Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 68 references

This paper establishes a closed-form ergodic uplink throughput for satellite-cell-free massive MIMO with MRC and imperfect CSI, and uses it to jointly optimize user association and transmit power for energy efficiency.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 06:26 UTC pith:5GVHEOOW

load-bearing objection The central closed-form SINR is missing the channel-estimation self-interference term, so the paper's exactness claim and numerical gains are unsupported, but the framework is plausible and worth refereeing. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21860 v1 pith:5GVHEOOW submitted 2026-07-23 cs.IT math.IT

Joint Load Balancing and Transmit Power Control for Energy Efficiency Maximization in the Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO Uplink

Ngo Tran Anh Thu , Lo Hai Long , Le Duc Anh Vu , Trinh Van Chien , Lajos Hanzo This is my paper
classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords SatelliteCell-free massive MIMOEnergy efficiencyUser associationPower controlDifferential evolutionMaximum ratio combiningRician fading
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that in a hybrid network where LEO satellites and terrestrial access points jointly serve single-antenna users, the uplink energy efficiency can be optimized by choosing which nodes serve each user and at what power. Its load-bearing result is a closed form for the ergodic uplink rate under maximum-ratio combining, valid for arbitrary numbers of satellites, APs, antennas, and users with imperfect CSI over spatially correlated Rician fading. The paper then forms the energy-efficiency objective as the sum of user rates divided by total power consumption, and solves the mixed-integer, NP-hard optimization with an improved differential evolution algorithm. Numerical comparisons show the hybrid design beats terrestrial-only and satellite-only baselines, and that joint association-and-power optimization improves energy efficiency over fixed or partially optimized designs. If correct, operators can decide satellite-AP associations and power levels in polynomial time, with satellites providing the largest benefit to users in poor channel conditions.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1: under MRC and MMSE channel estimation, the ergodic uplink throughput of user k is R_k = B (1 - K/tau_c) log2(1 + SINR_k), with an exact closed-form SINR given in (23)-(25). This SINR captures the coherent combination of line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight satellite contributions and terrestrial AP contributions, along with mutual interference and noise, and holds for arbitrary M, N, P, L, K. Building on it, the paper defines the energy efficiency f(x) in (29) as the ratio of the total ergodic throughput to the total power consumption of users, APs, satellites, fronthaul, and feeder links, and maximizes it over binary user-association variables and cont

What carries the argument

Two objects carry the argument. The composite channel o_{kk'} = sum_l alpha^SAT_{lk'} (w^SAT_{lk})^H h_{lk'} + sum_n alpha^AP_{nk'} (w^AP_{nk})^H g_{nk'} folds the association decisions into a single random variable; Theorem 1 computes its first and second moments for MRC to get the closed-form SINR in (23)-(25). The second object is the energy-efficiency objective f(x)=sum_k R_k / P_total(x), whose numerator comes from Theorem 1 and whose denominator includes user, AP, satellite, fronthaul, and feeder-link power terms. The improved differential evolution (IDE) algorithm encodes each candidate solution as binary satellite/AP associations plus normalized transmit powers, mutates and crossover

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the optical fronthaul and satellite radio feeder links are transparent: Section II-A declares them imperfect Gaussian channels, but no feeder-link or fronthaul impairment appears in the SINR derivations (22)-(25) or Theorem 1, so the closed-form rates and energy-efficiency gains silently assume perfect backhaul; if feeder-link noise, outage, or capacity limits are non-negligible, the reported numbers are optimistic.

What would settle it

Simulate or build a small uplink testbed with a rate-limited or noisy satellite feeder link and compare measured throughput against the closed-form (23)-(25) prediction; if the gap grows with feeder-link impairment, the transparent-backhaul assumption behind Theorem 1 collapses. Alternatively, enumerate all association patterns for a tiny network (e.g., K=5, N=4, L=1) and compare the IDE solution's energy efficiency with the global optimum to test the claimed near-optimality.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1 is exact, uplink throughput can be computed directly from large-scale fading statistics, angles, Rician factors, and association variables, making Monte Carlo unnecessary for performance evaluation.
  • The closed form turns energy-efficiency maximization into evaluating f(x) on candidate configurations, so the IDE metaheuristic runs in O(G Q K(L+N+1)) time and converges in probability to the epsilon-optimal set.
  • The hybrid satellite-AP architecture dominates terrestrial-only and satellite-only baselines in the numerical scenarios, with satellite assistance helping users in unfavorable channel conditions most.
  • Jointly optimizing association and power outperforms optimizing either alone by 20-260% in energy efficiency, and power control is the dominant lever in the trade-off.
  • The Pareto and proportional-fairness results in the paper show that sum-energy-efficiency optimization can starve weak users; fairness-oriented objectives require roughly 5.17 times more total power.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that its closed-form rate assumes transparent optical fronthaul and satellite feeder links; adding their capacity or noise to the objective would likely reduce the reported gains at high load, a directly testable extension.
  • The analysis assumes orthogonal pilots and perfect knowledge of channel statistics; a natural extension is to incorporate pilot contamination, which would introduce extra interference terms not present in (24).
  • The DE convergence guarantee is generic (measure-based) and does not quantify the optimality gap; brute-force enumeration over all associations for a small instance (e.g., K=5, N=4, L=1) could measure how close IDE actually comes to the global optimum.
  • The numerical finding that no user selects satellite-only access suggests satellites act as a diversity or relief layer rather than primary access; a testable prediction is that satellite-only associations become selected only when terrestrial AP density drops below some threshold.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an uplink hybrid satellite-cell-free massive MIMO system in which L LEO satellites and N terrestrial APs jointly serve K single-antenna users under imperfect CSI and binary user-association constraints. The main analytical contribution is Theorem 1, a closed-form ergodic throughput/SINR expression for MRC under spatially correlated Rician satellite fading and Rayleigh terrestrial fading. The paper then formulates an energy-efficiency maximization problem over binary association and continuous power variables and proposes an improved differential evolution (IDE) algorithm, with a claimed convergence guarantee. Numerical results compare the closed-form expression with Monte Carlo simulations and benchmark the IDE against other metaheuristics, reporting substantial energy-efficiency gains for the hybrid architecture.

Significance. If Theorem 1 were established rigorously, the closed-form rate expression would be a useful building block for joint association/power optimization in hybrid satellite-terrestrial cell-free massive MIMO, an area of current interest. The paper has a clear structure, uses a conventional MMSE/MRC framework, and does not rely on fitted constants. However, the manuscript as written contains several load-bearing inconsistencies: the physical model of user association in the received signals, the internal gaps and index errors in the proof of Theorem 1, and an invalid convergence proof for the IDE. These issues must be resolved before the numerical claims can be considered supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II-A, Eqs. (5)-(10)] The received pilot and data signals at each AP/satellite include the association variables multiplying the transmitted signals, e.g., y_n^AP = sum_k alpha_nk^AP sqrt(rho_k) g_nk s_k + n_n. In an uplink, association is a CPU-side combining decision; a non-associated node still receives the interfering signal. This model suppresses all interference from non-associated users and makes Theorem 1 a statement about a network in which non-associated users are silent. The authors should either revise (9)-(10) so that alpha appears only in the combiner (11), or state and analyze the orthogonal-resource assumption explicitly. The numerical claims inherit this issue.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (43)-(52)] The proof of Theorem 1 does not establish the displayed formula as written. Eq. (43) omits the square on the coherent-gain bracket and omits the alpha variables. Eq. (44) and (52) define D2 with k' != k, while MI_k in (24) includes k'=k terms in its second and third lines; those k'=k terms are the self-interference residual and are necessary for (22). Eq. (46) uses 2 rho K tr(Omega_lk) inside the squared mean where rho K tr(Omega_lk) is needed, and Eq. (52)(i) uses Omega_lk' where Omega_lk is the correct matrix. The final formula (24) appears to give the correct terrestrial-only K=1 result rho P theta / (rho beta + sigma^2), so the concern about a wholly omitted self-interference term does not land, but the derivation must be rewritten and aligned with (24).
  3. [Sec. IV-B5, Theorem 2] The convergence proof is invalid. The proof asserts that the mutation/crossover offspring x_c has probability density p_r(x_c)=1 if x_c in S and 0 otherwise, i.e., that the offspring is uniform over the feasible set. DE mutation (31)-(32) produces linear combinations of population members and crossover (34) copies parental components, so the offspring distribution is not uniform on S. Moreover, psi(S*_epsilon) is used as a probability without normalization, and P_ep is not defined. Thus Theorem 2 and Corollary 1 do not provide the claimed convergence guarantee.
  4. [Sec. II-A and Eqs. (22)-(25)] The AP fronthaul and satellite feeder links are described as 'imperfect Gaussian channels,' but no impairment from these links enters the SINR derivation (22)-(25), the rate (18), or the power model. As written, the closed forms assume transparent backhaul. The authors should either remove the 'imperfect Gaussian channels' claim or incorporate the impairment; otherwise the reported rates and energy-efficiency gains are optimistic.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (43)] The displayed expression is missing the square on the coherent-gain bracket and is missing the alpha association variables; this typo should be corrected for consistency with (23).
  2. [Eq. (24)] The label 'mutual interference' is misleading because the inner sums over k' include the desired user's estimation-error residual. Add a sentence clarifying that MI_k contains both inter-user interference and the self-interference residual from (22).
  3. [Sec. III-A, around Eq. (11)] The notation states w_lk in C^N, but the satellite combining vector should be in C^M; please check all dimensions.
  4. [Fig. 2] The Monte Carlo comparison should state the number of channel realizations and confirm that the simulation uses exactly the same alpha-in-received-signal model as the analysis; otherwise the close match is not informative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central rate derivation is self-contained and the optimization/algorithm sections apply it rather than presupposing it.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular. The ergodic SINR is defined in the standard use-and-then-forget form in (22), and Theorem 1 computes the required moments from the MMSE channel estimates and error covariances given in Lemma 1. Appendix B explicitly evaluates |E{o_kk}|^2, E{|o_kk|^2}, the inter-user interference D2, and the noise terms, so the closed-form rate is an algebraic consequence of the stated statistical model rather than being defined into existence. No fitted constant or externally imposed numerical value is inserted into the rate expression, and the numerical validation compares the closed form against Monte Carlo simulations of the same model. The energy-efficiency objective (29) is a direct ratio of the derived R_k to a power-consumption model, so optimizing it does not make the rate formula an input. The IDE convergence argument cites an external theorem [58] and the standard SHADE mechanism [57]; the self-citations, e.g. [34] and [20], provide the channel model and comparison baselines but are not the source of the Theorem 1 result. Any concern about a possibly omitted self-interference residual in the closed-form SINR would be a mathematical correctness issue, not a circularity, because the claimed conclusion is not equivalent to its assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation uses standard MMSE/MRC machinery and carries several unstated modeling simplifications. The main load-bearing choices are orthogonal pilots, channel-estimate independence, transparent backhaul/feeder links, and a false uniformity assumption in the DE convergence proof.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Users are assigned orthogonal pilots (K pilot symbols, one per user), so there is no pilot contamination in the channel estimates.
    Invoked in Lemma 1 and Appendix B; pilot sequences phi_k satisfy phi_k^H phi_k' = 0 for k != k'. In practice K may exceed available orthogonal pilots.
  • domain assumption Satellite and terrestrial channel estimates are mutually independent across links and across satellites; cross-terms in E|o_kk|^2 vanish.
    Used in Appendix B equations (45)-(50); not explicitly justified by geometry or estimation.
  • ad hoc to paper The satellite feeder link and AP fronthaul are transparent for data combining; no impairment from these links appears in (22)-(25), despite Section II-A declaring them imperfect Gaussian channels.
    Unstated simplification; if feeder-link noise/outage is nontrivial, the closed-form SINR is optimistic.
  • standard math Standard MMSE estimation with known channel statistics (Lemma 1, Appendix A).
    Textbook result [48]; requires known large-scale fading and correlation matrices.
  • standard math Use-and-then-forget capacity bounding and standard complex-Gaussian second-moment identities.
    Used to derive SINR (22) and the expectations in Appendix B.
  • ad hoc to paper The DE mutation/crossover offspring x_c is uniformly distributed over the feasible set S.
    Implicit in proof of Theorem 2 (statement pr(x_c)=1 if x_c in S); false in general for DE, so the convergence guarantee is not established.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25811 in / 16779 out tokens · 159846 ms · 2026-08-01T06:26:12.073923+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Joint Load Balancing and Transmit Power Control for Energy Efficiency Maximization in the Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO Uplink." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5GVHEOOW

@misc{pith2026260721860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Joint Load Balancing and Transmit Power Control for Energy Efficiency Maximization in the Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO Uplink},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5GVHEOOW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21860}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The seamless integration of non-terrestrial and terrestrial infrastructures is a key enabler for ubiquitous connectivity in next-generation (NG) wireless networks. We investigate a hybrid satellite-cell-free Massive MIMO system, where multiple low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites jointly serve users in unison with terrestrial access points (APs) under realistic imperfect channel state information and practical user association constraints. We first derive closed-form expressions of the uplink ergodic throughput by exploiting maximum ratio combining (MRC) for transmission over spatially correlated Rician fading channels. Our analysis reveals the characteristic impact of both user-satellite and user-AP association patterns on both the spectral efficiency and rate-fairness achieved. We then formulate an energy efficiency optimization problem under joint user association and power control. Since the problems are inherently NP-hard due to the binary nature of the user-association variables, we develop an improved Differential Evolution (IDE) framework that efficiently explores the feasible solutions in polynomial time. Numerical results validate our analysis and show that the proposed hybrid scheme substantially improves energy efficiency and network throughput. For large-scale scenarios, the DE framework provides practical user-satellite-AP association guidelines, enabling scalable performance gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21860 by Lajos Hanzo, Le Duc Anh Vu, Lo Hai Long, Ngo Tran Anh Thu, Trinh Van Chien.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The illustration of integrated Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO architecture and dense AP deployment: (a) System architecture with satellite feeder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CDF comparison of Monte Carlo simulations, closed-form analysis, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a), (b) Comparison of the effectiveness proposed algorithm IDE via three metrics as optimal fitness value (Energy Efficiency), average run time and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance comparison of different linear combining strategies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pareto frontier of Energy Efficiency, Minimum rate, and Total power. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Per-user metrics when optimizing Sum Energy Efficiency. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Energy efficiency versus maximum transmit power ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Per-user metrics when optimizing Proportional Energy Efficiency. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Testbeds,

    C.-X. Wang, X. You, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, E. G. Larsson, M. D. Renzo, W. Tong, P. Zhu, X. Shen, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “On the Road to 6G: Visions, Requirements, Key Technologies, and Testbeds,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, ...

    2023

  2. [2]

    User Association in 5G Networks: A Survey and an Outlook,

    D. Liu, L. Wang, Y . Chen, M. Elkashlan, K.-K. Wong, R. Schober, and L. Hanzo, “User Association in 5G Networks: A Survey and an Outlook,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1018–1044, 2016

    2016

  3. [3]

    Fifty Years of MIMO Detection: The Road to Large-Scale MIMOs,

    S. Yang and L. Hanzo, “Fifty Years of MIMO Detection: The Road to Large-Scale MIMOs,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1941–1988, 2015

    1941

  4. [4]

    5G-advanced toward 6G: Past, present, and future,

    W. Chen, X. Lin, J. Lee, A. Toskala, S. Sun, C. F. Chiasserini, and L. Liu, “5G-advanced toward 6G: Past, present, and future,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1592–1619, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    RIS-Assisted Cell-Free Massive MIMO Relying on Reflection Pattern Modulation,

    Z. Sui and other, “RIS-Assisted Cell-Free Massive MIMO Relying on Reflection Pattern Modulation,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 968–982, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Performance Analysis and Optimization of STAR-RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO Sys- tems Relying on Imperfect Hardware,

    Z. Sui, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaiou, and L. Hanzo, “Performance Analysis and Optimization of STAR-RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO Sys- tems Relying on Imperfect Hardware,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2925–2939, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Coordinated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,

    X. Yang, Z. Wei, J. Xu, Y . Fang, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “Coordinated transmit beamforming for networked ISAC with imperfect CSI and time synchronization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Target localization in cooperative ISAC systems: A scheme based on 5G NR OFDM signals,

    Z. Zhang, H. Ren, C. Pan, S. Hong, D. Wang, J. Wang, and X. You, “Target localization in cooperative ISAC systems: A scheme based on 5G NR OFDM signals,”IEEE Trans. Commun., 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Near-field communi- cations: What will be different?

    Y . Liu, J. Xu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, and L. Hanzo, “Near-field communi- cations: What will be different?”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 2025

    2025

  10. [10]

    A survey of blockchain and artificial intelligence for 6G wireless communications,

    Y . Zuo, J. Guo, N. Gao, Y . Zhu, S. Jin, and X. Li, “A survey of blockchain and artificial intelligence for 6G wireless communications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2494–2528, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Mobile cell-free massive MIMO: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, B. Ai, M. Debbah, and K. B. Letaief, “Mobile cell-free massive MIMO: Challenges, solutions, and future directions,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 140–147, 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    A survey on nongeostationary satellite systems: The communication perspective,

    H. Al-Hraishawi, H. Chougrani, S. Kisseleff, E. Lagunas, and S. Chatzinotas, “A survey on nongeostationary satellite systems: The communication perspective,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 101–132, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    Integrated satellite-terrestrial networks toward 6G: Architectures, applications, and challenges,

    X. Zhu and C. Jiang, “Integrated satellite-terrestrial networks toward 6G: Architectures, applications, and challenges,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 437–461, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Cell-free massive MIMO: A survey,

    S. Elhoushy, M. Ibrahim, and W. Hamouda, “Cell-free massive MIMO: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 492–523, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,

    H. A. Ammar, R. Adve, S. Shahbazpanahi, G. Boudreau, and K. V . Srinivas, “User-centric cell-free massive MIMO networks: A survey of opportunities, challenges and solutions,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 611–652, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overview and open questions,

    H. Q. Ngo, G. Interdonato, E. G. Larsson, G. Caire, and J. G. Andrews, “Ultradense cell-free massive MIMO for 6G: Technical overview and open questions,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 805–831, 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Joint channel estimation and data detection in cell-free massive MU- MIMO systems,

    H. Song, T. Goldstein, X. You, C. Zhang, O. Tirkkonen, and C. Studer, “Joint channel estimation and data detection in cell-free massive MU- MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 4068–4084, 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    Uplink spectral and energy efficiency of cell- free massive MIMO with optimal uniform quantization,

    M. Bashar, H. Q. Ngo, K. Cumanan, A. G. Burr, P. Xiao, E. Bj ¨ornson, and E. G. Larsson, “Uplink spectral and energy efficiency of cell- free massive MIMO with optimal uniform quantization,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 223–245, 2020

    2020

  19. [19]

    Power Control in Cellular Massive MIMO With Varying User Activity: A Deep Learning Solution,

    T. Van Chien, T. Nguyen Canh, E. Bj ¨ornson, and E. G. Larsson, “Power Control in Cellular Massive MIMO With Varying User Activity: A Deep Learning Solution,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5732–5748, 2020

    2020

  20. [20]

    Joint Power Allocation and Load Balancing Optimization for Energy-Efficient Cell-Free Mas- sive MIMO Networks,

    T. Van Chien, E. Bj ¨ornson, and E. G. Larsson, “Joint Power Allocation and Load Balancing Optimization for Energy-Efficient Cell-Free Mas- sive MIMO Networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 6798–6812, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    Phase Shift Design for RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO With Improved Differential Evolution,

    T. V . Chien, C. V . Le, H. T. T. Binh, H. Q. Ngo, and S. Chatzinotas, “Phase Shift Design for RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO With Improved Differential Evolution,”IEEE Wirel. Commun. Letters, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1499–1503, 2023

    2023

  22. [22]

    Joint user association and power control for cell-free massive MIMO,

    C. Hao, T. T. Vu, H. Q. Ngo, M. N. Dao, X. Dang, C. Wang, and M. Matthaiou, “Joint user association and power control for cell-free massive MIMO,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 15 823–15 841, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Stacked in- telligent metasurfaces for holographic MIMO-aided cell-free networks,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, C. Xu, J. An, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked in- telligent metasurfaces for holographic MIMO-aided cell-free networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 7139–7151, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    User-Centric Clustering and Beamforming Design for Satellite-Assisted Cell-Free Networks,

    Y . Lee, C. Song, D. Lee, W. Noh, and S. Cho, “User-Centric Clustering and Beamforming Design for Satellite-Assisted Cell-Free Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3467–3479, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Energy Efficiency for Massive MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems,

    H. T. Nguyen, V .-D. Nguyen, N. T. Nguyen, N. C. Luong, V .-N. Q. Bao, H. Q. Ngo, D. Niyato, and S. Chatzinotas, “Energy Efficiency for Massive MIMO Integrated Sensing and Communication Systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Differential evolution for infeasible circumstances in network-assisted full-duplex cell-free massive mimo,

    T. V . Chien, B. T. Duc, M. Mohammadi, H. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, “Differential evolution for infeasible circumstances in network-assisted full-duplex cell-free massive mimo,” inGECCO ’25, 2025, pp. 1497– 1505

    2025

  27. [27]

    Holographic Multi-User Multi-Stream Beamforming Maintaining Rate-Fairness,

    W. Zhu, H. Tuan, E. Dutkiewicz, H. Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Holographic Multi-User Multi-Stream Beamforming Maintaining Rate-Fairness,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Holo- graphic metasurface-based beamforming for multi-altitude LEO satellite networks,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, K. Cao, C. Xu, H. Haas, and L. Hanzo, “Holo- graphic metasurface-based beamforming for multi-altitude LEO satellite networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Ubiquitous cell-free massive MIMO communications,

    G. Interdonato, E. Bj ¨ornson, H. Q. Ngo, P. Frenger, and E. G. Larsson, “Ubiquitous cell-free massive MIMO communications,”Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019

    2019

  30. [30]

    Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,

    H. Q. Ngo, A. Ashikhmin, H. Yang, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, “Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1834–1850, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted cell-free massive MIMO systems over spatially correlated channels,

    T. V . Chien, H. Q. Ngo, S. Chatzinotas, M. Di Renzo, and B. Ot- tersten, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted cell-free massive MIMO systems over spatially correlated channels,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 5103–5118, 2022

    2022

  32. [32]

    LEO/VLEO satellite communications in 6G and beyond networks–technologies, applications, and challenges,

    X. Luo, H.-H. Chen, and Q. Guo, “LEO/VLEO satellite communications in 6G and beyond networks–technologies, applications, and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 273–285, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Latency versus reliability in LEO mega-constellations: Terrestrial, aerial, or space relay?

    G. Pan, J. Ye, J. An, and M.-S. Alouini, “Latency versus reliability in LEO mega-constellations: Terrestrial, aerial, or space relay?”IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 5330–5345, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Space-Terrestrial Cooperation Over Spatially Correlated Channels Relying on Imperfect Channel Estimates: Uplink Performance Analysis and Optimization,

    T. Van Chien, E. Lagunas, T. M. Hoang, S. Chatzinotas, B. Ottersten, and L. Hanzo, “Space-Terrestrial Cooperation Over Spatially Correlated Channels Relying on Imperfect Channel Estimates: Uplink Performance Analysis and Optimization,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 773–791, 2022

    2022

  35. [35]

    A review of surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive optimization problems,

    C. He, Y . Zhang, D. Gong, and X. Ji, “A review of surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive optimization problems,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 217, p. 119495, 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Active and passive beamforming designs for SER minimization in RIS-assisted MIMO systems,

    T. Van Chien, B. T. Duc, H. V . D. Luong, H. T. T. Binh, H. Q. Ngo, and S. Chatzinotas, “Active and passive beamforming designs for SER minimization in RIS-assisted MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2024

    2024

  37. [37]

    Single- and Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization for Next-Generation Networks in the Generative AI and Quantum Computing Era,

    T. V . Chien, B. T. Duc, N. X. Tung, V . D. Nguyen, W. Khalid, S. Chatzinotas, and L. Hanzo, “Single- and Multi-Objective Stochastic Optimization for Next-Generation Networks in the Generative AI and Quantum Computing Era,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2601.02175

    arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Improved Differential Evolution for Enhancing the Aggregated Channel Estimation of RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO,

    T. V . Chien and other, “Improved Differential Evolution for Enhancing the Aggregated Channel Estimation of RIS-Aided Cell-Free Massive MIMO,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–6, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    Solving Indefinite Communication Reliability Op- timization for RIS-Aided Mobile Systems by an Improved Differential Evolution,

    C. T. Van and other, “Solving Indefinite Communication Reliability Op- timization for RIS-Aided Mobile Systems by an Improved Differential Evolution,” inGECCO ’24’, 2024, pp. 651–654

    2024

  40. [40]

    Toward 6g optical fronthaul: A survey on enabling technologies and research perspectives,

    A. Fayad, T. Cinkler, and J. Rak, “Toward 6g optical fronthaul: A survey on enabling technologies and research perspectives,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 629–666, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    A statistical evaluation of coherence time for non-terrestrial communications,

    P. Zheng, A. Chaaban, M. J. Hossain, and T. Y . Al-Naffouri, “A statistical evaluation of coherence time for non-terrestrial communications,” in 2025 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom), 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  42. [42]

    T. S. Rappaport,Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Statistical Model- ing for Accurate Characterization of Doppler Effect in LEO-Terrestrial Networks,

    I. M. Tanash, R. Wichman, and N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, “Statistical Model- ing for Accurate Characterization of Doppler Effect in LEO-Terrestrial Networks,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 62, pp. 1150–1163, 2026

    2026

  44. [44]

    Foundations of user- centric cell-free massive MIMO,

    ¨O. T. Demir, E. Bj ¨ornson, L. Sanguinettiet al., “Foundations of user- centric cell-free massive MIMO,”Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 162–472, 2021. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 18, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2020 15

    2021

  45. [45]

    Signal Processing for High-Throughput Satellites: Chal- lenges in New Interference-Limited Scenarios,

    A. I. Perez-Neira, M. A. Vazquez, M. B. Shankar, S. Maleki, and S. Chatzinotas, “Signal Processing for High-Throughput Satellites: Chal- lenges in New Interference-Limited Scenarios,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 112–131, 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    Kronecker product correlation model and limited feedback codebook design in a 3D channel model,

    D. Ying, F. W. V ook, T. A. Thomas, D. J. Love, and A. Ghosh, “Kronecker product correlation model and limited feedback codebook design in a 3D channel model,” inProc. IEEE ICC. IEEE, 2014, pp. 5865–5870

    2014

  47. [47]

    Coverage in Multi-Antenna Two-tier Networks,

    V . Chandrasekhar, M. Kountouris, and J. G. Andrews, “Coverage in Multi-Antenna Two-tier Networks,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5314–5327, 2009

    2009

  48. [48]

    Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory

    S. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Prentice Hall, 1993

    1993

  49. [49]

    What is the Most Efficient Technique for Uplink Cell-Free Massive MIMO?

    W. Jiang and H. D. Schotten, “What is the Most Efficient Technique for Uplink Cell-Free Massive MIMO?”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.20708, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Uplink Rate-Splitting for Cell-Free Massive MIMO,

    X. Feng, J. Zheng, J. Zhang, D. Niyato, D. W. K. Ng, and B. Ai, “Uplink Rate-Splitting for Cell-Free Massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2025

    2025

  51. [51]

    On the Total Energy Efficiency of Cell-Free Massive MIMO,

    H. Q. Ngo, L.-N. Tran, T. Q. Duong, M. Matthaiou, and E. G. Larsson, “On the Total Energy Efficiency of Cell-Free Massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2017

    2017

  52. [52]

    Energy-Efficient Cell-Free Massive MIMO in Ultra- Dense LEO Networks: A Semi-Centralized Clustering Approach,

    R. M. Zaeem, J. C. M. Duncan, V . N. Ha, L. M. Marrero, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “Energy-Efficient Cell-Free Massive MIMO in Ultra- Dense LEO Networks: A Semi-Centralized Clustering Approach,” in 2024 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 131–135

    2024

  53. [53]

    Enhancing the downlink rate fairness of low-resolution active RIS-aided signaling by closed-form expression-based iterative optimization,

    Y . Chen, H. D. Tuan, Y . Fang, H. Yu, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Enhancing the downlink rate fairness of low-resolution active RIS-aided signaling by closed-form expression-based iterative optimization,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 8013–8029, 2024

    2024

  54. [54]

    Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,

    W. Zhu, H. D. Tuan, E. Dutkiewicz, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Max- min rate optimization of low-complexity hybrid multi-user beamforming maintaining rate-fairness,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5648–5662, 2023

    2023

  55. [55]

    On the Performance of User Association in Space-Ground Communications with Integer-Coded Genetic Algorithms,

    T. Van Chien, N. T. A. Thu, N. Hoang Lam, N. Binh, and H. Binh, “On the Performance of User Association in Space-Ground Communications with Integer-Coded Genetic Algorithms,” inProceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2024, pp. 1373–1380

    2024

  56. [56]

    Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks,

    J. Wang, C. Jiang, H. Zhang, Y . Ren, K.-C. Chen, and L. Hanzo, “Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1472–1514, 2020

    2020

  57. [57]

    Success-history based parameter adapta- tion for differential evolution,

    R. Tanabe and A. Fukunaga, “Success-history based parameter adapta- tion for differential evolution,” in2013 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, 2013, pp. 71–78

    2013

  58. [58]

    Sufficient conditions for global convergence of differential evolution algorithm,

    Z. Hu, S. Xiong, Q. Su, and X. Zhang, “Sufficient conditions for global convergence of differential evolution algorithm,”Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, no. 1, p. 193196, 2013

    2013

  59. [59]

    Study on 6G-enabling fea- tures in 3GPP Release 20,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Study on 6G-enabling fea- tures in 3GPP Release 20,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Report, 2025, study item, non-normative. Release 20 study phase for 6G: includes TR and TS documents—see 3GPP portal

    2025

  60. [60]

    Session Duration between Handovers in Dense LEO Satellite Networks,

    A. Al-Hourani, “Session Duration between Handovers in Dense LEO Satellite Networks,”IEEE Wirel. Commun. Letters, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2810–2814, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    Future Ultra- Dense LEO Satellite Networks: A Cell-Free Massive MIMO Approach,

    M. Y . Abdelsadek, H. Yanikomeroglu, and G. K. Kurt, “Future Ultra- Dense LEO Satellite Networks: A Cell-Free Massive MIMO Approach,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  62. [62]

    Millimeter-wave antenna-in-package solutions for WiGig and backhaul applications,

    A. Bisognin, D. Titz, C. Luxey, G. Jacquemod, R. Pilard, F. Gianesello, D. Gloria, C. Laporte, H. Ezzedine, J. R. Costaet al., “Millimeter-wave antenna-in-package solutions for WiGig and backhaul applications,” in 2015 International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT). IEEE, 2015, pp. 52–55

    2015

  63. [63]

    Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey,

    T. M. Shami, A. A. El-Saleh, M. Alswaitti, Q. Al-Tashi, M. A. Sum- makieh, and S. Mirjalili, “Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 10 031–10 061, 2022

    2022

  64. [64]

    Fairness Designs for Load Balancing Optimization in Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems,

    T. Van Chien, N. T. A. Thu, N. H. Lam, H. Q. Ngo, S. Chatzinotas, and H. T. T. Binh, “Fairness Designs for Load Balancing Optimization in Satellite-Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., pp. 1–13, 2025

    2025

  65. [65]

    Differential evolution mutations: taxonomy, comparison and convergence analysis,

    A. W. Mohamed, A. A. Hadi, and A. K. Mohamed, “Differential evolution mutations: taxonomy, comparison and convergence analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 68 629–68 662, 2021

    2021

  66. [66]

    A survey of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics, algorithms, and open problems,

    Z. Fei, B. Li, S. Yang, C. Xing, H. Chen, and L. Hanzo, “A survey of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics, algorithms, and open problems,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 550–586, 2017

    2017

  67. [67]

    Deep learning aided routing for space-air-ground integrated networks relying on real satellite, flight, and shipping data,

    D. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Cui, S.-X. Ng, R. G. Maunder, and L. Hanzo, “Deep learning aided routing for space-air-ground integrated networks relying on real satellite, flight, and shipping data,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2022

    2022

  68. [68]

    Pareto- optimal multiagent cooperative caching relying on multipolicy reinforce- ment learning,

    B. Guo, Y . Chen, P. Cheng, M. Ding, J. Hu, and L. Hanzo, “Pareto- optimal multiagent cooperative caching relying on multipolicy reinforce- ment learning,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7904–7917, 2024

    2024