Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.03018 v1 pith:5HD4NF3W submitted 2025-01-06 cs.LG

Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertainty

classification cs.LG
keywords stableoptimalmatchingunderbanditcorrectidentifymarkets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a learning problem for the stable marriage model under unknown preferences for the left side of the market. We focus on the centralized case, where at each time step, an online platform matches the agents, and obtains a noisy evaluation reflecting their preferences. Our aim is to quickly identify the stable matching that is left-side optimal, rendering this a pure exploration problem with bandit feedback. We specifically aim to find Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matchings and present several bandit algorithms to do so. Our findings provide a foundational understanding of how to efficiently gather and utilize preference information to identify the optimal stable matching in two-sided markets under uncertainty. An experimental analysis on synthetic data complements theoretical results on sample complexities for the proposed methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learn to Match: Two-Sided Matching with Temporally Extended Feedback

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Learn2Match is a POMG-based MARL benchmark for two-sided matching with temporally extended feedback; independent PPO yields higher social welfare and lower regret than CA-ETC but higher information-friction loss.