REVIEW 2 cited by
Analysis of the $\bar{D}\Sigma_c$, $\bar{D}\Sigma_c^*$, $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c$ and $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c^*$ pentaquark molecular states with QCD sum rules
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this article, we study the $\bar{D}\Sigma_c$, $\bar{D}\Sigma_c^*$, $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c$ and $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c^*$ pentaquark molecular states with the QCD sum rules by carrying out the operator product expansion up to the vacuum condensates of dimension $13$ in a consistent way. The present calculations support assigning the $P_c(4312)$ to be the $\bar{D}\Sigma_c$ pentaquark molecular state with $J^P={\frac{1}{2}}^-$, assigning the $P_c(4380)$ to be the $\bar{D}\Sigma_c^*$ pentaquark molecular state with $J^P={\frac{3}{2}}^-$, assigning the $P_c(4440/4457)$ to be the $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c$ pentaquark molecular state with $J^P={\frac{3}{2}}^-$ or the $\bar{D}^{*}\Sigma_c^*$ pentaquark molecular state with $J^P={\frac{5}{2}}^-$. Special attentions are payed to the operator product expansion.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probing the electromagnetic structure of the $P_c(4337)^+$ pentaquark: Insights from a diquark-diquark-antiquark picture for $J^P = \frac{1}{2}^-$ and $\frac{3}{2}^-$ states
Under the diquark-diquark-antiquark model, the magnetic moment of Pc(4337)+ is predicted to be 1.76 ± 0.44 μN for J^P = 1/2^- and -1.38 ± 0.35 μN for J^P = 3/2^-, with nonzero quadrupole and octupole moments in the 3/...
-
Investigation of full heavy $ QQQQ'\bar{Q}$ pentaquark candidates
QCD sum rules predict a pentaquark with three charm quarks, one bottom quark, and an anti-charm quark near 11.38 GeV, and a pentaquark with three bottom quarks, one charm quark, and an anti-bottom quark near 21.0 GeV,...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.