Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Techniques for Feature Extraction In Speech Recognition System : A Comparative Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1305.1145 v1 pith:5E36ZWPU submitted 2013-05-06 cs.SD cs.CL

classification cs.SDcs.CL
keywords informationspeechfeaturessignaldatadescribemethodsparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The time domain waveform of a speech signal carries all of the auditory information. From the phonological point of view, it little can be said on the basis of the waveform itself. However, past research in mathematics, acoustics, and speech technology have provided many methods for converting data that can be considered as information if interpreted correctly. In order to find some statistically relevant information from incoming data, it is important to have mechanisms for reducing the information of each segment in the audio signal into a relatively small number of parameters, or features. These features should describe each segment in such a characteristic way that other similar segments can be grouped together by comparing their features. There are enormous interesting and exceptional ways to describe the speech signal in terms of parameters. Though, they all have their strengths and weaknesses, we have presented some of the most used methods with their importance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparative Evaluation of Acoustic Feature Extraction Tools for Clinical Speech Analysis

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Acoustic features extracted from the same speech recordings by OpenSMILE, Praat, and Librosa often disagree, with some features showing negative cross-toolkit correlations.

Pith tools