Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 210 references

Designing edge currents using mesoscopic patterning in chiral d-wave superconductors

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mesoscopic patterning of chiral d-wave superconductors into pentagons, hexagons, or disks can amplify otherwise vanishing edge currents into magnetic fields of 0.01–0.5 mT, with a magnetic moment up to $\mu_B/2$ per Cooper pair.

desk verdict A numerically solid, honest mapping of how sample shape controls chiral edge currents in mesoscopic d-wave superconductors, with the main caveat that the headline fields and sign reversal rest on clean, specular surfaces and a circular Fermi surface. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14563 v2 pith:5FSGJOAP submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hall

Patric Holmvall , Annica M. Black-Schaffer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hall
keywords chirald-wavesuperconductivitymesoscopicpatterningedgecurrentsorbitalmagneticmomentedge-edgeinterferenceheatcapacityjumpscanningSQUIDmagnetometryquasiclassicaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Chiral d-wave superconductivity is hard to verify experimentally because the spontaneous chiral edge currents that should signal it are predicted to nearly vanish in bulk samples. This paper argues that the shape of a mesoscopic sample can be used as a design knob: in finite-sized superconductors, edge-edge interference between ballistic quasiparticle trajectories strongly enhances or suppresses the net edge current depending on geometry. Pentagons and hexagons (low rotation symmetry) produce large currents opposite to the bulk chirality, while circular disks produce comparably large currents along the chirality, with estimated magnetic fields of 0.01–0.5 mT and an orbital magnetic moment approaching $\mu_B/2$ per Cooper pair. The authors also find an additional heat capacity jump in square-shaped samples, marking a chiral-to-nodal transition, which could serve as an indirect calorimetric signature.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is edge-edge interference encoded in the quasiclassical surface propagator $\hat{g}(\mathbf{p}_F,\mathbf{R};\varepsilon)$: in a finite sample, straight ballistic trajectories along the Fermi velocity connect different portions of the edge that lie within a correlation length $r_0 \sim 2$–$10\xi_0$ of each other. The relative orientation of connected edges decides the sign of the interference—edges meeting at more perpendicular angles (low rotation symmetry) give destructive interference against the naive edge-mode current, while more parallel orientations (approaching the circular disk) give constructive interference. The calculations solve the Eilenberger equation with full self-consistency for both the superconducting order parameter and the vector potential, using a numerically stable Riccati formulation, and obtain the current, magnetic moment, free energy, and heat capacity from the resulting propagators.

What would settle it

A scanning SQUID or cantilever magnetometry measurement on patterned mesoscopic films of a candidate chiral d-wave superconductor, with pentagon-, hexagon-, and disk-shaped islands of size tens of $\xi_0$, looking for spontaneous magnetic fields of order 0.01–0.5 mT whose sign depends on shape as predicted; equivalently, a numerical simulation that adds surface roughness or an anisotropic Fermi surface to the same model and checks whether the shape-dependent sign and the $1/R$ divergence survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that mesoscopic finite-size effects, far from being a nuisance, can be engineered to greatly enhance the spontaneous chiral edge current and its magnetic fingerprints in chiral $d$-wave superconductors. Working within self-consistent quasiclassical theory with a cylindrical Fermi surface and specular edges, the authors find that the net current and the associated orbital magnetic moment and induced flux grow as the system size shrinks, with the net current scaling roughly as $I \sim 1/R$ until it is cut off by strong suppression of the superconducting order parameter below roughly $D \sim 10$–$20\xi_0$. The sign and magnitude depend systematically on the sample's rotation symmetry: for negative bulk chirality, pentagons ($C_5$) and hexagons ($C_6$) develop a large net current antiparallel to the chirality, the circular disk develops a comparably large current parallel to the chirality, and squares and triangles host the smallest currents. They estimate fields of 0.01–0.5 mT and magnetic moments up to $\mu_B/2$ per Cooper pair, within reach of scanning-probe and cantilever magnetometry. In squares, the geometric suppression of the $d_{xy}$ component creates an intermediate nodal state and a second-order transition to the chiral state at $T^*(D)$, with a heat capacity jump as large as 10% of the bulk normal-superconducting jump.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is the idealized sample model of Sec. IIC: a perfectly cylindrical Fermi surface, specular superconductor-vacuum surfaces, and no disorder, roughness, or band anisotropy; if real surfaces are rough or the Fermi surface is anisotropic, the predicted edge-edge interference—and with it the sign and magnitude of the currents—could weaken, shift, or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Patterning a chiral d-wave film into pentagons, hexagons, or disks of radius $R \approx 5$–$50\xi_0$ should produce spontaneous magnetic fields of 0.01–0.5 mT, detectable with current scanning-probe and cantilever magnetometry.
  • The net edge current and orbital magnetic moment grow roughly as $1/R$ as the sample shrinks, so smaller mesoscopic samples give stronger signals down to the size where order-parameter suppression cuts off the enhancement near $D \sim 10$–$20\xi_0$.
  • The sign of the net current is selected by rotation symmetry: low-symmetry polygons (pentagons, hexagons) yield current opposite to the bulk chirality, while disks yield current along the chirality, providing a shape-controlled test of the mechanism.
  • In square-shaped samples, an intermediate nodal $d$-wave state appears below a size- and temperature-dependent $T^*(D)$, accompanied by a second-order heat capacity jump up to about 10% of the bulk jump, offering a calorimetric signature.
  • In the semi-infinite limit all shapes recover the previously established vanishing net current, so the predicted enhancement is inherently a finite-size effect that disappears as $D \to \infty$, with the disk converging slowest because of finite edge curvature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same edge-edge interference mechanism should operate in other chiral paired states, including chiral $p$-wave superconductors and superfluids, so shape-dependence could be a general route to amplifying edge currents wherever the semi-infinite net current is suppressed.
  • A practical diagnostic: fabricating several shapes on the same film and comparing the sign and magnitude of their magnetic signals would isolate the geometric interference effect from material-specific parameters, since the ratios between shapes are the geometric prediction.
  • If surface roughness or Fermi-surface anisotropy reverses the predicted sign for one shape, the shape-dependence could become a sensitive probe of edge quality; conversely, observing the predicted $C_n$-dependent sign could certify a clean ballistic edge.
  • The predicted $1/R$ divergence suggests that at intermediate sizes the current is dominated by edge-edge trajectories rather than bulk condensate backflow, so a local measurement of the current density near corners versus flat edges could separate the two contributions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper uses self-consistent quasiclassical Eilenberger theory, implemented in the open-source package SuperConga, to study chiral d-wave superconductors in finite two-dimensional geometries: regular polygons and circular disks. The central results are that, for system sizes of tens of coherence lengths, the net edge current, orbital magnetic moment, and induced flux develop a strong and systematic shape dependence: pentagons and hexagons develop large currents opposite to the bulk chirality, circular disks develop large currents along the chirality, while squares and triangles have much smaller currents. The authors attribute this behavior to edge-edge interference between ballistic quasiparticle trajectories and support it with spatial current-density profiles and net-current, OMM, and flux data. They also report that geometries which break the degeneracy between the two d-wave components, such as squares, exhibit an additional second-order transition from a chiral to a nodal state, with a heat-capacity jump of order 10% of the bulk transition jump. The estimated magnetic fields are 0.01–0.5 mT and the magnetic moment approaches μB/2 per Cooper pair, and the paper concludes that mesoscopic patterning is a viable route to detect chiral d-wave superconductivity.

Significance. If the predictions survive contact with realistic materials, this is a significant contribution to the longstanding problem of detecting chiral d-wave superconductivity, because semi-infinite chiral d-wave edges are predicted in many models to have almost vanishing net currents. The study is carefully executed: the numerical solutions are fully self-consistent with explicit convergence criteria (tolerance 10^-7, 20 points per coherence length, 256 Fermi-surface points), the code and data are public, and the known vanishing-current limit is reproduced. The predictions are falsifiable and quantitatively specific, including a shape-dependent sign reversal and a calorimetric signature. The main caveat, which the authors acknowledge, is that the load-bearing model assumptions of a perfectly cylindrical Fermi surface and specular superconductor-vacuum surfaces have not yet been tested for robustness against surface roughness and Fermi-surface anisotropy; these are known to affect chiral d-wave edge currents, and the manuscript's design claim is therefore currently conditional on the idealized model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IIC; Conclusions] The model assumes a perfectly cylindrical Fermi surface and specular superconductor-vacuum surfaces (Sec. IIC), and the Conclusions explicitly defer surface roughness (Refs. [108,116,117]) and normal-state anisotropy (Ref. [203]) to future work. This is a load-bearing simplification because the shape-dependent sign reversal is attributed in Sec. IIIA to ballistic edge-edge interference along straight quasiparticle trajectories; diffuse surface scattering that randomizes the reflected quasiparticle phase will directly affect that interference. Published results for semi-infinite chiral d-wave edges show that surface roughness can suppress or even invert the spontaneous edge current, so the predicted pentagon/hexagon-versus-disk sign reversal and the 0.01–0.5 mT field range are not yet supported for realistic etched or grown interfaces. I request a quantitative sensitivity test (e.g., varying the surface specularity or adding a disorder self-energy in the same self-consistent scheme) for at least the pentagon, hexagon, and disk geometries, or a clearly stated bound on the domain of validity.
  2. [Sec. IIIA; Figs. 3, 9, 10] The central mechanism of destructive versus constructive edge-edge interference is inferred from the geometric trend in the current-density profiles rather than demonstrated directly. Because Eq. (6) yields only the total current density, the decomposition into bulk-edge and edge-edge contributions shown schematically in Fig. 3 is not verified in the numerics. A direct check—for example, extracting the edge-edge part of the surface propagator, or varying the healing length r0 at fixed shape—would convert this explanation from a qualitative association into a testable design principle. This matters because the sign change between C5/C6 and C∞ is the headline prediction; if the interference interpretation is incorrect, the suggested extrapolation to other shapes is not justified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. IIIA] The statement that 'the triangular system is the only concave geometry' is incorrect; a regular triangle is convex. The intended distinguishing feature is likely the acute internal angle or the sharpness of the corners, and the wording should be corrected.
  2. [Conclusions] The sentence 'Squares, on the other hand, have the the lowest currents' contains a duplicated article 'the the' and should be edited.
  3. [Abstract; Sec. IV] The abstract promises a 'full phase diagram as a function of temperature and system size for different geometries', but the main text presents the phase diagram only for square and disk geometries; other shapes are relegated to Appendix C. Either move part of the Appendix C discussion into the main text or soften the wording in the abstract.
  4. [Sec. IIIB] The estimate of 0.01–0.5 mT assumes a coherence length of 2–10 nm and R ~ 5–10 ξ0, but no explicit layer thickness or stray-field calculation is given. A brief statement of the assumed experimental geometry would make the claimed measurability more concrete.
  5. [Sec. IIB] The sentence 'The only assumption we make is to assume the same pairing strength in both d-wave channels' is too broad, since the model also assumes a cylindrical Fermi surface and specular boundaries. The sentence should be rephrased to refer specifically to assumptions about the pairing channels.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: shape-dependent currents, magnetic moments, and phase diagrams are self-consistently computed outputs with no fitted target quantity and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's results are numerical solutions of the Eilenberger equation (Eq. 2), the self-consistent gap equation (Eq. 10), and Ampère's law for the gauge field (Eq. 4), with the free energy (Eq. 13) used only to compare competing self-consistent states. The inputs are standard model choices: equal T_c in the two d-wave channels, a cylindrical Fermi surface, specular superconductor-vacuum boundaries, and λ0→∞ except for flux estimates. None of these inputs contains the output currents, orbital moment, flux, or phase diagram; the currents are computed via Eq. (6) from the self-consistently determined propagators. The 'edge-edge interference' account in Sec. IIIA is a post-hoc interpretation of the propagator's spatial correlations, not a constraint imposed before solving. The orbital magnetic moment estimate is obtained by inserting the computed current density into Eq. (8), so 'µ_B/2 per Cooper pair' is a unit conversion of a computed value, not a definition. The additional heat-capacity jump follows from the assumed degeneracy of the two d-wave channels, but the T*(D) transition line and the 10% jump are calculated from the temperature dependence of the self-consistent order parameters and free energy. Self-citations (Refs. [90], [94], [97]) document the numerical method and prior finite-size findings; the central shape effect is not taken from them as a premise. The paper also benchmarks against external results, reproducing the vanishing semi-infinite net current of Refs. [102-105]. The explicit deferral of surface roughness, disorder, and anisotropy is a limitation on experimental applicability, not an internal circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the model uses physical inputs (pairing strengths, T_c, coherence length, penetration depth) and standard quasiclassical approximations. The central claims are numerical outputs of a well-defined model. No new entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption Quasiclassical (Eilenberger) theory is valid in the clean weak-coupling limit with small |Delta|/E_F and hbar/(p_F xi_0).
    Sec. IIA: controlled expansion underpinning Eqs. (1)-(14).
  • domain assumption Equal pairing strength, hence equal bulk critical temperature, in the d_{x^2-y^2} and d_{xy} channels.
    Sec. IIB: 'Our only assumption about the superconducting order parameter is to have equal T_c^Gamma for the two d-wave channels'.
  • domain assumption Two-dimensional cylindrical Fermi surface and specular superconductor-vacuum surfaces.
    Sec. IIC: 'we additionally assume a cylindrically symmetric Fermi surface and specular superconductor-vacuum surfaces'.
  • domain assumption Cylindrical symmetry of the Fermi surface and lattice symmetries (hexagonal or twisted) guarantee degenerate d-wave channels; a 45-degree twist can engineer them.
    Sec. IIB: motivation for equal T_c in candidate materials.
  • domain assumption Self-consistent convergence to global error 10^-7 with 20 points per coherence length and 256 Fermi-surface points is sufficient for converged results.
    Sec. IID: numerical parameters; authors state no difference with finer resolution.
  • domain assumption Magnetic screening can be neglected for most quantities (lambda_0 to infinity) except the induced flux computed at lambda_0 = 40 xi_0.
    Sec. IIC: 'we for simplicity focus on lambda_0 to infinity in most of our results, except when computing Phi_ind'.
  • standard math Eilenberger transport equation and normalization condition g_hat^2 = -pi^2 tau_0 describe the quasiclassical propagator.
    Sec. IIA, Eq. (2).
  • standard math Luttinger-Ward functional gives the free energy in Eq. (13).
    Sec. IIA, Eq. (13).
  • standard math BCS gap equation with separable pairing interaction, Eq. (10), determines the order parameter.
    Sec. IIA, Eq. (10).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing edge currents using mesoscopic patterning in chiral d-wave superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5FSGJOAP

@misc{pith2026250114563,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing edge currents using mesoscopic patterning in chiral d-wave superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5FSGJOAP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14563}
}
abstract

Chiral superconductors are topological as characterized by a finite Chern number and chiral edge modes. Direct fingerprints of chiral superconductivity are thus often taken to be spontaneous edge currents with associated magnetic signatures. However, a number of recent theoretical studies have shown that the total edge current along semi-infinite edges is greatly reduced or even vanishes in many scenarios for all pairing symmetries except chiral $p$-wave, thus impeding experimental detection. We demonstrate how mesoscopic finite-sized samples can be designed to give rise to a shape- and size-dependent strong enhancement of the chiral edge currents and their generated orbital magnetic moment and magnetic fields. In particular, we find that low rotational symmetry systems, such as pentagons and hexagons, give rise to the largest currents, while circular disks also generate large currents but in the opposite direction. We estimate the resulting magnetic fields to be as large as $0.01-0.5$ mT, with a magnetic moment approaching $\mu_B/2$ per Cooper pair (Bohr magneton $\mu_B$). The current and magnetic signatures diverge with shrinking system sizes, eventually cut off by finite-size suppression of chiral superconductivity. We extract the full phase diagram as a function of temperature and system size for different geometries, including competing superconducting orders. In geometries strongly suppressing only one of the $d$-wave components, we find an additional heat capacity jump, as large as $10\%$ of the bulk normal-superconducting transition, marking the transition between a chiral and a nodal $d$-wave state. This further acts as an indirect signature of chiral superconductivity. Our results are relevant for system sizes on the order of tens to hundreds of coherence lengths, and highlight mesoscopic patterning as a viable route to experimentally identify chiral $d$-wave superconductivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14563 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of thin chiral d-wave superconductors (SC) with negative chirality (νˆ = −zˆ) with system size D tens of ξ0 and different mesoscopic shapes. Heatmap indicates the chiral charge-current density jϕ(R), inducing an orbital magnetic moment m = ±mzzˆ and magnetic field B = ±Bzzˆ with directions depending on the SC shape, measured with e.g. a scanning probe (purple) or cantilever setup (gray). ductors are not topol… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of cylindrical Fermi surfaces [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Typical spatial dependence of the charge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a),(b) Magnitude of the order parameter com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a,b) Area-averaged magnitude of the order pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Azimuthal component of the charge-current density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Area-averaged magnitude of the order parame [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

210 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [203]

    Wall-Wennerdal, A

    N. Wall-Wennerdal, A. Ask, P. Holmvall, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Breaking time-reversal and transla- tional symmetry at edges of d-wave superconductors: Microscopic theory and comparison with quasiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043198 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [1]

    G. E. Volovik, An analog of the quantum Hall effect in a superfluid 3He film, JETP Lett.67, 1804 (1988)

    1988

  3. [2]

    G. E. Volovik, Quantum Hall state and chiral edge state in thin 3He-A film, JETP Lett.55, 368 (1992), Pis’Ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 363 (1992)

    1992

  4. [3]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  5. [4]

    Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

    G. Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  6. [5]

    Kallin, Chiral p-wave order inSr2RuO4, Rep

    C. Kallin, Chiral p-wave order inSr2RuO4, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 042501 (2012)

    2012

  7. [6]

    Vollhardt and P

    D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle,The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3, Dover Books on Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 2013)

    2013

  8. [7]

    C.KallinandJ.Berlinsky,Chiralsuperconductors,Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 054502 (2016)

    2016

Show all 210 references
  1. [8]

    Mizushima, Y

    T. Mizushima, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawakami, M. Sato, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida, Symmetry-Protected Topological Superfluids and Superconductors —From the Basics to 3He—, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 022001 15 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    G. E. Volovik, Topological superfluids, JETP129, 618 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    G. E. Volovik,3He Universe 2020, J. Low Temp. Phys. 202, 11 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological theory of unconventional superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    1991

  5. [12]

    G. E. Volovik, On edge states in superconductors with time inversion symmetry breaking, JETP Lett.66, 522 (1997)

    1997

  6. [13]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and su- perconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  7. [14]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  8. [15]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  9. [16]

    Tanaka, M

    Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and N. Nagaosa, Symmetry and topology in superconductors –odd-frequency pairing and edge states–, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.81, 011013 (2012)

    2012

  10. [17]

    G. M. Graf and M. Porta, Bulk-edge correspondence for two-dimensionaltopologicalinsulators,Commun.Math. Phys. 324, 851 (2013)

    2013

  11. [18]

    A. M. Black-Schaffer and C. Honerkamp, Chirald-wave superconductivity in doped graphene, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 423201 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    A. P. Mackenzie and Y. Maeno, The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657 (2003)

    2003

  13. [20]

    S. Ran, C. Eckberg, Q.-P. Ding, Y. Furukawa, T. Metz, S. R. Saha, I.-L. Liu, M. Zic, H. Kim, J. Paglione, and N. P. Butch, Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet super- conductivity, Science365, 684 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    Y. Li, X. Xu, M.-H. Lee, M.-W. Chu, and C. L. Chien, Observation of half-quantum flux in the unconventional superconductor beta-Bi2Pd, Science366, 238 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    H. G. Suh, H. Menke, P. M. R. Brydon, C. Timm, A. Ramires, and D. F. Agterberg, Stabilizing even- parity chiral superconductivity inSr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 032023(R) (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    C. Duan, R. E. Baumbach, A. Podlesnyak, Y. Deng, C. Moir, A. J. Breindel, M. B. Maple, E. M. Nica, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Resonance from antiferromagnetic spin fluc- tuationsforsuperconductivityinUTe2,Nature 600,636 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    S. Bae, H. Kim, Y. S. Eo, S. Ran, I.-l. Liu, W. T. Fuhrman, J. Paglione, N. P. Butch, and S. M. Anlage, Anomalous normal fluid response in a chiral supercon- ductor UTe2, Nat. Commun.12, 2644 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    I. M. Hayes, D. S. Wei, T. Metz, J. Zhang, Y. S. Eo, S. Ran, S. R. Saha, J. Collini, N. P. Butch, D. F. Agter- berg, A. Kapitulnik, and J. Paglione, Multicomponent superconducting order parameter in UTe2, Science373, 797 (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    Aoki, J.-P

    D. Aoki, J.-P. Brison, J. Flouquet, K. Ishida, G. Knebel, Y. Tokunaga, and Y. Yanase, Unconventional super- conductivity in UTe2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 243002 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Siegl, A

    J. Siegl, A. Bleibaum, W. Wan, M. Kurpas, J. Schlie- mann, M. M. Ugeda, M. Marganska, and M. Gri- foni, Friedel oscillations and chiral superconductivity in monolayer NbSe 2 (2024), arXiv:2412.00273 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2024

  21. [28]

    X. Xu, Y. Li, and C. L. Chien, Observation of odd- parity superconductivity with the geshkenbein-larkin- barone composite rings, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056001 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    Yamanaka, K.-i

    S. Yamanaka, K.-i. Hotehama, and H. Kawaji, Super- conductivityat25.5kinelectron-dopedlayeredhafnium nitride, Nature 392, 580 (1998)

    1998

  23. [30]

    Takada, H

    K. Takada, H. Sakurai, E. Takayama-Muromachi, F. Izumi, R. A. Dilanian, and T. Sasaki, Superconduc- tivity in two-dimensional CoO2 layers, Nature422, 53 (2003)

    2003

  24. [31]

    A. M. Black-Schaffer and S. Doniach, Resonating va- lence bonds and mean-fieldd-wave superconductivity in graphite, Phys. Rev. B75, 134512 (2007)

    2007

  25. [32]

    Semimetal

    Y. Kasahara, T. Iwasawa, H. Shishido, T. Shibauchi, K. Behnia, Y. Haga, T. D. Matsuda, Y. Onuki, M. Sigrist, and Y. Matsuda, Exotic Superconducting Properties in the Electron-Hole-Compensated Heavy- Fermion “Semimetal” URu2Si2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 116402 (2007)

    2007

  26. [33]

    Kasahara, H

    Y. Kasahara, H. Shishido, T. Shibauchi, Y. Haga, T. D. Matsuda, Y. Onuki, and Y. Matsuda, Superconducting gap structure of heavy-fermion compound URu2Si2 de- termined by angle-resolved thermal conductivity, New J. Phys. 11, 055061 (2009)

    2009

  27. [34]

    Kuroki, Spin-fluctuation-mediated d + id ′ pairing mechanism in doped β−mNCl (m = Hf,Zr) supercon- ductors, Phys

    K. Kuroki, Spin-fluctuation-mediated d + id ′ pairing mechanism in doped β−mNCl (m = Hf,Zr) supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B81, 104502 (2010)

    2010

  28. [35]

    Nandkishore, L

    R. Nandkishore, L. S. Levitov, and A. V. Chubukov, Chiral superconductivity from repulsive interactions in doped graphene, Nat. Phys.8, 158

  29. [36]

    P. K. Biswas, H. Luetkens, T. Neupert, T. Stürzer, C. Baines, G. Pascua, A. P. Schnyder, M. H. Fis- cher, J. Goryo, M. R. Lees, H. Maeter, F. Brückner, H.-H. Klauss, M. Nicklas, P. J. Baker, A. D. Hillier, M. Sigrist, A. Amato, and D. Johrendt, Evidence for superconductivity w...

    2013

  30. [37]

    M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, W. Hanke, and R. Thomale, Model Evidence of an Anisotropic Chiral d+id-Wave Pairing State for the Water-Intercalated NaxCoO2 · yH2O Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 097001 (2013)

    2013

  31. [38]

    M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, C. Platt, A. P. Schnyder, W. Hanke, J. Goryo, R. Thomale, and M. Sigrist, Chiral d-wave superconductivity in SrPtAs, Phys. Rev. B89, 020509(R) (2014)

    2014

  32. [39]

    Shibauchi, H

    T. Shibauchi, H. Ikeda, and Y. Matsuda, Broken sym- metries in URu2Si2, Philos. Mag.94, 3747 (2014)

    2014

  33. [40]

    X. Gong, M. Kargarian, A. Stern, D. Yue, H. Zhou, X. Jin, V. M. Galitski, V. M. Yakovenko, and J. Xia, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity in epitaxial bismuth/nickel bilayers, Sci. Adv.3, e1602579 (2017)

    2017

  34. [41]

    J. W. F. Venderbos and R. M. Fernandes, Correlations and electronic order in a two-orbital honeycomb lattice model for twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B98, 245103 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Su and S.-Z

    Y. Su and S.-Z. Lin, Pairing symmetry and spon- taneous vortex-antivortex lattice in superconducting twisted-bilayer graphene: Bogoliubov-de gennes ap- 16 proach, Phys. Rev. B98, 195101 (2018)

    2018

  36. [43]

    Fidrysiak, M

    M. Fidrysiak, M. Zegrodnik, and J. Spałek, Unconven- tional topological superconductivity and phase diagram for an effective two-orbital model as applied to twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B98, 085436 (2018)

    2018

  37. [44]

    Xu and L

    C. Xu and L. Balents, Topological superconductivity in twisted multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 087001 (2018)

    2018

  38. [45]

    D. M. Kennes, J. Lischner, and C. Karrasch, Strong cor- relations andd + id superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B98, 241407(R) (2018)

    2018

  39. [46]

    Liu, L.-D

    C.-C. Liu, L.-D. Zhang, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Chi- ral spin density wave andd+id superconductivity in the magic-angle-twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018)

    2018

  40. [47]

    H. Guo, X. Zhu, S. Feng, and R. T. Scalettar, Pairing symmetry of interacting fermions on a twisted bilayer graphene superlattice, Phys. Rev. B97, 235453 (2018)

    2018

  41. [48]

    Wu, Topological chiral superconductivity with spon- taneous vortices and supercurrent in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys

    F. Wu, Topological chiral superconductivity with spon- taneous vortices and supercurrent in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 195114 (2019)

    2019

  42. [49]

    Hosseinabadi and M

    H. Hosseinabadi and M. Kargarian, Vortex bound states of charge and magnetic fluctuations induced topological superconductors in heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B100, 144507 (2019)

    2019

  43. [50]

    H. Ueki, R. Tamura, and J. Goryo, Possibility of chiral d-wave state in the hexagonal pnictide superconductor SrPtAs, Phys. Rev. B99, 144510 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    H. Ueki, S. Inagaki, R. Tamura, J. Goryo, Y. Imai, W. B. Rui, A. P. Schnyder, and M. Sigrist, Phenomenol- ogy of the chirald-wave state in the hexagonal pnictide superconductor SrPtAs, JPS Conf. Proc. 30, 011044 (2020)

    2020

  45. [52]

    O. Can, T. Tummuru, R. P. Day, I. Elfimov, A. Dam- ascelli, and M. Franz, High-temperature topological su- perconductivity in twisted double-layer copper oxides, Nat. Phys. 17, 519 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    Can, X.-X

    O. Can, X.-X. Zhang, C. Kallin, and M. Franz, Prob- ing time reversal symmetry breaking topological super- conductivity in twisted double layer copper oxides with polar kerr effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 157001 (2021)

    2021

  47. [54]

    Iguchi, I

    Y. Iguchi, I. P. Zhang, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, J. R. Kirtley, and K. A. Moler, Local observation of linear-T superfluid density and anomalous vortex dynamics in URu2Si2, Phys. Rev. B103, L220503 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    Fischer, L

    A. Fischer, L. Klebl, C. Honerkamp, and D. M. Kennes, Spin-fluctuation-induced pairing in twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B103, L041103 (2021)

    2021

  49. [56]

    P. K. Biswas, S. K. Ghosh, J. Z. Zhao, D. A. Mayoh, N. D. Zhigadlo, X. Xu, C. Baines, A. D. Hillier, G. Bal- akrishnan, and M. R. Lees, Chiral singlet superconduc- tivityintheweaklycorrelatedmetalLaPt3P,Nat.Com- mun. 12, 2504 (2021)

    2021

  50. [57]

    F. Ming, X. Wu, C. Chen, K. D. Wang, P. Mai, T. A. Maier, J. Strockoz, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. González, J. Ortega, S. Johnston, and H. H. Weitering, Evidence for chiral superconductivity on a silicon surface, Nat. Phys. 19, 500 (2023)

    2023

  51. [58]

    P. A. Volkov, S. Y. F. Zhao, N. Poccia, X. Cui, P. Kim, and J. H. Pixley, Josephson effects in twisted nodal su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B111, 014514 (2025)

    2025

  52. [59]

    J. H. Pixley and P. A. Volkov, Twisted nodal supercon- ductors (2025), arXiv:2503.23683 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topologi- cal quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  54. [61]

    Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf

    A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  55. [62]

    Beenakker, Search for majorana fermions in super- conductors, Annu

    C. Beenakker, Search for majorana fermions in super- conductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.4, 113 (2013)

    2013

  56. [63]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  57. [64]

    Mercado, S

    A. Mercado, S. Sahoo, and M. Franz, High-temperature majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 137002 (2022)

    2022

  58. [65]

    Margalit, B

    G. Margalit, B. Yan, M. Franz, and Y. Oreg, Chiral ma- jorana modes via proximity to a twisted cuprate bilayer, Phys. Rev. B106, 205424 (2022)

    2022

  59. [66]

    Huang, S.-S

    Y. Huang, S.-S. Gong, and D. N. Sheng, Quantum phase diagram and spontaneously emergent topological chiral superconductivity in doped triangular-lattice mott in- sulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 136003 (2023)

    2023

  60. [67]

    Li and C.-C

    Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, High-temperature majorana corner modes in ad + id ′ superconductor heterostruc- ture: Application to twisted bilayer cuprate supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B107, 235125 (2023)

    2023

  61. [68]

    Brosco, G

    V. Brosco, G. Serpico, V. Vinokur, N. Poccia, and U. Vool, Superconducting qubit based on twisted cuprate van der waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 017003 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    P. G. Björnsson, Y. Maeno, M. E. Huber, and K. A. Moler, Scanning magnetic imaging of Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 72, 012504 (2005)

    2005

  63. [70]

    J. R. Kirtley, C. Kallin, C. W. Hicks, E.-A. Kim, Y. Liu, K. A. Moler, Y. Maeno, and K. D. Nelson, Upper limit on spontaneous supercurrents in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014526 (2007)

    2007

  64. [71]

    C. W. Hicks, J. R. Kirtley, T. M. Lippman, N. C. Koshnick, M.E.Huber, Y.Maeno, W.M.Yuhasz, M.B. Maple, and K. A. Moler, Limits on superconductivity- related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy, Phys. Rev. B81, 214501 (2010)

    2010

  65. [72]

    Iguchi, H

    Y. Iguchi, H. Man, S. M. Thomas, F. Ronning, J. Ishizuka, M. Sigrist, P. F. S. Rosa, and K. A. Moler, Magnetic edge fields in UTe2 near zero background fields, Phys. Rev. B110, 214505 (2024)

    2024

  66. [73]

    P. W. Anderson and P. Morel, Generalized Bardeen- Cooper-Schrieffer States and the Proposed Low- Temperature Phase of LiquidHe3, Phys. Rev.123, 1911 (1961)

    1961

  67. [74]

    G. E. Volovik, Angular momentum and orbital waves in the anisotropic A phase of superfluid He3, JETP Lett. 22, 108 (1975)

    1975

  68. [75]

    A. J. Leggett, A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid3He, Rev. Mod. Phys.47, 331 (1975)

    1975

  69. [76]

    M.Ishikawa,OrbitalAngularMomentumofAnisotropic Superfluid, Prog. Theor. Phys.57, 1836 (1977)

    1977

  70. [77]

    M. C. Cross, Orbital dynamics of the Anderson- Brinkman-Morel phase of superfluid 3He, J. Low Temp. Phys. 26, 165 (1977)

    1977

  71. [78]

    two-fluid

    A. Leggett and S. Takagi, Orientational dynamics of su- perfluid 3He: A “two-fluid” model. II. Orbital dynamics, Ann. Phys. 110, 353 (1978)

    1978

  72. [79]

    M. G. McClure and S. Takagi, Angular momentum of 17 anisotropic superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 596 (1979)

    1979

  73. [80]

    Sigrist, T

    M. Sigrist, T. Rice, and K. Ueda, Magnetic proper- ties of time-reversal breaking superconductors, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 90-91, 653 (1990)

    1990

  74. [81]

    J. A. Sauls, A theory for the superconducting phases of UPt3, J. Low Temp. Phys.95, 153 (1994)

    1994

  75. [82]

    Kita, Angular momentum of anisotropic superfluids atfinitetemperatures,J.Phys.Soc.Jpn

    T. Kita, Angular momentum of anisotropic superfluids atfinitetemperatures,J.Phys.Soc.Jpn. 67,216(1998)

    1998

  76. [83]

    Matsumoto and M

    M. Matsumoto and M. Sigrist, Quasiparticle States near the Surface and the Domain Wall in apx ± ipy-Wave Superconductor, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.68, 994 (1999)

    1999

  77. [84]

    Matsumoto and M

    M. Matsumoto and M. Sigrist, Quasiparticle States near the Surface and the Domain Wall in apx ± ipy-Wave Superconductor, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.68, 3120 (1999)

    1999

  78. [85]

    Furusaki, M

    A. Furusaki, M. Matsumoto, and M. Sigrist, Sponta- neous hall effect in a chiral p-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B64, 054514 (2001)

    2001

  79. [86]

    Stone and R

    M. Stone and R. Roy, Edge modes, edge currents, and gauge invariance in px+ipy superfluids and supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B69, 184511 (2004)

    2004

  80. [87]

    Stone and I

    M. Stone and I. Anduaga, Mass flows and angular mo- mentum density for px+ipy paired fermions in a har- monic trap, Ann. Phys.323, 2 (2008), january Special Issue 2008

    2008

  81. [88]

    J. A. Sauls, Surface states, edge currents, and the angu- lar momentum of chiralp-wave superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 84, 214509 (2011)

    2011

  82. [89]

    H. Byun, J. Jeong, K. Kim, S. G. Kim, S.-B. Shim, J. Suh, and H. Choi, Measuring angular momentum of px + ipy topological superfluids: A proposal, Phys. Rev. B 98, 024518 (2018)

    2018

  83. [90]

    Holmvall and A

    P. Holmvall and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Enhanced chi- ral edge currents and orbital magnetic moment in chiral d-wave superconductors from mesoscopic finite-size ef- fects, Phys. Rev. B108, 174505 (2023)

    2023

  84. [91]

    Pathak, O

    V. Pathak, O. Can, and M. Franz, Edge currents as probeoftopologyintwistedcupratebilayers,Phys.Rev. B 110, 014506 (2024)

    2024

  85. [92]

    Yoshida, Y

    S. Yoshida, Y. Tanaka, A. A. Golubov, and S.-I. Suzuki, Chirality detection through vortex bound states in a (d + id ′ )-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014511 (2025)

    2025

  86. [93]

    Holmvall and A

    P. Holmvall and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Coreless vortices as direct signature of chiral d-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B108, L100506 (2023)

    2023

  87. [94]

    Holmvall, N

    P. Holmvall, N. Wall-Wennerdal, and A. M. Black- Schaffer, Robust and tunable coreless vortices and frac- tional vortices in chirald-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094511 (2023)

    2023

  88. [95]

    L. R. Cadorim, E. Sardella, and M. V. Milošević, Vorti- cal versus skyrmionic states in the topological phase of a twisted bilayer withd-wave superconducting pairing, Phys. Rev. B110, 064508 (2024)

    2024

  89. [96]

    Phys.: Condens

    N.A.Spaldin, M.Fiebig,andM.Mostovoy,Thetoroidal moment in condensed-matter physics and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 434203 (2008)

    2008

  90. [97]

    Holmvall, N

    P. Holmvall, N. Wall Wennerdal, M. Håkansson, P. Stadler, O. Shevtsov, T. Löfwander, and M. Fo- gelström, SuperConga: An open-source framework for mesoscopic superconductivity, Appl. Phys. Rev. 10, 011317 (2023)

    2023

  91. [98]

    A. M. Black-Schaffer, Edge properties and majorana fermions in the proposed chirald-wave superconducting state of doped graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 197001 (2012)

    2012

  92. [99]

    P. E. C. Ashby and C. Kallin, Suppression of sponta- neous supercurrents in a chiralp-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B79, 224509 (2009)

    2009

  93. [100]

    Bouhon and M

    A. Bouhon and M. Sigrist, Current inversion at the edges of a chiralp-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 90, 220511(R) (2014)

    2014

  94. [101]

    S. B. Etter, H. Kaneyasu, M. Ossadnik, and M. Sigrist, Limiting mechanism for critical current in topologically frustratedJosephsonjunctions,Phys.Rev.B 90,024515 (2014)

    2014

  95. [102]

    W.Huang, E.Taylor,andC.Kallin,Vanishingedgecur- rents in non-p-wave topological chiral superconductors, Phys. Rev. B90, 224519 (2014)

    2014

  96. [103]

    Huang, S

    W. Huang, S. Lederer, E. Taylor, and C. Kallin, Non- topological nature of the edge current in a chiralp-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B91, 094507 (2015)

    2015

  97. [104]

    Y. Tada, W. Nie, and M. Oshikawa, Orbital angular momentum and spectral flow in two-dimensional chiral superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 195301 (2015)

    2015

  98. [105]

    G. E. Volovik, Orbital momentum of chiral superfluids and the spectral asymmetry of edge states, JETP Lett. 100, 742 (2015)

    2015

  99. [106]

    Ojanen, Ground-state angular momentum, spectral asymmetry, and topology in chiral superfluids and su- perconductors, Phys

    T. Ojanen, Ground-state angular momentum, spectral asymmetry, and topology in chiral superfluids and su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B93, 174505 (2016)

    2016

  100. [107]

    Suzuki and Y

    S.-I. Suzuki and Y. Asano, Spontaneous edge current in a small chiral superconductor with a rough surface, Phys. Rev. B94, 155302 (2016)

    2016

  101. [108]

    Suzuki and Y

    S.-I. Suzuki and Y. Asano, Current inversion in a chi- ral d-wave superconductor due to surface roughness, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.807, 102001 (2017)

    2017

  102. [109]

    Goryo, Y

    J. Goryo, Y. Imai, W. B. Rui, M. Sigrist, and A. P. Schnyder, Surface magnetism in a chirald-wave super- conductor with hexagonal symmetry, Phys. Rev. B96, 140502(R) (2017)

    2017

  103. [110]

    X. Wang, Z. Wang, and C. Kallin, Spontaneous edge current in higher chirality superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094501 (2018)

    2018

  104. [111]

    Tada, Nonthermodynamic nature of the orbital an- gular momentum in neutral fermionic superfluids, Phys

    Y. Tada, Nonthermodynamic nature of the orbital an- gular momentum in neutral fermionic superfluids, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214523 (2018)

    2018

  105. [112]

    S. B. Etter, A. Bouhon, and M. Sigrist, Spontaneous surface flux pattern in chiral p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B97, 064510 (2018)

    2018

  106. [113]

    W. Nie, W. Huang, and H. Yao, Edge current and or- bital angular momentum of chiral superfluids revisited, Phys. Rev. B102, 054502 (2020)

    2020

  107. [114]

    Suzuki, S

    S.-I. Suzuki, S. Ikegaya, and A. A. Golubov, Destruction of surface states of(dzx + idyz )-wave superconductor by surface roughness: Application to sr2ruo4, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042020 (2022)

    2022

  108. [115]

    Suzuki and A

    S.-I. Suzuki and A. A. Golubov, Robustness of chiral surface current and subdominant s-wave cooper pairs, Phys. Rev. B108, 134501 (2023)

    2023

  109. [116]

    Suzuki, A

    S.-I. Suzuki, A. A. Golubov, and M. Eschrig, Chiral current inversion induced by flat-band andreev bound states (2024), arXiv:2406.19682 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Higashitani, G

    S. Higashitani, G. Sato, and Y. Nagato, Lifetime of edge modes at rough surfaces of chiral superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 224506 (2024)

    2024

  111. [118]

    C. A. Bolle, V. Aksyuk, F. Pardo, P. L. Gammel, E. Zel- 18 dov, E. Bucher, R. Boie, D. J. Bishop, and D. R. Nel- son, Observation of mesoscopic vortex physics using mi- cromechanical oscillators, Nature399, 43 (1999)

    1999

  112. [119]

    V. V. Khotkevych, M. V. Milošević, and S. J. Bending, A scanning Hall probe microscope for high resolution magnetic imaging down to 300 mK, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 123708 (2008)

    2008

  113. [120]

    A. C. Bleszynski-Jayich, W. E. Shanks, B. Peaudecerf, E. Ginossar, F. v. Oppen, L. Glazman, and J. G. E. Har- ris, Persistent Currents in Normal Metal Rings, Science 326, 272 (2009)

    2009

  114. [121]

    J. A. Bert, B. Kalisky, C. Bell, M. Kim, Y. Hikita, H. Y. Hwang, and K. A. Moler, Direct imaging of the coex- istence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Nat. Phys.7, 1 (2011)

    2011

  115. [122]

    J. Jang, D. G. Ferguson, V. Vakaryuk, R. Budakian, S. B. Chung, P. M. Goldbart, and Y. Maeno, Obser- vation of Half-Height Magnetization Steps in Sr2RuO4, Science 331, 186 (2011)

    2011

  116. [123]

    Vasyukov, Y

    D. Vasyukov, Y. Anahory, L. Embon, D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, L. Neeman, A. Finkler, Y. Segev, Y. Mya- soedov, M. L. Rappaport, M. E. Huber, and E. Zel- dov, A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity, Nat. Nan- otechnol. 8, 1 (2013)

    2013

  117. [124]

    P. J. Curran, S. J. Bending, W. M. Desoky, A. S. Gibbs, S. L. Lee, and A. P. Mackenzie, Search for spon- taneous edge currents and vortex imaging inSr2RuO4 mesostructures, Phys. Rev. B89, 144504 (2014)

    2014

  118. [125]

    J. R. Kirtley, L. Paulius, A. J. Rosenberg, J. C. Palm- strom, C. M. Holland, E. M. Spanton, D. Schiessl, C. L. Jermain, J. Gibbons, Y.-K.-K. Fung, M. E. Huber, D. C. Ralph, M. B. Ketchen, J. Gibson, Gerald W., and K. A. Moler, Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spa...

    2016 doi

  119. [126]

    Bishop-Van Horn, Z

    L. Bishop-Van Horn, Z. Cui, J. R. Kirtley, and K. A. Moler, Cryogen-free variable temperature scan- ning SQUID microscope, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 10.1063/1.5085008 (2019)

    2019 doi

  120. [127]

    A. Uri, Y. Kim, K. Bagani, C. K. Lewandowski, S. Grover, N. Auerbach, E. O. Lachman, Y. Myasoe- dov, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Smet, and E. Zel- dov, Nanoscale imaging of equilibrium quantum hall edge currents and of the magnetic monopole response in graphene, Nat. Phys.16...

    2020

  121. [128]

    S. Kim, J. Schwenk, D. Walkup, Y. Zeng, F. Ghahari, S. T. Le, M. R. Slot, J. Berwanger, S. R. Blanken- ship, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. J. Giessibl, N. B. Zhitenev, C. R. Dean, and J. A. Stroscio, Edge channels of broken-symmetry quantum hall states in graphene vi- sualized...

    2021

  122. [129]

    Persky, I

    E. Persky, I. Sochnikov, and B. Kalisky, Studying quan- tum materials with scanning squid microscopy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.13, 385 (2022)

    2022

  123. [130]

    A. K. Geim, I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, J. G. S. Lok, J. C. Maan, A. E. Filippov, and F. M. Peeters, Phase transitions in individual sub-micrometre super- conductors, Nature 390, 259 (1997)

    1997

  124. [131]

    L. F. Chibotaru, A. Ceulemans, V. Bruyndoncx, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Symmetry-induced formation of an- tivortices in mesoscopic superconductors, Nature 408, 833 (2000)

    2000

  125. [132]

    Kanda, B

    A. Kanda, B. J. Baelus, F. M. Peeters, K. Kadowaki, and Y. Ootuka, Experimental evidence for giant vortex states in a mesoscopic superconducting disk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 257002 (2004)

    2004

  126. [133]

    I. V. Grigorieva, W. Escoffier, J. Richardson, L. Y. Vin- nikov, S. Dubonos, and V. Oboznov, Direct observation of vortex shells and magic numbers in mesoscopic super- conducting disks, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 077005 (2006)

    2006

  127. [134]

    Kokubo, S

    N. Kokubo, S. Okayasu, A. Kanda, and B. Shinozaki, Scanningsquidmicroscopestudyofvortexpolygonsand shells in weak-pinning disks of an amorphous supercon- ducting film, Phys. Rev. B82, 014501 (2010)

    2010

  128. [135]

    T. Cren, L. Serrier-Garcia, F. Debontridder, and D. Roditchev, Vortex fusion and giant vortex states in confined superconducting condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 097202 (2011)

    2011

  129. [136]

    Gustafsson, D

    D. Gustafsson, D. Golubev, M. Fogelström, T. Claeson, S. Kubatkin, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Fully gapped superconductivity in a nanometre-size YBa 2Cu3O7−δ island enhanced by a magnetic field, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 25 (2013)

    2013

  130. [137]

    Timmermans, L

    M. Timmermans, L. Serrier-Garcia, M. Perini, J. Van de Vondel, and V. V. Moshchalkov, Direct observation of condensate and vortex confinement in nanostructured superconductors, Phys. Rev. B93, 054514 (2016)

    2016

  131. [138]

    P. J. Curran, S. J. Bending, A. S. Gibbs, and A. P. Mackenzie, The search for spontaneous edge currents in Sr2RuO4 mesa structures with controlled geometrical shapes, Sci. Rep.13, 12652 (2023)

    2023

  132. [139]

    Wu and J

    H. Wu and J. A. Sauls, Weyl fermions and broken sym- metry phases of laterally confined 3he films, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35, 495402 (2023)

    2023

  133. [140]

    Tagliati, V

    S. Tagliati, V. M. Krasnov, and A. Rydh, Differential membrane-based nanocalorimeter for high-resolution measurements of low-temperature specific heat, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 055107 (2012)

    2012

  134. [141]

    Willa, Z

    K. Willa, Z. Diao, D. Campanini, U. Welp, R. Di- van, M. Hudl, Z. Islam, W.-K. Kwok, and A. Rydh, Nanocalorimeter platform for in situ specific heat mea- surements and x-ray diffraction at low temperature, Rev. Sci. Instrum.88, 125108 (2017)

    2017

  135. [142]

    Yi and D

    F. Yi and D. A. LaVan, Nanocalorimetry: Exploring materials faster and smaller, Appl. Phys. Rev.6, 031302 (2019)

    2019

  136. [143]

    Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for typeIIsuperconductorsintotransport-likeequations,Z

    G. Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for typeIIsuperconductorsintotransport-likeequations,Z. Phys. A 214, 195 (1968)

    1968

  137. [144]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.55, 2262 (1969)

    1969

  138. [145]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Inelastic electron collisions and nonequilibrium stationary states in superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.61, 1254 (1971), [Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 668 (1972)]

    1971

  139. [146]

    Serene and D

    J. Serene and D. Rainer, The quasiclassical approach to superfluid 3He, Phys. Rep.101, 221 (1983)

    1983

  140. [147]

    A. L. Shelankov, On the derivation of quasiclassical equations for superconductors, J. Low Temp. Phys.60, 29 (1985)

    1985

  141. [148]

    Nagato, K

    Y. Nagato, K. Nagai, and J. Hara, Theory of the An- dreev reflection and the density of states in proximity contactnormal-superconductinginfinite double-layer,J. Low Temp. Phys.93, 33 (1993)

    1993

  142. [149]

    Eschrig, J

    M. Eschrig, J. Heym, and D. Rainer, Corrections to 19 Fermi-liquid theory of correlated metals, J. Low Temp. Phys. 95, 323 (1994)

    1994

  143. [150]

    Schopohl and K

    N. Schopohl and K. Maki, Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 52, 490 (1995)

    1995

  144. [151]

    Schopohl, Transformation of the eilenberger equa- tions of superconductivity to a scalar riccati equation (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9804064 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    N. Schopohl, Transformation of the eilenberger equa- tions of superconductivity to a scalar riccati equation (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9804064 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    1998 arXiv

  145. [152]

    Eschrig, D

    M. Eschrig, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Effects of strong magnetic fields on pairing fluctuations in high- temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B59, 12095 (1999)

    1999

  146. [153]

    Belzig, F

    W. Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, G. Schön, and A. D. Zaikin, Quasiclassical green’s function ap- proach to mesoscopic superconductivity, Superlattices Microstruct. 25, 1251 (1999)

    1999

  147. [154]

    N.Kopnin, Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (OUP Oxford, Oxford, 2009)

    2009

  148. [155]

    M.Eschrig,Scatteringprobleminnonequilibriumquasi- classical theory of metals and superconductors: General boundary conditions and applications, Phys. Rev. B80, 134511 (2009)

    2009

  149. [156]

    Grein, T

    R. Grein, T. Löfwander, and M. Eschrig, Inverse prox- imity effect and influence of disorder on triplet super- currents in strongly spin-polarized ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 88, 054502 (2013)

    2013

  150. [157]

    Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintron- ics: a review of current progress, Rep

    M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintron- ics: a review of current progress, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 104501 (2015)

    2015

  151. [158]

    Ozaki, Continued fraction representation of the Fermi-Dirac function for large-scale electronic structure calculations, Phys

    T. Ozaki, Continued fraction representation of the Fermi-Dirac function for large-scale electronic structure calculations, Phys. Rev. B75, 035123 (2007)

    2007

  152. [159]

    Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Prog

    T. Matsubara, A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics, Prog. Theor. Phys.14, 351 (1955)

    1955

  153. [160]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum The- ory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction, Ox- ford Graduate Texts (OUP Oxford, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  154. [161]

    Rammer,Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    J. Rammer,Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  155. [162]

    G.Mahan, Many-Particle Physics,PhysicsofSolidsand Liquids (Springer US, New York, 2013)

    2013

  156. [163]

    M. J. Graf, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Coupled two- dimensional Fermi liquids as a model for layered su- perconductors: Basic equations and elementary results, Phys. Rev. B47, 12089 (1993)

    1993

  157. [164]

    Yip and A

    S. Yip and A. Garg, Superconducting states of reduced symmetry: General order parameters and physical im- plications, Phys. Rev. B48, 3304 (1993)

    1993

  158. [165]

    J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Ground-State Energy of a Many-Fermion System. II, Physical Review 118, 1417 (1960)

    1960

  159. [166]

    E. V. Thuneberg, J. Kurkijärvi, and D. Rainer, Elementary-flux-pinning potential in type-II supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B29, 3913 (1984)

    1984

  160. [167]

    A. B. Vorontsov and J. A. Sauls, Thermodynamic prop- erties of thin films of superfluid3He − A, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064508 (2003)

    2003

  161. [168]

    Virtanen, A

    P. Virtanen, A. Vargunin, and M. Silaev, Quasiclassical free energy of superconductors: Disorder-driven first-order phase transition in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator bilayers, Phys. Rev. B101, 094507 (2020)

    2020

  162. [169]

    Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature for d 2 xa-x 2 b-wave superconductivity, Phys

    C.-R. Hu, Midgap surface states as a novel signature for d 2 xa-x 2 b-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 1526 (1994)

    1994

  163. [170]

    Yang and C.-R

    J. Yang and C.-R. Hu, Robustness of the midgap states predicted to exist on a 110 surface of ad 2 xa-x 2 b-wave su- perconductor, Phys. Rev. B50, 16766 (1994)

    1994

  164. [171]

    Löfwander, V

    T. Löfwander, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Andreev bound states in high-Tc superconducting junctions, Su- percond. Sci. Technol.14, R53 (2001)

    2001

  165. [172]

    A. B. Vorontsov, Andreev bound states in supercon- ducting films and confined superfluid He-3, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A376, 201501444 (2018)

    2018

  166. [173]

    V. A. Schweigert, F. M. Peeters, and P. S. Deo, Vortex phase diagram for mesoscopic superconducting disks, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 2783 (1998)

    1998

  167. [174]

    A. B. Vorontsov, Broken translational and time-reversal symmetry in unconventional superconducting films, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 177001 (2009)

    2009

  168. [175]

    Zhang, L

    L.-F. Zhang, L. Covaci, M. V. Milošević, G. R. Berdiy- orov, and F. M. Peeters, Unconventional vortex states in nanoscale superconductors due to shape-induced res- onances in the inhomogeneous cooper-pair condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 107001 (2012)

    2012

  169. [176]

    Zhang, L

    L.-F. Zhang, L. Covaci, M. V. Milošević, G. R. Berdiy- orov, and F. M. Peeters, Vortex states in nanoscale su- perconducting squares: The influence of quantum con- finement, Phys. Rev. B88, 144501 (2013)

    2013

  170. [177]

    J. J. Wiman and J. A. Sauls, Spontaneous helical or- der of a chiralp-wave superfluid confined in nanoscale channels, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 045301 (2018)

    2018

  171. [178]

    L. V. Levitin, B. Yager, L. Sumner, B. Cowan, A. J. Casey, J. Saunders, N. Zhelev, R. G. Bennett, and J. M. Parpia, Evidence for a spatially modulated superfluid phase of 3He under confinement, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 085301 (2019)

    2019

  172. [179]

    A. J. Shook, V. Vadakkumbatt, P. Senarath Yapa, C. Doolin, R. Boyack, P. H. Kim, G. G. Popowich, F. Souris, H. Christani, J. Maciejko, and J. P. Davis, Stabilized pair density wave via nanoscale confinement of superfluid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 015301 (2020)

    2020

  173. [180]

    stabilized pair density wave via nanoscale confinement of super- fluid 3He

    L. V. Levitin, X. Rojas, P. J. Heikkinen, A. J. Casey, J. M. Parpia, and J. Saunders, Comment on “stabilized pair density wave via nanoscale confinement of super- fluid 3He”, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 059601 (2020)

    2020

  174. [181]

    A. J. Shook, V. Vadakkumbatt, P. Senarath Yapa, C. Doolin, R. Boyack, P. H. Kim, G. G. Popowich, F. Souris, H. Christani, J. Maciejko, and J. P. Davis, Shook et al. reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 059602 (2020)

    2020

  175. [182]

    J. Choi, A. A. Zadorozhko, J. Choi, and E. Kim, Spa- tially modulated superfluid state in two-dimensional 4He films, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 135301 (2021)

    2021

  176. [183]

    R. C. Regan, J. J. Wiman, and J. A. Sauls, Half- quantum vortices in nematic and chiral phases of3He, Phys. Rev. B104, 024513 (2021)

    2021

  177. [184]

    Varga, C

    E. Varga, C. Undershute, and J. P. Davis, Surface- dominated finite-size effects in nanoconfined superfluid helium, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 145301 (2022)

    2022

  178. [185]

    P. S. Yapa, R. Boyack, and J. Maciejko, Triangular pair density wave in confined superfluid3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 015301 (2022)

    2022

  179. [186]

    Pleiner and H

    H. Pleiner and H. R. Brand, Macroscopic dynamics of superfluid 3He with a spatially modulated pair density wave, Phys. Rev. B108, 054502 (2023)

    2023

  180. [187]

    C. Sun, A. Attar, and I. Boettcher, Superfluid phase transition of nanoscale-confined helium-3, Phys. Rev. B 20 108, 144503 (2023)

    2023

  181. [188]

    V. G. Kogan and R. Prozorov, Anisotropic criteria for the type of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B90, 054516 (2014)

    2014

  182. [189]

    V. G. Kogan and R. Prozorov, Changing the type of superconductivity by magnetic and potential scattering, Phys. Rev. B90, 180502(R) (2014)

    2014

  183. [190]

    S. Ooi, M. Tachiki, T. Konomi, T. Kubo, A. Kikuchi, S. Arisawa, H. Ito, and K. Umemori, Observation of intermediate mixed state in high-purity cavity-grade Nb by magneto-optical imaging, Phys. Rev. B104, 064504 (2021)

    2021

  184. [191]

    Prozorov, M

    R. Prozorov, M. Zarea, and J. A. Sauls, Niobium in the clean limit: An intrinsic type-I superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 106, L180505 (2022)

    2022

  185. [192]

    Eschrig, Distribution functions in nonequilibrium theory of superconductivity and andreev spectroscopy in unconventional superconductors, Phys

    M. Eschrig, Distribution functions in nonequilibrium theory of superconductivity and andreev spectroscopy in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9061 (2000)

    2000

  186. [193]

    SuperConga team, SuperConga Online Documentation (2021)

    2021

  187. [194]

    SuperConga team, SuperConga GitLab repository (2021)

    2021

  188. [195]

    Barzilai and J

    J. Barzilai and J. M. Borwein, Two-Point Step Size Gra- dient Methods, IMA J. Numer. Anal.8, 141 (1988)

    1988

  189. [196]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number ½, Phys. Rev. D13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  190. [197]

    Samoilenka and E

    A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Boundary states with elevated critical temperatures in Bardeen-Cooper- Schrieffer superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134512 (2020)

    2020

  191. [198]

    Samoilenka and E

    A. Samoilenka and E. Babaev, Microscopic derivation of superconductor-insulator boundary conditions for Ginzburg-Landau theory revisited: Enhanced super- conductivity at boundaries with and without magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B103, 224516 (2021)

    2021

  192. [199]

    Hainzl, B

    C. Hainzl, B. Roos, and R. Seiringer, Boundary Super- conductivity in the BCS Model, J. Spectr. Theory12, 1507 (2022)

    2022

  193. [200]

    Roos and R

    B. Roos and R. Seiringer, Bcs critical temperature on half-spaces, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.249, 20 (2025)

    2025

  194. [201]

    Roos and R

    B. Roos and R. Seiringer, Enhanced superconductivity at a corner for the linear bcs equation, Forum Math. Sigma 13, e71 (2025)

    2025

  195. [202]

    K. M. Seja, N. Wall-Wennerdal, T. Löfwander, A. M. Black-Schaffer, M. Fogelström, and P. Holmvall, Im- purity strength–temperature phase diagram with phase crystals and competing time-reversal symmetry break- ing states in nodald-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094513 (2025)

    2025

  196. [204]

    Fidrysiak, B

    M. Fidrysiak, B. Rzeszotarski, and J. Spałek, Tuning topological superconductivity within thet−J−U model of twisted bilayer cuprates, Phys. Rev. B108, 224509 (2023)

    2023

  197. [205]

    K. M. Seja, N. Wall-Wennerdal, T. Löfwander, and M. Fogelström, Spontaneous splitting ofd-wave surface states: Competition between circulating currents and edge magnetization, Phys. Rev. B110, 064502 (2024)

    2024

  198. [206]

    K. M. Seja and T. Löfwander, Quasiclassical theory of charge transport across mesoscopic normal-metal– superconducting heterostructures with current conser- vation, Phys. Rev. B104, 104502 (2021)

    2021

  199. [207]

    K. M. Seja, L. Jacob, and T. Löfwander, Thermopower and thermophase in a d-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104506 (2022)

    2022

  200. [208]

    K. M. Seja and T. Löfwander, Self-consistent theory of current injection into d and d+is superconductors, J. Phys. Condens. 34, 425301 (2022)

    2022

  201. [209]

    Design- ing edge currents using mesoscopic patterning in chi- ral d-wave superconductors

    P. Holmvall and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Data for "Design- ing edge currents using mesoscopic patterning in chi- ral d-wave superconductors", [Data set], 10.5281/zen- odo.15366781 (2025)

    2025 doi

  202. [210]

    Iniotakis, S

    C. Iniotakis, S. Graser, T. Dahm, and N. Schopohl, Lo- cal density of states at polygonal boundaries ofd-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B71, 214508 (2005)

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.