Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 12 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2504.09737.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2504.09737 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 12 of 12 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 12 of 12 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T14:31:37.492686Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved0
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

1
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 1473a2d2-2a73-4e9a-bcc2-20c4b4dc56aa · inbound

OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models cites this paper.

OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 44

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T14:31:37.492686Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation aa9501ba-c2af-4613-aa40-701ea4dab052 · inbound

Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem cites this paper.

Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:22:49.615126Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation bbc3c5e3-412a-4bde-9fac-118a08470c6a · inbound

AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights cites this paper.

AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 47

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T13:38:56.186305Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2072a028-f32a-42c3-83de-dcf6f4b6e89d · inbound

When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review cites this paper.

When Your Reviewer is an LLM: Biases, Divergence, and Prompt Injection Risks in Peer Review Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 59

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T18:34:49.983781Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation b734ef6d-3fbd-4960-9c61-1ededdf2b517 · inbound

AI Can Learn Scientific Taste cites this paper.

AI Can Learn Scientific Taste Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 46

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T18:14:53.155809Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1cb592be-cf51-4577-8472-3177b0167a2e · inbound

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review cites this paper.

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 25

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-09T01:14:32.687805Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 8cda4d67-4213-45da-b591-f87d436e9e81 · inbound

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review cites this paper.

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 26

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-19T17:17:42.717638Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 1736a55f-e0e1-4419-8f6e-9a7542eba94b · inbound

SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones? cites this paper.

SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones? Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 13

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-29T08:23:15.789552Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 562cbe52-835c-4e1d-8eef-668ca24d02df · inbound

PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf cites this paper.

PaperMentor: A Human-Centered Multi-Agent Writing Tutor for AI Research Papers on Overleaf Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 18

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T23:17:29.065299Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 726f7add-437b-4b8f-8a6d-6d3de9a4f539 · inbound

Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economy cites this paper.

Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economy Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 18

Resolution: metadata mismatch; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T17:50:00.384010Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation addd68f2-2ba9-41df-8250-66f9fb85e87b · inbound

A Backward-Compatible Protocol Upgrade for HotNets cites this paper.

A Backward-Compatible Protocol Upgrade for HotNets Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 6

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-04T21:00:09.971744Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 3088c834-6f7c-42d3-86a1-0bdda2ecb012 · inbound

Is ChatGPT as reliable as individual reviewers assessing the quality of published journal articles from PDFs or titles and abstracts? cites this paper.

Is ChatGPT as reliable as individual reviewers assessing the quality of published journal articles from PDFs or titles and abstracts? Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025

Reference 2025

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T01:01:27.338316Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.