Pith. sign in

REVIEW 11 cited by

Classifying Anomalies THrough Outer Density Estimation (CATHODE)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.00546 v3 pith:5FI2WLGO submitted 2021-09-01 hep-ph hep-exphysics.data-an

classification hep-phhep-exphysics.data-an
keywords cathodedensitysignalestimationmodelregionanomaliesanomaly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a new model-agnostic search strategy for physics beyond the standard model (BSM) at the LHC, based on a novel application of neural density estimation to anomaly detection. Our approach, which we call Classifying Anomalies THrough Outer Density Estimation (CATHODE), assumes the BSM signal is localized in a signal region (defined e.g. using invariant mass). By training a conditional density estimator on a collection of additional features outside the signal region, interpolating it into the signal region, and sampling from it, we produce a collection of events that follow the background model. We can then train a classifier to distinguish the data from the events sampled from the background model, thereby approaching the optimal anomaly detector. Using the LHC Olympics R&D dataset, we demonstrate that CATHODE nearly saturates the best possible performance, and significantly outperforms other approaches that aim to enhance the bump hunt (CWoLa Hunting and ANODE). Finally, we demonstrate that CATHODE is very robust against correlations between the features and maintains nearly-optimal performance even in this more challenging setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Standard Model structure from LHC data with Riemannian flow matching

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ShellFlow, a Riemannian flow-matching transformer fed only on-shell and invariant-mass priors and ~8×10^8 recorded ATLAS events, reproduces the SM's dilepton resonances, Weinberg angle, and top/W mass peaks in a singl...

  2. Enhancing anomaly detection with topology-aware autoencoders

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Autoencoders with latent spaces shaped like S^2, S^2×S^2, or RP^2, matched to the phase-space topology of the background, reduce spurious reconstruction errors and give a small but consistent anomaly-detection gain ov...

  3. Model-agnostic search for dijet resonances with anomalous jet substructure in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2024-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A model-agnostic CMS search for dijet resonances with anomalous jet substructure finds no excess and reports first exclusion limits on several benchmark signals, with ML anomaly detection improving sensitivity over in...

  4. Towards anomaly detection searches for new physics signatures including Higgs bosons with weakly supervised machine learning

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HAXAD, a weakly supervised anomaly-detection search for Higgs-plus-X new physics, is extended with new embeddings and limit-setting, and on 470 fb^-1 of pseudo-data it matches or exceeds the best single cut-based limi...

  5. Explicit or Implicit? Encoding Physics at the Precision Frontier

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On three precision classification tasks — reweighting-based unfolding, likelihood-ratio estimation, and weakly supervised anomaly detection — a Lorentz-equivariant transformer and a pretrained foundation model perform...

  6. Look everywhere effects in anomaly detection

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Weakly supervised anomaly detectors that train and test on the same data produce badly miscalibrated p-values; independent test sets are calibrated but insensitive, while k-fold cross-validation is a workable middle ground.

  7. Mono-X Signal Characterization from Two-component Dark Matter Using a Convolutional Neural Network

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 1D multi-channel CNN trained on normalized histograms of simulated mono-jet and mono-Z events can partially classify one- versus two-component dark matter and regress masses, but only in a background-free, model-spe...

  8. Weakly supervised machine learning for model-agnostic searches of new phenomena in the $\gamma$-ray sky

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Weakly supervised classifiers trained on background-versus-mixture samples can identify anomalous gamma-ray sources without labeled signal templates, approaching supervised performance in controlled benchmarks.

  9. Optimal Transport Event Representation for Anomaly Detection

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding a few optimal-transport-based features to standard jet observables nearly doubles anomaly-detection significance at 0.5% signal injection on LHC Olympics benchmarks.

  10. Generator Based Inference (GBI)

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Generator Based Inference uses data-derived background generators to turn resonant anomaly detection into parameter estimation, reaching 0.1 sigma signal sensitivity on the LHCO benchmark.

  11. Machine Learning is Good for Physics - and Vice Versa

    hep-ph 2026-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    A perspective essay arguing that AI should be integrated into fundamental physics while preserving the field's statistical and theory-based standards, and that physics can enrich machine learning.

Pith tools