lengths of geodesics behind the horizon, again in semiclassical states. Finally, we apply our map to closed universes and find a failure of semiclassicality in simple cases, which can be partially alleviated by the addition of a massive probe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Gibbons and S.W

G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

1977
[2]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

arXiv 2020
[3]

Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

arXiv 1905
[4]

Saad, S.H

P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

arXiv 1903
[5]

Penington, S.H

G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, 1911.11977

arXiv 1911
[6]

Hsin, L.V

P.-S. Hsin, L.V. Iliesiu and Z. Yang,A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 194004 [2011.09444]

arXiv 2021
[7]

Balasubramanian, A

V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 011024 [2212.02447]. – 61 –

arXiv 2024
[8]

Balasubramanian, A

V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Astrophysical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141501 [2212.08623]

arXiv 2024

Show all 142 references

[9]

Iliesiu, S

L.V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G.J. Turiaci,Black hole microstate counting from the gravitational path integral,JHEP08(2025) 152 [2209.13602]

2025 arXiv
[10]

Mathur,What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?,1402.6378

S.D. Mathur,What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?,1402.6378

arXiv
[11]

Chandra, S

J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman and A. Maloney,Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs,JHEP12(2022) 069 [2203.06511]

2022 arXiv
[12]

Belin, J

A. Belin, J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis, P. Nayak and J. Sonner,Approximate CFTs and random tensor models,JHEP09(2024) 163 [2308.03829]

2024 arXiv
[13]

Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory,2507.11652

T. Hartman,Conformal Turaev-Viro Theory,2507.11652

arXiv
[14]

Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3,2507.12696

T. Hartman,Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS3,2507.12696

arXiv
[15]

Jafferis and D

D.L. Jafferis and D. Wang,The many facets of a hyperbolic tetrahedron: open and closed triangulations of 3d gravity,2604.09396

arXiv
[16]

Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807

H. Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,2512.13807
[17]

Wu,Filtering out Erratic Observables: Wormholes from Gauging Nonlocal Symmetries, 2605.28748

Q.-F. Wu,Filtering out Erratic Observables: Wormholes from Gauging Nonlocal Symmetries, 2605.28748

arXiv
[18]

Chandra and T

J. Chandra and T. Hartman,Toward random tensor networks and holographic codes in CFT,JHEP 05(2023) 109 [2302.02446]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

J. Chandra,Euclidean wormholes for individual 2d CFTs,JHEP04(2024) 051 [2305.07183]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Soni,Emergent Area Operators in the Boundary,2511.01382

R.M. Soni,Emergent Area Operators in the Boundary,2511.01382
[21]

Lin,Ryu-Takayanagi area from Virasoro modular data,2606.30723

J. Lin,Ryu-Takayanagi area from Virasoro modular data,2606.30723

arXiv
[22]

Iliesiu, A

L.V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H.W. Lin, H. Maxfield and M. Mezei,On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,JHEP10(2024) 220 [2403.08696]

2024 arXiv
[23]

Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys

D.R. Brill,Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4133 [gr-qc/9511022]

1996 arXiv
[24]

Brill,Geometry of black holes and multi - black holes in (2+1)-dimensions, inInternational Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology, 12, 1995 [gr-qc/9607026]

D.R. Brill,Geometry of black holes and multi - black holes in (2+1)-dimensions, inInternational Conference on Gravitation and Cosmology, 12, 1995 [gr-qc/9607026]

1995 arXiv
[25]

Aminneborg, I

S. Aminneborg, I. Bengtsson, D. Brill, S. Holst and P. Peldan,Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,Class. Quant. Grav.15(1998) 627 [gr-qc/9707036]

1998 arXiv
[26]

Aminneborg, I

S. Aminneborg, I. Bengtsson and S. Holst,A Spinning anti-de Sitter wormhole,Class. Quant. Grav. 16(1999) 363 [gr-qc/9805028]

1999 arXiv
[27]

Aminneborg and I

S. Aminneborg and I. Bengtsson,Anti-de Sitter Quotients: When Are They Black Holes?,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 095019 [0801.3163]

2008 arXiv
[28]

Krasnov,Analytic continuation for asymptotically AdS 3-D gravity,Class

K. Krasnov,Analytic continuation for asymptotically AdS 3-D gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 2399 [gr-qc/0111049]

2002 arXiv
[29]

Skenderis and B.C

K. Skenderis and B.C. van Rees,Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.301(2011) 583 [0912.2090]

2011 arXiv
[30]

Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(2010) 2323 [1005.3035]. [Int. J. Mod. Phys.D19,2429(2010)]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Balasubramanian, P

V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross,Multiboundary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 185015 [1406.2663]. – 62 –

2014 arXiv
[32]

Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit, 1809.01197

M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: It from BC-bit, 1809.01197

arXiv
[33]

Collier, A

S. Collier, A. Maloney, H. Maxfield and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in CFT2, JHEP07(2020) 074 [1912.00222]

2020 arXiv
[34]

Belin and J

A. Belin and J. de Boer,Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 164001 [2006.05499]

2021 arXiv
[35]

Belin, J

A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,Non-Gaussianities in the statistical distribution of heavy OPE coefficients and wormholes,JHEP06(2022) 116 [2110.14649]

2022 arXiv
[36]

Anous, A

T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer and D. Liska,OPE statistics from higher-point crossing,JHEP06 (2022) 102 [2112.09143]

2022 arXiv
[37]

Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

Y. Kusuki,Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP03(2022) 161 [2112.10984]

2022 arXiv
[38]

Numasawa and I

T. Numasawa and I. Tsiares,Universal dynamics of heavy operators in boundary CFT2,JHEP08 (2022) 156 [2202.01633]

2022 arXiv
[39]

Kusuki and Z

Y. Kusuki and Z. Wei,AdS/BCFT from conformal bootstrap: construction of gravity with branes and particles,JHEP01(2023) 108 [2210.03107]

2023 arXiv
[40]

Belin, S

A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro and W. Knop,Symmetric product orbifold universality and the mirage of an emergent spacetime,JHEP05(2025) 190 [2502.01734]

2025 arXiv
[41]

Kusuki,Modern Approach to 2D Conformal Field Theory,2412.18307

Y. Kusuki,Modern Approach to 2D Conformal Field Theory,2412.18307

arXiv
[42]

Jafferis, L

D.L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg and D. Wang,Open-closed 3d gravity as a random ensemble,JHEP10 (2025) 228 [2506.19817]

2025
[43]

Jafferis, L

D.L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, D. Sarkar and D. Wang,On random matrix statistics of 3d gravity, 2512.05045

arXiv
[44]

D. Wang, Z. Wang and Z. Wei,Wormholes with ends of the world,JHEP09(2025) 166 [2504.12278]

2025
[45]

Belin, S

A. Belin, S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, D. Liska and B. Post,A universal sum over topologies in 3d gravity,2601.07906
[46]

Teitelboim,Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,Phys

C. Teitelboim,Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 3159

1982
[47]

Parrikar and S.K

O. Parrikar and S.K. Sake,York time in JT gravity,JHEP04(2026) 010 [2505.19231]

2026 arXiv
[48]

Belin and J

A. Belin and J. de Boer,Baby Universes in AdS3,2512.02098
[49]

Abdalla, S

A.I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L.V. Iliesiu, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,2602.02682
[50]

X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf,Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP10(2019) 240 [1811.05382]

2019 arXiv
[51]

Akers and P

C. Akers and P. Rath,Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction,JHEP05(2019) 052 [1811.05171]

2019 arXiv
[52]

Dong and D

X. Dong and D. Marolf,One-loop universality of holographic codes,JHEP03(2020) 191 [1910.06329]

2020 arXiv
[53]

Marolf, S

D. Marolf, S. Wang and Z. Wang,Probing phase transitions of holographic entanglement entropy with fixed area states,JHEP12(2020) 084 [2006.10089]

2020 arXiv
[54]

X. Dong, D. Marolf and P. Rath,Constrained HRT Surfaces and their Entropic Interpretation,JHEP 02(2024) 151 [2311.18290]

2024 arXiv
[55]

X. Dong, D. Marolf, P. Rath, A. Tajdini and Z. Wang,The spacetime geometry of fixed-area states in gravitational systems,JHEP08(2022) 158 [2203.04973]. – 63 –

2022 arXiv
[56]

Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys

T. Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101602 [1105.5165]

2011 arXiv
[57]

Fujita, T

M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni,Aspects of AdS/BCFT,JHEP11(2011) 043 [1108.5152]

2011 arXiv
[58]

Brown and M

J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207

1986
[59]

Mess,Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature,arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.1570(2007)

G. Mess,Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature,arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.1570(2007)

2007 arXiv
[60]

Scarinci and K

C. Scarinci and K. Krasnov,The universal phase space ofAdS3 gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.322 (2013) 167 [1111.6507]

2013 arXiv
[61]

Krasnov and J.-M

K. Krasnov and J.-M. Schlenker,Minimal surfaces and particles in 3-manifolds,Geom. Dedicata126 (2007) 187 [math/0511441]

2007 arXiv
[62]

Soni and A.C

R.M. Soni and A.C. Wall,A New Covariant Entropy Bound from Cauchy Slice Holography, 2407.16769

arXiv
[63]

Jafferis,Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction,1703.01519

D.L. Jafferis,Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction,1703.01519

arXiv
[64]

Stanford and L

D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 126007 [1406.2678]

2014 arXiv
[65]

DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory,Phys. Rev.160(1967) 1113

1967
[66]

DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 2. The Manifestly Covariant Theory,Phys. Rev.162 (1967) 1195

1967
[67]

DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity

B.S. DeWitt,Quantum Theory of Gravity. 3. Applications of the Covariant Theory,Phys. Rev.162 (1967) 1239

1967
[68]

Kuchar,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,Int

K.V. Kuchar,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011) 3

2011
[69]

Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the question of time,Lect

C.J. Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the question of time,Lect. Notes Phys.434(1994) 150

1994
[70]

Araujo-Regado, R

G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan and A.C. Wall,Cauchy slice holography: a new AdS/CFT dictionary, JHEP03(2023) 026 [2204.00591]

2023 arXiv
[71]

Held and H

J. Held and H. Maxfield,Gravitational Hilbert spaces: invariant and co-invariant states, inner products, gauge-fixing, and BRST,JHEP07(2026) 021 [2509.05412]

2026 arXiv
[72]

Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511564192

S. Carlip,Quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2003), 10.1017/CBO9780511564192

2003 doi
[73]

Chua and Y

W.Z. Chua and Y. Jiang,Hartle-Hawking state and its factorization in 3d gravity,JHEP03(2024) 135 [2309.05126]

2024 arXiv
[74]

Kaushal, N.S

A. Kaushal, N.S. Prabhakar and S.R. Wadia,(2+1)-dimensional gravity in asymptotically AdS spacetimes with spatial wormhole slices: Reduced phase space dynamics and the BTZ black hole,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106018 [2510.21923]

2026
[75]

Collier, L

S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and M. Zhang,Solving 3d gravity with Virasoro TQFT,SciPost Phys.15 (2023) 151 [2304.13650]

2023 arXiv
[76]

Hayward,Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries,Phys

G. Hayward,Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3275

1993
[77]

Lehner, R.C

L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin,Gravitational action with null boundaries,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084046 [1609.00207]

2016 arXiv
[78]

Krishnan and A

C. Krishnan and A. Raju,A Neumann Boundary Term for Gravity,Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017) 1750077 [1605.01603]

2017 arXiv
[79]

Diaz Dorronsoro, J.J

J. Diaz Dorronsoro, J.J. Halliwell, J.B. Hartle, T. Hertog and O. Janssen,Real no-boundary wave function in Lorentzian quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043505 [1705.05340]

2017 arXiv
[80]

Marolf,Refined algebraic quantization: Systems with a single constraint,gr-qc/9508015

D. Marolf,Refined algebraic quantization: Systems with a single constraint,gr-qc/9508015. – 64 –

arXiv
[81]

D. Marolf,Group averaging and refined algebraic quantization: Where are we now?, in9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9), 7, 2000 [gr-qc/0011112]

2000 arXiv
[82]

Marolf and H

D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,JHEP08(2020) 044 [2002.08950]

2020 arXiv
[83]

de Boer, J

J. de Boer, J. Kames-King and B. Post,Surgery and statistics in 3d gravity,2506.04151

arXiv
[84]

Goker, L.V

J. Goker, L.V. Iliesiu and E. Tabor,A note on the quantization of angular momentum for black holes, 2606.13774
[85]

Ponsot and J

B. Ponsot and J. Teschner,Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group, hep-th/9911110

arXiv
[86]

Eberhardt,Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks,2309.11540

L. Eberhardt,Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks,2309.11540

arXiv
[87]

Hartman, C.A

T. Hartman, C.A. Keller and B. Stoica,Universal Spectrum of 2d Conformal Field Theory in the Large c Limit,JHEP09(2014) 118 [1405.5137]

2014 arXiv
[88]

Mukhametzhanov and A

B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov,Modular invariance, tauberian theorems and microcanonical entropy,JHEP10(2019) 261 [1904.06359]

2019 arXiv
[89]

Pal and Z

S. Pal and Z. Sun,Tauberian-Cardy formula with spin,JHEP01(2020) 135 [1910.07727]

2020 arXiv
[90]

I. Dey, S. Pal and J. Qiao,A universal inequality on the unitary 2D CFT partition function,JHEP 07(2025) 163 [2410.18174]

2025 arXiv
[91]

Belin, C.A

A. Belin, C.A. Keller and I.G. Zadeh,Genus two partition functions and Rényi entropies of large c conformal field theories,J. Phys. A50(2017) 435401 [1704.08250]

2017 arXiv
[92]

Czech, L

B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully,A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk, JHEP07(2016) 129 [1604.03110]

2016 arXiv
[93]

Fitzpatrick, J

A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Li and J. Wang,Exact Virasoro Blocks from Wilson Lines and Background-Independent Operators,JHEP07(2017) 092 [1612.06385]

2017 arXiv
[94]

Beşken, E

M. Beşken, E. D’Hoker, A. Hegde and P. Kraus,Renormalization of gravitational Wilson lines,JHEP 06(2019) 020 [1810.00766]

2019 arXiv
[95]

D’Hoker and P

E. D’Hoker and P. Kraus,Gravitational Wilson lines in AdS3,1912.02750

1912 arXiv
[96]

Marolf,Microcanonical Path Integrals and the Holography of small Black Hole Interiors,JHEP09 (2018) 114 [1808.00394]

D. Marolf,Microcanonical Path Integrals and the Holography of small Black Hole Interiors,JHEP09 (2018) 114 [1808.00394]

2018 arXiv
[97]

Bao, L.-Y

N. Bao, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and Z. Liu,QG from SymQRG: AdS3/CFT2 Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow,2412.12045

arXiv
[98]

N. Bao, H. Geng and Y. Jiang,Ryu-Takayanagi Formula for Multi-Boundary Black Holes from 2D Large-cCFT Ensemble,2504.12388
[99]

Geng, L.-Y

H. Geng, L.-Y. Hung and Y. Jiang,It from ETH: Multi-interval Entanglement and Replica Wormholes from Large-cBCFT Ensemble,2505.20385

arXiv
[100]

N. Bao, J. Chu, Y. Jiang and J. March,Coarse-Grained BCFT Tensor Networks and Holographic Reflected Entropy in 3D Gravity,2509.10170
[101]

Jackson, L

S. Jackson, L. McGough and H. Verlinde,Conformal Bootstrap, Universality and Gravitational Scattering,Nucl. Phys. B901(2015) 382 [1412.5205]

2015 arXiv
[102]

Gaberdiel,Fusion in conformal field theory as the tensor product of the symmetry algebra,Int

M. Gaberdiel,Fusion in conformal field theory as the tensor product of the symmetry algebra,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 4619 [hep-th/9307183]

1994 arXiv
[103]

Takayanagi and T

T. Takayanagi and T. Uetoko,Chern-Simons Gravity Dual of BCFT,JHEP04(2021) 193 [2011.02513]. – 65 –

2021 arXiv
[104]

N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A.C. Wall,Beyond Toy Models: Distilling Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2018) 069 [1812.01171]

2018 arXiv
[105]

X. Dong, S. Maguire, A. Maloney and H. Maxfield,Phase transitions in 3D gravity and fractal dimension,JHEP05(2018) 080 [1802.07275]

2018 arXiv
[106]

Cotler and K

J. Cotler and K. Jensen,AdS3 gravity and random CFT,JHEP04(2021) 033 [2006.08648]

2021 arXiv
[107]

Di Ubaldo and E

G. Di Ubaldo and E. Perlmutter,AdS3/RMT2 duality,JHEP12(2023) 179 [2307.03707]

2023 arXiv
[108]

Akers, T

C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath,Reflected entropy in random tensor networks. Part II. A topological index from canonical purification,JHEP01(2023) 067 [2210.15006]

2023 arXiv
[109]

T. Liu, S. Ming, X. Sun, B. Wu and T. Yang,Asymptotics ofb-6jsymbols and anti-de Sitter tetrahedra,2511.20953
[110]

Kaplan and D

M. Kaplan and D. Marolf,The action of HRT-areas as operators in semiclassical gravity,JHEP08 (2022) 102 [2203.04270]

2022 arXiv
[111]

Klauder,Continuous-representation theory

J.R. Klauder,Continuous-representation theory. i. postulates of continuous-representation theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics4(1963) 1055

1963
[112]

Klauder,Continuous-representation theory

J.R. Klauder,Continuous-representation theory. ii. generalized relation between quantum and classical dynamics,Journal of Mathematical Physics4(1963) 1058

1963
[113]

Ashtekar and T.A

A. Ashtekar and T.A. Schilling,Geometrical Formulation of Quantum Mechanics,gr-qc/9706069

arXiv
[114]

Akers and A.Y

C. Akers and A.Y. Wei,Background independent tensor networks,2402.05910

arXiv
[115]

R. Basu, A. Ganguly, S. Nath and O. Parrikar,Complexity growth and the Krylov-Wigner function, JHEP05(2024) 264 [2402.13694]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 202 (2026)]

2024
[116]

R. Basu, P. Chowdhury, A. Ganguly, S. Nath, O. Parrikar and S. Paul,Wigner negativity, random matrices and gravity,JHEP01(2026) 106 [2506.02110]

2026
[117]

Foini and J

L. Foini and J. Kurchan,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis and out of time order correlators,Phys. Rev. E99(2019) 042139 [1803.10658]

2019 arXiv
[118]

Akers, A

C. Akers, A. Lucas and A. Vikram,On the reconstruction map in JT gravity,JHEP12(2025) 045 [2506.18975]

2025
[119]

Preskill, M

J. Preskill, M. Usatyuk and S. Vardhan,Negative energies and the breakdown of bulk geometry, 2603.25782
[120]

Usatyuk, Z.-Y

M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity,SciPost Phys.17 (2024) 051 [2402.00098]

2024 arXiv
[121]

Usatyuk and Y

M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging,JHEP02(2025) 052 [2403.13047]

2025 arXiv
[122]

Harlow, M

D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,JHEP02(2026) 108 [2501.02359]

2026 arXiv
[123]

Van Raamsdonk and A

M. Van Raamsdonk and A. Vilar López,Menagerie of Euclidean constructions for 3D holographic cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 106010 [2601.10906]

2026 arXiv
[124]

Abdalla, S

A.I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L.V. Iliesiu and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,JHEP05(2025) 059 [2501.02632]

2025 arXiv
[125]

Akers, G

C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking and R. Rodriguez,On observers in holographic maps,JHEP05(2025) 201 [2503.09681]

2025 arXiv
[126]

Maloney and E

A. Maloney and E. Witten,Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,JHEP02 (2010) 029 [0712.0155]

2010 arXiv
[127]

de Boer, D

J. de Boer, D. Liska, B. Post and M. Sasieta,A principle of maximum ignorance for semiclassical gravity,JHEP2024(2024) 003 [2311.08132]. – 66 –

2024 arXiv
[128]

Akers, R.M

C. Akers, R.M. Soni and A.Y. Wei,Multipartite edge modes and tensor networks,SciPost Phys. Core 7(2024) 070 [2404.03651]

2024 arXiv
[129]

Chen, L.-Y

L. Chen, L.-Y. Hung, Y. Jiang and B.-X. Lao,Deriving the non-perturbative gravitational dual of quantum Liouville theory from BCFT operator algebra,2403.03179
[130]

Takahashi,Anyon condensation in Virasoro TQFT: wormhole factorization,JHEP06(2025) 243 [2412.11486]

S. Takahashi,Anyon condensation in Virasoro TQFT: wormhole factorization,JHEP06(2025) 243 [2412.11486]

2025 arXiv
[131]

Mertens, J

T.G. Mertens, J. Simón and G. Wong,A proposal for 3d quantum gravity and its bulk factorization, 2210.14196

arXiv
[132]

Wong,A note on the bulk interpretation of the quantum extremal surface formula,JHEP04 (2024) 024 [2212.03193]

G. Wong,A note on the bulk interpretation of the quantum extremal surface formula,JHEP04 (2024) 024 [2212.03193]

2024 arXiv
[133]

Krishnan and P.S

C. Krishnan and P.S. Pathak,Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,2601.18775
[134]

Balasubramanian and C

V. Balasubramanian and C. Cummings,Diffeomorphism invariant tensor networks for 3d gravity, 2510.13941
[135]

Castro, I

A. Castro, I. Coman, J.R. Fliss and C. Zukowski,Keeping matter in the loop in dS3 quantum gravity, JHEP07(2023) 120 [2302.12281]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 004 (2024)]

2023 arXiv
[136]

Bourne, J.R

R. Bourne, J.R. Fliss and B. Knighton,A spool for every quotient: One-loop partition functions in AdS3 gravity,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 065 [2507.05364]

2026 arXiv
[137]

Bourne, J.R

R. Bourne, J.R. Fliss and B. Knighton,What’s the Matter with 3D Gravity?,2607.01319

arXiv
[138]

Accessed on 08.07.2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0LzBb4DN5Q

Bousso Group at Berkeley,Ronak soni(chennai mathematical institute) fixed-area states, ope blocks, hamiltonian gauge symmetry, 2026. Accessed on 08.07.2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0LzBb4DN5Q

2026
[139]

Ammon, A

M. Ammon, A. Castro and N. Iqbal,Wilson Lines and Entanglement Entropy in Higher Spin Gravity, JHEP10(2013) 110 [1306.4338]

2013 arXiv
[140]

Moore and N

G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg,Classical and Quantum Conformal Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys. 123(1989) 177

1989
[141]

Lewellen,Sewing constraints for conformal field theories on surfaces with boundaries,Nucl

D.C. Lewellen,Sewing constraints for conformal field theories on surfaces with boundaries,Nucl. Phys. B372(1992) 654

1992
[142]

Behrend, P.A

R.E. Behrend, P.A. Pearce, V.B. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber,Boundary conditions in rational conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 525 [hep-th/9908036]. – 67 –

2000 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Gibbons and S.W

G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

1977

[2] [2]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

arXiv 2020

[3] [3]

Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,1905.08255

arXiv 1905

[4] [4]

Saad, S.H

P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

arXiv 1903

[5] [5]

Penington, S.H

G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, 1911.11977

arXiv 1911

[6] [6]

Hsin, L.V

P.-S. Hsin, L.V. Iliesiu and Z. Yang,A violation of global symmetries from replica wormholes and the fate of black hole remnants,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 194004 [2011.09444]

arXiv 2021

[7] [7]

Balasubramanian, A

V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 011024 [2212.02447]. – 61 –

arXiv 2024

[8] [8]

Balasubramanian, A

V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J.M. Magan and M. Sasieta,Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Astrophysical Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141501 [2212.08623]

arXiv 2024