REVIEW 2 cited by
Analysis strategies for general spin-independent WIMP-nucleus scattering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We propose a formalism for the analysis of direct-detection dark-matter searches that covers all coherent responses for scalar and vector interactions and incorporates QCD constraints imposed by chiral symmetry, including all one- and two-body WIMP-nucleon interactions up to third order in chiral effective field theory. One of the free parameters in the WIMP-nucleus cross section corresponds to standard spin-independent searches, but in general different combinations of new-physics couplings are probed. We identify the interference with the isovector counterpart of the standard spin-independent response and two-body currents as the dominant corrections to the leading spin-independent structure factor, and discuss the general consequences for the interpretation of direct-detection experiments, including minimal extensions of the standard spin-independent analysis. Fits for all structure factors required for the scattering off xenon targets are provided based on state-of-the-art nuclear shell-model calculations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Ab initio calculations of parity-violating electron scattering off $^{48}$Ca and $^{208}$Pb
Ab initio chiral EFT calculations of parity-violating asymmetries for 48Ca and 208Pb show mild tension with data and infer a neutron skin of 0.187(25)(18) fm for 208Pb.
-
The third-generation-philic WIMP: an EFT analysis
A fermionic dark matter particle interacting mainly with third-generation fermions is allowed by current direct-detection bounds in a 1-2 TeV window that the XLZD experiment will fully cover.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.